SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 69
13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
13 Aggregate Planning
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Heizer and Render
Operations Management, 10e
Principles of Operations Management, 8e
PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
13 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outline
 Global Company Profile: Frito-Lay
 The Planning Process
 Planning Horizons
 The Nature of Aggregate Planning
 Aggregate Planning Strategies
 Capacity Options
 Demand Options
 Mixing Options to Develop a Plan
13 - 3© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outline – Continued
 Methods for Aggregate Planning
 Graphical Methods
 Mathematical Approaches
 Comparison of Aggregate Planning
Methods
13 - 4© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Outline – Continued
 Aggregate Planning in Services
 Restaurants
 Hospitals
 National Chains of Small Service
Firms
 Miscellaneous Services
 Airline Industry
 Yield Management
13 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you
should be able to:
1. Define aggregate planning
2. Identify optional strategies for
developing an aggregate plan
3. Prepare a graphical aggregate plan
13 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter you
should be able to:
4. Solve an aggregate plan via the
transportation method of linear
programming
5. Understand and solve a yield
management problem
13 - 7© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Frito-Lay
 More than three dozen brands, 15
brands sell more than $100 million
annually, 7 sell over $1 billion
 Planning processes covers 3 to 18
months
 Unique processes and specially
designed equipment
 High fixed costs require high volumes
and high utilization
13 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Frito-Lay
 Demand profile based on historical
sales, forecasts, innovations,
promotion, local demand data
 Match total demand to capacity,
expansion plans, and costs
 Quarterly aggregate plan goes to 38
plants in 18 regions
 Each plant develops 4-week plan for
product lines and production runs
13 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning
The objective of aggregate planning
is to meet forecasted demand while
minimizing cost over the planning
period
13 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Planning Process
 Objective is to minimize cost over the
planning period by adjusting
 Production rates
 Labor levels
 Inventory levels
 Overtime work
 Subcontracting rates
 Other controllable variables
Determine the quantity and timing of
production for the intermediate future
13 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning
 A logical overall unit for measuring sales
and output
 A forecast of demand for an intermediate
planning period in these aggregate terms
 A method for determining costs
 A model that combines forecasts and
costs so that scheduling decisions can
be made for the planning period
Required for aggregate planning
13 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Planning Horizons
Figure 13.1
Long-range plans
(over one year)
Research and Development
New product plans
Capital investments
Facility location/expansion
Intermediate-range plans
(3 to 18 months)
Sales planning
Production planning and budgeting
Setting employment, inventory,
subcontracting levels
Analyzing operating plans
Short-range plans
(up to 3 months)
Job assignments
Ordering
Job scheduling
Dispatching
Overtime
Part-time help
Top
executives
Operations
managers
Operations
managers,
supervisors,
foremen
Responsibility Planning tasks and horizon
13 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning
Quarter 1
Jan Feb Mar
150,000 120,000 110,000
Quarter 2
Apr May Jun
100,000 130,000 150,000
Quarter 3
Jul Aug Sep
180,000 150,000 140,000
13 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate
Planning
Figure 13.2
13 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning
 Combines appropriate resources
into general terms
 Part of a larger production planning
system
 Disaggregation breaks the plan
down into greater detail
 Disaggregation results in a master
production schedule
13 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning
Strategies
1. Use inventories to absorb changes in
demand
2. Accommodate changes by varying
workforce size
3. Use part-timers, overtime, or idle time to
absorb changes
4. Use subcontractors and maintain a
stable workforce
5. Change prices or other factors to
influence demand
13 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Capacity Options
 Changing inventory levels
 Increase inventory in low demand
periods to meet high demand in
the future
 Increases costs associated with
storage, insurance, handling,
obsolescence, and capital
investment
 Shortages may mean lost sales
due to long lead times and poor
customer service
13 - 18© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Capacity Options
 Varying workforce size by hiring
or layoffs
 Match production rate to demand
 Training and separation costs for
hiring and laying off workers
 New workers may have lower
productivity
 Laying off workers may lower
morale and productivity
13 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Capacity Options
 Varying production rate through
overtime or idle time
 Allows constant workforce
 May be difficult to meet large
increases in demand
 Overtime can be costly and may
drive down productivity
 Absorbing idle time may be
difficult
13 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Capacity Options
 Subcontracting
 Temporary measure during
periods of peak demand
 May be costly
 Assuring quality and timely
delivery may be difficult
 Exposes your customers to a
possible competitor
13 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Capacity Options
 Using part-time workers
 Useful for filling unskilled or low
skilled positions, especially in
services
13 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Demand Options
 Influencing demand
 Use advertising or promotion
to increase demand in low
periods
 Attempt to shift
demand to slow
periods
 May not be
sufficient to
balance demand
and capacity
13 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Demand Options
 Back ordering during high-
demand periods
 Requires customers to wait for an
order without loss of goodwill or
the order
 Most effective when there are few
if any substitutes for the product
or service
 Often results in lost sales
13 - 24© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Demand Options
 Counterseasonal product and
service mixing
 Develop a product mix of
counterseasonal items
 May lead to products or services
outside the company’s areas of
expertise
13 - 25© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning Options
Table 13.1
Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments
Changing
inventory
levels
Changes in
human
resources are
gradual or
none; no abrupt
production
changes.
Inventory
holding cost
may increase.
Shortages may
result in lost
sales.
Applies mainly to
production, not
service,
operations.
Varying
workforce
size by
hiring or
layoffs
Avoids the costs
of other
alternatives.
Hiring, layoff,
and training
costs may be
significant.
Used where size
of labor pool is
large.
13 - 26© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning Options
Table 13.1
Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments
Varying
production
rates
through
overtime or
idle time
Matches
seasonal
fluctuations
without hiring/
training costs.
Overtime
premiums; tired
workers; may
not meet
demand.
Allows flexibility
within the
aggregate plan.
Sub-
contracting
Permits
flexibility and
smoothing of
the firm’s
output.
Loss of quality
control;
reduced profits;
loss of future
business.
Applies mainly in
production
settings.
13 - 27© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning Options
Table 13.1
Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments
Using part-
time
workers
Is less costly
and more
flexible than
full-time
workers.
High turnover/
training costs;
quality suffers;
scheduling
difficult.
Good for
unskilled jobs in
areas with large
temporary labor
pools.
Influencing
demand
Tries to use
excess
capacity.
Discounts draw
new customers.
Uncertainty in
demand. Hard
to match
demand to
supply exactly.
Creates
marketing
ideas.
Overbooking
used in some
businesses.
13 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning Options
Table 13.1
Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments
Back
ordering
during
high-
demand
periods
May avoid
overtime.
Keeps capacity
constant.
Customer must
be willing to
wait, but
goodwill is lost.
Many companies
back order.
Counter-
seasonal
product
and service
mixing
Fully utilizes
resources;
allows stable
workforce.
May require
skills or
equipment
outside the
firm’s areas of
expertise.
Risky finding
products or
services with
opposite
demand
patterns.
13 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Methods for Aggregate
Planning
 A mixed strategy may be the best
way to achieve minimum costs
 There are many possible mixed
strategies
 Finding the optimal plan is not
always possible
13 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Mixing Options to
Develop a Plan
 Chase strategy
 Match output rates to demand
forecast for each period
 Vary workforce levels or vary
production rate
 Favored by many service
organizations
13 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Mixing Options to
Develop a Plan
 Level strategy
 Daily production is uniform
 Use inventory or idle time as buffer
 Stable production leads to better
quality and productivity
 Some combination of capacity
options, a mixed strategy, might be
the best solution
13 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Graphical Methods
 Popular techniques
 Easy to understand and use
 Trial-and-error approaches that do
not guarantee an optimal solution
 Require only limited computations
13 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Graphical Methods
1. Determine the demand for each period
2. Determine the capacity for regular time,
overtime, and subcontracting each period
3. Find labor costs, hiring and layoff costs,
and inventory holding costs
4. Consider company policy on workers and
stock levels
5. Develop alternative plans and examine
their total costs
13 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 1
Table 13.2
Month Expected Demand
Production
Days
Demand Per Day
(computed)
Jan 900 22 41
Feb 700 18 39
Mar 800 21 38
Apr 1,200 21 57
May 1,500 22 68
June 1,100 20 55
6,200 124
= = 50 units per day
6,200
124
Average
requirement =
Total expected demand
Number of production days
13 - 35© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 1
Figure 13.3
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
0 –
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month
     
22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number of
working days
Productionrateperworkingday
Level production using average
monthly forecast demand
Forecast demand
13 - 36© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate
$17 per hour
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate
(hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
$600 per unit
13 - 37© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate
$17 per hour
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate
(hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
$600 per unit
Month
Production
Days
Production
at 50 Units
per Day
Demand
Forecast
Monthly
Inventory
Change
Ending
Inventory
Jan 22 1,100 900 +200 200
Feb 18 900 700 +200 400
Mar 21 1,050 800 +250 650
Apr 21 1,050 1,200 -150 500
May 22 1,100 1,500 -400 100
June 20 1,000 1,100 -100 0
1,850
Total units of inventory carried over from one
month to the next = 1,850 units
Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers
13 - 38© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate
$17 per hour
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate
(hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
$600 per unit
Month
Production
Days
Production
at 50 Units
per Day
Demand
Forecast
Monthly
Inventory
Change
Ending
Inventory
Jan 22 1,100 900 +200 200
Feb 18 900 700 +200 400
Mar 21 1,050 800 +250 650
Apr 21 1,050 1,200 -150 500
May 22 1,100 1,500 -400 100
June 20 1,000 1,100 -100 0
1,850
Total units of inventory carried over from one
month to the next = 1,850 units
Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers
Costs Calculations
Inventory carrying $9,250 (= 1,850 units carried x $5
per unit)
Regular-time labor 99,200 (= 10 workers x $80 per
day x 124 days)
Other costs (overtime,
hiring, layoffs,
subcontracting) 0
Total cost $108,450
13 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 2
Figure 13.4
Cumulativedemandunits
7,000 –
6,000 –
5,000 –
4,000 –
3,000 –
2,000 –
1,000 –
–
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Cumulative forecast
requirements
Cumulative level
production using
average monthly
forecast
requirements
Reduction
of inventory
Excess inventory
6,200 units
13 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 3
Table 13.2
Month Expected Demand
Production
Days
Demand Per Day
(computed)
Jan 900 22 41
Feb 700 18 39
Mar 800 21 38
Apr 1,200 21 57
May 1,500 22 68
June 1,100 20 55
6,200 124
Minimum requirement = 38 units per day
13 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 3
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
0 –
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month
     
22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number of
working days
Productionrateperworkingday
Level production
using lowest
monthly forecast
demand
Forecast demand
13 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 3
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate
$17 per hour
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate
(hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
$600 per unit
13 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 3
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carry cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit
Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day)
Overtime pay rate
$ 7 per hour
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate
(hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
$600 per unit
In-house production = 38 units per day
x 124 days
= 4,712 units
Subcontract units = 6,200 - 4,712
= 1,488 units
13 - 44© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carry cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit
Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day)
Overtime pay rate
$ 7 per hour
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate
(hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
$600 per unit
Roofing Supplier Example 3
In-house production = 38 units per day
x 124 days
= 4,712 units
Subcontract units = 6,200 - 4,712
= 1,488 units
Costs Calculations
Regular-time labor $75,392 (= 7.6 workers x $80 per
day x 124 days)
Subcontracting 29,760 (= 1,488 units x $20 per
unit)
Total cost $105,152
13 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 4
Table 13.2
Month Expected Demand
Production
Days
Demand Per Day
(computed)
Jan 900 22 41
Feb 700 18 39
Mar 800 21 38
Apr 1,200 21 57
May 1,500 22 68
June 1,100 20 55
6,200 124
Production = Expected Demand
13 - 46© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 4
70 –
60 –
50 –
40 –
30 –
0 –
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month
     
22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number of
working days
Productionrateperworkingday
Forecast demand and
monthly production
13 - 47© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 4
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit
Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day)
Overtime pay rate
$17 per hour
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate
(hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
$600 per unit
13 - 48© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Roofing Supplier Example 4
Table 13.3
Cost Information
Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit
Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day)
Overtime pay rate
$ 7 per hour
(above 8 hours per day)
Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit
Cost of increasing daily production rate
(hiring and training)
$300 per unit
Cost of decreasing daily production rate
(layoffs)
$600 per unit
Month
Forecast
(units)
Daily
Prod
Rate
Basic
Production
Cost
(demand x
1.6 hrs/unit x
$10/hr)
Extra Cost of
Increasing
Production
(hiring cost)
Extra Cost of
Decreasing
Production
(layoff cost) Total Cost
Jan 900 41 $ 14,400 — — $ 14,400
Feb 700 39 11,200 —
$1,200
(= 2 x $600)
12,400
Mar 800 38 12,800 —
$600
(= 1 x $600)
13,400
Apr 1,200 57 19,200
$5,700
(= 19 x $300)
— 24,900
May 1,500 68 24,000
$3,300
(= 11 x $300)
— 24,300
June 1,100 55 17,600 —
$7,800
(= 13 x $600)
25,400
$99,200 $9,000 $9,600 $117,800
Table 13.4
13 - 49© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Comparison of Three Plans
Table 13.5
Cost Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3
Inventory carrying $ 9,250 $ 0 $ 0
Regular labor 99,200 75,392 99,200
Overtime labor 0 0 0
Hiring 0 0 9,000
Layoffs 0 0 9,600
Subcontracting 0 29,760 0
Total cost $108,450 $105,152 $117,800
Plan 2 is the lowest cost option
13 - 50© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Mathematical Approaches
 Useful for generating strategies
 Transportation Method of Linear
Programming
 Produces an optimal plan
 Management Coefficients Model
 Model built around manager’s
experience and performance
 Other Models
 Linear Decision Rule
 Simulation
13 - 51© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Transportation Method
Table 13.6
Costs
Regular time $40 per tire
Overtime $50 per tire
Subcontracting $70 per tire
Carrying $ 2 per tire per month
Sales Period
Mar Apr May
Demand 800 1,000 750
Capacity:
Regular 700 700 700
Overtime 50 50 50
Subcontracting 150 150 130
Beginning inventory 100 tires
13 - 52© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Transportation Example
Important points
1. Carrying costs are $2/tire/month. If
goods are made in one period and held
over to the next, holding costs are
incurred
2. Supply must equal demand, so a dummy
column called “unused capacity” is
added
3. Because back ordering is not viable in
this example, cells that might be used to
satisfy earlier demand are not available
13 - 53© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Transportation Example
Important points
4. Quantities in each column designate
the levels of inventory needed to meet
demand requirements
5. In general, production should be
allocated to the lowest cost cell
available without exceeding unused
capacity in the row or demand in the
column
13 - 54© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Transportation
Example
Table 13.7
13 - 55© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Management Coefficients
Model
 Builds a model based on manager’s
experience and performance
 A regression model is constructed
to define the relationships between
decision variables
 Objective is to remove
inconsistencies in decision making
13 - 56© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Other Models
Linear Decision Rule
 Minimizes costs using quadratic cost curves
 Operates over a particular time period
Simulation
 Uses a search procedure to try different
combinations of variables
 Develops feasible but not necessarily optimal
solutions
13 - 57© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Summary of Aggregate
Planning Methods
Techniques
Solution
Approaches Important Aspects
Graphical
methods
Trial and
error
Simple to understand and
easy to use. Many
solutions; one chosen
may not be optimal.
Transportation
method of linear
programming
Optimization LP software available;
permits sensitivity
analysis and new
constraints; linear
functions may not be
realistic.
Table 13.8
13 - 58© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Summary of Aggregate
Planning Methods
Techniques
Solution
Approaches Important Aspects
Management
coefficients
model
Heuristic Simple, easy to implement;
tries to mimic manager’s
decision process; uses
regression.
Simulation Change
parameters
Complex; may be difficult
to build and for managers
to understand.
Table 13.8
13 - 59© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Aggregate Planning in
Services
Controlling the cost of labor is critical
1. Accurate scheduling of labor-hours
to assure quick response to customer
demand
2. An on-call labor resource to cover
unexpected demand
3. Flexibility of individual worker skills
4. Flexibility in rate of output or hours of
work
13 - 60© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Five Service Scenarios
 Restaurants
 Smoothing the production
process
 Determining the optimal
workforce size
 Hospitals
 Responding to patient demand
13 - 61© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Five Service Scenarios
 National Chains of Small Service
Firms
 Planning done at national level
and at local level
 Miscellaneous Services
 Plan human resource
requirements
 Manage demand
13 - 62© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Law Firm Example
Table 13.9
Labor-Hours Required Capacity Constraints
(2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
(1) Forecasts Maximum Number of
Category of Best Likely Worst Demand in Qualified
Legal Business (hours) (hours) (hours) People Personnel
Trial work 1,800 1,500 1,200 3.6 4
Legal research 4,500 4,000 3,500 9.0 32
Corporate law 8,000 7,000 6,500 16.0 15
Real estate law 1,700 1,500 1,300 3.4 6
Criminal law 3,500 3,000 2,500 7.0 12
Total hours 19,500 17,000 15,000
Lawyers needed 39 34 30
13 - 63© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Five Service Scenarios
 Airline industry
 Extremely complex planning
problem
 Involves number of flights,
number of passengers, air and
ground personnel, allocation of
seats to fare classes
 Resources spread through the
entire system
13 - 64© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Yield Management
Allocating resources to customers at
prices that will maximize yield or
revenue
1. Service or product can be sold in
advance of consumption
2. Demand fluctuates
3. Capacity is relatively fixed
4. Demand can be segmented
5. Variable costs are low and fixed costs
are high
13 - 65© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Demand
Curve
Yield Management Example
Figure 13.5
Passed-up
contribution
Money left
on the table
Potential customers exist who
are willing to pay more than the
$15 variable cost of the room,
but not $150
Some customers who paid
$150 were actually willing
to pay more for the roomTotal
$ contribution
= (Price) x (50
rooms)
= ($150 - $15)
x (50)
= $6,750
Price
Room sales
100
50
$150
Price charged
for room
$15
Variable cost
of room
13 - 66© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Total $ contribution =
(1st price) x 30 rooms + (2nd price) x 30 rooms =
($100 - $15) x 30 + ($200 - $15) x 30 =
$2,550 + $5,550 = $8,100
Demand
Curve
Yield Management Example
Figure 13.6
Price
Room sales
100
60
30
$100
Price 1
for room
$200
Price 2
for room
$15
Variable cost
of room
13 - 67© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Yield Management Matrix
Durationofuse
TendtobeTendtobe
Uncertainpredictable
Price
Tend to be fixed Tend to be variable
Quadrant 1: Quadrant 2:
Movies Hotels
Stadiums/arenas Airlines
Convention centers Rental cars
Hotel meeting space Cruise lines
Quadrant 3: Quadrant 4:
Restaurants Continuing care
Golf courses hospitals
Internet service
providers
Figure 13.7
13 - 68© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Making Yield Management
Work
1. Multiple pricing structures must
be feasible and appear logical to
the customer
2. Forecasts of the use and
duration of use
3. Changes in demand
13 - 69© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente (20)

Heizer 14
Heizer 14Heizer 14
Heizer 14
 
Heizer mod b
Heizer mod bHeizer mod b
Heizer mod b
 
Heizer 03
Heizer 03Heizer 03
Heizer 03
 
Heizer 16
Heizer 16Heizer 16
Heizer 16
 
Heizer 05
Heizer 05Heizer 05
Heizer 05
 
Heizer 15
Heizer 15Heizer 15
Heizer 15
 
Heizer 04
Heizer 04Heizer 04
Heizer 04
 
Chapter 8 Location Strategy.ppt
Chapter 8 Location Strategy.pptChapter 8 Location Strategy.ppt
Chapter 8 Location Strategy.ppt
 
Heizer 17
Heizer 17Heizer 17
Heizer 17
 
Heizer 14
Heizer 14Heizer 14
Heizer 14
 
Heizer 10
Heizer 10Heizer 10
Heizer 10
 
Heizer om10 ch11
Heizer om10 ch11Heizer om10 ch11
Heizer om10 ch11
 
Heizer 09
Heizer 09Heizer 09
Heizer 09
 
Heizer Chapter ch02
Heizer Chapter  ch02Heizer Chapter  ch02
Heizer Chapter ch02
 
Chapter 9 layout strategies
Chapter 9 layout strategiesChapter 9 layout strategies
Chapter 9 layout strategies
 
Heizer om10 ch07
Heizer om10 ch07Heizer om10 ch07
Heizer om10 ch07
 
Introduction to operations and logistics management
Introduction to operations and logistics managementIntroduction to operations and logistics management
Introduction to operations and logistics management
 
Chapter 12
Chapter 12Chapter 12
Chapter 12
 
Chap12 mc questions&answers
Chap12 mc questions&answersChap12 mc questions&answers
Chap12 mc questions&answers
 
Supply Chain Management English
Supply Chain Management EnglishSupply Chain Management English
Supply Chain Management English
 

Similar a Heizer om10 ch13

13 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Aggregate Plan.docx
13 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Aggregate Plan.docx13 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Aggregate Plan.docx
13 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Aggregate Plan.docxaulasnilda
 
CH13.PPT
CH13.PPTCH13.PPT
CH13.PPTjafyu
 
Mba ii pmom_unit-2.4 aggregate planning a
Mba ii pmom_unit-2.4 aggregate planning aMba ii pmom_unit-2.4 aggregate planning a
Mba ii pmom_unit-2.4 aggregate planning aRai University
 
Heizer om10 ch14
Heizer om10 ch14Heizer om10 ch14
Heizer om10 ch14ryaekle
 
Supply Chain Management chap 9
Supply Chain Management chap 9Supply Chain Management chap 9
Supply Chain Management chap 9Umair Arain
 
Session 4_OM
Session 4_OMSession 4_OM
Session 4_OMthangv
 
Forecasting And Aggregate Planning
Forecasting And Aggregate PlanningForecasting And Aggregate Planning
Forecasting And Aggregate PlanningJoanmaines
 
Heizer om10 ch16
Heizer om10 ch16Heizer om10 ch16
Heizer om10 ch16ryaekle
 
Coordination in SCM.pptx
Coordination in SCM.pptxCoordination in SCM.pptx
Coordination in SCM.pptxsheetalip
 
6 ch 8 Aggregate Planning.ppt
6 ch 8 Aggregate Planning.ppt6 ch 8 Aggregate Planning.ppt
6 ch 8 Aggregate Planning.pptDemekeChimdessa1
 
360_ch04
360_ch04360_ch04
360_ch04ryaekle
 
Supply Chain Management chap 10
Supply Chain Management chap 10Supply Chain Management chap 10
Supply Chain Management chap 10Umair Arain
 
david_sm13_ppt_08.ppt
david_sm13_ppt_08.pptdavid_sm13_ppt_08.ppt
david_sm13_ppt_08.pptShahidRandhwa
 

Similar a Heizer om10 ch13 (20)

13 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Aggregate Plan.docx
13 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Aggregate Plan.docx13 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Aggregate Plan.docx
13 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.Aggregate Plan.docx
 
Sales Operations
Sales OperationsSales Operations
Sales Operations
 
CH13.PPT
CH13.PPTCH13.PPT
CH13.PPT
 
Balance Scorecard.ppt
Balance Scorecard.pptBalance Scorecard.ppt
Balance Scorecard.ppt
 
Mba ii pmom_unit-2.4 aggregate planning a
Mba ii pmom_unit-2.4 aggregate planning aMba ii pmom_unit-2.4 aggregate planning a
Mba ii pmom_unit-2.4 aggregate planning a
 
Heizer om10 ch14
Heizer om10 ch14Heizer om10 ch14
Heizer om10 ch14
 
Supply Chain Management chap 9
Supply Chain Management chap 9Supply Chain Management chap 9
Supply Chain Management chap 9
 
Session 4_OM
Session 4_OMSession 4_OM
Session 4_OM
 
Chapter 4_OM
Chapter 4_OMChapter 4_OM
Chapter 4_OM
 
Forecasting And Aggregate Planning
Forecasting And Aggregate PlanningForecasting And Aggregate Planning
Forecasting And Aggregate Planning
 
Heizer om10 ch16
Heizer om10 ch16Heizer om10 ch16
Heizer om10 ch16
 
SCM-4.pptx
SCM-4.pptxSCM-4.pptx
SCM-4.pptx
 
SCM-4.pptx
SCM-4.pptxSCM-4.pptx
SCM-4.pptx
 
Coordination in SCM.pptx
Coordination in SCM.pptxCoordination in SCM.pptx
Coordination in SCM.pptx
 
6 ch 8 Aggregate Planning.ppt
6 ch 8 Aggregate Planning.ppt6 ch 8 Aggregate Planning.ppt
6 ch 8 Aggregate Planning.ppt
 
360_ch04
360_ch04360_ch04
360_ch04
 
PPC_2_Forecasting_English.pdf
PPC_2_Forecasting_English.pdfPPC_2_Forecasting_English.pdf
PPC_2_Forecasting_English.pdf
 
Supply Chain Management chap 10
Supply Chain Management chap 10Supply Chain Management chap 10
Supply Chain Management chap 10
 
David sm13 ppt_05
David sm13 ppt_05David sm13 ppt_05
David sm13 ppt_05
 
david_sm13_ppt_08.ppt
david_sm13_ppt_08.pptdavid_sm13_ppt_08.ppt
david_sm13_ppt_08.ppt
 

Más de ryaekle

Bad410 business law
Bad410 business lawBad410 business law
Bad410 business lawryaekle
 
Meet your professor
Meet your professorMeet your professor
Meet your professorryaekle
 
Human resources assignment
Human resources assignmentHuman resources assignment
Human resources assignmentryaekle
 
Bad360 operations management online
Bad360 operations management onlineBad360 operations management online
Bad360 operations management onlineryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_f
Heizer om10 mod_fHeizer om10 mod_f
Heizer om10 mod_fryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_e
Heizer om10 mod_eHeizer om10 mod_e
Heizer om10 mod_eryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_dHeizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_dryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_c
Heizer om10 mod_cHeizer om10 mod_c
Heizer om10 mod_cryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_b
Heizer om10 mod_bHeizer om10 mod_b
Heizer om10 mod_bryaekle
 
Heizer om10 mod_a
Heizer om10 mod_aHeizer om10 mod_a
Heizer om10 mod_aryaekle
 
Heizer om10 ch17
Heizer om10 ch17Heizer om10 ch17
Heizer om10 ch17ryaekle
 
Heizer om10 ch15
Heizer om10 ch15Heizer om10 ch15
Heizer om10 ch15ryaekle
 
Heizer om10 ch12
Heizer om10 ch12Heizer om10 ch12
Heizer om10 ch12ryaekle
 
Heizer om10 ch10
Heizer om10 ch10Heizer om10 ch10
Heizer om10 ch10ryaekle
 
Heizer om10 ch09
Heizer om10 ch09Heizer om10 ch09
Heizer om10 ch09ryaekle
 
Heizer om10 ch06
Heizer om10 ch06Heizer om10 ch06
Heizer om10 ch06ryaekle
 
Heizer om10 ch05
Heizer om10 ch05Heizer om10 ch05
Heizer om10 ch05ryaekle
 
p305_pp12
p305_pp12p305_pp12
p305_pp12ryaekle
 
p305_pp11
p305_pp11p305_pp11
p305_pp11ryaekle
 
p305_pp10
p305_pp10p305_pp10
p305_pp10ryaekle
 

Más de ryaekle (20)

Bad410 business law
Bad410 business lawBad410 business law
Bad410 business law
 
Meet your professor
Meet your professorMeet your professor
Meet your professor
 
Human resources assignment
Human resources assignmentHuman resources assignment
Human resources assignment
 
Bad360 operations management online
Bad360 operations management onlineBad360 operations management online
Bad360 operations management online
 
Heizer om10 mod_f
Heizer om10 mod_fHeizer om10 mod_f
Heizer om10 mod_f
 
Heizer om10 mod_e
Heizer om10 mod_eHeizer om10 mod_e
Heizer om10 mod_e
 
Heizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_dHeizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_d
 
Heizer om10 mod_c
Heizer om10 mod_cHeizer om10 mod_c
Heizer om10 mod_c
 
Heizer om10 mod_b
Heizer om10 mod_bHeizer om10 mod_b
Heizer om10 mod_b
 
Heizer om10 mod_a
Heizer om10 mod_aHeizer om10 mod_a
Heizer om10 mod_a
 
Heizer om10 ch17
Heizer om10 ch17Heizer om10 ch17
Heizer om10 ch17
 
Heizer om10 ch15
Heizer om10 ch15Heizer om10 ch15
Heizer om10 ch15
 
Heizer om10 ch12
Heizer om10 ch12Heizer om10 ch12
Heizer om10 ch12
 
Heizer om10 ch10
Heizer om10 ch10Heizer om10 ch10
Heizer om10 ch10
 
Heizer om10 ch09
Heizer om10 ch09Heizer om10 ch09
Heizer om10 ch09
 
Heizer om10 ch06
Heizer om10 ch06Heizer om10 ch06
Heizer om10 ch06
 
Heizer om10 ch05
Heizer om10 ch05Heizer om10 ch05
Heizer om10 ch05
 
p305_pp12
p305_pp12p305_pp12
p305_pp12
 
p305_pp11
p305_pp11p305_pp11
p305_pp11
 
p305_pp10
p305_pp10p305_pp10
p305_pp10
 

Último

Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfLoriGlavin3
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionDilum Bandara
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .Alan Dix
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationSlibray Presentation
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024Lorenzo Miniero
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfAddepto
 
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxThe State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek SchlawackFwdays
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxunit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxBkGupta21
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersRaghuram Pandurangan
 

Último (20)

Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
 
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxThe State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxunit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
 

Heizer om10 ch13

  • 1. 13 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Aggregate Planning PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8e PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
  • 2. 13 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Outline  Global Company Profile: Frito-Lay  The Planning Process  Planning Horizons  The Nature of Aggregate Planning  Aggregate Planning Strategies  Capacity Options  Demand Options  Mixing Options to Develop a Plan
  • 3. 13 - 3© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Outline – Continued  Methods for Aggregate Planning  Graphical Methods  Mathematical Approaches  Comparison of Aggregate Planning Methods
  • 4. 13 - 4© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Outline – Continued  Aggregate Planning in Services  Restaurants  Hospitals  National Chains of Small Service Firms  Miscellaneous Services  Airline Industry  Yield Management
  • 5. 13 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to: 1. Define aggregate planning 2. Identify optional strategies for developing an aggregate plan 3. Prepare a graphical aggregate plan
  • 6. 13 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to: 4. Solve an aggregate plan via the transportation method of linear programming 5. Understand and solve a yield management problem
  • 7. 13 - 7© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Frito-Lay  More than three dozen brands, 15 brands sell more than $100 million annually, 7 sell over $1 billion  Planning processes covers 3 to 18 months  Unique processes and specially designed equipment  High fixed costs require high volumes and high utilization
  • 8. 13 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Frito-Lay  Demand profile based on historical sales, forecasts, innovations, promotion, local demand data  Match total demand to capacity, expansion plans, and costs  Quarterly aggregate plan goes to 38 plants in 18 regions  Each plant develops 4-week plan for product lines and production runs
  • 9. 13 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning The objective of aggregate planning is to meet forecasted demand while minimizing cost over the planning period
  • 10. 13 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Planning Process  Objective is to minimize cost over the planning period by adjusting  Production rates  Labor levels  Inventory levels  Overtime work  Subcontracting rates  Other controllable variables Determine the quantity and timing of production for the intermediate future
  • 11. 13 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning  A logical overall unit for measuring sales and output  A forecast of demand for an intermediate planning period in these aggregate terms  A method for determining costs  A model that combines forecasts and costs so that scheduling decisions can be made for the planning period Required for aggregate planning
  • 12. 13 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Planning Horizons Figure 13.1 Long-range plans (over one year) Research and Development New product plans Capital investments Facility location/expansion Intermediate-range plans (3 to 18 months) Sales planning Production planning and budgeting Setting employment, inventory, subcontracting levels Analyzing operating plans Short-range plans (up to 3 months) Job assignments Ordering Job scheduling Dispatching Overtime Part-time help Top executives Operations managers Operations managers, supervisors, foremen Responsibility Planning tasks and horizon
  • 13. 13 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning Quarter 1 Jan Feb Mar 150,000 120,000 110,000 Quarter 2 Apr May Jun 100,000 130,000 150,000 Quarter 3 Jul Aug Sep 180,000 150,000 140,000
  • 14. 13 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning Figure 13.2
  • 15. 13 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning  Combines appropriate resources into general terms  Part of a larger production planning system  Disaggregation breaks the plan down into greater detail  Disaggregation results in a master production schedule
  • 16. 13 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning Strategies 1. Use inventories to absorb changes in demand 2. Accommodate changes by varying workforce size 3. Use part-timers, overtime, or idle time to absorb changes 4. Use subcontractors and maintain a stable workforce 5. Change prices or other factors to influence demand
  • 17. 13 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Capacity Options  Changing inventory levels  Increase inventory in low demand periods to meet high demand in the future  Increases costs associated with storage, insurance, handling, obsolescence, and capital investment  Shortages may mean lost sales due to long lead times and poor customer service
  • 18. 13 - 18© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Capacity Options  Varying workforce size by hiring or layoffs  Match production rate to demand  Training and separation costs for hiring and laying off workers  New workers may have lower productivity  Laying off workers may lower morale and productivity
  • 19. 13 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Capacity Options  Varying production rate through overtime or idle time  Allows constant workforce  May be difficult to meet large increases in demand  Overtime can be costly and may drive down productivity  Absorbing idle time may be difficult
  • 20. 13 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Capacity Options  Subcontracting  Temporary measure during periods of peak demand  May be costly  Assuring quality and timely delivery may be difficult  Exposes your customers to a possible competitor
  • 21. 13 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Capacity Options  Using part-time workers  Useful for filling unskilled or low skilled positions, especially in services
  • 22. 13 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Demand Options  Influencing demand  Use advertising or promotion to increase demand in low periods  Attempt to shift demand to slow periods  May not be sufficient to balance demand and capacity
  • 23. 13 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Demand Options  Back ordering during high- demand periods  Requires customers to wait for an order without loss of goodwill or the order  Most effective when there are few if any substitutes for the product or service  Often results in lost sales
  • 24. 13 - 24© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Demand Options  Counterseasonal product and service mixing  Develop a product mix of counterseasonal items  May lead to products or services outside the company’s areas of expertise
  • 25. 13 - 25© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning Options Table 13.1 Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments Changing inventory levels Changes in human resources are gradual or none; no abrupt production changes. Inventory holding cost may increase. Shortages may result in lost sales. Applies mainly to production, not service, operations. Varying workforce size by hiring or layoffs Avoids the costs of other alternatives. Hiring, layoff, and training costs may be significant. Used where size of labor pool is large.
  • 26. 13 - 26© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning Options Table 13.1 Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments Varying production rates through overtime or idle time Matches seasonal fluctuations without hiring/ training costs. Overtime premiums; tired workers; may not meet demand. Allows flexibility within the aggregate plan. Sub- contracting Permits flexibility and smoothing of the firm’s output. Loss of quality control; reduced profits; loss of future business. Applies mainly in production settings.
  • 27. 13 - 27© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning Options Table 13.1 Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments Using part- time workers Is less costly and more flexible than full-time workers. High turnover/ training costs; quality suffers; scheduling difficult. Good for unskilled jobs in areas with large temporary labor pools. Influencing demand Tries to use excess capacity. Discounts draw new customers. Uncertainty in demand. Hard to match demand to supply exactly. Creates marketing ideas. Overbooking used in some businesses.
  • 28. 13 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning Options Table 13.1 Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments Back ordering during high- demand periods May avoid overtime. Keeps capacity constant. Customer must be willing to wait, but goodwill is lost. Many companies back order. Counter- seasonal product and service mixing Fully utilizes resources; allows stable workforce. May require skills or equipment outside the firm’s areas of expertise. Risky finding products or services with opposite demand patterns.
  • 29. 13 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Methods for Aggregate Planning  A mixed strategy may be the best way to achieve minimum costs  There are many possible mixed strategies  Finding the optimal plan is not always possible
  • 30. 13 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Mixing Options to Develop a Plan  Chase strategy  Match output rates to demand forecast for each period  Vary workforce levels or vary production rate  Favored by many service organizations
  • 31. 13 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Mixing Options to Develop a Plan  Level strategy  Daily production is uniform  Use inventory or idle time as buffer  Stable production leads to better quality and productivity  Some combination of capacity options, a mixed strategy, might be the best solution
  • 32. 13 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Graphical Methods  Popular techniques  Easy to understand and use  Trial-and-error approaches that do not guarantee an optimal solution  Require only limited computations
  • 33. 13 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Graphical Methods 1. Determine the demand for each period 2. Determine the capacity for regular time, overtime, and subcontracting each period 3. Find labor costs, hiring and layoff costs, and inventory holding costs 4. Consider company policy on workers and stock levels 5. Develop alternative plans and examine their total costs
  • 34. 13 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 1 Table 13.2 Month Expected Demand Production Days Demand Per Day (computed) Jan 900 22 41 Feb 700 18 39 Mar 800 21 38 Apr 1,200 21 57 May 1,500 22 68 June 1,100 20 55 6,200 124 = = 50 units per day 6,200 124 Average requirement = Total expected demand Number of production days
  • 35. 13 - 35© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 1 Figure 13.3 70 – 60 – 50 – 40 – 30 – 0 – Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month       22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number of working days Productionrateperworkingday Level production using average monthly forecast demand Forecast demand
  • 36. 13 - 36© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 2 Table 13.3 Cost Information Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day) Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day) Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training) $300 per unit Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs) $600 per unit
  • 37. 13 - 37© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 2 Table 13.3 Cost Information Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day) Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day) Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training) $300 per unit Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs) $600 per unit Month Production Days Production at 50 Units per Day Demand Forecast Monthly Inventory Change Ending Inventory Jan 22 1,100 900 +200 200 Feb 18 900 700 +200 400 Mar 21 1,050 800 +250 650 Apr 21 1,050 1,200 -150 500 May 22 1,100 1,500 -400 100 June 20 1,000 1,100 -100 0 1,850 Total units of inventory carried over from one month to the next = 1,850 units Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers
  • 38. 13 - 38© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 2 Table 13.3 Cost Information Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day) Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day) Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training) $300 per unit Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs) $600 per unit Month Production Days Production at 50 Units per Day Demand Forecast Monthly Inventory Change Ending Inventory Jan 22 1,100 900 +200 200 Feb 18 900 700 +200 400 Mar 21 1,050 800 +250 650 Apr 21 1,050 1,200 -150 500 May 22 1,100 1,500 -400 100 June 20 1,000 1,100 -100 0 1,850 Total units of inventory carried over from one month to the next = 1,850 units Workforce required to produce 50 units per day = 10 workers Costs Calculations Inventory carrying $9,250 (= 1,850 units carried x $5 per unit) Regular-time labor 99,200 (= 10 workers x $80 per day x 124 days) Other costs (overtime, hiring, layoffs, subcontracting) 0 Total cost $108,450
  • 39. 13 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 2 Figure 13.4 Cumulativedemandunits 7,000 – 6,000 – 5,000 – 4,000 – 3,000 – 2,000 – 1,000 – – Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Cumulative forecast requirements Cumulative level production using average monthly forecast requirements Reduction of inventory Excess inventory 6,200 units
  • 40. 13 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 3 Table 13.2 Month Expected Demand Production Days Demand Per Day (computed) Jan 900 22 41 Feb 700 18 39 Mar 800 21 38 Apr 1,200 21 57 May 1,500 22 68 June 1,100 20 55 6,200 124 Minimum requirement = 38 units per day
  • 41. 13 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 3 70 – 60 – 50 – 40 – 30 – 0 – Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month       22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number of working days Productionrateperworkingday Level production using lowest monthly forecast demand Forecast demand
  • 42. 13 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 3 Table 13.3 Cost Information Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day) Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day) Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training) $300 per unit Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs) $600 per unit
  • 43. 13 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 3 Table 13.3 Cost Information Inventory carry cost $ 5 per unit per month Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day) Overtime pay rate $ 7 per hour (above 8 hours per day) Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training) $300 per unit Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs) $600 per unit In-house production = 38 units per day x 124 days = 4,712 units Subcontract units = 6,200 - 4,712 = 1,488 units
  • 44. 13 - 44© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Table 13.3 Cost Information Inventory carry cost $ 5 per unit per month Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day) Overtime pay rate $ 7 per hour (above 8 hours per day) Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training) $300 per unit Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs) $600 per unit Roofing Supplier Example 3 In-house production = 38 units per day x 124 days = 4,712 units Subcontract units = 6,200 - 4,712 = 1,488 units Costs Calculations Regular-time labor $75,392 (= 7.6 workers x $80 per day x 124 days) Subcontracting 29,760 (= 1,488 units x $20 per unit) Total cost $105,152
  • 45. 13 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 4 Table 13.2 Month Expected Demand Production Days Demand Per Day (computed) Jan 900 22 41 Feb 700 18 39 Mar 800 21 38 Apr 1,200 21 57 May 1,500 22 68 June 1,100 20 55 6,200 124 Production = Expected Demand
  • 46. 13 - 46© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 4 70 – 60 – 50 – 40 – 30 – 0 – Jan Feb Mar Apr May June = Month       22 18 21 21 22 20 = Number of working days Productionrateperworkingday Forecast demand and monthly production
  • 47. 13 - 47© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 4 Table 13.3 Cost Information Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month Subcontracting cost per unit $20 per unit Average pay rate $10 per hour ($80 per day) Overtime pay rate $17 per hour (above 8 hours per day) Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training) $300 per unit Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs) $600 per unit
  • 48. 13 - 48© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Roofing Supplier Example 4 Table 13.3 Cost Information Inventory carrying cost $ 5 per unit per month Subcontracting cost per unit $10 per unit Average pay rate $ 5 per hour ($40 per day) Overtime pay rate $ 7 per hour (above 8 hours per day) Labor-hours to produce a unit 1.6 hours per unit Cost of increasing daily production rate (hiring and training) $300 per unit Cost of decreasing daily production rate (layoffs) $600 per unit Month Forecast (units) Daily Prod Rate Basic Production Cost (demand x 1.6 hrs/unit x $10/hr) Extra Cost of Increasing Production (hiring cost) Extra Cost of Decreasing Production (layoff cost) Total Cost Jan 900 41 $ 14,400 — — $ 14,400 Feb 700 39 11,200 — $1,200 (= 2 x $600) 12,400 Mar 800 38 12,800 — $600 (= 1 x $600) 13,400 Apr 1,200 57 19,200 $5,700 (= 19 x $300) — 24,900 May 1,500 68 24,000 $3,300 (= 11 x $300) — 24,300 June 1,100 55 17,600 — $7,800 (= 13 x $600) 25,400 $99,200 $9,000 $9,600 $117,800 Table 13.4
  • 49. 13 - 49© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Comparison of Three Plans Table 13.5 Cost Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 Inventory carrying $ 9,250 $ 0 $ 0 Regular labor 99,200 75,392 99,200 Overtime labor 0 0 0 Hiring 0 0 9,000 Layoffs 0 0 9,600 Subcontracting 0 29,760 0 Total cost $108,450 $105,152 $117,800 Plan 2 is the lowest cost option
  • 50. 13 - 50© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Mathematical Approaches  Useful for generating strategies  Transportation Method of Linear Programming  Produces an optimal plan  Management Coefficients Model  Model built around manager’s experience and performance  Other Models  Linear Decision Rule  Simulation
  • 51. 13 - 51© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Transportation Method Table 13.6 Costs Regular time $40 per tire Overtime $50 per tire Subcontracting $70 per tire Carrying $ 2 per tire per month Sales Period Mar Apr May Demand 800 1,000 750 Capacity: Regular 700 700 700 Overtime 50 50 50 Subcontracting 150 150 130 Beginning inventory 100 tires
  • 52. 13 - 52© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Transportation Example Important points 1. Carrying costs are $2/tire/month. If goods are made in one period and held over to the next, holding costs are incurred 2. Supply must equal demand, so a dummy column called “unused capacity” is added 3. Because back ordering is not viable in this example, cells that might be used to satisfy earlier demand are not available
  • 53. 13 - 53© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Transportation Example Important points 4. Quantities in each column designate the levels of inventory needed to meet demand requirements 5. In general, production should be allocated to the lowest cost cell available without exceeding unused capacity in the row or demand in the column
  • 54. 13 - 54© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Transportation Example Table 13.7
  • 55. 13 - 55© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Management Coefficients Model  Builds a model based on manager’s experience and performance  A regression model is constructed to define the relationships between decision variables  Objective is to remove inconsistencies in decision making
  • 56. 13 - 56© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Other Models Linear Decision Rule  Minimizes costs using quadratic cost curves  Operates over a particular time period Simulation  Uses a search procedure to try different combinations of variables  Develops feasible but not necessarily optimal solutions
  • 57. 13 - 57© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Summary of Aggregate Planning Methods Techniques Solution Approaches Important Aspects Graphical methods Trial and error Simple to understand and easy to use. Many solutions; one chosen may not be optimal. Transportation method of linear programming Optimization LP software available; permits sensitivity analysis and new constraints; linear functions may not be realistic. Table 13.8
  • 58. 13 - 58© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Summary of Aggregate Planning Methods Techniques Solution Approaches Important Aspects Management coefficients model Heuristic Simple, easy to implement; tries to mimic manager’s decision process; uses regression. Simulation Change parameters Complex; may be difficult to build and for managers to understand. Table 13.8
  • 59. 13 - 59© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Aggregate Planning in Services Controlling the cost of labor is critical 1. Accurate scheduling of labor-hours to assure quick response to customer demand 2. An on-call labor resource to cover unexpected demand 3. Flexibility of individual worker skills 4. Flexibility in rate of output or hours of work
  • 60. 13 - 60© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Five Service Scenarios  Restaurants  Smoothing the production process  Determining the optimal workforce size  Hospitals  Responding to patient demand
  • 61. 13 - 61© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Five Service Scenarios  National Chains of Small Service Firms  Planning done at national level and at local level  Miscellaneous Services  Plan human resource requirements  Manage demand
  • 62. 13 - 62© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Law Firm Example Table 13.9 Labor-Hours Required Capacity Constraints (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (1) Forecasts Maximum Number of Category of Best Likely Worst Demand in Qualified Legal Business (hours) (hours) (hours) People Personnel Trial work 1,800 1,500 1,200 3.6 4 Legal research 4,500 4,000 3,500 9.0 32 Corporate law 8,000 7,000 6,500 16.0 15 Real estate law 1,700 1,500 1,300 3.4 6 Criminal law 3,500 3,000 2,500 7.0 12 Total hours 19,500 17,000 15,000 Lawyers needed 39 34 30
  • 63. 13 - 63© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Five Service Scenarios  Airline industry  Extremely complex planning problem  Involves number of flights, number of passengers, air and ground personnel, allocation of seats to fare classes  Resources spread through the entire system
  • 64. 13 - 64© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Yield Management Allocating resources to customers at prices that will maximize yield or revenue 1. Service or product can be sold in advance of consumption 2. Demand fluctuates 3. Capacity is relatively fixed 4. Demand can be segmented 5. Variable costs are low and fixed costs are high
  • 65. 13 - 65© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Demand Curve Yield Management Example Figure 13.5 Passed-up contribution Money left on the table Potential customers exist who are willing to pay more than the $15 variable cost of the room, but not $150 Some customers who paid $150 were actually willing to pay more for the roomTotal $ contribution = (Price) x (50 rooms) = ($150 - $15) x (50) = $6,750 Price Room sales 100 50 $150 Price charged for room $15 Variable cost of room
  • 66. 13 - 66© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Total $ contribution = (1st price) x 30 rooms + (2nd price) x 30 rooms = ($100 - $15) x 30 + ($200 - $15) x 30 = $2,550 + $5,550 = $8,100 Demand Curve Yield Management Example Figure 13.6 Price Room sales 100 60 30 $100 Price 1 for room $200 Price 2 for room $15 Variable cost of room
  • 67. 13 - 67© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Yield Management Matrix Durationofuse TendtobeTendtobe Uncertainpredictable Price Tend to be fixed Tend to be variable Quadrant 1: Quadrant 2: Movies Hotels Stadiums/arenas Airlines Convention centers Rental cars Hotel meeting space Cruise lines Quadrant 3: Quadrant 4: Restaurants Continuing care Golf courses hospitals Internet service providers Figure 13.7
  • 68. 13 - 68© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Making Yield Management Work 1. Multiple pricing structures must be feasible and appear logical to the customer 2. Forecasts of the use and duration of use 3. Changes in demand
  • 69. 13 - 69© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.