SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 13
 1904 – According to 1904 agreement, the border would follow the
watershed between the countries
 1907 – Thai-Cambodian border was mapped by the French on behalf of
a bilateral border commission (Annex I map) (the temple is placed in
Cambodia)
 That year, Thailand’s prince Damrong accepted the map for
official.(previously maps has been communicated to the siam’s
members of Mixed Commission,who said nothing)
 1930 – Thai authorities made their own survey on the site, finding the
error.
 1940 – French colonial government refused to comply and fighting
broke out along the border (French-Thai War)
 7/12/1941 Pearl Harbor and Invasion of Thai by Japanese Army
 21/12/1941 – Japanese-Thai Alliance
 1953 end of french colonialism in Indocina and independence of
Cambodia
 1954 - Thai forces occupied the Temple of Preah Vihear
 1962 – Judgement of 15 June 1962 - ICJ
“The Court,
 Finds in consequence, that Thailand is under an
obligation to withdraw any military or police forces,
or other guards or keepers, stationed by her at the
Temple, or in its vicinity on Cambodian territory;
and
That Thailand is under an obligation to restore to
Cambodia any objects which may, since the date
of the occupation of the Temple by Thailand in
1954, have been removed from the Temple or the
Temple areae by Thai authorities”
 Thailand withdrew forces from temple
Barbed wire fence divides the Temple ruins from the
rest of the promontory Preah Vihear(Council of
Ministers of Thailand)
 1970 Cambodia’s civil war and Viet-Cambodia’s
war
 1992 first tourists access to the Temple
 2007 Cambodia requested that UNESCO inscribes
the site of the Temple of Preah Vihear
 2008 Thai suggested joint management of the site,
Cambodia refuses.
 2008 World heritage committee inscribes the site
of the temple of P.V. on World Heritage list
 July 15 2008 – cross-border tensions:
protestants attempt to plant Thailand’s flag near
the temple and arrest of Thai people.
 16 July 2008 deployiment of Cambodia’s troops
to ensure order and sovereignty of the territory.
 2008 -2011 Thai-Cambodia troops clashes.
 28 April 2011 Cambodia filed request of
interpretation of the judgement of 1962.
 11 Nov.2011 The interpretation of the 1962
Judgment
 Art.60 of the Statute(of the ICJ)
 “The judgment is final and without appeal; and
In the event of dispute as to the meaning or scope of the
judgment, the Court shall construe it upon the request of any
party”
The existence of a dispute
1. Court did or did not reconize the annex I map costituting the
border?
2. Meaning of “situated in territory under the sovereignty of
Cambodia and it’s vicinity on the cambodia’s border
3. Thailand’s obligation to withdraw from the area of the temple
and its vicinity on cambodian territory
Art.98
Paragraph1: “in the event of dispute as to
the meaning or scope of a judgment any
party may make a request for its
interpretation”
Paragraph 2 (Rules of the Court, requires
a party to indicate in its request for
interpretation)“the precise point or points in
dispute as to the meaning or scope of the
judgment”
 Art. 48 Cdt - Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
 Paragraph 2
The international court of justice’s Preah Vihear temple

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a The international court of justice’s Preah Vihear temple

1962 T.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_Iand_II
1962  T.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_Iand_II1962  T.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_Iand_II
1962 T.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_Iand_II
ChrisMumelo
 
1962 ABC.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case nd_II
1962  ABC.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case nd_II1962  ABC.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case nd_II
1962 ABC.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case nd_II
ChrisMumelo
 

Similar a The international court of justice’s Preah Vihear temple (15)

Paper on status of taiwan law in international maritime law 08.07.2009 fresh ...
Paper on status of taiwan law in international maritime law 08.07.2009 fresh ...Paper on status of taiwan law in international maritime law 08.07.2009 fresh ...
Paper on status of taiwan law in international maritime law 08.07.2009 fresh ...
 
1962 C VS T.pptx
1962  C VS T.pptx1962  C VS T.pptx
1962 C VS T.pptx
 
C VS T 1962.pptx
C VS T 1962.pptxC VS T 1962.pptx
C VS T 1962.pptx
 
C VS T.pptx
C VS T.pptxC VS T.pptx
C VS T.pptx
 
1962 - C VS T.pptx
1962 - C VS T.pptx1962 - C VS T.pptx
1962 - C VS T.pptx
 
1962 - C VS TH.pptx
1962 - C VS TH.pptx1962 - C VS TH.pptx
1962 - C VS TH.pptx
 
C VS T 1962 CASE.pptx
C VS T 1962 CASE.pptxC VS T 1962 CASE.pptx
C VS T 1962 CASE.pptx
 
CAMBODIA VS THAILAND 1962 CASE ICJ.pptx
CAMBODIA VS THAILAND 1962 CASE ICJ.pptxCAMBODIA VS THAILAND 1962 CASE ICJ.pptx
CAMBODIA VS THAILAND 1962 CASE ICJ.pptx
 
1962 TEMPLE.pptx Temple_Preahe_brief_I_and_II
1962  TEMPLE.pptx Temple_Preahe_brief_I_and_II1962  TEMPLE.pptx Temple_Preahe_brief_I_and_II
1962 TEMPLE.pptx Temple_Preahe_brief_I_and_II
 
1962 T.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_Iand_II
1962  T.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_Iand_II1962  T.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_Iand_II
1962 T.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_Iand_II
 
1962 ABC.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case nd_II
1962  ABC.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case nd_II1962  ABC.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case nd_II
1962 ABC.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case nd_II
 
TEMPLE.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case__I_and_II
TEMPLE.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case__I_and_IITEMPLE.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case__I_and_II
TEMPLE.pptx Temple_Preah_Vihear_case__I_and_II
 
Temple_brief_I_and_II aad.pptx Preah_Vihear_case_
Temple_brief_I_and_II aad.pptx Preah_Vihear_case_Temple_brief_I_and_II aad.pptx Preah_Vihear_case_
Temple_brief_I_and_II aad.pptx Preah_Vihear_case_
 
Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_I_and_II aad.pptx
Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_I_and_II aad.pptxTemple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_I_and_II aad.pptx
Temple_Preah_Vihear_case_brief_I_and_II aad.pptx
 
33333.pptx Paradigm_LE+Vol+No+2-04 Paradigm_LE+Vol+1.+No+2-04
33333.pptx Paradigm_LE+Vol+No+2-04 Paradigm_LE+Vol+1.+No+2-0433333.pptx Paradigm_LE+Vol+No+2-04 Paradigm_LE+Vol+1.+No+2-04
33333.pptx Paradigm_LE+Vol+No+2-04 Paradigm_LE+Vol+1.+No+2-04
 

Último

一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
bd2c5966a56d
 
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
ss
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)澳洲悉尼大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)澳洲悉尼大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)澳洲悉尼大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)澳洲悉尼大学毕业证如何办理
A AA
 
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
Airst S
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
bd2c5966a56d
 

Último (20)

Analysis of R V Kelkar's Criminal Procedure Code ppt- chapter 1 .pptx
Analysis of R V Kelkar's Criminal Procedure Code ppt- chapter 1 .pptxAnalysis of R V Kelkar's Criminal Procedure Code ppt- chapter 1 .pptx
Analysis of R V Kelkar's Criminal Procedure Code ppt- chapter 1 .pptx
 
Police Misconduct Lawyers - Law Office of Jerry L. Steering
Police Misconduct Lawyers - Law Office of Jerry L. SteeringPolice Misconduct Lawyers - Law Office of Jerry L. Steering
Police Misconduct Lawyers - Law Office of Jerry L. Steering
 
Independent Call Girls Pune | 8005736733 Independent Escorts & Dating Escorts...
Independent Call Girls Pune | 8005736733 Independent Escorts & Dating Escorts...Independent Call Girls Pune | 8005736733 Independent Escorts & Dating Escorts...
Independent Call Girls Pune | 8005736733 Independent Escorts & Dating Escorts...
 
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(UC毕业证书)堪培拉大学毕业证如何办理
 
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Nangli Wazidpur Sector 135 ( Noida)
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
 
IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptx
IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptxIBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptx
IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016)-IOD - PPT.pptx
 
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证书)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
 
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...
 
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptxShubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
Shubh_Burden of proof_Indian Evidence Act.pptx
 
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版曼彻斯特城市大学毕业证如何办理
 
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
589308994-interpretation-of-statutes-notes-law-college.pdf
 
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
How do cyber crime lawyers in Mumbai collaborate with law enforcement agencie...
 
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(JCU毕业证书)詹姆斯库克大学毕业证如何办理
 
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation StrategySmarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
Smarp Snapshot 210 -- Google's Social Media Ad Fraud & Disinformation Strategy
 
Navigating Employment Law - Term Project.pptx
Navigating Employment Law - Term Project.pptxNavigating Employment Law - Term Project.pptx
Navigating Employment Law - Term Project.pptx
 
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)澳洲悉尼大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)澳洲悉尼大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)澳洲悉尼大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)澳洲悉尼大学毕业证如何办理
 
Clarifying Land Donation Issues Memo for
Clarifying Land Donation Issues Memo forClarifying Land Donation Issues Memo for
Clarifying Land Donation Issues Memo for
 
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版埃克塞特大学毕业证如何办理
 
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(QUT毕业证书)昆士兰科技大学毕业证如何办理
 

The international court of justice’s Preah Vihear temple

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.  1904 – According to 1904 agreement, the border would follow the watershed between the countries  1907 – Thai-Cambodian border was mapped by the French on behalf of a bilateral border commission (Annex I map) (the temple is placed in Cambodia)  That year, Thailand’s prince Damrong accepted the map for official.(previously maps has been communicated to the siam’s members of Mixed Commission,who said nothing)  1930 – Thai authorities made their own survey on the site, finding the error.  1940 – French colonial government refused to comply and fighting broke out along the border (French-Thai War)  7/12/1941 Pearl Harbor and Invasion of Thai by Japanese Army  21/12/1941 – Japanese-Thai Alliance  1953 end of french colonialism in Indocina and independence of Cambodia  1954 - Thai forces occupied the Temple of Preah Vihear  1962 – Judgement of 15 June 1962 - ICJ
  • 6. “The Court,  Finds in consequence, that Thailand is under an obligation to withdraw any military or police forces, or other guards or keepers, stationed by her at the Temple, or in its vicinity on Cambodian territory; and That Thailand is under an obligation to restore to Cambodia any objects which may, since the date of the occupation of the Temple by Thailand in 1954, have been removed from the Temple or the Temple areae by Thai authorities”
  • 7.  Thailand withdrew forces from temple Barbed wire fence divides the Temple ruins from the rest of the promontory Preah Vihear(Council of Ministers of Thailand)  1970 Cambodia’s civil war and Viet-Cambodia’s war  1992 first tourists access to the Temple  2007 Cambodia requested that UNESCO inscribes the site of the Temple of Preah Vihear  2008 Thai suggested joint management of the site, Cambodia refuses.  2008 World heritage committee inscribes the site of the temple of P.V. on World Heritage list
  • 8.
  • 9.  July 15 2008 – cross-border tensions: protestants attempt to plant Thailand’s flag near the temple and arrest of Thai people.  16 July 2008 deployiment of Cambodia’s troops to ensure order and sovereignty of the territory.  2008 -2011 Thai-Cambodia troops clashes.  28 April 2011 Cambodia filed request of interpretation of the judgement of 1962.  11 Nov.2011 The interpretation of the 1962 Judgment
  • 10.  Art.60 of the Statute(of the ICJ)  “The judgment is final and without appeal; and In the event of dispute as to the meaning or scope of the judgment, the Court shall construe it upon the request of any party” The existence of a dispute 1. Court did or did not reconize the annex I map costituting the border? 2. Meaning of “situated in territory under the sovereignty of Cambodia and it’s vicinity on the cambodia’s border 3. Thailand’s obligation to withdraw from the area of the temple and its vicinity on cambodian territory
  • 11. Art.98 Paragraph1: “in the event of dispute as to the meaning or scope of a judgment any party may make a request for its interpretation” Paragraph 2 (Rules of the Court, requires a party to indicate in its request for interpretation)“the precise point or points in dispute as to the meaning or scope of the judgment”
  • 12.  Art. 48 Cdt - Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties  Paragraph 2