Presumed Innocent Essay

Presumed Innocent Essay
Presumed Innocent
Innocent until proven guilty has been an important mantra in US law. The burden of proof remains on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable
doubt that the accused is guilty. This principle guides the premise that wrongly accusing the incident is a greater harm than not punishing the guilty,
and sets a clean slate to build on in the minds of the Judge and jury. Additionally, this principle protects from unreasonable accusations assuming that
significant evidence must be present first.
Opposite of this philosophy would be guilty until proven innocent. In societies following this philosophy the accused must jump through hurdles to
prove they are indeed innocent. Imagine, for example, you come home after a long day, flop down on the couch and fall asleep watching TV.
Suddenly, bursting into the room comes the police, arresting you for robbing the convenience store down the street. You were there, you were asleep,
but how do you prove this, the clerk said you did it. How do you proceed? Unjustly charged, potentially punished, having the presumption of innocence
would have protected you.
While Presumed Innocent is the mantra in the courts, it rarely is practiced in the court of public opinion. As seen in the movie "Presumed Innocent"
the lead character, Rozat Sabich, was charged with a highly publicized murder. Being a public figure in the midst of an election, his arrest was
publicized heavily in the media. As the story leaked out, and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

lesson learned Essay
"Lesson Learned"
As I was standing in front of the judge many emotions proceeded to give me a nudge,
my heart sank and the tears rolled down my face as if I was trying to fill a river. I knew I
was going to be jailed for the bad decision that I had made when I decided to get behind
the wheel of my vehicle. After my sentencing I was escorted to the booking room where
they proceeded to take my fingerprints, height, and my photo. After ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The
one blanket that the jailor had given to me was not enough to keep me warm in a place so
cold. The privacy I had was very little. The shower and toilet was located in the corner of
the cell but they were not isolated enough to where the other inmates could not see me.
I undressed and dressed inside the shower to have some privacy. I even tried to have
privacy by hanging up a blanket from one corner of a wall stand to another but I got in
trouble by the jailor. All of these things just seemed so horrible and degrading to me.

My first few nights being in the cell called J–1 was scary. There were three other
woman in the cell that was always yelling or fighting over ridiculous things like the
television. Around the corner I could hear the accused killer "Cowboy Mike" always
singing the country songs that he liked so much or the banging of his coffee cup against
the bars of the cell when he was angry. One time he even used the shower curtain rod to
try to escape from his line cell. Even further down the line there was an accused rapist
and of course he had to put his two cents in by always screaming that the devil was
coming after him. All I could think is how scary this was and I wanted out. Not two
days from now nor thirty days I wanted out right then!
I was separated from the outside unable to touch or hold the people that were so
dear to me. It was a lonely feeling; I would hate to see anyone

Questions On The Importance Of A Hacker And A Player Who...
Basic information
Age:
16 Year old
Timezone:
CET +1
Past usernames/Current:
Ginac
Location:
Belgium
How I go to work.
Skills and Reasons:
Commands/Skills:
– Detect hackers easily
– Know the difference between a hacker and a player who has high ping and is good at PvP.
– How to keep players calm
– How to multitask
– Fast with ban & mute reports but at the same time accurate
– Know how to use commands to punish or help keep the server protected from those who want to destroy it.
– Take a situation with a grain of salt (meaning I don 't take what people said personally or over react quickly)
– Able to record quickly
– Listen to both sides of stories before making decision
Commands i would use when these come up
Spamming – /tempmute Player Name 1h Spamming
Hacking – /ban Player Name Hacking vanish – /v screenshare – /ss teleport – /tp player freeze players – /freeze
Temp–muting – /tempmute player temp–banning – /tempban player kick players – /kick player

Gamemode Moderator – /mod
Activity:
Mon – 3:00pm–11pm
Tues –3:00pm–11pm
Wen –1:00pm–12pm
Thur – 3:00pm–11pm
Fri– 3:00pm–11pm
Sat– 8:00am–11pm
Sun– 7:00am–11:00pm
My activity constanly changes as I am very addicted to my computer
I will most likly be online more then these hours.
Also sometimes I have no school on Monday so then ill be on longer.
Ways I would handle things!
If a player were to come to me saying he 's been being verbally abused in factions chat or /m I would ask this player for proof of the accused

Dangers And Disadvantages Of Right To Counsel
The Right to Counsel was not established until 1923 when the United States Supreme Court realized in Powell v. Alabama; defendants filed an appeal
claiming they should have been provided, counsel. (Hall, 2014) However, the right to counsel was not founded upon the Sixth Amendment to be exact
it was the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court reasoned the absence of counsel deprives a person of a fair trial. Courts have rules and laws that the
average person does not understand; nonetheless, why represent yourself if you lack the education of law? In 1975, the first case to establish the right
to self–representation was Faretta v. California 422 U.S. 806. "The Supreme Court recognized that the assistance of trained legal counsel is essential
to preparing and presenting a defense" (Hall, 2014, p.572). Therefore, a defendant who chooses to act as his or her own counsel (pro se) increases the
probability of a conviction. Therefore, a defendant who chooses to represent themselves, a judge may appoint a standby counsel to take over if
necessary during a trial. The Sixth Amendment gives a person the right to counsel, and it is not the only constitutional provision assuring counsel, the
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments in some circumstances does as well. (Hall, 2014) "A defendant must be made aware of the dangers and
disadvantages of self–representation" (Hall, 2014, p. 572). Some States only allow a defendant to represent themselves if they're indigent. Defendants
estimate the cost of trial

The Importance Of Civil Rights
We as American's have certain rights available to us as citizens of the United States of America. These rights are known as our civil rights. Civil
Rights are enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives rise to an action for injury. According to Wikipedia, "Civil and
Political Rights are a class of rights that protect individual's freedom from infringement by government, social organizations and private individuals."
(Wikipedia) It is also describes how far we have come, with equality for all people no matter what sex, age, religion, or race you are. Civil Rights may
have different meanings to certain people, but it was made for one purpose. That purpose was so that all of us would be treated equally, but the chain of
events lately has raised questions that our civil rights are being taken away from certain groups of Americans. Here in the U.S.A civil rights have led to
the African American Civil Rights movement as well as the American Indian Movement. They have added new amendment's to our civil rights that
have included the enactment of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment's. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery, but some states enacted
"black codes" that were intended to limit newly freed slaves civil rights. Then in 1868 the Fourteenth Amendment countered these "black codes", to
give equal rights to all. Several NFL players and NFL owners joined together to take a knee during the National Anthem. They did this with no
disrespect

Analysis Of Snow Falling On Cedars
In Snow Falling on Cedars by David Guterson Kabuo Miyamoto is being charged with the murder of a local fisherman. This novel starts with Kabuo's
trial, "The accused man, Kabuo Miyamoto, sat proudly upright with a rigid grace, his palms placed softly on the defendant's table– the posture of a
man who has detached himself insofar as this is possible at his own trial"(3). The use of the word proudly makes me already believe that Kabuo is
the one to blame for the murder because he is sitting up straight which shows confidence. Kabuo holds an emotionless expression which makes me
think of a killer because they usually would not hold any guilt in their face. Putting myself in Kabuo's position and I realized that he is a very strong
man because he had to keep himself emotionless and if that were me, I would have been terrified to be there especially since during that time period
Japanese people were being discriminated. The use of the word accused is used again to describe Kabuo, "The accused man, Kabuo Miyamoto, leaned
to his right..."(28). The author uses the word accused to let us know that Kabuo might be the killer or he might not be. This helps us to not be biased
when we read all of the evidence that shows he is guilty. Hatsue and Ishmael were in love until she realized they could never truly be together because
of their differences "He himself was always in need of words, even when he couldn't quite muster them, but she seemed capable of a brand of silence
he couldn't feel

Accused Amendments
Rights of the Accused
In the amendments there are four that protect people who have been accused for a crime or arrested for a crime. These are the fourth, fifth, sixth, and
the eighth amendments that give specifics on how the process should go and how the arrested person is to go through it. In the amendment they even
say that the police must read you your rights when they arrest you, and if they don't they can get in trouble.
Before a person is arrested the police usually need a probable cause to arrest them, or a solid reason to arrest someone. The same goes with the police
coming to your house to search it, they need a warrant, or a signed piece of paper signed by a judge. In order to get this paper they need proper
evidence or else it

The Lady Or The Tiger Analysis
The story " The Lady, or the Tiger" is by Frank R. Stockton. It mostly talks about how a princess has to make a choice as do people today. Even
though, the princess loved her lover she might have sent him to the tiger's cage.
How the trail worked is the accused person will enter an arena on x date and choose between two door one with have a tiger or woman; The lady means
the accused is innocent and is married at once , however if the accused picks the tiger that mean he/she is guilty and will be tronen a part. Ever
since, the king found out about the princess and her lover he has been on trial. Franks writes " Would it not be better for him to die at once , and go
to wait for her in the blessed regions of semi barbaric futurity." The princess has thought everyday ever since her lover was taken thinking it would be
better for him to die the wait for her in the afterlife. But the slite thought of her lover being with another lady made her blood boil ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Frank writes " The princess was well satisfied with her lover , she loved him with an ardor that had enough of barbarism in it to make it exceedingly.
The princess was in love with a man she wasn't supposed to be , and their love was strong enough to surpass he semi – barbarism. Frank writes " This
love affair moved in happily for many months , until one day the king discover its existence." No one has ever dared to love the princess because
since he was the king and it's forbidden. The princess has tossed and turn up at night thinking about the of the day trail. Frank writes " However
often , in her waking hours and in her dreams, had she started in wild horror and covered he face with her hands as she thought of her lover opening
the door on the other side of which waited the cruel, fangs of the tiger!" As much as it might hurt her to see her lover with someone else , the thought
of him dying in front of her by is far more

Michael Phelps Suicide
1.This article is loosely based on the actions of Michael Phelps–one of which he was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, driving while
impaired by alcohol, violation of a license restriction, and failure to obey a traffic control device while under the age of 21, another of which
includes him, at 23 years old, smoking from a marijuana pipe. This analysis looks into how Phelps' image was saved by his public relations team; their
quick actions led him to a continued career with a multitude of sponsors. Joseph Walsh and Shelia M. McAllister–Spooner team up to find out what
methods were taken when this controversy occurred; essentially how Phelps and his team prevented a banishment of him from the world's eyes. They
take certain ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Another study that could follow up this study could be to see if men, from different sports backgrounds, have the same rapport with the media/fans.
For example, we could take the case of many, many NFL players being charged with DUI or caught smoking marijuana and not having to go through
the same process as Phelps yet, they could keep their jobs, fans, or even sponsorships. The main objective would be to see if the public reacts the same
depending on the sports background of male athletes. First, I would go to google and research male athletes who are accused of the same, or similar
crimes–whether that be drug offenses, DUI, or a domestic dispute. To avoid any biases in my conclusion, I would need to go to different locations to
ask diverse races, genders, ages these questions. To begin the survey process, I would start with basic questions to grasp the gist of how much the
participant knows/cares about sports with their age, sports knowledge, and teams there are fans of. I would take 3 men with similar offenses, if not
identical, and survey the public to see how they reacted when the story broke–whether or not they are still a fan, whether they believe they will not do
it again, whether or not they believe their apology to the world was sincere, etc. These questions would be short yes or no questions to ensure that the
end results will be more conclusive then questions that ask the person to go more in

The Accused: The Salem Witch Trials
In the start of something new, the Salem witch Trials brought distress and panic to the town of Salem,
Massachusetts. The trials begin March 01, 1692 and lasted until 1693 during the trials more than 200
people were accused of witchcraft and about 20 people were executed.
For instance, the town assumes witchcraft is upon them in 1688 when, Martha Goodwin, beings having
strange behaviors after having an argument with Goody Glover. Soon after 3 other Goodwin children
start acting the same way. Once Goody Glover is hung the behaviors continue and worsen. On Jan. 20,
1692, Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Parris being having the same behaviors as the Goodwin children did
years earlier. Reverend Parris sees the girls in the forest and

The Death Of Witchcraft By Richard Godbeer Essay
Ultio, is the Latin word for Revenge, which the witchcraft craze of the 1800's was indirectly a result of. Richard Godbeer argues that women and
men, alike, were accused of witchcraft by vengeful neighbors. These vengeful acts, however, were a direct result of tensions in and around the
colonies. In a new land faced by harsh weather, disease, and war with neighboring Native American tribes, many colonists needed an escape, something
they could easily control and defeat. Accusing neighbors of witchcraft, was not only an act of revenge, but a way for colonists to band together against
a common enemy they could destroy. They essentially created a substitute for their fears and hatred.
Connecticut had already begun to face a renewal of Indian attacks, and dissention between Quakers and Anglicans, as Stamford begin to experience
witch accusations. Goodbeer mentions, in his Afterword, that the rhetoric used to describe increasing tensions caused by Indian attacks and religious
conflicts was similar to what was used to describe witches. Portraying them as being worshipers of Satan. In small communities, like those of the
Puritans in the colonies, congressional members were expected to be friendly, kind and generous at all times. Any deviation from this norm resulted in
aggravated neighbors who would then proceed to call that person a witch. Puritans were not particularly bothered by those who were healers, or
practiced the occults, but rather were bothered by those who did them

Sexual Exploitation Of The Police Station
I have been involved in a number of activities in my placement at Wright Chambers, mostly to do with criminal matters rather than civil. I have
accompanied Nick and a client to the Hindley Street Police Station. We met with Nick's client and the client's wife outside of the station and Nick gave
him some brief directions about not saying anything, even if he believed it would help his situation. At the time, I did not know what the client was
being accused of, and it turned out that it was persistent sexual exploitation of his niece. I felt confident but somewhat wary that I had to maintain my
friendly (if that is the right word) – but professional – manner towards the client. This was not difficult for me, although I am unable to reflect... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Before I end my placement, I would like to have more to do with clients before their matters reach trial. From my perspective as a CLE student, I have
found that doing my placement with a criminal barrister has its limitations. The main one being that the 'groundwork', such as the initial interview, has
already been done prior to the matter before it reaches Nick because he is briefed by solicitors, and sometimes by the Commonwealth or State DPP. Of
course I understand the issues surrounding liability so I cannot conduct the interviews myself, but I was disappointed to have so little do with the
clients prior to reaching trial. The extent of the client contact that I have had is the police interview, and another occasion at the District Court in an
area where the accused stayed and spoke with Nick, not at any great length. This is something that I should have considered before deciding to do my
placement at Wright Chambers, and it's something that I regret. While I haven't had the pressure of dealing with emotional clients, and making sure
that I've provided the correct legal advice to those clients, I have missed out on a great opportunity for my professional development, specifically
regarding client contact. This is something that I hope to address before the end of my placement, and it is something that I regret not having
considered at any earlier

Falsely Accused Analysis
The stigma associated with a sexual assault charge can be difficult to shake, even following an exoneration. Although the U.S. legal system adheres to a
presumption of innocence, an accusation of this magnitude can easily ruin a person's livelihood, relationships, and reputation – regardless of the
claim's validity. If you have been falsely accused of sexual assault, swift action must be taken to ensure your rights are protected. Below, Rochester,
NY defense attorney Maurice Verrillo from The Law Offices of Maurice J. Verrillo, P.C. explains how to handle a false accusation. Defense Attorney
Explains What to Do Following a False Accusation Remain Silent You have the right to remain silent– use it. Anything you say now can be flipped,
skewed,

The System Of Criminal Trial Essay
4.6(2) Adversary system
The system of criminal trial as mentioned or directed by the Code is the adversary system based on the accusatorial method . In this system the
prosecutor representing the State (or the people) accuses the defendant (the accused person) of the commission of some crime; and the law requires
him to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt. The law also provides fair opportunity to the accused person to defend himself. The judge, more or less,
is to work as an umpire between the two contestants. Challenge constitutes the essence of adversary trial and truth is supposed to emerge from the
controverted facts through effective and constant challenges . Experience has shown that adversary is by and large dependable for the reconciliation of
public and private interest i.e. public interest in punishing the criminals and private interest in preventing wrongful convictions.
4.6(3) Section 304 of Code of Criminal Procedure: Legal aid to accused at State expense in certain cases:
Most of the accused persons are poor and uneducated. They cannot afford to engage lawyers for their defence, nor do they have any legal knowledge
and professional skill to safeguard their interests themselves. Therefore, though the adversary system predicts equal legal rights and opportunities to the
parties to present their respective cases before the court, such legal rights and opportunities would in practice operate unevenly and harshly, affecting
undesirably the poor accused

Sergeant Scott : A Cadet Disciplinary Board
Cadet PO3 Scott has repeated minor offenses, to which he has received report chits. He has recently added another, more serious transgression to his
record. He has shown that he does not honor NJROTC and is not committed to the unit. The NJROTC program carries itself with a set of rules and
this cadet has shown that he does not respect them. The Commanding officer has called a Cadet Disciplinary Board to determine what will happen to
Cadet Scott. He must defend himself and prove that his word is honorable. First, the board will be called to order by the commanding officer, then and
officer from the administrative department will read the charges aloud. After this, the commanding officer will ask questions to witnesses, if any. Any
written... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lastly, the SNSI, or NSI if the SNSI is not present, will make a decision on what action will be taken. The SNSI will take the board's sanctions into
consideration when they do. The board is composed of the commanding officer, Cadet Lt. Cmdr. Benjamin Cowan, the administrative officer,
Cadet ENS Makayla Swanson, Cadet Senior Chief Lacey Reeves, and Cadet ENS Amairanny Guzman. The witnesses are Cadet PO2 Cameesha
Riley and myself. Cadet Lt. Cmdr. Cowan called the meeting to order. Cadet ENS Swanson read the litany of charges that involved the following:
minor infractions of failure to achieve an acceptable level of performance in drill, inattention or failure to follow instructions in class, and the
major infraction of fighting while in uniform. Cadet PO2 Riley was the first of the witnesses to speak. She stated that she was in class with the
cadet and that he did not participate in drill activities. I was then called up to tell what I had seen. I told the board that I had witnessed an
altercation between Cadet Scott and another student whose name I was not familiar with. I then said that I had seen the fight being disbanded by
security guards and that was all I said on the matter, as that was all that I had observed. Cadet Scott made a statement after we had concluded ours.
He said that he was only defending himself. He then told that he had thought he had been doing well in his NJROTC class. Cadet Scott was asked if
this was all that he had to say on his behalf, he

Response Letter To The Asbo
1)I Mr. Simon Cordell do state the following, the stated being in regards to any wrongful doings that I find myself in defense off and I therefore write
this letter of a true Comprehensive list of synonyms so to make the real on goings of events easier for any person to understand.
2)In relation towards the wrongfully doings that I now am being asked to attended a meeting at Enfield civic center about, so to be questioned, I find it
overwhelmingly unjustified that I have to attended at such a meeting, the reason's given by myself to why I understand it not to be right or fair that I
have been ordered to attended for this meeting or I therefore risk my home being taken, by way of a position order being placed against my person,
are given ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
13)The Asbo is issued upon my statue of liberties fraudulently and therefore incorrectly and for sure this now can be proven as to be correct but still
has not been rectified.
14)In the Asbo orders development as opposed to being manufactured the evidence was fabricated by persific members of Enfield's Councils Anti
Social Behavior team inclusive of members of the metropolitan police.
15)This has been gained by foul and corrupt practice, in turn having illegal effects on the running abilities of my company and way of life and to my
understanding for there own self gain and creed, for a further continuation of negative effects there practices have now achieved in breaching a
multitude of my human rights.
16)I believe as I suspect any other honest person would also do, in that such behavior of governing bodies should not be

The Accused: The Boston Massacre
On March 5th, 1770, Colonists were angry about all Townshend acts. They were aggressive and started throwing snowballs and stones. One
soldier was injured in that situation. Then, there was a shooting in Boston in a crowd where many people were injured and killed. Our British
soldiers fired shots. Captain Preston was in charge of ordering the soldiers to shoot. All shots were fired as soon as the first shot went off.
Authorities arrested one officer, 8 soldiers and four civilians for charges of murder. This was a serious case that no one was ready to take on except
John Adams, Samuel Adam's brother, who accepted the case. He thought he would be famous if he won this case. There were two sides in the court,
defensive and prosecution.

Similarities And Differences Between The Crucible And Mr Hale
In the play, The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, there are some similarities and differences between Mr. Hale and I. Mr. Hale is a Reverend from
Beverly, who's called to Salem by Reverend Parris to help wake his daughter, Betty, who fell ill after being caught in the woods "summoning" the
devil. While dealing with accusations of witchcraft, Mr. Hale acts a certain way which can define his character. When he first arrives in Salem he
remains hopeful. Towards the middle of the play he tries to help more by getting involved with the court trials, which ends up causing bigger
problems. At the end of the play, Mr. Hale notices the good in those who are in jail and goes out of his way to help them. Overall, Mr. Hale's
character is considered optimistic and valuable, which relates to myself. When Mr. Hale was first introduced in the play, he maintained a positive
attitude and remained hopeful. After he arrived in Salem and heard rumors of witches and the devil flying around, he informed the community that he'll
control the situation and destroy the devil. "Have no fear now–we shall find him out if he has come among us, and I mean to crush him utterly if he has
shown his face!" (39). By hoping to clear up this mess, Mr. Hale reads from his books with hope that it'll break Betty away from the devil and
assuage the situation entirely. I'm like Mr. Hale in this case because when the worst may be brought upon me, I remain hopeful that I can push
through it. We both won't quit when we're faced with a tough decision that doesn't have a clear solution, but instead we put our effort into solving
whatever the problem may be, before it gets any worse. As the play perseveres, more similarities and differences between Mr. Hale and I surface.
Quickly after Mr. Hale's arrival in Salem, the situation regarding witchcraft escalates. Mr. Hale gets sucked into the middle of something which didn't
impact his life personally in the first place. As rumors of the devil spread around, more names known to be "seen" with him are mentioned in the court.
Mr. Hale takes it upon himself to visit the houses of those who are accused of involvement in witchcraft. "No– no, I come of my own, without the
court's authority. Hear me. I know not if you are

Rights of the Criminally Accused Essay
Everyone in the United States have specific rights when they are criminally accused. "I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined
by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution." This quote was from Thomas Jefferson. Trial by jury goes along
with everyone having rights when they are accused, it is one of the basic things in the bill of rights, that when you are accused, you have the right to
a trial by jury. There are many other rights as well. I had already known some things about this topic. Other stuff was new knowledge to me.
Something that I already knew was that when you are being arrested, the officer arresting you has to read you your rights as an American. I also knew
that... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One specific case would be Gideon Vs. Wainwright in 1962. In this case Clarence Earl Gideon was convicted and didn't have enough money to
obtain a lawyer. He asked for an Attorney, but he didn't get one because the court denied his request. They considered the question if this violated
Gideon's right, so they unanimously decided that Gideon should be appointed an Attorney, and he was given one. This case is an example of the
Sixth Amendment right of getting an Attorney if you cannot afford one ("Rights of the Accused", np). The Criminally Accused are given a public
trial to discourage the abuse of prosecutorial power. If you weren't given a public trial you could be put to death, and no one would even know
why. That is also the reason that you have a trial by jury. They determine if you are guilty or not guilty by the evidence presented at trial. They also
have the power to acquit an accused if it believes that he is accused of violation an unjust law (Hornberger, np). When you are arrested, if you aren't
given you Miranda Rights, then questioning after an arrest, can be inadmissible at trial ("Advisement of Rights", np). That is part of what Due
Process is. Due Process is the right that you have to be given all of your rights and the court has to execute all of your rights before you can be
punished. Another right is no cruel or unusual

Feminist Theory In The Movie The Accused
1
1. Introduction
Feminist theory is a supporter of equality for man and women. For such long time, mostly the old days, there were so many limitations to what a lady
should be or permitted to do, throughout the years with the assistance of education and acknowledgment that all sexual orientations are and should be
equal, this has become less and less over time but it still exist at this very moment. In the movie "The Accused", Sarah Tobias (Jodie Foster) is ruthlessly
assaulted by three men in a bar while individuals watch and cheer. A district Attorney Kathryn Murphy (
Kelly McGillis) takes the case, however, allows
the rapists to receive a mild sentence. A distraught Sarah decides to seek punishment for the men who witnessed and encouraged the assault. To get
justice, Sarah must take the stand and revisit the night of her attack in this drama based on true events. In this essay, I will dive into the film The
Accused then explain what the feminist theory really means and its background and lastly, apply the theory to the film to better understand how it
works in reality.
2. The Accused
After having a bad fight with her boyfriend, Sarah Tobias goes to a bar to sit down to chat with her great friend. They sit and discuss anything to get
her mind off of her boyfriend issue which prompts her flirting with one of the guys at the bar. She had an impression that he was funny and cool, so
appreciated his company. She starts drinking and smoking with the guy, which was a bad idea.

Accused In The Crucible
Topic/Question: What are the dangers of making accusations without "proper regard for evidence?"
The founding fathers of our Constitution held firmly to the principle of justice in which "Every man is presumed innocent until he is proven guilty."
There have been several episodes in history in which communities violate this principle and allow unsubstantiated accusations to drive their justice
system. As depicted in Arthur Miller's The Crucible, during the Salem witch trials, to be accused of "witchcraft" was to be guilty. To be guilty meant a
death sentence, which could only be avoided if one was to confess their guilt and to identify other "afflicted girls." During the McCarthy era, a
strikingly similar situation aroused when suspected ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
McCarthy stated that "the state department harbors a nest of communists...who are helping to shape our foreign policy. I have in possession the names
of 57 communists who are in the State department at present." As a student, I was brought in for questioning with the drug incident because of my
association with a student with whom I had carpooled. In this way, I can connect to Tituba, who eventually did give into the pressure of Reverend
Hale to say names of others, including Goody Good and Goody Osbourn. Putnam suspected these women of witchcraft when he suggested their names
during Hale's interrogation of Tituba in the Parris household. Even though Tituba had not personally experienced their forms of "witchcraft" firsthand,
she admitted that she had seen these women "always talking; always runnin' round and carryin' on (with the devil)..." (Miller 46) in order to gain trust
and an image of innocence. Similarly, when I was pressured to give my knowledge of the situation to the school principal, the first names that came to
mind were the ones that I had heard other students in the hallways suspect, and if I wanted to create an image associating myself with a clear
conscience, I would have named those

The Accused: The Salem Witch Trial
Have you ever been accused before? Ever been someone you shouldn't be? Well there is this crazy thunderstorm at the Salem, Massachusetts about
witches. There are witches that been accused and executed in 1692. Some witches were hanged but also one of them got piled up with rocks .
Well to begin with, the first cause was about age, gender, and marital status. Mostly females were married at the age 41–60 for the Accused people.
Then, there were single females at the age 16–20 for the Accusers. There was hardly males that were witches. There was about 15 that was married at
the age 41–60 as well for the Accused. Then for the accusers there were single males at the age 11–15 to 16–20 for the Accusers.
The second cause of the Salem witch trial

The Scottish Legal System Is Discovering The Truth
Fundamental to the Scottish legal system is discovering the truth. In Scotland, a defendant has to be presumed innocent until proven guilty . The
burden of proof lies with the Crown, who must prove their case against a defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. From the very beginning of the
criminal process – the arrests of the suspect – until the very end – the conviction of the defendant – the state are empowered with many rights, such as
the power to detain , which assist them in reaching the truth. Although the state are provided with these rights, there are limitations placed on them in
the form of the rights of the defendant, such as the right to remain silent or the right to defend themself either in person or through legal... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Both models' fundamental principal is discovering the truth. The crime control model focuses on the truth regardless of how it is reached whereas the
due process model places restrictions on what the state can do to discover the truth. In addition, the crime control model aims for the repression of
criminal conduct, whilst the due process model aims to prevent and eliminate crime. Packer's intentions were not to create two separate models; rather
he intended to create a spectrum from one extreme to the other. The Scottish legal system does not wholly consist of crime control elements nor due
process elements. It is a mixture of both of these models that attempts to balance the rights of the state to secure a conviction, with the rights of the
accused to a fair trial. It can be seen that there is not an appropriate balance between the two as there is not equal and proportionate rights given to both
parties, resulting in excessive protection being given to the defendant. This imbalance is best described by discussing the powers of the state in contrast
to the defendant's rights pre–trial and during trial.
The pre–trial powers which the state are provided with lie with the police force. They are empowered with the authority to arrest, interrogate and detain
suspects. If the police see a person and suspect the are someone who is committing a known crime then, under s.13(1) of the Criminal Procedure
(Scotland) Act 1995, they can either ask for an

The Face Behind Bitcoin
The Face Behind Bitcoin The Newsweek has gone too far by invading Satoshi Nakamoto's private life without his consent. The reporter goes to the
extent of going to confront Nakamoto from his residence in temple city where he decides to involve the police because he never consented on
speaking with the reporter. In the letter he accuses Newsweek of printing false reports concerning his life, and this has created a great deal of
confusion and stress to him and the family members. He finishes by asking the Newsweek to respect his privacy. The allegation made on Mr.
Nakamoto is not justifiable in any sense since he personally denied being involved in the programming and invention of the bitcoin technology. The
magazine is seen to have developed its own thesis on the programmer's identity by matching Nakamoto's name and career to the alleged creator of
the digital currency system. He even argues out that he never heard the term Bitcoin until his son told him. The reporter goes ahead to his home even
after noticing Mr. Nakamoto's character of not being social to the public. In the story he is described to be a man with few words and very intelligent.
The initial program document carried the name of Satoshi Nakamoto, and because the author chose to remain private and anonymous, it had been
widely assumed the name to be a pseudonym. The reporter is seen to have gone to the extent of going to Mr Nakamoto's home to confront him on the
story which he earlier denied talking about

Film Analysis : The Twelve Angry Men
"Don't judge so you shall not be judged" (Luke 6:37), is a famous proverb quote that many people go by. But why is it that people judge? Or
assume that someone is already guilty of a crime based on their race, skin color, economic status or family background? If someone has to make a
judgment, he has to be certain of the facts surrounding the situation. Sentencing a person to die is a very crucial decision and the same reason goes
into setting a guilty person free. Everybody deserves a fair and thorough trial. Judging a person according to someone else's standards is not fair. In
the 1957 Sydney Lumet film, The Twelve Angry Men, 12 jurors decided the fate of an 18–year boy, who was accused of killing his own father. The
situation gradually transitioned from conflicting to agreeable and jurors' characters changed from vindictive to considerate. The movie circled around
the arguments on how people take a decision on innocence versus guilt in our democratic society. The increasing angst among the men was due to their
different family backgrounds, personal differences, and the extremely inconvenient environment they are in.
What made the movie more interesting was the jurors' family background was so diverse. Putting them all together in one room can be difficult and
explosive. The unique personalities of the characters added more drama into scenes and the whole movie would have been awfully dull if not for the
strong and persuasive dialogues and remarks they threw at each other. Jurors
number 3, 10 and 7 were the most critical and mean. Anyone can say that they grew up in a harsh environment with authoritarian parents. They were
the men who made very demeaning remarks and made a direct attack on the boy's personality. If jurors based their judgment on personal predispositions
and prejudices, anybody who is on trial will not stand a chance of a fair hearing. Of course, it is impossible to have all the jurors come with the same
family backgrounds. That is the whole point of the jury; to remove any form of bias towards the accused and by looking through the facts and not just
relying on the evidence provided by the unreliable witnesses, which could only be circumstantial.
As the movie progressed, the men became

Argumentative Essay On The Bill Of Rights
The Bill of Rights is one of the most important things in the American government .The Bill of Rights has 10 Amendments. The fifth one however is
one of the important one. The fifth Amendment deals with police procedures. Along with basic Constitutional limits, or in other words guidelines that
Congress has to follow. The Fifth Amendment is a one of the most important Amendments because it gives people the rights to speech and privacy, the
fifth doesn't let people be charged with the same felony twice, and it gives citizens the right to a fair trial.
The first reason the fifth amendment is one of the more important amendments is because it gives people the rights to speech and privacy. "No person
shall be held to answer for a capital, or other infamous crime" (Bill of Rights). This states that a person does not have to talk if they do not deem it fit.
Someone can plead the fifth and they just stated that they do not want to talk. On the other hand some might say that this is not a strong argument
because in other countries crime is limited because people have to speak. "The government continued to take controversial steps restricting media
freedom, justifying them mostly by the need to counter Russia's anti–Ukraine propaganda" (World Report 2017). This states that when banning the
freedom of social media it protects the government and country from attacks, mainly Russia. Although this is true banning the rights of social media
may cause arguments to break out. The fifth

The Crime Control Model And The Due Process Model
Herbert Packer, a Stanford University law professor, developed two models of the criminal justice system (CJS) in the United States, the crime
control model and the due process model. This has now been implemented and applied to the CJS of England and Wales and there are several
examples of due process and crime control measures which this CJS is made up of.
The due process model relies on the underlying principle that an individual cannot be deprived of liberty, property, or even life without appropriate
legal procedures and safeguards. When people are charged with a crime they are required to have their rights protected by the CJS. The primary actor of
this model is the defendant as it is largely structured around protecting the rights ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This is a procedural safeguard of the CJS and is a part of the due process model. Another example of the due process model in the CJS is the system
of being able to appeal. The fact that there is a higher Court of Appeal if you feel the lower courts have made a mistake and even an even higher
House of Lords for appeals. This is a procedural safeguard for the accused to ensure their guilt is beyond reasonable doubt and is another feature of
the due process model. Another due process feature of the CJS is the panel of lay people known as the jury which decide upon the guilt. This is a
feature of the due process model as again it protects the rights of the defendant as expected by the due process model. An example in context of the
due process model in the CJS is in relation to the Woolwich murder of Drummer Lee Rigby. This is my ideal example of the due process model
being implemented in the CJS of England and Wales, this is because although the two men (Micheal Adebowale and Micheal Adebolajo) were quite
visibly caught on tape and actually waited to be arrested they were still given their right as human beings to undergo the due course and process of
the law as they still had a trial and were still allowed to appeal. There are other features of the due process model in the CJS of England and Wales
such as the right to silence, the right to legal advice and

Analysis Of ' 12 Angry Men '
12 Angry Men
Barling definitions (for background):
Idealized Influence – defined by the values, morals, and ethical principles of a leader and is manifest through behaviours that supress self interest and
focus on the good of the collective.
Research has shown that leaders who have higher moral reasoning, who are ethical, or who are self–sacrificing are perceived as more transformational
or charismatic.
Ways in which juror number 11 demonstrated idealized influence:
"A refugee from Europe who had come to this country in 1941. Aman who speaks with an accent and who is ashamed, humble, almost subservient to
the people around him, but who will honestly seek justice because he has suffered through so much injustice." https://docs.google.com/document/d
/1irVXTuMAQESSwtoqOtQiC_–5dZa59LCmOxA_IQzlxww/edit Juror 11 is a refugee from Europe. He is a watchmaker who speaks politely and
deeply appreciates his democratic rights and freedoms and has no tolerance for those that don't. He respects process, and wants others to do what is
right. For the most part he is controlled in his emotions and we only really see him get fired up when juror 7 wants to change his vote simply to
hurry the process so that he can make the baseball game for which he has tickets. He is disgusted that someone would not take their role seriously
especially when a boy's life is at stake. He pushes hard at the juror and demands that he explain why he changed his vote. He speaks with such
conviction that seven

Why Is The Rights Of The Accused Is Proven Accused
Name
Instructor Name
Class
Date
History of the Rights of the Accused and the Warren Court
One of the most well–known epithets in the United States is "innocent until proven guilty." This means that until a prosecution has proven beyond a
reasonable doubt that a person accused of a crime has indeed committed that crime, he or she is to be presumed innocent of all charges. In theory,
this idea upholds the sense of democracy and fair trial upon which the country was founded. In practice, however, it is less so. Oftentimes, an
accusation or a criminal charge defines the person accused, as he or she is already presumed guilty in the court of public opinion. Especially in the
cases of high–profile trials, most people accept that the person ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Constitution clearly outlines the rights of the accused and what steps must be taken before an accused person can be punished. One of these
rights is The Writ of Habeas Corpus, which means that a person cannot be held or detained for an unreasonable amount of time without having been
charged with a crime. This prevents the government and law officials from imprisoning citizens without cause. Today, "a large number of criminal
conviction appeals are raised under the habeas corpus privilege, [wherein] individuals ... convicted of crimes ... may demand that the government
justify his or her physical confinement" (ThisNation). In other words, even if a person has been convicted of a crime, if it is found that his or her right
to habeas corpus has been violated, it can nullify the conviction.
Another right that is guaranteed to the accused is the right to a trial by jury. Article III of the Constitution guarantees that those who are accused of
crimes have the right to "have their guilt or innocence determined by a panel of fellow–citizens" (ThisNation). A person cannot be convicted of a crime
without receiving a fair trial, during which the prosecution must present its proof that the accused is guilty. If there is not enough proof to determine
that the accused person did commit the crime, then the jury cannot convict, and the accused is free to go. There are some exceptions to the trial by
jury right, such as if a person is accused of a crime that has a penalty of

Jessica Bennett Internet Fame
Internet Shaming Jessica Bennett is stating that Internet fame has a dark side and how becoming internet famous may not be great. There will
always be backlash for any type of fame, so it's to be expected with internet fame. Jessica lists many examples that backup her opinion on internet
fame. The first example is about Ghyslain Raza. Raza recorded himself preforming an imaginary battle with a lightsaber. About a year later, someone
finds his recording and posted it online which resulted in the video going viral globally. Since the video had been posted, the video has been watched
over 32 billion times. Raza immediately became famous, and with fame comes backlash. Jessica doesn't come close to presenting enough information.
Raza's situation wasn't pretty–he dropped out of school and was diagnosed with depression. Jessica should have presented more information to
convince people that there is... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This resulted in a barrage of harassment that even forced her to drop out. Another example is a college student by the name of Lewis. Lewis was
accused of sexually assaulting a female student on Facebook. These examples are great ones. They give enough detail to show why and how this is a
problem. With this example, it shows that a couple of sentences can ruin your life and that people will believe the accuser not the accused. Jessica
compares internet shaming to that of Ancient Romans and how they branded criminals on the forehead for the crime they committed, or how colonial
American would force adulterers to wear a scarlet A. The comparison between internet shaming and ancient public shaming doesn't work. Yes, nothing
disappears from the internet, but eventually it will be replaced by something new. By branding someone, it is a constant reminder to the public. The
memory of Raza never comes up, nor are there any corrupt thoughts that are joined

The Trial Scene And Anatomy Of A Murder
Criminal law provides procedural rules in governing the criminal justice system's operation. In films, the trial scenes rarely give an accurate depiction
of the court process. The writers and producers make the crime movies more dramatic as a technique to draw in the audience. The trial scene tends to
be the climax in crime films, which gives it more depth and meaning. The 1959 movie Anatomy of a Murder follows a murder trial of a defendant
who murdered a man that allegedly raped his wife. The movie's plot is primarily focused on the entire trial of this case. While the 1988 movie The
Accused, discusses a case involving a women who was gang raped at a local bar. It portrayed this as a very serious offense that ended up destroying the
life ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was not the only film that had illustrated the criminal justice system. In the well–known movie The Accused, the judicial system is presented in an
accurate manner. The film insinuated that since Sarah Tobias, played by Jodie Foster, was dressed provocatively and she likes to have fun. It then
made the implication that she was looking for it, which is exactly what the opposing attorney argued. In reality, these are the type of questions or
implications that typically come up in rape cases. The plea deals made in between the prosecutor and defense attorneys is something that happens a lot
in the criminal justice system (cite movie). Typically, in reality the prosecutor will first consult with the victim before offering a plea deal. In the
movie, that was something that was not by the prosecutor Kathryn Murray, played by Kelly McGillis, which brought injustice to the victim. In this
movie, the audience first–hand witnessed how this type of trauma can have a profound affect on the victim. There are many negative effects that can
result such as depression or anxiety (cite academic journal, p.389). The movie showed how the victim was impacted in a mental and emotional type of
way. This movie shows that there are ways to bring forth the accused so that justice can prevail. The criteria for describing crime films can have
various definitions.

Importance of Not Being Late Essay
Importance of not being late. In the following paper I will be discussing what series of actions brought me to write this paper, the army regulations
surrounding said actions, the possible effects these actions might have on the accomplishment of the mission, the possible affects on your career,
and how to discourage and possibly stop such things from ever happening soon or ever again. The reason I am being subject to this time consuming,
uninspired, and rather lackluster writing assignment is because I failed to be at the correct place of duty at the time appointed to me by my
superiors. The day before we had a relatively late work call and I adjustment my alarm clock to reflect the change and give myself ample time to get
myself ready... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If you are charged and found guilty under these articles you can be facing a multitude of outcomes none of which one would strife for. The
commanding officer could be as lenient as letting you go with a stern yet fair warning and talking, you may find yourself picking up trash after
work and during the weekends for anything between the parameters of seven to forty five days of extra duty. You may also suffer from the
economical side of the house because they may decide to go ahead and cut your monthly pay in half for two whole months back to back. Last of
the outcomes named here but the one that I personally believe to be the worst is the loss of rank. The can take one or all of the them depending on
the severity of the cause being presented to the commanding officer. Rank is the thing that takes the most time to achieve the first time around
coming up the ranks, to lose it after you have it makes it harder for you to be seeing as a professional and a soldier that is worth pushing forward to
achieve to the next step in his career. Next we will discuss in this paper the impact such actions can have getting the mission finished, moral and
appearance of the company or organization, and the direct impact it can have on the people you work closely with. In our job

Principato's Supplemental Report Of An Accident
1. OPERATION OF THE VEHICLE:
On 03/18/2017 at 2349 hours, I was dispatched to the area of Hurffville Road and Pasadena for a motor vehicle stop P.O. Principato #5247 had
initiated. Refer to his supplemental report for details.
2. ARRIVAL AT THE SCENE:
Upon my arrival, I spoke with P.O. Principato who advised he observed a Hyundai Tuscon stopped in the middle of roadway with the driver side
passenger door open. P.O. Principato advised he safely conducted a U–Turn and pulled behind the vehicle, illuminating its emergency lights. P.O.
Principato advised that as he approached her, the driver was leaning into the vehicle looking under the seats. After stating whom he was and his
attentions, the driver looked at him and smiled. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I then explained to Monique that when commanded, to tilt her head backwards, close her eyes and count the passage of 30 seconds in her head.
Once the time elapsed, open her eyes, look straight ahead and advised me to stop. I then demonstrated the test for Monique. After my demonstration,
Monique advised she understood. I then gave the command for her to begin. Monique closed her eyes and tilted her head back. As she was counting
in her head, I observed Monique to have eye lid tremors. I also observed Monique to have a 2"–3" sway left to right. Monique then told me to stop.
Monique estimated the passage of 30 seconds in 21 seconds. I then told Monique to turn around and place her hands behind her

Supreme Court Case: Gideon V. Wainwright
Public defenders have a tough job defending their indigent clients. In an ideal scenario, they are to defend their clients in a zealous manner.
Unfortunately for the clients, most cases end via plea bargains . For cases that do make it to court, some clients find their attorney lacking in many
respects . This is because the Supreme Court case Gideon v Wainwright only guarantees the right to an attorney. Unfortunately, that right does not
extend to a quality lawyer or defense . I intern at the Orange County Public Defender's office, where the clients are poor and homeless. As such, they
cannot hire their own lawyers and must rely on free legal representation from the office's attorneys. But just like other Public Defenders across the U.S.,
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For the public defenders and prosecutors, I will ask the head of each group for verbal consent to carry out the research. For the homeless population,
I will use convenience sampling when sending out surveys. I will walk around the general vicinity and ask the clients, if they can spare 15 minutes
for the research. They will be asked to complete a series of questions. The surveys will differ depending on the group. For the public defenders, the
questions will focus on the scope of the issues that their office faces. When it comes to the prosecutors, the questions will focus on whether or not, they
want any change to the current state of affairs. Lastly, for the clients, the questions will focus on their experience with the criminal justice system and
what kind of changes they

Theodore Boone The Accused
Do you know what Protagonist and Antagonist are? Protagonist is the character whose actions are the primary focus of the story. Antagonist is the
character who the protagonist has the most conflict with. In Theodore Boone the Accused, the main conflict is conflict is that Theodore Boone is
accused of stealing computers from a shop that he has never been in before. Most people think he is guilty but Theo knows he is not. Theodore
Boone is the proantagonist in this story. Theodore is a very intelligent kid who loves figuring out crimes. In the book, Theodores conflict is that he is
accused of stealing computers he's never touched before. In the book, Theodore says "You won't find any of my fingerprints on those tablets because
I've never

The Executive Accused Of Fraud
A former bank executive accused of fraud, decides to create her own "companionship" business as she plots to get back at the man responsible for
getting her fired.
BRIEF SYNOPSIS
SLOAN EARNEST (40's) is a former bank executive accused of fraud and fired from her job. She has recently gotten a divorced from her husband,
EDWARD, and is unable to sell her home. At a bar she meets a man, CASH, who pays her for sex.
Sloan comes up with an unconventional new line of work. She decides to open her own "companionship" or escort business called Ally Cats.
Sloan decides to assemble a team of "workers" and recruits SUNNY (20's) a bartender, CHASTITY (30's) a stripper, and STELLA (60's) her stylish.
She also recruits a former co–worker, who was also ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Senator is willing to drop the charges if Sloan agrees to attend his fundraiser. She agrees.
Sloan continues to investigate the Senator and at the fund–raiser, she exposes how he took millions of bailout money for his personal use. Sloan is
exonerated.
At the fundraiser, she runs into Cash, who is the mysterious person who warned her about the Senator. Cash is an attorney who was supposed to do the
audits that never happened. He heard about one banker who was in favor of the audits and he wanted to get to know her, but their relationship took a
sudden, unexpected turn.
Cash tells her that the US Capital is the most expensive brothel in the world. He wonders what her price is, as he slides over next to her.
STORY COMMENTS
AMERICAN WHORE offers an intriguing inside look into the two fascinating worlds. One is the world of prostitution and the other is the world of
bank fraud. What is cleverly emphasized is that both of these worlds are similar. While some women prostitute their self for money, so does the
government and politicians. It's an interesting comparison.
The script is driven by solid themes of greed, seduction, and corruption.
While the connection between prostitution and the government is well appreciated, the script would benefit from more development. Some of the
areas that are worthy of discussion are structure, tone, tension, and some more character development.
One of the first concerns to

Comparing John Blue And Mystery Man
John Blue is your typical day to day mailman. He's the nicest person you can ever possibly meet. Long story short, John's a superhero. He has
powers like no one has ever seen before and uses them to protect his city that lurks with evil, Folletsville. Mr. Blue goes by "Mystery Man" or
"Double M" if you must. The people of Folletsville named him after noticing the strange and particular ways he fights crime, but also because no one
knows his true identity. John never tells anyone about his double life fearing that they might treat him differently. One night while fighting his
archenemy, Bin Nav, Mystery Man lost his balance and hit his head on a rock that caused him to go unconscious. When he awoke he noticed he wasn't
where he used used to

Case Analysis: The Accused
Based on a true story, "The Accused" was first released in 1988 and tells the story of a woman, named Sarah, who was raped by three men in a bar,
in front of people. She later sought revenge on her three rapists and also people who were encouraging them that night. At first, the men only received
a small sentence; but Sarah wasn't satisfied with their punishment. She later fought hard to get witnesses testify in her favor which finally led to her
"victory". Her attorney Kathryn was in charge of the case during the whole process. However, Sarah's story has raised many questions: did the
bystanders owe her a legal duty? What are the criminal omissions, legal and moral duty that can be highlighted in her case? Although Sarah had the
reputation

Presumed Innocent Essay

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Más de Sarah Michalak

Más de Sarah Michalak (20)

Último

Último (20)

Presumed Innocent Essay