SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 16
Descargar para leer sin conexión
The Effects of the Learning
Management System on Student
Performance, Interaction and Course
Ease of Use.!
Philippos Savvides!
Arizona State University - Online
Effects of the LMS!

•  Motivation of the study!
•  Course creation process!
•  Learning Management Systems!
•  Method & Results!
•  Discussion
Motivation!

•  2.31 million online students in the United
States in 2004.!

•  Make sure technologies we use are
effective.!

•  Lack of literature of the effects of LMS.!
•  LMS transition.
Course Development Process!

•  Rapid Design!
•  Gather information, design, develop.!

•  Quality Matters Rubric
Learning Management Systems!

•  Automate the administration,
documentation, tracking and reporting of
courses.!

•  Blackboard, Sakai, Moodle,
LearningStudio (formerly eCollege) and
others.
Blackboard vs. LearningStudio!
Both offer !
•  Exams, adaptive release, calendar,
chat, discussion boards, gradebook,
group management, document
submission.
Blackboard!
LearningStudio!
Research Questions!
What is the relationship between:!

1. the LMS and student perceived ease of
use?!

2. the LMS and student perceived course
interaction?!

3. the LMS and student performance?
Hypothesis!
Students who participated in courses
delivered in LearningStudio will report
higher course interaction, ease of use, and
performance.
Method!

•  58, 7-week online courses.!
•  27 in Blackboard 9; 31 in LearningStudio.!
•  1,596 students solicited!
•  796 in Blackboard; 840 in LearningStudio!
•  277 responded (17%)!
•  126 in Blackboard; 151 in LearningStudio.
Student Characteristics	

Gender!

Ethnicity!

College
Work
Experience! Hours!

Male!
25.9%!

Caucasian!
62.8%!

< 2 years!
4.7%!

Female!
74.1%!

African
American!
8.1%!

Credits
Enrolled!

GPA!

# of online
classes!

Do not work! 3 - 6!
20.9%!
12.8%!

4.0 - 3.5!
44.2%!

First!
0%!

2 years!
10.1%!

< 20!
19.6%!

7 -12!
33.1%!

3.49 - 3.0!
28.6%!

1-3!
0.7%!

Hispanic!
18.2%!

3 years!
27.7%!

20-29!
14.9%!

13 - 18!
48.6%!

2.99 - 2.5!
19%!

4-6!
1.4%!

Asian
American!
2.7%!

> 3!
57.4%!

30-40!
19.6%!

19 - 21 !
4.1%!

2.49 - 2.0!
6.8%!

7-10!
0%!

Native
American!
1.4%!

41-59!
21.6%!

> 21!
1.4%!

< 2.0!
1.4%!

> 10!
98%!

Other!
6.8%!

> 60 hours!
3.4%!
Perceived Ease of Use!
1. It was easy to navigate the course.!
2. It was easy to communicate with the instructor.!
3. It was easy to communicate with other students.!
4. It was easy to access the course materials.!
5. It was easy to submit an assignment.!
6. It was easy to participate in online discussions.!
7. It was easy to take quizzes and/or exams online.!
8. It was easy to access the gradebook.!
9. It was easy for me to become skillful at using the
online course.!
10. I found the online course easy to use.!
11. The overall usability of the online course was
	


good.

F (1,236) = 3.42, p = .98!
η2 = .01
Perceived Course Interaction!
1. My online course is setup so that I can interact
with my classmates.!
2. Interaction between the instructor and
students is essential to online learning.!
3. The quality of discussions in my online course
is high.!
4. The lecture material in my online course is
valuable to course interaction.!
5. Interaction between students is essential to
online learning.!
6. The amount of interaction with other students
(decreased/increased).!
7. The quality of interaction with other students
(decreased/increased).!
8. The amount of interaction with the instructor
(decreased/increased).!
9. The quality of interaction with the instructor
	


(decreased/increased).

F (1,235) = 10.11, p = .002!
η2 = .04
Student Performance!

1. What grade did you

receive in your course?
	


F (1,217) = .011, p = .917!
η2 = .00
The effects of the learning management system on student satisfaction, performance, and course interaction

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

CA12 Assessing Online Courses (Updated)
CA12 Assessing Online Courses (Updated)CA12 Assessing Online Courses (Updated)
CA12 Assessing Online Courses (Updated)
CETLA
 
App4 howelld
App4 howelldApp4 howelld
App4 howelld
howelldd
 
Persuasive presentation
Persuasive presentationPersuasive presentation
Persuasive presentation
jimmyessbee
 

La actualidad más candente (15)

CA12 Assessing Online Courses (Updated)
CA12 Assessing Online Courses (Updated)CA12 Assessing Online Courses (Updated)
CA12 Assessing Online Courses (Updated)
 
Distance education
Distance educationDistance education
Distance education
 
App4 howelld
App4 howelldApp4 howelld
App4 howelld
 
Job Talk (2007): University of Cincinnati
Job Talk (2007): University of CincinnatiJob Talk (2007): University of Cincinnati
Job Talk (2007): University of Cincinnati
 
Lessons learnt from using the Mobler App
Lessons learnt from using the Mobler AppLessons learnt from using the Mobler App
Lessons learnt from using the Mobler App
 
Coospace
CoospaceCoospace
Coospace
 
Formative Assessment using the Mobler App
Formative Assessment using the Mobler AppFormative Assessment using the Mobler App
Formative Assessment using the Mobler App
 
Using a Private Social Media Platform with Pharmacy Students
Using a Private Social Media Platform with Pharmacy StudentsUsing a Private Social Media Platform with Pharmacy Students
Using a Private Social Media Platform with Pharmacy Students
 
Job Talk: Research (2007) - Wayne State University
Job Talk: Research (2007) - Wayne State UniversityJob Talk: Research (2007) - Wayne State University
Job Talk: Research (2007) - Wayne State University
 
Hiring and Instruction-CritLib Theory and Action
Hiring and Instruction-CritLib Theory and ActionHiring and Instruction-CritLib Theory and Action
Hiring and Instruction-CritLib Theory and Action
 
Persuasive presentation
Persuasive presentationPersuasive presentation
Persuasive presentation
 
Online Teaching
Online Teaching Online Teaching
Online Teaching
 
Experience of Coursera Moocs
Experience of Coursera MoocsExperience of Coursera Moocs
Experience of Coursera Moocs
 
Structured Internet Learning for Geography 2002
Structured Internet Learning for Geography 2002Structured Internet Learning for Geography 2002
Structured Internet Learning for Geography 2002
 
A Study on Mobile Learning & Student's Engagement
A Study on Mobile Learning & Student's EngagementA Study on Mobile Learning & Student's Engagement
A Study on Mobile Learning & Student's Engagement
 

Similar a The effects of the learning management system on student satisfaction, performance, and course interaction

Ensuring quality in blended
Ensuring quality in blendedEnsuring quality in blended
Ensuring quality in blended
Tanya Joosten
 
Synchronous and asynchronous video conferencing tools
Synchronous and asynchronous video conferencing toolsSynchronous and asynchronous video conferencing tools
Synchronous and asynchronous video conferencing tools
David Wicks
 
Launching An OER Initiative at Your Institution
Launching An OER Initiative at Your InstitutionLaunching An OER Initiative at Your Institution
Launching An OER Initiative at Your Institution
Una Daly
 
Aeth presentation
Aeth presentationAeth presentation
Aeth presentation
ardeeach
 
Landscape of Online Learning- Presentation for Southwestern CC 2012
Landscape of Online Learning- Presentation for Southwestern CC 2012Landscape of Online Learning- Presentation for Southwestern CC 2012
Landscape of Online Learning- Presentation for Southwestern CC 2012
Dr. Ashley Skylar-Krohn
 
Tech course lesson plan
Tech course lesson planTech course lesson plan
Tech course lesson plan
benspu
 

Similar a The effects of the learning management system on student satisfaction, performance, and course interaction (20)

Introduction to blended learning
Introduction to blended learningIntroduction to blended learning
Introduction to blended learning
 
Designing Blended Introductory Computer Courses
Designing Blended Introductory Computer CoursesDesigning Blended Introductory Computer Courses
Designing Blended Introductory Computer Courses
 
VSS 2005 - Evaluation of the IVHS Course Development Process
VSS 2005 - Evaluation of the IVHS Course Development ProcessVSS 2005 - Evaluation of the IVHS Course Development Process
VSS 2005 - Evaluation of the IVHS Course Development Process
 
Evaluating Tools in the Higher Ed Classroom: What Works
Evaluating Tools in the Higher Ed Classroom: What WorksEvaluating Tools in the Higher Ed Classroom: What Works
Evaluating Tools in the Higher Ed Classroom: What Works
 
Ensuring quality in blended
Ensuring quality in blendedEnsuring quality in blended
Ensuring quality in blended
 
Synchronous and asynchronous video conferencing tools
Synchronous and asynchronous video conferencing toolsSynchronous and asynchronous video conferencing tools
Synchronous and asynchronous video conferencing tools
 
Survey says! Uncovering faculty support needs #DTL13
Survey says!  Uncovering faculty support needs #DTL13Survey says!  Uncovering faculty support needs #DTL13
Survey says! Uncovering faculty support needs #DTL13
 
Student leadership-and-digital-citizenship-1
Student leadership-and-digital-citizenship-1Student leadership-and-digital-citizenship-1
Student leadership-and-digital-citizenship-1
 
Ensuring quality in blended and online
Ensuring quality in blended and onlineEnsuring quality in blended and online
Ensuring quality in blended and online
 
Launching An OER Initiative at Your Institution
Launching An OER Initiative at Your InstitutionLaunching An OER Initiative at Your Institution
Launching An OER Initiative at Your Institution
 
Ensuring quality in blended and online: D2L Fusion
Ensuring quality in blended and online: D2L FusionEnsuring quality in blended and online: D2L Fusion
Ensuring quality in blended and online: D2L Fusion
 
Tools for Blended Learning Administrators
Tools for Blended Learning AdministratorsTools for Blended Learning Administrators
Tools for Blended Learning Administrators
 
SITE presentation webinar semingson owens
SITE presentation webinar semingson owensSITE presentation webinar semingson owens
SITE presentation webinar semingson owens
 
Aeth presentation
Aeth presentationAeth presentation
Aeth presentation
 
Preparing Instructors to Teach Online: Two Faculty Development Models
Preparing Instructors to Teach Online: Two Faculty Development ModelsPreparing Instructors to Teach Online: Two Faculty Development Models
Preparing Instructors to Teach Online: Two Faculty Development Models
 
Landscape of Online Learning- Presentation for Southwestern CC 2012
Landscape of Online Learning- Presentation for Southwestern CC 2012Landscape of Online Learning- Presentation for Southwestern CC 2012
Landscape of Online Learning- Presentation for Southwestern CC 2012
 
Online Design Concepts
Online Design ConceptsOnline Design Concepts
Online Design Concepts
 
Tech course lesson plan
Tech course lesson planTech course lesson plan
Tech course lesson plan
 
PLUTO Institute: Reasons for Choosing Blended Learning
PLUTO Institute: Reasons for Choosing Blended LearningPLUTO Institute: Reasons for Choosing Blended Learning
PLUTO Institute: Reasons for Choosing Blended Learning
 
So You Want to Teach Online?
So You Want to Teach Online?So You Want to Teach Online?
So You Want to Teach Online?
 

Último

1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
MateoGardella
 

Último (20)

SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch LetterGardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
Gardella_PRCampaignConclusion Pitch Letter
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 

The effects of the learning management system on student satisfaction, performance, and course interaction

  • 1. The Effects of the Learning Management System on Student Performance, Interaction and Course Ease of Use.! Philippos Savvides! Arizona State University - Online
  • 2. Effects of the LMS! •  Motivation of the study! •  Course creation process! •  Learning Management Systems! •  Method & Results! •  Discussion
  • 3. Motivation! •  2.31 million online students in the United States in 2004.! •  Make sure technologies we use are effective.! •  Lack of literature of the effects of LMS.! •  LMS transition.
  • 4. Course Development Process! •  Rapid Design! •  Gather information, design, develop.! •  Quality Matters Rubric
  • 5. Learning Management Systems! •  Automate the administration, documentation, tracking and reporting of courses.! •  Blackboard, Sakai, Moodle, LearningStudio (formerly eCollege) and others.
  • 6. Blackboard vs. LearningStudio! Both offer ! •  Exams, adaptive release, calendar, chat, discussion boards, gradebook, group management, document submission.
  • 9. Research Questions! What is the relationship between:! 1. the LMS and student perceived ease of use?! 2. the LMS and student perceived course interaction?! 3. the LMS and student performance?
  • 10. Hypothesis! Students who participated in courses delivered in LearningStudio will report higher course interaction, ease of use, and performance.
  • 11. Method! •  58, 7-week online courses.! •  27 in Blackboard 9; 31 in LearningStudio.! •  1,596 students solicited! •  796 in Blackboard; 840 in LearningStudio! •  277 responded (17%)! •  126 in Blackboard; 151 in LearningStudio.
  • 12. Student Characteristics Gender! Ethnicity! College Work Experience! Hours! Male! 25.9%! Caucasian! 62.8%! < 2 years! 4.7%! Female! 74.1%! African American! 8.1%! Credits Enrolled! GPA! # of online classes! Do not work! 3 - 6! 20.9%! 12.8%! 4.0 - 3.5! 44.2%! First! 0%! 2 years! 10.1%! < 20! 19.6%! 7 -12! 33.1%! 3.49 - 3.0! 28.6%! 1-3! 0.7%! Hispanic! 18.2%! 3 years! 27.7%! 20-29! 14.9%! 13 - 18! 48.6%! 2.99 - 2.5! 19%! 4-6! 1.4%! Asian American! 2.7%! > 3! 57.4%! 30-40! 19.6%! 19 - 21 ! 4.1%! 2.49 - 2.0! 6.8%! 7-10! 0%! Native American! 1.4%! 41-59! 21.6%! > 21! 1.4%! < 2.0! 1.4%! > 10! 98%! Other! 6.8%! > 60 hours! 3.4%!
  • 13. Perceived Ease of Use! 1. It was easy to navigate the course.! 2. It was easy to communicate with the instructor.! 3. It was easy to communicate with other students.! 4. It was easy to access the course materials.! 5. It was easy to submit an assignment.! 6. It was easy to participate in online discussions.! 7. It was easy to take quizzes and/or exams online.! 8. It was easy to access the gradebook.! 9. It was easy for me to become skillful at using the online course.! 10. I found the online course easy to use.! 11. The overall usability of the online course was good. F (1,236) = 3.42, p = .98! η2 = .01
  • 14. Perceived Course Interaction! 1. My online course is setup so that I can interact with my classmates.! 2. Interaction between the instructor and students is essential to online learning.! 3. The quality of discussions in my online course is high.! 4. The lecture material in my online course is valuable to course interaction.! 5. Interaction between students is essential to online learning.! 6. The amount of interaction with other students (decreased/increased).! 7. The quality of interaction with other students (decreased/increased).! 8. The amount of interaction with the instructor (decreased/increased).! 9. The quality of interaction with the instructor (decreased/increased). F (1,235) = 10.11, p = .002! η2 = .04
  • 15. Student Performance! 1. What grade did you receive in your course? F (1,217) = .011, p = .917! η2 = .00