Scientists and Lawyers often have quite different perspectives on scientific research and the systems that support it. Reconciling those is one of the keys to a successful electronic lab notebook project.
1. Scientists & Lawers
Walking the Tightrope
Simon Coles
CTO
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 1
2. A copy of this
presentation can be
downloaded from my
blog
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 2
3. What we do
• We make Lawyer’s lives less stressful – we hope!
• Software & expertise
• Which helps you to Create & Preserve evidence of
Scientific activity
• In a reliable, consistent manner
• Without stressing the scientists too much
• And without costing a fortune
• Organisations of all sizes, in many different
industries, around the world
• Primary problem is US Patent Law but there’s lots
of other considerations too
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 3
6. Two different worlds
• Scientists & IP Lawyers need each other
• But they live in very different worlds
• They have contrasting interests
• The relationship between the two can be a little
stressful
• Especially under the US “First to Invent” system
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 5
8. Scientists’ World
• Creativity
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 6
9. Scientists’ World
• Creativity
• Change
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 6
10. Scientists’ World
• Creativity
• Change
• The science is the main event
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 6
11. Scientists’ World
• Creativity
• Change
• The science is the main event
• Record keeping for other people’s benefit is at
best a sideshow
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 6
12. Scientists’ World
• Creativity
• Change
• The science is the main event
• Record keeping for other people’s benefit is at
best a sideshow
• Little interest in the long term implications of
their Notebooks
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 6
13. Scientists’ World
• Creativity
• Change
• The science is the main event
• Record keeping for other people’s benefit is at
best a sideshow
• Little interest in the long term implications of
their Notebooks
• Little interest in Legal Discovery implications of
keeping everything forever
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 6
15. IP Lawyers’ World
• Charged with keeping the company out of
trouble
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 7
16. IP Lawyers’ World
• Charged with keeping the company out of
trouble
• And being able to profit from IP, often by
Patents or Trade Secrets
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 7
17. IP Lawyers’ World
• Charged with keeping the company out of
trouble
• And being able to profit from IP, often by
Patents or Trade Secrets
• Defend the company when needed
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 7
18. What most lawyers need
• You need to know what they’ve actually
invented!
• For US Patents
• Good evidence of scientific activity
• Demonstrate a priority date of invention
• Conception, Reduction to Practice, Diligence
• For Governments, Auditors, Tax authorities
• What your scientists did, where, and when
• Evidence to overcome concerns of Scientific
Fraud
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 8
19. US Patent Law
• In most cases US Patent concerns are why
people are cautious about moving away from
Paper Notebooks
• This concern is less of an issue, but you still
need to be careful
• There are other more complex problems
starting to bubble up
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 9
20. Electronic Evidence
• March 10 1998, Official Gazette
Admissibility of electronic records in
interferences:
Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.671, electronic records are
admissible as evidence in interferences before the Board
of Patent Appeals and Interferences to the same extent
that electronic records are admissible under the Federal
Rules of Evidence. The weight to be given any particular
record necessarily must be determined on a case-by-case
basis.
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 10
21. US Patent Reform
• If it happens…
• Won’t remove the need to Create & Preserve
detailed records of inventive activity
• Requirement to demonstrate inventorship & date
• Could well cause other patenting authorities to
require records too
• Introduction of the one year “Grace Period” for
prior art
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 11
23. The Problem
• Getting scientists to create good, reliable Lab
Notebooks was hard enough before computers
came along
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 12
24. The Problem
• Getting scientists to create good, reliable Lab
Notebooks was hard enough before computers
came along
• In the modern lab, it is even harder
• They’re working electronically
• Often with no regard for Records Management
issues, Discovery implications etc.
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 12
25. The Problem
• Getting scientists to create good, reliable Lab
Notebooks was hard enough before computers
came along
• In the modern lab, it is even harder
• They’re working electronically
• Often with no regard for Records Management
issues, Discovery implications etc.
• They’re working electronically and their only
notebook is a paper one!
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 12
26. The Problem
• You need consistent practices across the
organisation
• For diverse scientific activity
• Even for every large companies
• You also need to deal with per-country niceties
• And all the other reasons you need notebooks
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 13
27. Discovery Problems, too
• Everyone knows Electronic records admissible
and useful in US Patent disputes
• But if you end up in a fight, anything you’ve got
to disclose everything you have
• Unless you’ve got a really good records
management programme, there’s going to be a lot
of stuff
• Most of the time this can’t help you, and might
well hurt you
• And it will cost a fortune to find and disclose!
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 14
28. This Presentation
• Typical issues
• Some of the basic lessons which seem to crop
up time and again
• Some tools to help you explore some tricky
issues
• Some of the common pitfalls
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 15
29. Typical issues
in the Notebook Process
• Who keeps Notebooks
• What they put in them
• What they keep elsewhere
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 16
30. People aren’t keeping
notebooks properly
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 17
31. People aren’t keeping
notebooks properly
• Typically in most larger organistions
• 20% of the people who are laboriously creating
notebooks (fully witnessed) don’t need to
because their work isn’t IP sensitive
• A fair number of the most prolific inventors
aren’t keeping notebooks at all and there’s very
little evidence of their work
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 17
32. People aren’t keeping
notebooks properly
• Typically in most larger organistions
• 20% of the people who are laboriously creating
notebooks (fully witnessed) don’t need to
because their work isn’t IP sensitive
• A fair number of the most prolific inventors
aren’t keeping notebooks at all and there’s very
little evidence of their work
• Most companies have a very low compliance
with their paper process for signing &
witnessing
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 17
33. They’re writing the wrong
stuff down
• Often very difficult for scientists to know what
they should be writing up
• Some think all that matters is data, when we
really care about what was going on in their
brains
• Need simple guidance which can be applied in a
variety of situations
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 18
34. They keep too much stuff
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 19
35. They keep too much stuff
• Most scientists view any data as valuable
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 19
36. They keep too much stuff
• Most scientists view any data as valuable
• So they keep everything
• Generally anywhere
• With little indexing
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 19
37. They keep too much stuff
• Most scientists view any data as valuable
• So they keep everything
• Generally anywhere
• With little indexing
• A nightmare when it comes to legal discovery
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 19
38. They keep too much stuff
• Most scientists view any data as valuable
• So they keep everything
• Generally anywhere
• With little indexing
• A nightmare when it comes to legal discovery
• Your Records Manager is your best friend
• A well thought and consistent Records
Management process is your best asset
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 19
39. They keep too much stuff
• Most scientists view any data as valuable
• So they keep everything
• Generally anywhere
• With little indexing
• A nightmare when it comes to legal discovery
• Your Records Manager is your best friend
• A well thought and consistent Records
Management process is your best asset
• This isn’t really a Notebook problem – but it is
your problem
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 19
41. Some good news
• A properly designed Patent Evidence system will
give you better more reliable records than the
existing paper system
• And save an awful lot of scientist time!
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 20
42. Some good news
• A properly designed Patent Evidence system will
give you better more reliable records than the
existing paper system
• And save an awful lot of scientist time!
• With an electronic system you get a much
better idea of what’s really going on
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 20
43. Some good news
• A properly designed Patent Evidence system will
give you better more reliable records than the
existing paper system
• And save an awful lot of scientist time!
• With an electronic system you get a much
better idea of what’s really going on
• You will get very high levels of compliance with
your requirements
• For example documents tend to be witnessed in
less than an hour compared to weeks
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 20
44. SOP design
• Most Standard Operating Procedures are
• Too detailed & specific
• Too long
• Better to have a simple SOP which describes
what you want
• “All scientists should write up their experiments
in an approved Lab Notebook such that someone
skilled in the art can reproduce their work”
• etc.
• Then have guidance documents for each area
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 21
45. Some tools for dealing with
diversity
• Many projects get stuck on the sheer
complexity of the scientific process
• Especially in larger firms
• With many different spheres of activity
• Two frameworks which might help
• Look at the diversity of activity and where to put
your attention
• Tease out what data is important and what isn’t
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 22
47. Dealing with Diversity
Medicinal Chemistry
Process Chemistry
Molecular Biology
Pharmacology
Etc.
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 23
48. Dealing with Diversity
Corporate aspects
(Records, IP protection, Sharing)
Medicinal Chemistry
Process Chemistry
Molecular Biology
Pharmacology
Etc.
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 23
49. Dealing with Diversity
Corporate aspects
(Records, IP protection, Sharing)
Medicinal Chemistry
Process Chemistry
Molecular Biology
Let them use
Pharmacology
whatever systems
they want here
Etc.
(because they will
anyway)
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 23
50. Dealing with Diversity
Corporate aspects Focus IP concerns
here
(Records, IP protection, Sharing)
Medicinal Chemistry
Process Chemistry
Molecular Biology
Let them use
Pharmacology
whatever systems
they want here
Etc.
(because they will
anyway)
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 23
51. Dealing with Diversity
Corporate aspects Focus IP concerns
here
(Records, IP protection, Sharing)
Medicinal Chemistry
Process Chemistry
Molecular Biology
Pharmacology s
Let them use
o whatever systems
ha
they want here
C
Etc.
(because they will
ive
anyway)
at
re
C
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 23
52. Dealing with Diversity
y s,
nc es
te oc
Corporate aspects
sis , Pr
Focus IP concerns
on e
C lin
here
(Records, IP protection, Sharing)
ip
isc
D
Medicinal Chemistry
Process Chemistry
Molecular Biology
Pharmacology s
Let them use
o whatever systems
ha
they want here
C
Etc.
(because they will
ive
anyway)
at
re
C
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 23
53. Don’t be tempted
• Don’t be tempted to mix where the scientists
work, and the record keeping system
• We tried that with the paper notebook and that
didn’t work out well for anyone
• Creates lots of issues for introduction &
ownership
• Also, don’t mix systems for IP protection and
Regulatory Compliance
• Different problems
• Very hard (impossible?) to do in one place
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 24
54. What’s Important
• Most scientific activity
creates electronic “Stuff”
• Some of this is more
useful than others
•
Programmes
Useful to look at things
as a pyramid Projects
Experiments
Interpreted Data/Reports
Raw Data
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 25
55. What’s Important
• Most scientific activity
creates electronic “Stuff”
• Some of this is more
useful than others
•
Programmes
Useful to look at things
as a pyramid Projects
Experiments
Not so interesting, Long Term Interpreted Data/Reports
Harder to preserve anyway Raw Data
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 25
56. What goes in the notebook
Programmes
Projects
Corporate aspects Experiments
(Records, IP protection, Sharing)
Process Chemistry
Interpreted Data/Reports
Molecular Biology
Pharmacology
Chemistry
Medicinal
Raw Data
Etc.
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 26
57. What goes in the notebook
• Nothing need change from the paper notebook
process
• Just because you can dump loads of raw data in,
doesn’t mean you need to
• Scientists will often need specific guidance on
what to put in for different circumstances
• Often what’s currently happening isn’t what you
need
• One advantage of an electronic system is you can
sample what they’re doing and offer gentle
assistance
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 27
58. Diversity
• Doesn’t have to be a killer problem
• Moving to an electronic system will make things
a lot easier
• However you will uncover issues which have
remained hidden
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 28
59. Pitfalls for the unwary
• Communication gaps
• IT departments
• Records Management
• Commercial issues
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 29
60. Communication Gaps
• The general Patent Evidence problem bridges many
departments
• Legal, Scientists, Management, Business Development,
Quality, Librarians etc.
• In most companies the conversation that created the
current process happened generations ago
• When you try to modernise this process for the
electronic world
• You need to re-have that conversation with new
assumptions
• And you now have to involve a new player, IT!
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 30
61. Communication Gaps
• It seems that there’s precious little common
ground between some of these groups
• A surprising amount of our time is spent helping
these groups talk with each other
• One powerful tool is the “Fire Drill”
• Take a notebook record “Into court”
• “Depose” the scientist
• Then start asking difficult questions of IT
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 31
62. Fire Drill outcomes
• Everyone finds them very useful
• Scientists often had no idea what would happen
• Radically change how they write things up
• IT had no idea what happens when a bunch of
lawyers start asking questions
• Everyone now understands the fuller picture
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 32
64. IT Departments
• IT is unfortunately generally charged with keeping
costs low
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 33
65. IT Departments
• IT is unfortunately generally charged with keeping
costs low
• Unfortunately this means “IT costs”
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 33
66. IT Departments
• IT is unfortunately generally charged with keeping
costs low
• Unfortunately this means “IT costs”
• There are plenty of times where optimising for
low IT costs
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 33
67. IT Departments
• IT is unfortunately generally charged with keeping
costs low
• Unfortunately this means “IT costs”
• There are plenty of times where optimising for
low IT costs
• Increases legal costs
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 33
68. IT Departments
• IT is unfortunately generally charged with keeping
costs low
• Unfortunately this means “IT costs”
• There are plenty of times where optimising for
low IT costs
• Increases legal costs
• Increases legal risk
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 33
69. IT Departments
• IT is unfortunately generally charged with keeping
costs low
• Unfortunately this means “IT costs”
• There are plenty of times where optimising for
low IT costs
• Increases legal costs
• Increases legal risk
• Could completely imperil the evidence you’ve
created
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 33
70. IT Departments
• IT is unfortunately generally charged with keeping
costs low
• Unfortunately this means “IT costs”
• There are plenty of times where optimising for
low IT costs
• Increases legal costs
• Increases legal risk
• Could completely imperil the evidence you’ve
created
• Most IT groups need a fire drill to internalise this
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 33
71. Records Management
• The unsung heros of organisations
• Make sure you nominate a Custodian of every
IP-critical system you have, at the outset
• Most IT tools have well-meaning features which
are really nasty from a records perspective
• e.g. regulatory systems which create masses of
unhelpful detailed data with no way of purging it
• Few IT tools are built with long term records
involved
• It really isn’t in the vendor’s interest to worry
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 34
72. Commercial Issues
• Most industrial organisations work with
partners & governments
• Those contracts contain clauses around
confidentiality, “Chinese Walls”, records
retention etc.
• Few IT tools deal gracefully with these issues
• Worse, few organisations have an efficient and
reliable process for getting the Information
required to implement these contracts
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 35
73. Summary
• IP concerns are often not really something a
scientist worries about
• The situation in most organisations could
certainly do with some improvement
• An Electronic system can really help improve IP
protection, and make scientists happy
• But it does need a little care
• We’d love to talk further…
http://www.amphora-research.com/
My blog: http://elnblog.com 36