SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 11
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Page |1
 
     EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A
         SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS FROM APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY


                                       Larry E. Cole, Ph.D.
                                         TeamMax, Inc.
                                      5 East Towering Pines
                                       Conway, AR 72032
                                        Tel: 800/880-1728
                                        Fax: 501/327-4116
                                      E-mail: lcole@cei.net

                                     Michael S. Cole, Ph.D.
                                   Department of Management
                                   Texas Christian University
                                     Fort Worth, TX 76109
                                       Tel: 817/257-6796
                                       Fax: 817/257-7227
                                    E-mail: m.s.cole@tcu.edu


                                       INTRODUCTION

       In his seminal 1976 review of the job satisfaction literature, Locke observed that more

than 3,300 scholarly articles had been published on the topic of job satisfaction. Harter, Schmidt,

and Hayes’ (2002) search yielded another 7,855 articles having been published between 1976

and 2000. As the increase in research studies suggests, the notion that workplace attitudes (e.g.,

job satisfaction) might be positively connected with performance outcomes continues to intrigue

academic scholars as well as practicing managers. The majority of the research examining the

employee satisfaction-performance relationship has been conducted on the micro-level of

analysis, otherwise known as the individual employee level. For example, research has reported a

positive correlation between individuals’ job attitudes and their performance (r = .17; Iaffaldano

& Muchinsky, 1985). Moreover, a recent meta-analysis found a substantive correlation between
Page |2
 
individual job satisfaction and individual performance (r = .30; Judge, Thoresen, Bono, &

Patton, 2001).1

              As Schneider , Hanges, Smith, and Salvaggio (2003) recently observed, researchers’

micro-orientation towards the job attitude-performance relationship is somewhat perplexing,

given that the interest in employee attitudes had much of its impetus in the 1960s when

organizational scientists such as Argyris (1964), Likert (1961), and McGregor (1960) suggested

that the way employees experience their work would be reflected in organizational performance.

Historically, the job satisfaction-performance linkage has been primarily discussed by theorists

from the Socio-technical and Human Relations schools of thought. According to the Socio-

technical approach (e.g., Emery & Trist, 1960), organizational performance depends on

congruence between the technical and social structures of the organization. Building on this

notion, the Human Relations perspective posits that satisfied workers are productive workers

(e.g., Likert, 1961; McGregor, 1960). Thus, organizational productivity and efficiency is

achieved through employee satisfaction and attention to employees’ physical as well as socio-

emotional needs. Human relations researchers further argue that employee satisfaction

sentiments are best achieved through maintaining a positive social organizational environment,

such as by providing autonomy, participation, and mutual trust (Likert, 1961). Based on this

logic, employee satisfaction is believed to influence the development of routine patterns of

interaction within organizations. Through mutual interactions, employees develop relationships

with coworkers that also prescribe behavioral expectations and influence behaviors (e.g., norms

or informal standards of acceptable behavior). For example, an unhappy employee could be


                                                            
1
  A meta-analysis statistically combines the results of several studies that address a set of related
research hypotheses. A meta-analytically derived correlation is a more accurate estimate of the
true population correlation coefficient. 
Page |3
 
prevented from lowering their performance by control mechanisms (e.g., standards of

measurement, supervisory influence); however, widespread dissatisfaction among employees

could lead to a strike or sabotage that might hinder an organization’s effectiveness. Alternatively,

dissatisfied employees might choose to maintain performance levels (due to control mechanisms)

but neglect to inform supervisors of important information that, over time, would result in lower

organizational effectiveness or efficiency. Thus, employees’ job satisfaction sentiments are

important because they can determine collaborative effort. Consistent with this reasoning, Likert

(1961) has argued that collaborative effort directed towards the organization’s goals is necessary

for achievement of organizational objectives, with unhappy employees failing to participate

(effectively) in such efforts. In sum, available theory supports the contention that the satisfaction

level of employees (as a whole) may relate to performance at the business-unit and/or

organizational levels.

       From a practical vantage, conducting research at the business-unit and/or organizational

level is believed important because this is the level of analysis at which employees’ survey data

are commonly reported to client organizations (Harter et al., 2002). Empirical research at higher

level units of analysis (strategic business units or SBUs, across many organizations, etc.) also

afford applied researchers and managers with the opportunity to establish empirical linkages to

salient outcomes that are directly relevant – including profitability, productivity, efficiency,

employee turnover, safety, and customer loyalty and satisfaction.

                               REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

       Although it has been more common to investigate employee attitude data at the

individual employee level, researchers have begun to explore similar relationships at the

business-unit level and the organizational level. Research conducted under the rubric of
Page |4
 
organizational climate has had success in aggregating individual employees’ perceptions and

investigating their relationship to both organizational-level and individual-level outcomes (see,

e.g., Schneider, White, & Paul, 1998; Zohar & Luria, 2005). In addition, there are a handful of

studies that have explored the relationship between aggregated employee job satisfaction

attitudes and organizational (or unit-level) performance.

       Ostroff (1992), studying a sample of 364 schools, investigated the relationship between

employees’ attitudes and organizational performance. Ostroff found that aggregated teacher

attitudes such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment were concurrently related to

school performance, as measured by several performance outcomes such as student academic

achievement and teacher turnover rates. Across 12 organizational performance indexes, the

magnitudes of the correlations between teacher satisfaction and performance ranged from .11 to

.54, with a mean of .28. When the unique characteristics of the schools were statistically

controlled for, teacher satisfaction and other job-related attitudes continued to predict many of

the organizational performance outcomes. Results were strongest for teacher satisfaction; thus,

organizations with more satisfied employees tended to be more effective than organizations with

dissatisfied employees. This study indicates that satisfaction is an important social process factor

that fosters organizational effectiveness. The major limitation of this study pertains to the nature

of the study sample; all organizations were secondary schools. The extent to which similar

relationships would hold for organizations in other types of industries (manufacturing, service,

etc) and occupations cannot be determined.

       Ryan, Schmitt, and Johnson (1996) investigated similar relationships between aggregated

employee attitudes, firm productivity, and customer satisfaction. The authors measured these

relationships at two points in time from 142 branches of an auto finance company. Results
Page |5
 
indicated employee morale was related to subsequent business performance indicators, customer

satisfaction sentiments, and turnover ratios. These researchers attempted to study the causal

relations among the variables; however, their attempts lead to mostly inconclusive findings.

Interestingly, they did find evidence suggestive of customer satisfaction as a causal influence on

morale (a finding that is opposite of the directionality assumed by the literature). Although a

tentative finding, Ryan et al. (1996) discussed several possible explanations for it. For instance,

the customer satisfaction index was monitored closely by unit managers and success or failure

likely translated into management practices that influenced employees’ job attitudes. Moreover,

the researchers speculated that the particular setting may be unusual in that customer satisfaction

might be inversely related to the amount of contact with the organization (e.g., customers

without problems with the processing of their payments are likely to have less interaction with

company representatives than customers with such problems). Similar to Ostroff’s (1992) study,

the major concern with Ryan et al.’s (1996) research is that the data were all from one

organization which limits the generalizability of the findings.

       In a unique study conducted by Harter et al. (2002), the authors conducted a meta-

analysis of studies previously conducted by The Gallup Organization. The study examined

aggregated employee job satisfaction sentiments and employee engagement, with the latter

variable referring to individual’s involvement with as well as enthusiasm for work. Based on

7,939 business units in 36 organizations, the researchers found positive and substantive

correlations between employee satisfaction-engagement and the business unit outcomes of

productivity, profit, employee turnover, employee accidents, and customer satisfaction. More

importantly, these researchers explored the practical utility of the observed relationships. For

example, business units in the top quartile on the employee engagement measure yielded 1 to 4
Page |6
 
percentage points higher profitability. Similar findings were found for productivity. Specifically,

business units in the top quartile on employee engagement had, on average, from $80,000 to

$120,000 higher monthly revenue or sales. Based on these data, it seems clear that aggregated

measures of employee satisfaction and employee engagement are meaningfully related to

business outcomes at a magnitude that is important to many (if not all) organizations. In

comparison to prior studies, the strength of Harter and his colleagues’ research is the large

number of participants (n = 198,514), business units (n = 7,939), and firms (n = 36) included,

thereby providing a level of precision and statistical power rarely found in scholarly (i.e., non-

proprietary) research.

       Schneider et al. (2003) report analyses of employee attitude survey data aggregated to the

organizational level of analysis. These authors explored the relationships between several facets

of employee satisfaction and organizational financial (return on assets; ROA) and market

performance (earnings per share; EPS) using data from 35 organizations over a period of eight

years. Thus, in contrast to previous studies, Schneider and his colleagues’ study was able to

make some inferences about directional causality (i.e., are employee attitudes a stronger cause of

organizational performance than the reverse). Their results showed consistent and statistically

significant positive relationships (over varied time lags) between attitudes concerning

satisfaction with security, satisfaction with pay, and overall job satisfaction with financial (ROA)

and market performance (EPS). Although these findings are consistent with applied researchers’

and managers’ implicit beliefs, their study was not without some surprises. One of the more

surprising findings was related to overall job satisfaction and the performance criteria. Results

demonstrated that the causal directionality flows from financial and market performance to

overall job satisfaction. This latter result does not deny the fact that there were significant
Page |7
 
relations going from overall job satisfaction to ROA and EPS; nevertheless, the reverse direction

relationships tended to be stronger in magnitude. Moreover, the relationship between satisfaction

with pay and the performance indicators appeared to be reciprocal in nature. The obvious

strength of this research study is the longitudinal nature of both the aggregated employee data

and the financial and market performance data. By collecting longitudinal data on both sets of

variables, these researchers were able to examine and begin to disentangle a set of very important

but complex relationships.

Are companies with happy workers more productive companies?

       One major issue regarding many of the reviewed studies relates to the causal nature of the

relationship between aggregated employee satisfaction and organizational (or unit-level)

performance. The implicit belief both in academe and practice is that the relationship runs from

employee satisfaction sentiments to organizational effectiveness and efficiency outcomes.

Moreover, this implicit assumption is apparent in the research studies reviewed here. That is, the

attitude data were typically collected at one time period and performance outcomes were

concurrently collected or at multiple time periods following the collection of the employee

attitude data. The study conducted by Schneider et al. (2003) suggests that collecting data in this

fashion may lead researchers to draw erroneous conclusions because their data prevent them

from discovering significantly stronger relationships for performance causing satisfaction. It

could be argued, for example, that employees who are in higher performing organizations are

more likely to be satisfied than those in lower performing organizations simply because their

organizations are doing well. Indeed, this causal pattern was found in the study conducted by

Schneider and his colleagues (2003). Specifically, their data supported causal relationships

between financial and market performance outcomes and employees’ overall job satisfaction and
Page |8
 
satisfaction for security. Although more research is needed before concrete conclusions are

drawn, Schneider et al.’s (2003) research demonstrates that employees can derive satisfaction

from the knowledge or feedback that their organization is performing well and is accomplishing

its goals – a finding that is in stark contrast to the presumption found in the academic literature

(see, e.g., Likert, 1961).

        When we consider the studies collectively, directional causality may work in both

directions; employee satisfaction causes organizational performance and vice versa. Therefore,

it seems most likely that reciprocal relationships exist and that, as noted by Gross and Etzioni

(1985), “organizational reality and human happiness go hand and hand” (p. 4). Thus, although

directions of causality remain unresolved, initial evidence suggests that aggregate employee

attitudes have connections with organizational performance outcomes.

What can we do to create happy employees, then?

        Given the fact that significant and practically important relationships exist between

aggregated employee attitudes and organizational performance, it is important to question what

factors contribute to satisfaction. The predominant view has focused on the situational context

(e.g., supervisory support) as a cause of satisfaction and has argued that high-performance work

practices and thus a positive working climate foster employee satisfaction (see, e.g., Bowen, &

Ostroff, 2004; Wright, Dunford, & Snell, 2001; Wright, Gardner, Moynihan, & Allen, 2005).

This rationale is consistent with recent research on the impact of financial and nonfinancial

incentives (e.g., training) on business-unit outcomes. For example, Peterson and Luthans (2006)

used a quasi-experimental, control group design and found that both types of incentives had a

significant impact on store profit, customer service, and employee turnover. Initially, the

financial incentive had a greater effect on all three outcomes (as one might expect). But over
Page |9
 
time, however, the financial and nonfinancial incentives exhibited equally significant impacts on

two of the three outcomes (the exception was employee turnover).

A brief comment on the need for a multidimensional measure of performance.

       Researchers have suggested that organizational effectiveness most likely reflects the

combination and interaction of employee work behaviors that promote organizational

performance (e.g., Ostroff, 1992). In other words, the definition of organizational performance

may be too limited and narrow. Outcomes such as attendance, compliance, following of rules,

cooperation, sabotage, and so on may also be important; however, such outcomes are usually not

included in organizational performance criteria. Accordingly, we suggest that organizations

wishing to explore the empirical connections between aggregated employee attitudes and

organizational outcomes consider a wider range of performance-related outcomes.

                                         CONCLUSION

       The current understanding of how aggregated employee attitudes influence and are

influenced by important business outcomes is limited. Based on the evidence to date, we

conclude that employee satisfaction is related to meaningful business outcomes and that these

relationships generalize across companies (and industries). Research efforts directed at further

exploring these issues are sorely needed, and we believe there is potential for longitudinal

research in the area of aggregated employee satisfaction. For example, future research should

emphasize research designs that study changes in employee satisfaction and the causes of such

changes. Through such longitudinal designs, the connections between aggregated job attitudes

and performance can be more fully understood. At this point, evidence of directionality would

suggest not only some directionality from employee attitudes to business outcomes (as well as

the reverse) but also a reciprocal relationship in some cases!
P a g e | 10
 
                                        REFERENCES

Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley.

Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of

      "strength" of the HR system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203-221.

Emery, R. E., & Trist, E. L. (1960). Socio-technical systems. In C. W. Churchman and M.

       Verhulst (Eds.), Management science models and techniques (Vol. 2, pp. 83-97).

       Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

Gross, E., & Etzioni, A. (1985). Organizations in society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit level relationship between

       employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis.

       Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.

Iaffaldano, M. T., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-

       analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 251-273.

Likert, R. L. (1961). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.

McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Organ, D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes-performance

       hypothesis. Academy of Management Review, 2, 46-53.

Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An

       organizational Level Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963-974.

Peterson, S. J., & Luthans, F. (2006). The impact of financial and nonfinancial incentives on

       business-unit outcomes over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 156-165.

Ryan, A. M., Schmitt, M. J., & Johnson, R. (1996). Attitudes and effectiveness: Examining

       relations at an organizational level. Personnel Psychology, 49, 853-882.
P a g e | 11
 
Schneider, B., & Schmitt, N. (1986). Staffing organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Schneider, B., Hanges, P. J., Smith, D. B., & Salvaggio, A. N. (2003). Which comes first:

       Employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? Journal of

       Applied Psychology, 88, 836-851.

Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer

       perceptions of service quality: Tests of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology,

       83, 150-163.

Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based

      view of the firm. Journal of Management, 18, 295-320.

Wright, P. M., Gardner, T. M., Moynihan, L. M., & Allen, M. R. (2005). The relationship

      between HR practices and firm performance: Examining causal order. Personnel

      Psychology, 58, 409-446.

Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships

       between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 616-

       628.

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

14771721 job-satisfaction-research-project-report
14771721 job-satisfaction-research-project-report14771721 job-satisfaction-research-project-report
14771721 job-satisfaction-research-project-reportSuresh Bandekar
 
Synopsis for employee satisfaction program with reference to Pescafresh
Synopsis  for employee satisfaction program with reference to Pescafresh Synopsis  for employee satisfaction program with reference to Pescafresh
Synopsis for employee satisfaction program with reference to Pescafresh VaishnaviDesai21
 
Project report on Employee Satisfaction
 Project report on Employee Satisfaction Project report on Employee Satisfaction
Project report on Employee SatisfactionMegha Sanghavi
 
PROJECT ON JOB SATISFACTION
PROJECT ON JOB SATISFACTIONPROJECT ON JOB SATISFACTION
PROJECT ON JOB SATISFACTIONPavani Guduru
 
A study on work environment and commitment of employees
A study on work environment and commitment of employeesA study on work environment and commitment of employees
A study on work environment and commitment of employeesProjects Kart
 
21784998 job-satisfaction-project-report
21784998 job-satisfaction-project-report21784998 job-satisfaction-project-report
21784998 job-satisfaction-project-reportRamesh Mariyappa
 
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH.pdf
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH.pdfA STUDY ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH.pdf
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH.pdfAjitKumarRoy7
 
Employee motivation total project
Employee motivation total projectEmployee motivation total project
Employee motivation total projectShaik Ahmed
 
HR PROJECT REPORT - DISSERTATION HELP MBA
HR PROJECT REPORT - DISSERTATION HELP MBAHR PROJECT REPORT - DISSERTATION HELP MBA
HR PROJECT REPORT - DISSERTATION HELP MBAmba project reports
 
Employee engagement report
Employee engagement reportEmployee engagement report
Employee engagement reportSripRiya Iduri
 
A study on employee job satisfaction h r final project
A study on employee job satisfaction h r final projectA study on employee job satisfaction h r final project
A study on employee job satisfaction h r final projectProjects Kart
 
PROJECT REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION (sample)
PROJECT REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION (sample)PROJECT REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION (sample)
PROJECT REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION (sample)Ajeesh Mk
 
SIP on Ir scenario at NALCO damonjodi FINAL REPORT
SIP on Ir scenario at NALCO damonjodi FINAL REPORTSIP on Ir scenario at NALCO damonjodi FINAL REPORT
SIP on Ir scenario at NALCO damonjodi FINAL REPORTtanmayagudla
 
Kalaivani - JOB SATISFACTION II
Kalaivani - JOB SATISFACTION IIKalaivani - JOB SATISFACTION II
Kalaivani - JOB SATISFACTION IIKalaivani K
 
summer internship project on Training Need Assessment for Industrial employee...
summer internship project on Training Need Assessment for Industrial employee...summer internship project on Training Need Assessment for Industrial employee...
summer internship project on Training Need Assessment for Industrial employee...Zubair Inam Barbhuiya
 
Recruitment and selection process synopsis
Recruitment and selection process synopsisRecruitment and selection process synopsis
Recruitment and selection process synopsisNesar Ahmad
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Job satisfaction
Job satisfactionJob satisfaction
Job satisfaction
 
14771721 job-satisfaction-research-project-report
14771721 job-satisfaction-research-project-report14771721 job-satisfaction-research-project-report
14771721 job-satisfaction-research-project-report
 
Synopsis for employee satisfaction program with reference to Pescafresh
Synopsis  for employee satisfaction program with reference to Pescafresh Synopsis  for employee satisfaction program with reference to Pescafresh
Synopsis for employee satisfaction program with reference to Pescafresh
 
Project report on Employee Satisfaction
 Project report on Employee Satisfaction Project report on Employee Satisfaction
Project report on Employee Satisfaction
 
PROJECT ON JOB SATISFACTION
PROJECT ON JOB SATISFACTIONPROJECT ON JOB SATISFACTION
PROJECT ON JOB SATISFACTION
 
A study on work environment and commitment of employees
A study on work environment and commitment of employeesA study on work environment and commitment of employees
A study on work environment and commitment of employees
 
21784998 job-satisfaction-project-report
21784998 job-satisfaction-project-report21784998 job-satisfaction-project-report
21784998 job-satisfaction-project-report
 
Job satisfaction
Job satisfactionJob satisfaction
Job satisfaction
 
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH.pdf
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH.pdfA STUDY ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH.pdf
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH.pdf
 
Employee motivation total project
Employee motivation total projectEmployee motivation total project
Employee motivation total project
 
Job satisfaction
Job satisfactionJob satisfaction
Job satisfaction
 
OVERALL JOB SATISFACTION
OVERALL JOB SATISFACTIONOVERALL JOB SATISFACTION
OVERALL JOB SATISFACTION
 
HR PROJECT REPORT - DISSERTATION HELP MBA
HR PROJECT REPORT - DISSERTATION HELP MBAHR PROJECT REPORT - DISSERTATION HELP MBA
HR PROJECT REPORT - DISSERTATION HELP MBA
 
Employee engagement report
Employee engagement reportEmployee engagement report
Employee engagement report
 
A study on employee job satisfaction h r final project
A study on employee job satisfaction h r final projectA study on employee job satisfaction h r final project
A study on employee job satisfaction h r final project
 
PROJECT REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION (sample)
PROJECT REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION (sample)PROJECT REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION (sample)
PROJECT REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION (sample)
 
SIP on Ir scenario at NALCO damonjodi FINAL REPORT
SIP on Ir scenario at NALCO damonjodi FINAL REPORTSIP on Ir scenario at NALCO damonjodi FINAL REPORT
SIP on Ir scenario at NALCO damonjodi FINAL REPORT
 
Kalaivani - JOB SATISFACTION II
Kalaivani - JOB SATISFACTION IIKalaivani - JOB SATISFACTION II
Kalaivani - JOB SATISFACTION II
 
summer internship project on Training Need Assessment for Industrial employee...
summer internship project on Training Need Assessment for Industrial employee...summer internship project on Training Need Assessment for Industrial employee...
summer internship project on Training Need Assessment for Industrial employee...
 
Recruitment and selection process synopsis
Recruitment and selection process synopsisRecruitment and selection process synopsis
Recruitment and selection process synopsis
 

Destacado

A study on employee morale1
A study on employee morale1A study on employee morale1
A study on employee morale1Prabhu HR
 
Review of the literature1
Review of the literature1Review of the literature1
Review of the literature1Mani Shanker
 
a project report on Job satisfaction
 a project report on Job satisfaction a project report on Job satisfaction
a project report on Job satisfactionBabasab Patil
 
A project report on job satisfaction at birla ltd.,
A project report on job satisfaction at birla ltd.,A project report on job satisfaction at birla ltd.,
A project report on job satisfaction at birla ltd.,Projects Kart
 
A project report on customer satisfaction of two wheelers industries with spe...
A project report on customer satisfaction of two wheelers industries with spe...A project report on customer satisfaction of two wheelers industries with spe...
A project report on customer satisfaction of two wheelers industries with spe...Projects Kart
 
The meaning and measurement of employee engagement A review of the literature...
The meaning and measurement of employee engagement A review of the literature...The meaning and measurement of employee engagement A review of the literature...
The meaning and measurement of employee engagement A review of the literature...Omar Ababneh
 
AN ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE MORALE IN INDUSTRIES (Sanofi-Aventis)
AN ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE MORALE IN INDUSTRIES (Sanofi-Aventis)AN ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE MORALE IN INDUSTRIES (Sanofi-Aventis)
AN ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE MORALE IN INDUSTRIES (Sanofi-Aventis)Atul Gurav
 
Review of litera
Review of literaReview of litera
Review of literankthi6230i
 
Employee satisfaction survey questionnaire
Employee satisfaction survey questionnaire Employee satisfaction survey questionnaire
Employee satisfaction survey questionnaire Malik Umar Hayat
 
REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTIONREPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTIONDhaval Prajapati
 
Job satisfaction.ppt
Job satisfaction.pptJob satisfaction.ppt
Job satisfaction.pptsadia saeed
 
Budgetary tension and privatization The effects on firm performance
Budgetary tension and privatization The effects on firm performance Budgetary tension and privatization The effects on firm performance
Budgetary tension and privatization The effects on firm performance GRAPE
 
6 Employee Retention Strategies to Reduce Small Businesses Turnover
6 Employee Retention Strategies to Reduce Small Businesses Turnover6 Employee Retention Strategies to Reduce Small Businesses Turnover
6 Employee Retention Strategies to Reduce Small Businesses TurnoverMJ Management Solutions
 
Art of employee happiness
Art of employee happinessArt of employee happiness
Art of employee happinessMelissa Jones
 
Blake Lapthorn Employment seminar - employee morale and motivation - 17 Novem...
Blake Lapthorn Employment seminar - employee morale and motivation - 17 Novem...Blake Lapthorn Employment seminar - employee morale and motivation - 17 Novem...
Blake Lapthorn Employment seminar - employee morale and motivation - 17 Novem...Blake Morgan
 

Destacado (20)

A study on employee morale1
A study on employee morale1A study on employee morale1
A study on employee morale1
 
Review of the literature1
Review of the literature1Review of the literature1
Review of the literature1
 
a project report on Job satisfaction
 a project report on Job satisfaction a project report on Job satisfaction
a project report on Job satisfaction
 
Employee Morale
Employee MoraleEmployee Morale
Employee Morale
 
A project report on job satisfaction at birla ltd.,
A project report on job satisfaction at birla ltd.,A project report on job satisfaction at birla ltd.,
A project report on job satisfaction at birla ltd.,
 
A project report on customer satisfaction of two wheelers industries with spe...
A project report on customer satisfaction of two wheelers industries with spe...A project report on customer satisfaction of two wheelers industries with spe...
A project report on customer satisfaction of two wheelers industries with spe...
 
The meaning and measurement of employee engagement A review of the literature...
The meaning and measurement of employee engagement A review of the literature...The meaning and measurement of employee engagement A review of the literature...
The meaning and measurement of employee engagement A review of the literature...
 
AN ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE MORALE IN INDUSTRIES (Sanofi-Aventis)
AN ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE MORALE IN INDUSTRIES (Sanofi-Aventis)AN ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE MORALE IN INDUSTRIES (Sanofi-Aventis)
AN ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE MORALE IN INDUSTRIES (Sanofi-Aventis)
 
Review of litera
Review of literaReview of litera
Review of litera
 
Employee satisfaction survey questionnaire
Employee satisfaction survey questionnaire Employee satisfaction survey questionnaire
Employee satisfaction survey questionnaire
 
REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTIONREPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
REPORT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION
 
Job satisfaction.ppt
Job satisfaction.pptJob satisfaction.ppt
Job satisfaction.ppt
 
Customer satisfaction
Customer satisfactionCustomer satisfaction
Customer satisfaction
 
Literature Review
Literature ReviewLiterature Review
Literature Review
 
Linaj
LinajLinaj
Linaj
 
Budgetary tension and privatization The effects on firm performance
Budgetary tension and privatization The effects on firm performance Budgetary tension and privatization The effects on firm performance
Budgetary tension and privatization The effects on firm performance
 
Literature search and review
Literature search and reviewLiterature search and review
Literature search and review
 
6 Employee Retention Strategies to Reduce Small Businesses Turnover
6 Employee Retention Strategies to Reduce Small Businesses Turnover6 Employee Retention Strategies to Reduce Small Businesses Turnover
6 Employee Retention Strategies to Reduce Small Businesses Turnover
 
Art of employee happiness
Art of employee happinessArt of employee happiness
Art of employee happiness
 
Blake Lapthorn Employment seminar - employee morale and motivation - 17 Novem...
Blake Lapthorn Employment seminar - employee morale and motivation - 17 Novem...Blake Lapthorn Employment seminar - employee morale and motivation - 17 Novem...
Blake Lapthorn Employment seminar - employee morale and motivation - 17 Novem...
 

Similar a Literature review

Literaturereview 121109102532-phpapp02
Literaturereview 121109102532-phpapp02Literaturereview 121109102532-phpapp02
Literaturereview 121109102532-phpapp02Vishnu Raj
 
organization behaviour disertation.pdf
organization behaviour disertation.pdforganization behaviour disertation.pdf
organization behaviour disertation.pdfZhaolinWang3
 
organization behaviour disertati.docx
organization behaviour disertati.docxorganization behaviour disertati.docx
organization behaviour disertati.docxZhaolinWang3
 
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudesA study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudesAlexander Decker
 
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudesA study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudesAlexander Decker
 
Context matters examining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ approaches to emp.docx
Context matters examining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ approaches to emp.docxContext matters examining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ approaches to emp.docx
Context matters examining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ approaches to emp.docxdickonsondorris
 
A Critical Review Of Literature On Employee Engagement Concept
A Critical Review Of Literature On Employee Engagement ConceptA Critical Review Of Literature On Employee Engagement Concept
A Critical Review Of Literature On Employee Engagement ConceptJim Webb
 
Relationship of Demographic Variables and Job Satisfaction among Married Women
Relationship of Demographic Variables and Job Satisfaction among Married WomenRelationship of Demographic Variables and Job Satisfaction among Married Women
Relationship of Demographic Variables and Job Satisfaction among Married WomenIJLT EMAS
 
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ON QUALITY AND PROFITABILITY O...
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ON QUALITY AND PROFITABILITY O...A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ON QUALITY AND PROFITABILITY O...
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ON QUALITY AND PROFITABILITY O...Becky Goins
 
Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...
Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...
Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...Alexander Decker
 
Asif razzaq final Business Research Methods on Employees satisfaction
Asif razzaq final Business Research Methods on Employees satisfactionAsif razzaq final Business Research Methods on Employees satisfaction
Asif razzaq final Business Research Methods on Employees satisfactionAsif Razzaq
 
275JIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61, No.docx
275JIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61, No.docx275JIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61, No.docx
275JIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61, No.docxgilbertkpeters11344
 
Job satisfaction in teaching profession
Job satisfaction in teaching professionJob satisfaction in teaching profession
Job satisfaction in teaching professionbuket77
 
A study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmen
A study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmenA study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmen
A study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmenIAEME Publication
 
A STUDY ON ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AND JOB SATISFACTION IN SELECTED BUSINESS ...
A STUDY ON ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AND JOB SATISFACTION IN SELECTED BUSINESS ...A STUDY ON ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AND JOB SATISFACTION IN SELECTED BUSINESS ...
A STUDY ON ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AND JOB SATISFACTION IN SELECTED BUSINESS ...IAEME Publication
 
Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for orga...
Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for orga...Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for orga...
Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for orga...Andrea Kropp
 
Relationship between performance appraisal politics, organizational commitmen...
Relationship between performance appraisal politics, organizational commitmen...Relationship between performance appraisal politics, organizational commitmen...
Relationship between performance appraisal politics, organizational commitmen...Alexander Decker
 
A Study on Employee Job Satisfaction at Eid Parry Nellikuppam Cuddalore
A Study on Employee Job Satisfaction at Eid Parry Nellikuppam CuddaloreA Study on Employee Job Satisfaction at Eid Parry Nellikuppam Cuddalore
A Study on Employee Job Satisfaction at Eid Parry Nellikuppam Cuddaloreijtsrd
 
Master's Thesis MSc BA - O&MC, Marc Haakma
Master's Thesis MSc BA - O&MC, Marc HaakmaMaster's Thesis MSc BA - O&MC, Marc Haakma
Master's Thesis MSc BA - O&MC, Marc HaakmaMarc Haakma
 

Similar a Literature review (20)

Literaturereview 121109102532-phpapp02
Literaturereview 121109102532-phpapp02Literaturereview 121109102532-phpapp02
Literaturereview 121109102532-phpapp02
 
organization behaviour disertation.pdf
organization behaviour disertation.pdforganization behaviour disertation.pdf
organization behaviour disertation.pdf
 
organization behaviour disertati.docx
organization behaviour disertati.docxorganization behaviour disertati.docx
organization behaviour disertati.docx
 
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudesA study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
 
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudesA study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
A study on impact of job characteristics on key attitudes
 
Context matters examining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ approaches to emp.docx
Context matters examining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ approaches to emp.docxContext matters examining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ approaches to emp.docx
Context matters examining ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ approaches to emp.docx
 
A Critical Review Of Literature On Employee Engagement Concept
A Critical Review Of Literature On Employee Engagement ConceptA Critical Review Of Literature On Employee Engagement Concept
A Critical Review Of Literature On Employee Engagement Concept
 
Relationship of Demographic Variables and Job Satisfaction among Married Women
Relationship of Demographic Variables and Job Satisfaction among Married WomenRelationship of Demographic Variables and Job Satisfaction among Married Women
Relationship of Demographic Variables and Job Satisfaction among Married Women
 
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ON QUALITY AND PROFITABILITY O...
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ON QUALITY AND PROFITABILITY O...A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ON QUALITY AND PROFITABILITY O...
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ON QUALITY AND PROFITABILITY O...
 
Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...
Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...
Perception of job performance appraisals toward turnover intention and job sa...
 
Asif razzaq final Business Research Methods on Employees satisfaction
Asif razzaq final Business Research Methods on Employees satisfactionAsif razzaq final Business Research Methods on Employees satisfaction
Asif razzaq final Business Research Methods on Employees satisfaction
 
275JIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61, No.docx
275JIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61, No.docx275JIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61, No.docx
275JIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61, No.docx
 
Job satisfaction in teaching profession
Job satisfaction in teaching professionJob satisfaction in teaching profession
Job satisfaction in teaching profession
 
A study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmen
A study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmenA study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmen
A study on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitmen
 
A STUDY ON ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AND JOB SATISFACTION IN SELECTED BUSINESS ...
A STUDY ON ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AND JOB SATISFACTION IN SELECTED BUSINESS ...A STUDY ON ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AND JOB SATISFACTION IN SELECTED BUSINESS ...
A STUDY ON ORGANIZATION COMMITMENT AND JOB SATISFACTION IN SELECTED BUSINESS ...
 
Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for orga...
Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for orga...Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for orga...
Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for orga...
 
Relationship between performance appraisal politics, organizational commitmen...
Relationship between performance appraisal politics, organizational commitmen...Relationship between performance appraisal politics, organizational commitmen...
Relationship between performance appraisal politics, organizational commitmen...
 
A Study on Employee Job Satisfaction at Eid Parry Nellikuppam Cuddalore
A Study on Employee Job Satisfaction at Eid Parry Nellikuppam CuddaloreA Study on Employee Job Satisfaction at Eid Parry Nellikuppam Cuddalore
A Study on Employee Job Satisfaction at Eid Parry Nellikuppam Cuddalore
 
Master's Thesis MSc BA - O&MC, Marc Haakma
Master's Thesis MSc BA - O&MC, Marc HaakmaMaster's Thesis MSc BA - O&MC, Marc Haakma
Master's Thesis MSc BA - O&MC, Marc Haakma
 
I037054058
I037054058I037054058
I037054058
 

Literature review

  • 1. Page |1   EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS FROM APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY Larry E. Cole, Ph.D. TeamMax, Inc. 5 East Towering Pines Conway, AR 72032 Tel: 800/880-1728 Fax: 501/327-4116 E-mail: lcole@cei.net Michael S. Cole, Ph.D. Department of Management Texas Christian University Fort Worth, TX 76109 Tel: 817/257-6796 Fax: 817/257-7227 E-mail: m.s.cole@tcu.edu INTRODUCTION In his seminal 1976 review of the job satisfaction literature, Locke observed that more than 3,300 scholarly articles had been published on the topic of job satisfaction. Harter, Schmidt, and Hayes’ (2002) search yielded another 7,855 articles having been published between 1976 and 2000. As the increase in research studies suggests, the notion that workplace attitudes (e.g., job satisfaction) might be positively connected with performance outcomes continues to intrigue academic scholars as well as practicing managers. The majority of the research examining the employee satisfaction-performance relationship has been conducted on the micro-level of analysis, otherwise known as the individual employee level. For example, research has reported a positive correlation between individuals’ job attitudes and their performance (r = .17; Iaffaldano & Muchinsky, 1985). Moreover, a recent meta-analysis found a substantive correlation between
  • 2. Page |2   individual job satisfaction and individual performance (r = .30; Judge, Thoresen, Bono, & Patton, 2001).1 As Schneider , Hanges, Smith, and Salvaggio (2003) recently observed, researchers’ micro-orientation towards the job attitude-performance relationship is somewhat perplexing, given that the interest in employee attitudes had much of its impetus in the 1960s when organizational scientists such as Argyris (1964), Likert (1961), and McGregor (1960) suggested that the way employees experience their work would be reflected in organizational performance. Historically, the job satisfaction-performance linkage has been primarily discussed by theorists from the Socio-technical and Human Relations schools of thought. According to the Socio- technical approach (e.g., Emery & Trist, 1960), organizational performance depends on congruence between the technical and social structures of the organization. Building on this notion, the Human Relations perspective posits that satisfied workers are productive workers (e.g., Likert, 1961; McGregor, 1960). Thus, organizational productivity and efficiency is achieved through employee satisfaction and attention to employees’ physical as well as socio- emotional needs. Human relations researchers further argue that employee satisfaction sentiments are best achieved through maintaining a positive social organizational environment, such as by providing autonomy, participation, and mutual trust (Likert, 1961). Based on this logic, employee satisfaction is believed to influence the development of routine patterns of interaction within organizations. Through mutual interactions, employees develop relationships with coworkers that also prescribe behavioral expectations and influence behaviors (e.g., norms or informal standards of acceptable behavior). For example, an unhappy employee could be                                                              1  A meta-analysis statistically combines the results of several studies that address a set of related research hypotheses. A meta-analytically derived correlation is a more accurate estimate of the true population correlation coefficient. 
  • 3. Page |3   prevented from lowering their performance by control mechanisms (e.g., standards of measurement, supervisory influence); however, widespread dissatisfaction among employees could lead to a strike or sabotage that might hinder an organization’s effectiveness. Alternatively, dissatisfied employees might choose to maintain performance levels (due to control mechanisms) but neglect to inform supervisors of important information that, over time, would result in lower organizational effectiveness or efficiency. Thus, employees’ job satisfaction sentiments are important because they can determine collaborative effort. Consistent with this reasoning, Likert (1961) has argued that collaborative effort directed towards the organization’s goals is necessary for achievement of organizational objectives, with unhappy employees failing to participate (effectively) in such efforts. In sum, available theory supports the contention that the satisfaction level of employees (as a whole) may relate to performance at the business-unit and/or organizational levels. From a practical vantage, conducting research at the business-unit and/or organizational level is believed important because this is the level of analysis at which employees’ survey data are commonly reported to client organizations (Harter et al., 2002). Empirical research at higher level units of analysis (strategic business units or SBUs, across many organizations, etc.) also afford applied researchers and managers with the opportunity to establish empirical linkages to salient outcomes that are directly relevant – including profitability, productivity, efficiency, employee turnover, safety, and customer loyalty and satisfaction. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Although it has been more common to investigate employee attitude data at the individual employee level, researchers have begun to explore similar relationships at the business-unit level and the organizational level. Research conducted under the rubric of
  • 4. Page |4   organizational climate has had success in aggregating individual employees’ perceptions and investigating their relationship to both organizational-level and individual-level outcomes (see, e.g., Schneider, White, & Paul, 1998; Zohar & Luria, 2005). In addition, there are a handful of studies that have explored the relationship between aggregated employee job satisfaction attitudes and organizational (or unit-level) performance. Ostroff (1992), studying a sample of 364 schools, investigated the relationship between employees’ attitudes and organizational performance. Ostroff found that aggregated teacher attitudes such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment were concurrently related to school performance, as measured by several performance outcomes such as student academic achievement and teacher turnover rates. Across 12 organizational performance indexes, the magnitudes of the correlations between teacher satisfaction and performance ranged from .11 to .54, with a mean of .28. When the unique characteristics of the schools were statistically controlled for, teacher satisfaction and other job-related attitudes continued to predict many of the organizational performance outcomes. Results were strongest for teacher satisfaction; thus, organizations with more satisfied employees tended to be more effective than organizations with dissatisfied employees. This study indicates that satisfaction is an important social process factor that fosters organizational effectiveness. The major limitation of this study pertains to the nature of the study sample; all organizations were secondary schools. The extent to which similar relationships would hold for organizations in other types of industries (manufacturing, service, etc) and occupations cannot be determined. Ryan, Schmitt, and Johnson (1996) investigated similar relationships between aggregated employee attitudes, firm productivity, and customer satisfaction. The authors measured these relationships at two points in time from 142 branches of an auto finance company. Results
  • 5. Page |5   indicated employee morale was related to subsequent business performance indicators, customer satisfaction sentiments, and turnover ratios. These researchers attempted to study the causal relations among the variables; however, their attempts lead to mostly inconclusive findings. Interestingly, they did find evidence suggestive of customer satisfaction as a causal influence on morale (a finding that is opposite of the directionality assumed by the literature). Although a tentative finding, Ryan et al. (1996) discussed several possible explanations for it. For instance, the customer satisfaction index was monitored closely by unit managers and success or failure likely translated into management practices that influenced employees’ job attitudes. Moreover, the researchers speculated that the particular setting may be unusual in that customer satisfaction might be inversely related to the amount of contact with the organization (e.g., customers without problems with the processing of their payments are likely to have less interaction with company representatives than customers with such problems). Similar to Ostroff’s (1992) study, the major concern with Ryan et al.’s (1996) research is that the data were all from one organization which limits the generalizability of the findings. In a unique study conducted by Harter et al. (2002), the authors conducted a meta- analysis of studies previously conducted by The Gallup Organization. The study examined aggregated employee job satisfaction sentiments and employee engagement, with the latter variable referring to individual’s involvement with as well as enthusiasm for work. Based on 7,939 business units in 36 organizations, the researchers found positive and substantive correlations between employee satisfaction-engagement and the business unit outcomes of productivity, profit, employee turnover, employee accidents, and customer satisfaction. More importantly, these researchers explored the practical utility of the observed relationships. For example, business units in the top quartile on the employee engagement measure yielded 1 to 4
  • 6. Page |6   percentage points higher profitability. Similar findings were found for productivity. Specifically, business units in the top quartile on employee engagement had, on average, from $80,000 to $120,000 higher monthly revenue or sales. Based on these data, it seems clear that aggregated measures of employee satisfaction and employee engagement are meaningfully related to business outcomes at a magnitude that is important to many (if not all) organizations. In comparison to prior studies, the strength of Harter and his colleagues’ research is the large number of participants (n = 198,514), business units (n = 7,939), and firms (n = 36) included, thereby providing a level of precision and statistical power rarely found in scholarly (i.e., non- proprietary) research. Schneider et al. (2003) report analyses of employee attitude survey data aggregated to the organizational level of analysis. These authors explored the relationships between several facets of employee satisfaction and organizational financial (return on assets; ROA) and market performance (earnings per share; EPS) using data from 35 organizations over a period of eight years. Thus, in contrast to previous studies, Schneider and his colleagues’ study was able to make some inferences about directional causality (i.e., are employee attitudes a stronger cause of organizational performance than the reverse). Their results showed consistent and statistically significant positive relationships (over varied time lags) between attitudes concerning satisfaction with security, satisfaction with pay, and overall job satisfaction with financial (ROA) and market performance (EPS). Although these findings are consistent with applied researchers’ and managers’ implicit beliefs, their study was not without some surprises. One of the more surprising findings was related to overall job satisfaction and the performance criteria. Results demonstrated that the causal directionality flows from financial and market performance to overall job satisfaction. This latter result does not deny the fact that there were significant
  • 7. Page |7   relations going from overall job satisfaction to ROA and EPS; nevertheless, the reverse direction relationships tended to be stronger in magnitude. Moreover, the relationship between satisfaction with pay and the performance indicators appeared to be reciprocal in nature. The obvious strength of this research study is the longitudinal nature of both the aggregated employee data and the financial and market performance data. By collecting longitudinal data on both sets of variables, these researchers were able to examine and begin to disentangle a set of very important but complex relationships. Are companies with happy workers more productive companies? One major issue regarding many of the reviewed studies relates to the causal nature of the relationship between aggregated employee satisfaction and organizational (or unit-level) performance. The implicit belief both in academe and practice is that the relationship runs from employee satisfaction sentiments to organizational effectiveness and efficiency outcomes. Moreover, this implicit assumption is apparent in the research studies reviewed here. That is, the attitude data were typically collected at one time period and performance outcomes were concurrently collected or at multiple time periods following the collection of the employee attitude data. The study conducted by Schneider et al. (2003) suggests that collecting data in this fashion may lead researchers to draw erroneous conclusions because their data prevent them from discovering significantly stronger relationships for performance causing satisfaction. It could be argued, for example, that employees who are in higher performing organizations are more likely to be satisfied than those in lower performing organizations simply because their organizations are doing well. Indeed, this causal pattern was found in the study conducted by Schneider and his colleagues (2003). Specifically, their data supported causal relationships between financial and market performance outcomes and employees’ overall job satisfaction and
  • 8. Page |8   satisfaction for security. Although more research is needed before concrete conclusions are drawn, Schneider et al.’s (2003) research demonstrates that employees can derive satisfaction from the knowledge or feedback that their organization is performing well and is accomplishing its goals – a finding that is in stark contrast to the presumption found in the academic literature (see, e.g., Likert, 1961). When we consider the studies collectively, directional causality may work in both directions; employee satisfaction causes organizational performance and vice versa. Therefore, it seems most likely that reciprocal relationships exist and that, as noted by Gross and Etzioni (1985), “organizational reality and human happiness go hand and hand” (p. 4). Thus, although directions of causality remain unresolved, initial evidence suggests that aggregate employee attitudes have connections with organizational performance outcomes. What can we do to create happy employees, then? Given the fact that significant and practically important relationships exist between aggregated employee attitudes and organizational performance, it is important to question what factors contribute to satisfaction. The predominant view has focused on the situational context (e.g., supervisory support) as a cause of satisfaction and has argued that high-performance work practices and thus a positive working climate foster employee satisfaction (see, e.g., Bowen, & Ostroff, 2004; Wright, Dunford, & Snell, 2001; Wright, Gardner, Moynihan, & Allen, 2005). This rationale is consistent with recent research on the impact of financial and nonfinancial incentives (e.g., training) on business-unit outcomes. For example, Peterson and Luthans (2006) used a quasi-experimental, control group design and found that both types of incentives had a significant impact on store profit, customer service, and employee turnover. Initially, the financial incentive had a greater effect on all three outcomes (as one might expect). But over
  • 9. Page |9   time, however, the financial and nonfinancial incentives exhibited equally significant impacts on two of the three outcomes (the exception was employee turnover). A brief comment on the need for a multidimensional measure of performance. Researchers have suggested that organizational effectiveness most likely reflects the combination and interaction of employee work behaviors that promote organizational performance (e.g., Ostroff, 1992). In other words, the definition of organizational performance may be too limited and narrow. Outcomes such as attendance, compliance, following of rules, cooperation, sabotage, and so on may also be important; however, such outcomes are usually not included in organizational performance criteria. Accordingly, we suggest that organizations wishing to explore the empirical connections between aggregated employee attitudes and organizational outcomes consider a wider range of performance-related outcomes. CONCLUSION The current understanding of how aggregated employee attitudes influence and are influenced by important business outcomes is limited. Based on the evidence to date, we conclude that employee satisfaction is related to meaningful business outcomes and that these relationships generalize across companies (and industries). Research efforts directed at further exploring these issues are sorely needed, and we believe there is potential for longitudinal research in the area of aggregated employee satisfaction. For example, future research should emphasize research designs that study changes in employee satisfaction and the causes of such changes. Through such longitudinal designs, the connections between aggregated job attitudes and performance can be more fully understood. At this point, evidence of directionality would suggest not only some directionality from employee attitudes to business outcomes (as well as the reverse) but also a reciprocal relationship in some cases!
  • 10. P a g e | 10   REFERENCES Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley. Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of "strength" of the HR system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203-221. Emery, R. E., & Trist, E. L. (1960). Socio-technical systems. In C. W. Churchman and M. Verhulst (Eds.), Management science models and techniques (Vol. 2, pp. 83-97). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press. Gross, E., & Etzioni, A. (1985). Organizations in society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279. Iaffaldano, M. T., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta- analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 251-273. Likert, R. L. (1961). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill. Organ, D. W. (1977). A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction-causes-performance hypothesis. Academy of Management Review, 2, 46-53. Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational Level Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963-974. Peterson, S. J., & Luthans, F. (2006). The impact of financial and nonfinancial incentives on business-unit outcomes over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 156-165. Ryan, A. M., Schmitt, M. J., & Johnson, R. (1996). Attitudes and effectiveness: Examining relations at an organizational level. Personnel Psychology, 49, 853-882.
  • 11. P a g e | 11   Schneider, B., & Schmitt, N. (1986). Staffing organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. Schneider, B., Hanges, P. J., Smith, D. B., & Salvaggio, A. N. (2003). Which comes first: Employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 836-851. Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Tests of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 150-163. Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 18, 295-320. Wright, P. M., Gardner, T. M., Moynihan, L. M., & Allen, M. R. (2005). The relationship between HR practices and firm performance: Examining causal order. Personnel Psychology, 58, 409-446. Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 616- 628.