1. Engaging Learners Beyond the Classroom
Collaborating to Learn : Learning to Collaborate
Sonia Wadhwa & Arun Prakash
InfoPro Learning, Inc.
2. 1 Who are Learners
2 MWuhltyim Eendgiaag Weorkflow
3 Engagement: Structure
4 Platforms for Engagement
5 Challenges in Engagement
3. Who is a Learner?
• Adult
• Literate
• Professional
• Adept at managing his / her learning and growth - ?
How do we treat the learner when we are in a “classroom”
(teacher) mode?
4. How do we treat the learner when we
are in a “classroom” (teacher) mode?
• Force them to learn
• Track the learning
• Evaluate the impact of learning
• Try to engage learners - ?
What exactly is an engaged learner?
5. What exactly is an engaged learner?
Contributive Active
Interested
Involved
Sharing
Knowledge
Sharing
Ideas
Connected
Asking
Questions Participative
6. Why Engage?
Why Collaborate to Engage?
Think about how
often you connect
with someone to:
• Find information
• Get answers to
questions
• Seek guidance
• Share ideas
• Get second
opinions
The reality is that:
• There is too much
information for us to
mange it all by
ourselves
• Information from
people we trust is
richer
•We all need to connect
and feel connected
Because this is the way we have learned and worked…
7. The New Workscape
Need for engagement…
Work is increasingly
collaborative
• Specialization
• Optimization
• Just in time
information
Need for streamlined
information base
•Collective common
repository
•Organic expert base
Changing nature of work
•Anytime, anywhere
•Faster, smarter, better
“Today more than 85% of a typical S&P’s
500 company’s market value is a result of
its intangible assets. For many of these
companies, a bulk of these intangible
assets is its people. It is no longer what
you own that counts, but what you
know…”
Craig Symons (Forrestor Research)
9. Engagement: Why structure?
Formal
Processes and
Systems
Dispersed and
Virtual Teams
Diverse, Global
Workforce
Formal
Hierarchies
Networked
Organizations
A structure that connects formal & informal learning, without compromising on the quality of engagement…
10. Are you ready for a structured
engagement?
• Does your company promote a culture of open sharing
and decentralized decision making?
• Does your L&D department recommend on-the-job
employee development?
• Do you have a significant number of millennials
generation (and outgoing baby-boomers)?
• Does your industry demand constant innovation and
experimentation?
• Most importantly – what is the senior management’s
conviction?
11. What can you “expect” from an
Engagement / Collaborative system?
• “Corporate Hierarchy” based communications to “Quality
of Thought” based communication
• Extension of formal training
• Connects the knowledge from formal training with real-life
situations
• Knowledge that is contextual and relevant to the
organization
12. More “expectations”…
User generated Content
Self policing, not
anarchy
Moderated for Compliance
Connects with Formal
Learning Methods
Real-time engagement
with Experts
Structured, searchable
organizational repository
Measurable Outcomes
Creates a social structure for engagement wherein technology puts power into communities, not institutions
13. Applying Collaboration
Creating engagement parameters
Establishing
communities
• Expert panel(s)
•Mentors/ Thought
Leaders
• Participants/ Learners
• Closed user groups
• Focused Communities/
Forums
Fostering
communication
• Posting content (text,
audio, video, weblinks,
documents)
• Chats
• Blogs
• Screen-sharing/ Online
Meetings
• Tagging
• User feedback (Rate,
Like, Comment)
• User recommendations
• Asking Questions
Administering
•Management
Recommendations
• Expert answers
• Content Moderation
• Incentivizing
Contributors
Analytics
• Quality of Content
(based on
Accreditations by
Peers/ Mentors)
• User Participation (# of
Posts, Questions and
Rating)
• Thought Leadership
Score
•Organizational
Engagement Score
• Areas of Expertise
15. The Brave New Connected World
What do you think are the
key challenges towards
implementing a collaborative
system in the workplace?
16. Challenges
Organizational
Risks
•Lack of
readiness to
move to a non
hierarchical
framework
•Transparency
issues
•Lack of
sponsorship-both
financial
and moral
•Hesitation in
intra-organizational
sharing
•Usage /
adoption
Technical Risks
•Platform does
not support
internal rubrics
and systems
•Security
concerns
•Privacy issues
•Compliance /
regulatory
concerns
Economic Risks
•Lack of
organizational
sponsorship
•Cost of
engagement
Measurability
•Lack of analytics
expertise
and/or
resources
•Unreliable data
• Inconsistent
analytical
approaches
Other Risks
•Anarchic data
without
moderation
•Lack of visible
mentors
•Perceived loss
of employee
productivity
The bump before the freeway…
17. Mitigating the Challenges
Making engagement a reality…
• Do not be in a hurry…consider a phased
approach
• Identify the departments or businesses
that are good candidates
• Take IT into confidence
• Let momentum build up naturally
• While you govern subtly…
18. Case Studies
Creating Organizational Value with Engagement
Need Collaboration
Method and How it
Worked
Learner Benefit Organizational
Benefit
Developing Leadership Cohort learning in
which a team of
people came together
for a sustained learning
experience beyond
courses and sessions
Sustained relationships
with learning partners
and senior leaders
Meaningful networking
and long-term loyalty
Sharing among
companies in a
consortium
Platform for continued
sharing of creative
ideas beyond
“brainstorming”
sessions
Leveraging across
geographies
“Idea” repository
19. Case Studies
Creating Organizational Value with Engagement
Need Engagement Method and
How it Worked
Learner Benefit Organizational
Benefit
New Product
Launches
Used by teams to collaborate
during development of new
products
Critical and creative
thinking
Faster and superior
product ideas
Maximizing use
of large talent
pool
Communities of practice in
which internal and external
scientific brains coordinate to
exchange knowledge and
practices around shared
interests
Access to specialized,
often tacit,
knowledge
Effective way of engaging
special interest groups
that minimizes risk and
variance with diversity of
talent pool. Creation of
organic knowledge
repositories.
20. What not to “expect”
• Replacement for formal / traditional
learning
• Overnight culture change
• Quantification similar to “formal” training
21. GNOSIS
Tap Into Knowledge; Derive Wisdom
http://www.infoprolearning.com/gnosis
Many of us have been in a learning / training role for several years in our careers. Let’s take a moment to reflect on who our learners have been, esp in the context of a corporate setup.
A typical learner is an adult, has a certain level of education, is a professional concerned about his or her professional growth and the need to learn to maintain or grow in their job.
But, how do we treat our learners? Let’s see…
We force them to learn…for example, in Elearning programs, sometimes we go as far as not letting them move to the next screen before they listen to the complete audio.
We also track their learning…by tracking what all slides they have seen, how much time they have spent, etc.
It’s important to evaluate the impact of learning of course…so we give them tests and quizzes to see how much they have learnt.
Some words to describe an engaged learner…on other words, a “Collaborative” learner
An engaged learner is collaborative…but what makes them collaborative?
While we have all been engaging for years, the current workscape makes this engagement even more relevant.
Engagement beyond the classroom or offices is as old a concept as learning and teaching itself. Such an engagement is for the most part an informal process. The challenge, however, lies in giving this engagement a structure that allows people to collaborate and connect productively, thereby bridging the gap between formal and informal learning.
What makes it so important to have a structure around something that we have been doing for so many years?
Most organizations have dispersed and virtual teams…the workforce is becoming more and more diverse and global.
As a result, companies are creating formal processes and systems to enable these diverse set of people to work with each other. On the other hand, company structures are changing from formal hierarchies to networked organizations.
All of these factors combined together make it imperative to have a structure around how all these people collaborate with each other.
When you try to implement a new strategy that counters the corporate culture—the corporate culture will push back and almost always win. This type of challenge is often identified when leaders and employees say, “We’ve never done it that way.” This attitude represents a fear of something new. Cultures may be more resistant to adoption if they are less technologically-dependent, or if the organizations are more hierarchical. Demographics, such as generational differences, may also play a role in this dynamic.
“These systems compromise classified or private information. Social media is effective, but primarily for socializing, which could lead to lawsuits (e.g., sexual harassment).”
Basically state conditions conducive to collaboration in a disperse, diverse, virtual corporate environment.
Web2.0 is often taken to be built up of technology components, however is it important that we first attempt to look at it within the discourse of learning and engagement.
Web 2.0 technology, with its social paradigm, provides the tools to create collaborative learning platforms. This can serve as a vehicle for learners to share further insights, get their questions answered, and connect with their peers and mentors to further enhance learning based on real-life experiences. Web 2.0 allows for social computing, and creates a social structure for engagement wherein technology puts power into communities, not institutions.
Organizational risks: Cultures may be more resistant to adoption if they are less technologically-dependent, or if the organizations are more hierarchical. Demographics, such as generational differences, may also play a role in this dynamic.
A client in the logistics space for whom we created some leadership development programs are implementing a system that connects the people taking these programs in the form of a team that has a means to sustain the learning in the programs beyond just the courses administered thru the LMS.
Another client in the advertising space has made a very unique use of an engagement platform wherein they are using it to conduct brainstorming sessions on creative ideas for adverts. As they are a consortium of geographically dispersed advertising companies that work together, they are using features that allow some ideas to be shared by all companies and employees across all locations; whereas some idea communities are restricted to only one particular company. Overall, the idea is to also create a huge repository that can be cross-leveraged.
A client that is into development of medical devices has started using a system for collaboration during development of new product ideas or design changes to existing products. They have created communities focused on specific products and people from different departments – product development, design, marketing, sales all are contributing to ideas. The intangible benefit seen is faster ideas…superiority is somewhat ambiguous to measure as of now…trying to link it to product changes and recalls later.
Another client – a pharma company – is implementing a system to engage their large talent pool – both internal and external. The aim is to create knowledge repositories by tapping into their large talent pool.
A social learning model will not replace traditional formal learning. Companies will still need to create, deliver, manage, and report on certification and compliance initiatives. Physical classrooms,
virtual classrooms, and web-based training (WBT) will all still be appropriate vehicles for content delivery, and instructional designers will still need to determine which approach to use.
Once you implement a system, do not expect the culture to change next Monday…people will continue to collaborate and engage the way they have been used to…it will take a lot of management support, conviction from the learning team, from entities like HR to ensure that the collaboration actually happens to create a tangible benefit for the organization.
Also, it may not be fair to expect quantification or measurement of collaboration similar to formal training…for instance, the way we have been used to tracking learning parameters thru LMSs.