4. Ms. Judelyn G. Taraya
Ms. Lampel Cuarenta
KINDER Ms. Edlen De Ocampo
Mrs. Beril M. Desabille
Mrs. Elizabeth N. Macaraeg
Mrs. Ellaine C. Raon
Mrs. Maribel Z. Labios
GRADE 1 Mrs. Maricel P. Llano
Mrs. Melane B. Celeste
Ms. Roxan B. Zamora
Mrs. Gina M. Cao
Mrs. Melba T. Bustos
GRADE 2 Mrs. Beril M. Desabille
Mrs. Jasmin G. Chua
Ms. Maricel D. Recto
Mrs. Evelyn R. Jacosalem
Mrs. Loreta C. Bation
GRADE 3 Mrs. Marie Christine T. Manuel
Dr. Delia C. Ms. Mylene B. Garcia, Mrs.Marissa G. Caubat
Martin, Principal Asstant-to-the-Principal Mrs. Grace D. espena
Mrs. Sheryl M. Corsiga
Mrs. Rowena T. Bation
GRADE 4 Mrs. Soledad D. Teodoro
Mrs. Adalla C. Turlao
Ms. Nelly P. Punsalan
Mrs. Ruth M. Festejo
Mrs. Janette D. Obana
Mrs. Aurea M. Untalan
GRADE 5 Mrs. Nena M. Bauson
Mrs. Imelda M. Fajardo
Mrs. Elizabeth P. Dagdag
Mrs. Teresita C. Caisido
Mrs. Irene J. Evangelista
Mrs. Remigia C. Gajudo
GRADE 6 Mrs. Marianita M. Gajudo
Mrs. Mildred S. Lasdoce
Mrs. Estrella E. Ares

5. VISION MISSION
BES: an advocate of the Instill among the pupils
culture of excellence. the right values to live-by
& strong desire for self-
CORE improvement through
ORGANIZATIONAL quality education.
VALUES GOALS
B- Balance To make every child
(Maintaining healthy body,
life and work.) functionally literate
E- Efficiency through different school
(Being efficient and effective in programs, projects and
everything we do.)
activities that will
S- Service Excellence strengthen the multi-
(Giving the best and world class
service to clientele and achieving intelligence of the pupils.
positive results.)

7. EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
DATA
AREA (Source: Online) OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
Barangay Baesa was created in  The leading economic More than 60% of the
1910 and was derived from a woman activities are factories, labor population are
who was the first inhabitant of the general merchandise, below-average income
place. This was once a forest with big
trees and bamboos. According to
and tracking. earner.
history, in this forested place, there  More than 70% of the
lives a woman who lived alone, which population are
mean “Babaeng Nag-iisa” in Tagalog, employed.
which later on became “Baesa”.
As others relayed; there was once a
Spaniard who can not speak Tagalog
well. That instead of saying “Babaeng
Nag-iisa”, he pronounced it “BA-ISA.”
ECONOMIC Until the present time, the place was
called Baesa from its original word of
"Ba-isa", except of its spelling which is
“Baesa.”
Baesa was once a part of Caloocan,
but when Quezon City was created,
some of its parts were sliced to form
part of Quezon City, including which is
now Barangay Baesa. Until it was
developed, and became the center of
business entities. All the farms that
were once tilled by the farmers were
converted into subdivisions.

8. EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
DATA
AREA (Source: Online) OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
Baesa was divided in 3 different  More that 70% of the Around sixty percent
barangays: Barangay Baesa- population are (60%) of its population
reparo or Brgy. 161 wherein the employed and have are considered poor
Baesa Elementary School situated resources to send their wherein thirty percent
has a total population of 7,411, the children to school. (30%) are indigents.
Barangay 160 or Baesa-Libis has
15,019 total population, while the  There are many
big part is Barangay Baesa located industries that can be
in Quezon City, has a total tapped as potential
population of 55,792. partners.
SOCIAL There are several schools,  The development in the
hospital and private schools barangay’s economy
within the Barangay Baesa. will result to increase
support/allocation for
education
The barangay offers different
social services to its constituent
such as Supplementary Feeding,
Day caree Centers, Elderly and
GAD Advocay Program

9. EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
DATA
AREA (Source: Online) OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
Baesa Elementary School was  The Barangay 161 The barangay officials
located in Barangay 161 headed by initiates projects for belong to opposing
Captain Teotimo DG. Gajudo. the schools e.g Clean political parties
and Green, fogging,
Different committees were and trimming of trees.
created to cater the needs of its
constituents and maintain peace
and order.
POLITICAL

10. EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
DATA
AREA (Source: Online) OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
 Barangay Baesa was a highly  The barangay ensures  The constituents
urbanized area contains all types of regular collection of including the BES
air pollutants due to different garbage . Pupils are prone to
industries/factories, and motor disease or illness due to
vehicles that passed by the areas.  Provision of trash bins air and water pollution.
 The barangay’s shares rivers and that promote segregation
streams with other localities are of garbage  Rampant water
physically apparent of contamination pollution is observable
 The soil that covers 90% of the total  Project Recom promotes in the riverside.
land area of the barangay are light school cleanliness, gulayan
reddish brown to bright reddish sa paaralan , and the
brown in color. The surface and establishment of a
ECOLOGICAL subsoil are friable and granular in Materials Recovery
structure. Facility (MRF) in schools
 The Solid Waste Management in the
baranagay is presently under the
supervision of the Environmental
Sanitation Services (ESS). The major
services are door to door collection,
station to station collection and
regular street cleaning. Along with
these services, ESS also implements
different cleaning and environmental
projects

11. EXTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
DATA
AREA (Source: Online) OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
 The road network system serving  The barangay hall and
Barangay 161, wherein Baesa its schools are accessible.  More pupils were
Elementary School is located are hooked in computer
Baesa Road and Reparo Service  Efficiency in the delivery games.
Road. of services, monitoring,
and evaluation  There is no provision
 Tricycles and jeepneys are the for technical assistance
mode of transportation in the  Efficiency in the transfer and maintenance
barangay. and retrieval of
information.
 MERALCO is the source of
electricity, hence MAYNILAD is
TECHNOLOGICAL
the water services system in the
barangay.
 PLDT has the most franchised
telecommunication in the area.
 Government and private offices
have access to the internet.
 Most schools have technological
equipment like computers and IWB

13. INTERNAL ANALYSIS MATRIX
DATA
AREA
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
Basic Inputs Ratio Ratio Ratio
Teachers 36 1:44 36 1:47 34 1:48
Classrooms 17 1:46 18 1:47 22 1:37
Seats 1,175 1:1 848 1:2 848 1:2
WatSan
Facility 7 1:225 30 1:56 24 1:68

14. DATA
AREA 2010-
2011-2012 2012-2013
2011
Textbooks Ratio Ratio Ratio
Kindergarten
Grade 1 1113 1:1 1113 1:1 1113 1:1
Grade 2 1021 1:1 1021 1:1 1021 1:1
Grade 3 1555 1:1 1555 1:1 1555 1:1
Grade 4 1744 1:1 1744 1:1 1744 1:1
Grade 5 1564 1:1 1564 1:1 1564 1:1
Grade 6
1692 1:1 1692 1:1 1692 1:1

16. INDICATORS 2011 Annual % Inc. to 2016 PDP
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
(Actual) meet the target Target
Cohort Survival Rate
Regional 86.26% 88.61% 89.96% 90.00% 95.00% 98.00% 2.35% 86.76%
Division 90.82% 92.25% 93.68% 95.11% 96.54% 98.00% 1.43%
School 89.93% 92.25% 93.68% 95.11% 96.54% 98.00% 0.64%
Completion Rate
Regional 83.06% 85.45% 87.84% 90.22% 92.00% 95.00% 2.39%
Division 87.26% 88.81% 90.36% 91.91% 93.46% 95.00% 1.55%
School 82.73% 88.81% 90.36% 91.91% 93.46% 95.00% 0.81%
Drop-out Rate
Regional 2.93% 2.35% 1.76% 1.17% 0.59% 0.00% -0.59%
Division 2.14% 1.72% 1.30% 0.88% 0.46% 0.00% -0.42%
School 0.45% 0.34% 0.23% 0.12% 0.01% 0.00% -0.11%
NAT Result
GRADE 3
Regional 45.17% 51.14% 57.10% 63.07% 69.03% 75.00% 5.97% 75.00%
Division 45.02% 51.14% 57.10% 63.07% 70.02% 75.02% 6.0%
School 48.08% 53.46% 58.84% 64.22% 70.02% 75.02% 5.38%
GRADE 6
Regional 57.08% 60.66% 64.25% 67.83% 71.42% 75.00% 3.58% 75.00%
Division 56.87% 60.66% 64.27% 67.97% 71.67% 75.37% 3.7%
School 77.78% 78.34% 78.90% 79.46% 80.02% 80.58% 0.56%

17. GRADE 3 2011 Inc. per PDP
SUBJECT AREA (Actual) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 year TARGET
READING ENGLISH
Regional 42.80 49.24 55.68 62.12 68.56 75.00 6.44 75.00
Division 41.75 49.24 55.68 62.12 68.56 75.25 6.44
School 38.77 49.24 55.68 62.12 68.56 75.25 7.25
READING FILIPINO
Regional 50.68 55.54 60.41 65.27 70.14 75.00 4.86 75.00
Division 50.02 55.54 60.41 65.27 70.14 75.02 5.52
School 49.98 55.54 60.41 65.27 70.14 75.02 5
ENGLISH GRAMMAR
Regional 42.07 48.65 55.24 61.83 68.41 75.00 6.59 75.00
Division 41.66 48.65 55.24 61.83 68.46 75.16 6.7
School 50.54 55.43 60.32 65.21 70.10 75.16 4.89
FILIPINO GRAMMAR
Regional 48.25 53.60 58.95 64.30 69.65 75.00 5.35 75.00
Division 48.58 53.98 59.38 64.78 70.18 75.58 5.4
School 54.14 58.31 62.48 66.65 70.82 75.58 4.17
SCIENCE
Regional 42.44 48.95 55.47 61.98 68.49 75.00 6.51 75.00
Division 42.88 49.38 55.88 62.38 68.88 75.38 6.5
School 54.07 58.26 62.45 66.64 70.83 75.38 4.19
MATH
Regional 43.75 50.00 56.25 62.50 68.75 75.00 6.25 75.00
Division 44.72 50.82 56.92 63.02 69.12 75.22 6.1
School 46.26 52.01 57.76 63.51 69.26 75.22 5.75
TOTAL TEST
Regional 45.17 51.14 57.10 63.07 69.03 75.00 5.97 75.00
Division 45.02 51.14 57.10 63.07 70.02 75.02 6
School 48.08 53.46 58.84 64.22 70.02 75.02 5.38

18. 2011 Inc.per PDP
GRADE 6 (Actual) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Year Target
MATH
Region 51.99 56.59 61.19 65.80 70.40 75.00 4.60 75.00
Division 52.28 56.78 61.28 65.78 70.78 75.28 4.5
School 79.99 80.99 81.99 82.99 83.99 84.99 1.0
ENGLISH
Region 56.80 60.44 64.08 67.72 71.36 75.00 3.64 75.00
Division 55.45 60.44 64.08 67.72 71.45 75.45 4
School 81.61 82.93 84.25 85.57 86.89 88.21 1.32
SCIENCE
Region 56.63 60.30 63.98 67.65 71.33 75.00 3.67 75.00
Division 56.08 60.30 63.98 67.78 71.68 75.58 3.9
School 82.07 83.48 84.89 86.30 87.71 89.12 1.41
FILIPINO
Region 64.61 66.69 68.77 70.84 72.92 75.00 2.08 75.00
Division 63.90 66.69 68.77 70.84 73.00 75.20 2.2
School 72.09 72.68 73.27 73.86 74.45 75.20 0.59
HEKASI
Region 55.38 59.30 63.23 67.15 71.08 75.00 3.92 75.00
Division 56.62 60.42 64.22 68.02 71.82 75.62 3.8
School 73.15 73.52 73.89 74.26 74.63 75.62 0.37
TOTAL TEST
Region 57.23 60.78 64.34 67.89 71.45 75.00 3.55 75.00
Division 56.87 60.78 64.34 67.97 71.67 75.37 3.7
School 77.78 78.34 78.90 79.46 80.02 80.58 0.56

22. Strengths Weaknesses
•The School ranked 4 in the •There was no Kinder teacher
Division during 2012 NAT item allotted in the school.
Grade 6.
•The number of teacher to student •Insufficient learning materials in
ratio is within the standard of 1:45- the school library.
50.
• There are enough number of •Lack of teachers due to
seats in every classroom. retirement.
• The LGU allots a budget in
construction of school covered-
court.
• More than 75% of the pupils who
are enrolled are within the target
age bracket.
•The textbook to pupil ratio is 1:1.
•There is available internet access
in the school.
•New classrooms were built and
ready- to-used.

23. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
CRITICAL
STRATEGY/
ISSUES TARGETS PAPs
(Access) STRATEGIES
 Projection of
enrolment per
Classroom ratio Early Registration grade level
is 1:45-50 pupils Program
• Congestion  Prioritize students
from the catchment
areas.

24. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
CRITICAL ISSUES STRATEGY/
TARGETS PAPs
(Quality) STRATEGIES
 Kalinga sa Bata  Feeding the indigent pupils
 Raised by 2% of Program With healthy and nutritious foods
pupil performance in
all learning areas  Enrichment Program  Enrichment activity to fast
learner
LOW PERFORMANCE  100% of pupils
LEVEL IN THE FIVE improved their study  Lingap Mag-aaral  Remedial program conducted
LEARNING ARES habits Program by master teachers
 Non-readers  Partnership with  Tutok-Turo  Engaging time on task
 Poor comprehension school and home
 Absenteeism  Perfect Attendance  Giving ribbons and certificates
 Poor study habits awards to pupils with perfect
 Less support from attendance
parents or guardians  Kaagapay Ka,
Magulang`Program  Conference with parents
regarding pupils attitudes and
behaviors.

25. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
CRITICAL ISSUES STRATEGY/
TARGETS PAPs
(Efficiency) STRATEGIES
 Monitor daily
 Zero Drop-out attendance of pupils
 Child Friendly School  Giving ribbons and
Zero (0) number of drop Program recognition on pupils
HIGH DROP-OUT RATE outs by 2016  Gender and who have perfect
Development attendance
Advocacy  Strengthen School
 Education for All feeding program
Policy
CRITICAL ISSUES STRATEGY/
TARGETS PAPs
(Governance) STRATEGIES
•Provide continuous Conduct seminars
100% effective and
• Effective and Efficient capability building of and workshops on
efficient
implementation of School Schools Heads and key SBM
implementation of SBM
Based Management school personnel on SBM
-Update entries in the e - Conduct ICT
• Effective and Efficient -Accurate and up to BEIS training and seminar
eBEIS date e BEIS - continuous capability for eBEIS
training of eBEIS in charge

27. S-O (How can strengths be W-O (How can weaknesses be
employed to take overcome to take advantage of or
advantage of the exploit the opportunities?)
opportunities?)
Strategic Options Strategic Options
-Strengthen partnership with - Involve the external stakeholders in school
external stakeholders Programs & Projects
- Strengthen school rules and - Strengthen Adopt-a-school program
policies to cater the needs of the
learners
- Strengthen school rules and policies to raise
-create more Programs & Projects learners’ academic performance
that will sharpen the multi-
intelligence of the pupils

28. S-T (How can strengths be W-T (How can weaknesses be
used to counteract threats overcome to counteract threats and
in order to take take advantage/exploit the
advantage/exploit the opportunities?)
opportunities?)
Strategic Options
Strategic Options
-Strengthen partnership with external
stakeholders
-Strengthen partnership with
external stakeholders -Strengthen NAT Review
-Strengthen school policy -Strengthen K to12 Program
formulation and implementation
to address needs -Strengthen Education for All (EFA) policy
-Adopt Child Friendly School Program
-Improve school rules and policy

30. CY 2014 PROPOSED BUDGET (in thousand Pesos)
INCREASE INCREASE
INCREASE INCREASE
CY 2012 IN AMOUNT CY 2013 CY 2014 IN
% %
AMOUNT
PS 15,363.00 1,522,787.00 16,887,787.00 9.02 844,389.00 17,732,176.00 0.05
MOOE 533,529.00 28,690.00 573,800.00 7.02 28,690.00 602,490.00 0.05
CO - - - - - - -
Total 54,889.92 15,514.77 17,461,587.00 16.04 873,079.35 18,334.67 0.10