5. Company Overview…. Cont…
1879: George Eastman invented the dry-plate process
and filed patent for a machine that coated dry
photographic plates
1880: George Eastman established the Eastman Dry
Plate Company, at Rochester N.Y.
1884: Introduced paper roll film
1889: Invented perforated celluloid film
1900: The Brownie box camera went on the market
with a price of $1
1935: Introduced color film
1960: Brought the Instamatic camera to the market
1970: Major sales growth for Kodak. Concentrates on
film and basic cameras
5
6. Company Overview….
Cont…
1980: Fuji emerges as a serious competitor
1994: Kodak abandoned its non-imaging health-related
businesses began to invest in digital imaging
products for medical practice
1997: Kodak was a high-cost manufacturer with a
growing portfolio of digital products which was
losing hundreds of millions of dollars annually
1997: Restructuring that eliminated 19,000 jobs and cut
more than $1 billion from annual costs
1999: Kodak entered the digital radiography market
6
7. Company Overview….
Cont…
2001: Kodak is pushing aggressively into China, an
important growth market
2003: Carp unveiled the plan to invest $3 billion in the
next three years in digital products by cutting
dividends by 72% - to 50 cents per share
2004: Kodak announced that it would stop selling
traditional film cameras in Europe and North
America, and cut up to 15,000 jobs
January 2005: The Kodak EasyShare-One Digital
Camera, the world’s first Wi-Fi consumer digital
camera capable of sending pictures by email, was
unveiled
7
8. Company Overview….
Cont…
December 2010: Standard & Poor's removed
Kodak from its S&P 500 index
January 19, 2012: Kodak filed for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Protection The company's stock was
delisted from NYSE and moved to OTC exchange.
Following the news it ended the day trading down
35% at $0.36 a share
February 9, 2012: Kodak announces it will exit the
digital image capture business
8
12. Porter’s 5 Forces Model
12
To aid firms in analyzing competitive
forces in an industry environment.
Question: How competitive
forces affect industry
attractiveness
13. Porter’s 5 Forces: Digital
Camera
Threat of
Substitute
Products
Threat of
New
Entrants
Threat of New
Entrants
Rivalry Among
Competing Firms in
Industry
Bargaining
Power of
Buyers
Bargaining
Power of
Suppliers
--
o
-
--
o - --
Low Moderate High
High Competition,
technology driven,
move fast, numbers
of players, lower price
strategy.
Few substitutions,
i.e. Mobile phone,
Camcorder,
Traditional
cameras
Technology, know
how, economies of
scales, and high
investment
Numbers of digital
cameras ,trend of
digital market
suppliers worldwide,
China base
Numbers of digital
cameras ,trend of
digital market
suppliers worldwide,
China base
13
14. Porter’s 5 Force in terms of
photographic industry
Buyers bargaining power
• Have more choice
• Switching cost low
Suppliers Bargaining Power is
• Out side the country from global market
14
Strong bargaining power
moderate to weak
15. Porter’s 5 Forces…
Cont..
Potential New Entrants
• Huge capital & specialized
• Not relay on any company
Substitutes Products
Low switching cost
Low price of substitutes
High bargaining power
Strong entry barriers
Strong threats
15
17. Industry Analysis through 5-forces:
Answer Question 1
Strong entry barriers
Buyer in strong position
Moderate to weak position of
Supplier
Huge threat from substitute
Strong rivals
Apparently
Unattractive
Industry
17
18. Industry Driving Forces: Answer
Question No2
• Rapid decline in demand for traditional
photography equipment in developed
economies
• Rapid growth in demand for digital cameras
in developed economies
• Steady decline in demand for film and photo
processing
• Development of new imaging technology
such as photo-enabled wireless telephones
and high-megapixel digital cameras
18
19. Key Success Factors
• Technological capabilities
• Rapid design-to-market cycle times
• Reputation for producing high-quality consumer
electronics
• Reputation for producing high-quality optical
devices (cameras, binoculars, microscopes, medical
equipment)
• Distribution network that includes large electronics
chains and local camera retailers
• Involvement in multiple segments of the industry
value chain—camera production and sales, printing
supplies, professional photo processing
19
20. Strategic Group mapping
Leica Sony
Samsung
Olympus Nikon
Kodak Cannon
High Price
Low Price
Market share
Firm % Market Share Average Price
Canon 40% $220.00
Sony 15% $300.00
Samsung 10% $260.00
Nikon 10% $250.00
High Market
Share
Low Market
Share
P
r
i
c
e
20
22. Kodak in terms of core competences
22
Not Rare
Not
valuable
Not Non
substitutabl
e
Not costly
to imitate
Not Core
Competence
s
Not able
to get
competitiv
e
advantage
23. SWOT Analysis
Strength
• Existing Brand equity
•Distribution Presence
•Competitive capabilities
• Market advantage
•Acquire many strategically
aligned companies
Weakness
Rapidly decreasing sales
revenue
•EBITDA are very low
•Work force has been cut
off
• Corporate Culture
Opportunity
• Digital Image
• New alliances
•On line photo sharing and
storage
Threat
•Competition in traditional
• Demise of silver halide
technology
•Photo capable mobile phone
•Price sensitive
•Economic health & terrorism
23
24. Value chain pre digital age
24
Image Capture Processing
Projection
Printing
Storage
- Film Camera
- Video Camera
- Retailer
Processing
- All Retail Stores
- Reprints
25. Value Chain post digital age
25
-Digital Camera -Digital Cameras Software -Hard Disk
- Video Camera -Scanner at home -Floppy Disk/CD
-Online (email)
-Digital mini-labs -Removable
Storage
- Kiosks at retailers
-Online Services
Image
Capture
Projection
Digitalization Storage
Transmission
Printing
Manipulation
Retrieval
26. Kodak Strategy based on
case
In 2003, CEO Daniel carp revealed 4
pillars Strategy:
1. Managing the traditional film business
2. Leading in distributed output
3. Growing the digital capture business;
and
4. Expanding digital imaging services
26
27. Kodak Strategy….Cont..
1. Managing the Traditional Film
Business:
• Slow exit strategy from film business
• Looking forward to digital technology
27
28. Kodak Strategy….Cont..
2. Leading The Distributed
Output
• Now a day digital photography much easer to
view & share photo(i.e. integrated display on
camera & sharing through electronic mail or
kiosks etc.) and its affecting the photography
industries.
• Then Kodak is able to bring fewer profit
through digital technology (i.e. digital print)
instead of traditional printing.
28
29. Kodak Strategy….Cont..
3. Growing the digital capture business
• Profit much lower in digital photography than
traditional photography
• Success in this part of the business is
dramatically opposed to the traditional
photography business .
29
30. Kodak Strategy….Cont..
4.Expanding digital imaging service
30
• Strategy take place by expanding product &
services. For example Kiosks that could print
image directly from mobile phone.
• In case of expanding service/online service
Kodak acquiring companies like Ofodo to
boost Kodak Easy Share Gallery.
31. Low Cost Provider Strategy
• Introduced cheapest Inkjet printers Cost
$150-$300;Almost 50% less then
competitor, i.e. HP, Epson, Lexmark.
• Ink Cartridges sold $9.99 Black & $14.99
color. Competitor avg. price $ 30.
• Encourage more people to print at home.
Photo value pack will allows to print at
home for 10 cent, 60% cheaper then HP
system
31
32. Reason For Failure
1.Core competency became core
rigidities
2.Lack of market research
3.Late mover of digital photography
4. Innovation and transformation Failure
5.Unwillingness to change
32
33. Current Strategy
Current CEO Antonio Perez adopt new
strategy, such as_
1. Outsourcing Manufacturing
2. Huge invest in digital technology;
3. Spent hundreds of millions of dollars to build up a
high-margin printer ink business to replace
shriveling film sales
4. Aggressive patent litigation in order to generate
revenue;
5. Expand current brand licensing program
33
34. Recommendation
• Discontinue unprofitable products
• Change middle to high-level management
• Launch new and innovative product
• Move to another business segment such as
movie and entertainment
• Focus on high potential products
– Kiosks and mini-lab
– Online services such as photo printing and sharing
• Emphasize on niche market i.e. medical market
and professional
34
35. Conclusion
• Great example of strategic failure.
• Different models and theoretical concepts were
applied to identify key factors that have led the
company from where it was to where it stands
today.
• Lessons we can learn:
• External environment can be deceiving
• Change happens
• Greatest strength can be weakness
• Innovation is not the perfect solution
• Its not all over till its over
35