Presented by Prof. Brad Hunt, Roosevelt University, at the CivicLab, February 24, 2014. The CivicLab is America's only co-working space dedicated to collaboration, education and innovation for civic engagement. http://www.civiclab.us.

1. Planning Chicago
presentation at the
Civic Lab
Monday, February 24 2013
D. Bradford Hunt
Dean, College of Professional Studies
Vice Provost, Adult and Experiential Learning

2. Chicago Plans
Downtown
Comprehensive Planning for
the city’s future, 1958-1974

3. The Heyday of Modern Planning in Chicago
1958 - 1973
1958
1966
1973
3

4. Richard J. Daley Consolidates
Planning Power, 1956-1957
• Creates Public Building Commission of Chicago (1956)
• Enacts Zoning Reform (1957)
• Creates Department of City Planning (1957)

5. Development Plan for
the Central Area of Chicago, 1958
• “Compact, accessible Loop”
• 50,000 new residents (middleclass)
• New University of Illinois
campus
• Limited clearance and
displacement
• Endorsed Transit expansion

6. Growth Coalition
Mayor Richard J. Daley and city leaders viewing model of 1958 Development
Plan for the Central Area of Chicago

7. Railroad Space
in Chicago, 1930
Encyclopedia of Chicago, 2004

8. Downtown Living: Marina City (1963)
8

9. New University of Illinois Campus (1964)
University of Illinois Campus, no date, 1970s

10. Transit Investment, 1950s
10

11. The 1966 Comprehensive Plan of Chicago
• Covered the whole city
• $500 million in capital
spending per year
• Follow-on regulatory
framework plans
• Chicago 21 plan for central
area
11

12. The 1966 Comprehensive Plan of Chicago
12

13. Follow-on Regulatory Plan:
Illinois Center (1968)
Illinois Central Rail Yards, 1947

14. Illinois Center and Lakeshore East, 2012

15. Follow-on Regulatory Plans:
Lakefront Plan (1972) and Riveredge Plan (1974)
15

16. Chicago 21
• Bold plans for downtown
living
• Bold Plans for Near South
(Dearborn Park)
• Transit ideas
• State Street Mall
16

17. “Chicago 21” (1973) and Dearborn Park
17

18. Mayor Harold Washington and Jobs
18

19. Goose Island,
Planned
Manufacturing
District,
2012
19

20. City of
Chicago
Industrial
Corridors,
2011
20

21. Industrial
Corridors:
Calumet Area
Land Plan
2001
21

22. Planning for Jobs:
Ford’s Chicago Assembly Plant
Calumet Industrial Corridor
22

23. Chicago Plans the
Neighborhoods
Race, class, and the
neighborhoods

24. Neighborhood Planning: Urban Renewal
Urban Renewal on Chicago’s South Side, 1954
Lake Meadows (complete) and future South Commons site, 1955

25. Neighborhood Planning:
Backlash against Top-Down Planning and the
Rise of Community-Based Planning
The Woodlawn
Organization

26. Neighborhood Planning:
Uptown, Voice of the People
26

27. Englewood: Retail decline
Halsted Street near 63rd Street, 2000
27

28. Englewood: Kennedy-King Community College,
2008

29. Englewood: Kennedy-King Community College,
2008

30. Local Initiatives
Support Corporation
(LISC) New
Communities
Program
“Quality-of-Life” planning
process

31. Englewood Quality of Life Plan, 2005

32. Englewood Quality of Life Plan, 2005

33. Englewood: Kennedy-King Community College,
2008

34. Chicago Returns to
Downtown
Central Area Plan 2003
Central Area Action Plan 2009

35. Chicago Central Area Plan, 2003
35

36. Office Growth in West Loop,
Chicago Central Area Plan, 2003
36

37. West Loop Transportation Center, 2003
37

38. West Loop Transportation Center, 2003
38

39. Transitway under Monroe Street, 2003
39

40. Transitways,
2003 Central
Area Plan
40

41. Central Area Action Plan, 2009
Transportation needs
41

42. Olympic Bid
42

43. Challenges for the
present and future
Will the city rise to them?

44. Population, Race, and Immigration
44

45. Population
Change,
2000-2010
45

46. 46

47. Tax Increment
Financing
Districts
2011
47

48. Mayor Emanuel and Planning
• Budget for Department of Housing and Economic
Development (DHED) down by 40% in recent years
• Recently revived Department of Planning
• “Privatization of Planning”
– World Business Chicago
– OECD Territorial Review
• “Quick Recruitment Hits”
48

49. Planning Chicago Agenda
• Increase transit capacity
• Adapt industrial policy to rapidly changing needs
• Pursue robust neighborhood planning
• Assert planning as a priority and as a “public good”
49

50. 50