4. What Are Priority Action Plans?
• NIST workshops identified priority standards issues
– many standards require revision or enhancement
– and new standards need to be developed to fill gaps
• A total of 70 priority standards issues were identified in the EPRI
report
• NIST determined which require most urgent resolution and
selected top 14 to initiate PAPs
• The August SDO Workshop was used to develop the action plan
for each priority issue.
• Current status for each PAP is posted on the NIST website
– broad SDO and stakeholder support and participation
– aggressive milestones in 2009 or early 2010 established
• The Smart Grip Interoperability Panel will guide oversee progress
on PAPs and development of new PAPs.
Xanthus Consulting January 6, 2013
International
5. NIST Priority Action Plans
1. IP for the Smart Grid: Develop profiles for use of the Internet Protocol
suite for Smart Grid applications
2. Wireless Communications for the Smart Grid: Guidelines for wireless
communications for the smart grid
3. Pricing and Products
4. Common Pricing Model and Scheduling Mechanism: develop and
standardize pricing and scheduling for the smart grid
5. Common Semantic Model for Meter Data Tables: Translate ANSI
C12.19 into common semantic mode
6. Standard Meter Data Profiles Standard: Design one or more standard
meter profiles using ANSI C12.19 Exchange Data Language
7. Electric Storage Interconnection Guidelines: Develop storage device
electrical interconnection guidelines Standard Energy Usage
Information: Provide energy usage information to Customer EMS
8. CIM for Distribution Grid Management: Accelerate the work of
developing the Common Information Model (CIM) for Distribution Grid
Management including CIM and Multispeak harmonization
Xanthus Consulting January 6, 2013
International
6. NIST Priority Action Plans (con’t)
9. Energy Usage: to specify a process for developing a common semantic
model for standard DR signals.
10. Standard DR Signals: Develop or adopt standard DR signals;
DR/ES/G/PEV Planning Meeting - energy interop/OpenADR
11. Common Object Models for Electric Transportation: Develop and
standardize common object models for electric transportation
12. IEC 61850 Objects/DNP3 Mapping: Map IEC 61850 objects to DNP3
for legacy interfaces
13. Time Synchronization, IEC 61850 Objects/IEEE C37.118
Harmonization: Develop or adopt application-based synchronization
guideline; Harmonize IEC 61850 and IEEE C 37.118
14. Transmission and Distribution Power Systems Model Mapping: Identify
information needs and map to transmission and distribution power
system model; Integrate relay settings and other field component
management functions
15. Power line carrier within the home
16. Cyber Security Strategy for the Smart Grid
Xanthus Consulting January 6, 2013
International
7. PAP02: Use of Wireless Communications in the Smart
Grid
• There are a number of advantages for using wireless communications
including:
– Untethered access to information
– Mobility
– Interoperability
– Reduced cost and complexity
– Availability of technologies with different characteristics to choose
from
• A number of challenges remain to be addressed:
– How to choose among technologies with different characteristics?
– How do we know which technology to use for what Smart Grid
application?
– Are there any implications for using a certain wireless technology
in a certain environment?
– Are there any deployment? Interference issues?
• Growing list of Use Cases on the NIST Information Knowledge Base -
http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-
sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/IKBUseCases
Xanthus Consulting
International
8. PAP02: Task on Guidelines for the Use of Wireless
Communications in the Smart Grid
• Develop Smart Grid application communication requirements and
organize applications with similar network requirements
– Draft under development and available for review
http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-
sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless/app_matrix_pap.xls
• Develop terminology and definitions
• Create an attribute list and performance metrics for wireless standards
– Draft developed and available for review
http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless/NIST_PAP2-
_Wireless_Characteristics-IEEE802-v_02.xls
• Create an inventory of wireless technologies and standards that are
identified by each SDO
– Feedback is expected by December 6, 2009.
• Conduct an evaluation of the wireless technologies based on the
application requirements
• Perform a gap analysis and developing guidelines for the use of
wireless technologies.
Xanthus Consulting 8
International
9. President’s Cyberspace Policy Review
…as the United States deploys
new Smart Grid technology, the
Federal government must
ensure that security standards
are developed and adopted to
avoid creating unexpected
opportunities for adversaries to
penetrate these systems or
conduct large-scale attacks.
Xanthus Consulting 9
International
10. Smart Grid Cyber Security Strategy
• Establishment of a Cyber Security Coordination Task Group
(CSCTG)
– Over 200 participants
• Private sector – vendors, service providers
• Academia
• Regulatory organizations
• Federal agencies
– Have established several sub-working groups
• Vulnerability class analysis
• Bottom-Up assessment
• Privacy
• Standards assessment
• High level requirements
• Functional architecture development
– Weekly teleconferences for each sub-working group
Xanthus Consulting 10
International
11. Smart Grid Cyber Security Strategy (2)
• The strategy…
– Selection of use cases with cyber security considerations (see
NISTIR version 1, Sept 2009 at http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-
sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/NISTIR7628Sep252009 )
– Performance of a risk assessment of the Smart Grid, including
assessing vulnerabilities and impacts
– Development of a security architecture linked to the Smart Grid
interface diagrams
– Identification of cyber security requirements and risk mitigation
measures to provide adequate protection
• The final product
– A set of recommended cyber security requirements for each
Category of Interfaces (see diagrams)
– NISTIR version 2 due in mid-January
– Final due late Spring 2010
Xanthus Consulting 11
International
12. Operations Distribution Service Provider Operations Distribution
Service Provider 1 Transmission 24
5 MDMS 10 11 OMS 18
SCADA/EMS
Billing
Aggregator / Field Crew
Retail Energy
4 Distribution Tool
23
9 17 DA Field 26 25
DMS SCADA AMI
Provider Devices 22
Applications 12
Headend
8 CIS 20
44 41 Third
22 18 DRMS/
6 Party/Vendor
7 LMS 39
14 30
Billing 24 MDMS OMS Local
11 AMI Network Web Connection
45 27
LMS / 13 Field Public or 29
GIS/WMS 19 42 28
Third Party 26 10 DRMS Crew Tool
12
Private
16 Network
2 15 In-Home
AMI 20 47 Customer Electric
25 CIS 21 Display
Headend Metering
42 27 46
40 Energy Services 45
Public or Aggregator /
21 AMI Web Interface/ HAN
Private Network Local Retail Energy 31 32 37
Network 30 Gateway Customer/
Connection Provider
29 Customer Building EMS
39
28 33 34 50 Sub-
43 36
Energy Market Energy Services 35 Metering
Customer 2
Clearinghouse Interface/ HAN 31 32 Metering 51
EMS Customer DER:
Gateway Generation and 44
37
3
43 36 48 Storage 38
35
Customer Customer
33 34 Sub-Meter Energy Market 49
Appliances Appliances
RTO/ISO Customer Clearinghouse Water/Gas/ Electric
46
DER Street Light Vehicle
Electric Metering
Vehicle
38 Markets Customer
Markets Customer
DRMS: Demand Response Management System HAN: Home Area Network
HAN/BAN Use Cases: Actors, Logical LMS: Load Management System DER: Distributed Energy Resources
AMI Systems Use Cases: Actors, AMI: Advanced Metering Infrastructure DRMS: Demand Response Management System LMS: Load Management System
SCADA: Supervisory Control and MDMS: Meter Data Management System GIS: Geographic Information System Interfaces, and Networks CIS: Customer Information System MDMS: Meter Data Management System
Logical Interfaces, and Networks Data Acquisition DMS: Distribution Management System CIS: Customer Information System OMS: Outage Management System EMS: Energy Management System
WMS: Work Management System EMS: Energy Management System OMS: Outage Management System
12
Bulk Generation ISO/RTO
Operations Customer
Energy Market Clearinghouse 2 Aggregators and Energy Energy Service WAS 1
Wide Area
Market-based Providers Providers
Measurement
Markets Service Provider WAS 2
WAS 9 System
6 WAS 4 WAS 23
Customer
37 EMS
WAS 6 WAS 31
Transmission 34 Collectors 33 Sensors Plant Control
ISO/RTO 1 36 RTUs System
SCADA/EMS WAS 8 Operator SCADA
or WAS10
28 Displays WAS 21
3 24 9 IEDs 35 Distributed Intelligence WAS 11 WAS 22
4 WAS 12
Capabilities WAS 15
Distribution WAS 3
23 SCADA
WAS 20
Geographic Metering & WAS 5
EMS WAS 13
Distribution Field Information Billing DMS
Crews, Mobile 8 System AM/FM
14 21 29
WAS 28 WAS 25
Computing 5
15 WAS 26
AMI Headend WAS 33
DMS power system Customer WAS 27 WAS 7
7 modeling functions: 25 19
WAS 14
13 22 Information Sys IED
DOMA, VVWS, FLIR, 20 Distribution ISO/RTO/
31 WAS 16 PMU
CA, MFR, OMS, WMS Wholesale WAS 29 RTU
Distribution AMI Network
17 Market RTU
Operator 27
26 ESI/Gateway
16 Load Metering WAS 32 Aggregator WAS 24
18 30
Distribution Management 11 IED
Engineering Markets Service Provider Transmission Distribution
System
Customer ESI/
Operations Wide-Area Situational Awareness (WASA) Use WAS 30
EMS Gateway
Cases: Actors and Logical Interfaces WAS19
Distribution Grid Management Use Cases: Actors Key: ID Communications
IED: Intelligent Electronic Device
and Logical Interfaces 32 10 DMS: Distribution Management System
Association / Connector
WAS 17 Actor Actor
DOMA: Distribution Operations Model & Analysis MFR: Multi-Feeder Reconnection EMS: Energy Management System #
Customer appliances, DER, PEV,
January 6, 2013
1 2
Xanthus Consulting SCADA: Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
VVWS: Volt-Var-Watt OMS: Outage Management System
FLIR: Fault Location, Isolation, Restoration WMS: Work Management System Electric Storage (see HAN for details) Customer AMI: Advanced Metering Infrastructure WAS18 Logical Interfaces
International
13. Questions?
Frances Cleveland
fcleve@xanthus-consulting.com
Xanthus
Consulting
International
Notas del editor
The Department of Energy should work with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to determine whether additional security mandates and procedures should be developed for energy-related industrial control systems.