SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 7
Hatcher Enterprises
Transportation Model Solution


                         By – Vivek Ehiraj
                              11EMBA10
Question
•   Hatcher Enterprises uses a chemical called Rbase in production operations at fie
    divisions. Only 6 suppliers of Rbase meet Hatchers quality control standards. All 6
    suppliers can produce Rbase in sufficient quantities to accommodate the needs of
    each division. The Quantity of Rbase needed by each Hatcher division and the
    price per gallon charged by each supplier as follows:

                         Demand                                  Price
     Division            (1000 of gallons) Supplier              per gallon ($)
                       1                40                     1              12.6
                       2                45                     2                14
                       3                50                     3              10.2
                       4                35                     4              14.2
                       5                45                     5                12
                                                               6                13
Question-Contd.
•   The cost per gallon ($) for shipping from each supplier to each division is provided in the
    following table.

                                            Supplie
                                            r
         Division             1           2        3              4           5          6
                1          2.75         2.5    3.15             2.8        2.75       2.75
                2           0.8         0.2     5.4             1.2         3.4          1
                3           4.7         2.6     5.3             2.8           6        5.6
                4           2.6         1.8     4.4             2.4           5        2.8
                5           3.4         0.4        5            1.2         2.6        3.6
•   Hatcher believes in spreading its business among suppliers so that the company will
    be less affected by supplier problems (e.g. labor strikes or resource availability).
    Company policy requires that each division have a separate supplier.
     –   a. For each supplier-division combination, compute the total cost of supplying the divisions demand.
     –   b. Determine the optimal assignment of suppliers to divisions.
Solution
• Total Demand = sum of demand from all the divisions = 215 gallons.
• Supply by each supplier, 1 to 6 is equal therefore = 215/6 = 35.833 gallons.
• Formulate the solution in Excel using the below formulas in each cell –
                                                                                   Demand
                                                                       "=SUM(B3:
                                                                       G3)"                 40
                                                                                            45
                                                                                            50
                                                                                            35
                                                                                            45
             "=SUM(B3:B7)"
    Supply     35.83333 35.83333 35.83333 35.83333 35.83333 35.83333
                                                                                   "=SUM(B1
                "=B13*B3+B14*B4+B15*B5+B16*B6+B17*B7"                              0:G10)"
                                       Suppliers
    Divisions            1        2        3        4      5       6
              1       2.75      2.5     3.15      2.8   2.75    2.75
              2        0.8      0.2      5.4      1.2    3.4       1
              3        4.7      2.6      5.3      2.8      6     5.6
              4        2.6      1.8      4.4      2.4      5     2.8
              5        3.4      0.4        5      1.2    2.6     3.6
Solution
• Using the solver options as –
• Changing Cells
    – Shaded portion in previous slide
• Constraints –
    – Sum of supply = Total supply
    – Sum of demand = Total demand
• The solution is shown below, indicating the least transportation cost as
  $476.67. The break-up of division to supplier quantities are listed below –
    –   Division 1 supplies 35.8 units to Supplier3 & 4.17 units to Suplier4
    –   Division 2 supplies 35.8 units to Supplier1 & 9.17 units to Supplier6
    –   Division 3 supplies 14.1 units to Supplier2 & 35.8 units to Supplier4
    –   Division 4 supplies 8.3 units to Supplier2 & 26.7 units to Supplier6
    –   Division 5 supplies 13.3 units to Supplier2 & 31.7 units to Supplier5
• Total Cost = Quantity * price (of the chosen division to supplier
  combination) + Transportation cost
• Cost = 2673.333 + 476.6667 = $3150
Sensitivity Analysis
• Adjustable Cells –
    – The Suppliers who are not being served by Division1 can be serviced to the tune
      of 1.4 to 2.8 gallons of Rbase as the minimum and maximum. The cost per unit
      will increase by 1.4 to 2.8 if these suppliers that have been omitted by the
      solution are serviced.
    – For those suppliers who are being serviced as per the solution, there is no more
      demand remaining that can be served by divisions 1 to 6. Therefore there will
      be no alteration in the cost.
Sensitivity Analysis- Contd.
•   Constraints interpretation-
     – Suppliers
         •   There is no more Rbase remaining to be supplied to Suppliers 1 to 6.
         •   An increased supply of 8.3 gallons can be made to Supplier1. This will increase the per unit cost by $0.6 .
         •   An increased supply of 35.83 gallons can be made to Supplier2. This will decrease the per unit cost by $0.2 .
         •   An increased supply of 4.17 gallons can be made to Supplier3. This will increase the per unit cost by $2.4.
         •   Supplier 4 cannot take any more supply. His capacity is maximized.
         •   An increased supply of 13.3 gallons can be made to Supplier5. This will increase the per unit cost by $2.
         •   An increased supply of 8.3 gallons can be made to Supplier6. This will increase the per unit cost by $0.8 .
     – Division
         •   The divisions increase their capacity to supply anymore Rbase.
         •   A reduction in capacity of 4.17 gallons can be made by Division1. This will increase the profit by $0.75.
         •   A reduction in capacity of 8.3 gallons can be made by Division2. This will increase the profit by $0.2.
         •   A reduction in capacity of 35.8 gallons can be made by Division3. This will increase the profit by $2.8.
         •   A reduction in capacity of 8.3 gallons can be made by Division4. This will increase the profit by $2.
         •   A reduction in capacity of 13.3 gallons can be made by Division5. This will increase the profit by $0.6 .

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Vinamilk truong hoangthuyminh qtkd_2008
Vinamilk truong hoangthuyminh qtkd_2008Vinamilk truong hoangthuyminh qtkd_2008
Vinamilk truong hoangthuyminh qtkd_2008
hụng hung
 
Chuỗi cung ứng và ứng dụng trong unilever
Chuỗi cung ứng  và ứng dụng trong unileverChuỗi cung ứng  và ứng dụng trong unilever
Chuỗi cung ứng và ứng dụng trong unilever
Luyến Hoàng
 
Nestle | Reridgerated Food Products Case Study
Nestle | Reridgerated Food Products Case StudyNestle | Reridgerated Food Products Case Study
Nestle | Reridgerated Food Products Case Study
Rohit Rohan
 
Vietnam Retail Market Report, Nielsen
Vietnam Retail Market Report, NielsenVietnam Retail Market Report, Nielsen
Vietnam Retail Market Report, Nielsen
Phi Jack
 
CHIẾN LƯỢC MARKETING MIX CỦA SABECO
CHIẾN LƯỢC MARKETING MIX CỦA SABECOCHIẾN LƯỢC MARKETING MIX CỦA SABECO
CHIẾN LƯỢC MARKETING MIX CỦA SABECO
Hanh Tran
 
Chiến lược cạnh tranh theo phân khúc tiêu dùng của pepsi co
Chiến lược cạnh tranh theo phân khúc tiêu dùng của pepsi coChiến lược cạnh tranh theo phân khúc tiêu dùng của pepsi co
Chiến lược cạnh tranh theo phân khúc tiêu dùng của pepsi co
feb_13_1989
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Vinamilk truong hoangthuyminh qtkd_2008
Vinamilk truong hoangthuyminh qtkd_2008Vinamilk truong hoangthuyminh qtkd_2008
Vinamilk truong hoangthuyminh qtkd_2008
 
Khoá Luận Tốt Nghiệp Đánh Giá Và Biện Pháp Nâng Cao Hiệu Quả Hoạt Động Xuất K...
Khoá Luận Tốt Nghiệp Đánh Giá Và Biện Pháp Nâng Cao Hiệu Quả Hoạt Động Xuất K...Khoá Luận Tốt Nghiệp Đánh Giá Và Biện Pháp Nâng Cao Hiệu Quả Hoạt Động Xuất K...
Khoá Luận Tốt Nghiệp Đánh Giá Và Biện Pháp Nâng Cao Hiệu Quả Hoạt Động Xuất K...
 
Nielsen insights pocketbook 2018
Nielsen insights pocketbook 2018Nielsen insights pocketbook 2018
Nielsen insights pocketbook 2018
 
Chuỗi cung ứng Vinamilk và những vấn đề xuất hiện trong chuỗi cung ứng
Chuỗi cung ứng Vinamilk và những vấn đề xuất hiện trong chuỗi cung ứngChuỗi cung ứng Vinamilk và những vấn đề xuất hiện trong chuỗi cung ứng
Chuỗi cung ứng Vinamilk và những vấn đề xuất hiện trong chuỗi cung ứng
 
Vietnam retail store modern trade trend 2023
Vietnam retail store modern trade trend 2023Vietnam retail store modern trade trend 2023
Vietnam retail store modern trade trend 2023
 
Vietnam Retail Store Statistic 2021
Vietnam Retail Store Statistic 2021Vietnam Retail Store Statistic 2021
Vietnam Retail Store Statistic 2021
 
Chuỗi cung ứng và ứng dụng trong unilever
Chuỗi cung ứng  và ứng dụng trong unileverChuỗi cung ứng  và ứng dụng trong unilever
Chuỗi cung ứng và ứng dụng trong unilever
 
Sabeco corporation
Sabeco corporationSabeco corporation
Sabeco corporation
 
Vietnam chocolate - Marou
Vietnam chocolate - MarouVietnam chocolate - Marou
Vietnam chocolate - Marou
 
Nestle | Reridgerated Food Products Case Study
Nestle | Reridgerated Food Products Case StudyNestle | Reridgerated Food Products Case Study
Nestle | Reridgerated Food Products Case Study
 
Vietnam Retail Market Report, Nielsen
Vietnam Retail Market Report, NielsenVietnam Retail Market Report, Nielsen
Vietnam Retail Market Report, Nielsen
 
[Nielsen] Cập nhật thông tin thị trường FMCG - Tháng 8/2017
[Nielsen] Cập nhật thông tin thị trường FMCG - Tháng 8/2017[Nielsen] Cập nhật thông tin thị trường FMCG - Tháng 8/2017
[Nielsen] Cập nhật thông tin thị trường FMCG - Tháng 8/2017
 
Lập kế hoạch Marketing cho nhãn hàng sữa Vinamilk 2020
Lập kế hoạch Marketing cho nhãn hàng sữa Vinamilk 2020 Lập kế hoạch Marketing cho nhãn hàng sữa Vinamilk 2020
Lập kế hoạch Marketing cho nhãn hàng sữa Vinamilk 2020
 
Vinamilk
VinamilkVinamilk
Vinamilk
 
Chủ đề 3 mô hình chuỗi cung ứng của nike
Chủ đề 3 mô hình chuỗi cung ứng của nikeChủ đề 3 mô hình chuỗi cung ứng của nike
Chủ đề 3 mô hình chuỗi cung ứng của nike
 
Khoá Luận Phân Tích Hoạt Động Marketing Của Công Ty.
Khoá Luận Phân Tích Hoạt Động Marketing Của Công Ty.Khoá Luận Phân Tích Hoạt Động Marketing Của Công Ty.
Khoá Luận Phân Tích Hoạt Động Marketing Của Công Ty.
 
CHIẾN LƯỢC MARKETING MIX CỦA SABECO
CHIẾN LƯỢC MARKETING MIX CỦA SABECOCHIẾN LƯỢC MARKETING MIX CỦA SABECO
CHIẾN LƯỢC MARKETING MIX CỦA SABECO
 
Chiến lược cạnh tranh theo phân khúc tiêu dùng của pepsi co
Chiến lược cạnh tranh theo phân khúc tiêu dùng của pepsi coChiến lược cạnh tranh theo phân khúc tiêu dùng của pepsi co
Chiến lược cạnh tranh theo phân khúc tiêu dùng của pepsi co
 
Glo bus 2018 grand champion tips 2018-10-09 how to win GLO-BUS
Glo bus 2018 grand champion tips 2018-10-09  how to win GLO-BUSGlo bus 2018 grand champion tips 2018-10-09  how to win GLO-BUS
Glo bus 2018 grand champion tips 2018-10-09 how to win GLO-BUS
 
Young marketers 5+1 + Vũ Thị Hồng Anh
Young marketers 5+1 + Vũ Thị Hồng AnhYoung marketers 5+1 + Vũ Thị Hồng Anh
Young marketers 5+1 + Vũ Thị Hồng Anh
 

Similar a Hatcher enterprises

MEGA CRETE SLURRY II CATALOG PG
MEGA CRETE SLURRY II CATALOG PGMEGA CRETE SLURRY II CATALOG PG
MEGA CRETE SLURRY II CATALOG PG
Roger Gundy
 
Webcast2 t06 ing
Webcast2 t06 ingWebcast2 t06 ing
Webcast2 t06 ing
Petrobras
 

Similar a Hatcher enterprises (20)

Item 1. Value of a PT
Item 1. Value of a PTItem 1. Value of a PT
Item 1. Value of a PT
 
RE-FRAC OF SHALE WELLS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
RE-FRAC OF SHALE WELLS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCERE-FRAC OF SHALE WELLS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
RE-FRAC OF SHALE WELLS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
 
Spot welding lobe curve simulation
Spot welding lobe curve simulationSpot welding lobe curve simulation
Spot welding lobe curve simulation
 
OR_L03.pdf
OR_L03.pdfOR_L03.pdf
OR_L03.pdf
 
AH CCM 10.22.18 Item #4 AH Rate Study
AH CCM 10.22.18 Item #4 AH Rate StudyAH CCM 10.22.18 Item #4 AH Rate Study
AH CCM 10.22.18 Item #4 AH Rate Study
 
0427 The System of Rice Intensification (SRI): Advantages - Part III
0427 The System of Rice Intensification (SRI):   Advantages - Part III0427 The System of Rice Intensification (SRI):   Advantages - Part III
0427 The System of Rice Intensification (SRI): Advantages - Part III
 
AH CCM 10.08.18 - Item #5 - ppt AH Rate Study
AH CCM 10.08.18 - Item #5 - ppt AH Rate StudyAH CCM 10.08.18 - Item #5 - ppt AH Rate Study
AH CCM 10.08.18 - Item #5 - ppt AH Rate Study
 
dti presentation
dti presentationdti presentation
dti presentation
 
Log11 uitwerking opdrachten
Log11 uitwerking opdrachtenLog11 uitwerking opdrachten
Log11 uitwerking opdrachten
 
Reactor and Catalyst Design
Reactor and Catalyst DesignReactor and Catalyst Design
Reactor and Catalyst Design
 
CBE480ProjectReport
CBE480ProjectReportCBE480ProjectReport
CBE480ProjectReport
 
Javier Garcia - Verdugo Sanchez - Six Sigma Training - W1 Minitab - Graphical...
Javier Garcia - Verdugo Sanchez - Six Sigma Training - W1 Minitab - Graphical...Javier Garcia - Verdugo Sanchez - Six Sigma Training - W1 Minitab - Graphical...
Javier Garcia - Verdugo Sanchez - Six Sigma Training - W1 Minitab - Graphical...
 
Mixing of Solid-Liquid Systems
Mixing of Solid-Liquid SystemsMixing of Solid-Liquid Systems
Mixing of Solid-Liquid Systems
 
Gravity water supply design illustration using SW software
Gravity water supply design illustration using SW softwareGravity water supply design illustration using SW software
Gravity water supply design illustration using SW software
 
Amp cbecl 240 tpd rice mill plant
Amp cbecl 240 tpd rice mill plantAmp cbecl 240 tpd rice mill plant
Amp cbecl 240 tpd rice mill plant
 
Reducing reject delivery to customer pasir gudang edible oils (pgeo)
Reducing reject delivery to customer pasir gudang edible oils (pgeo)Reducing reject delivery to customer pasir gudang edible oils (pgeo)
Reducing reject delivery to customer pasir gudang edible oils (pgeo)
 
Ousep abstract
Ousep  abstractOusep  abstract
Ousep abstract
 
GROTESQUE - ANS 2012
GROTESQUE - ANS 2012GROTESQUE - ANS 2012
GROTESQUE - ANS 2012
 
MEGA CRETE SLURRY II CATALOG PG
MEGA CRETE SLURRY II CATALOG PGMEGA CRETE SLURRY II CATALOG PG
MEGA CRETE SLURRY II CATALOG PG
 
Webcast2 t06 ing
Webcast2 t06 ingWebcast2 t06 ing
Webcast2 t06 ing
 

Hatcher enterprises

  • 1. Hatcher Enterprises Transportation Model Solution By – Vivek Ehiraj 11EMBA10
  • 2. Question • Hatcher Enterprises uses a chemical called Rbase in production operations at fie divisions. Only 6 suppliers of Rbase meet Hatchers quality control standards. All 6 suppliers can produce Rbase in sufficient quantities to accommodate the needs of each division. The Quantity of Rbase needed by each Hatcher division and the price per gallon charged by each supplier as follows: Demand Price Division (1000 of gallons) Supplier per gallon ($) 1 40 1 12.6 2 45 2 14 3 50 3 10.2 4 35 4 14.2 5 45 5 12 6 13
  • 3. Question-Contd. • The cost per gallon ($) for shipping from each supplier to each division is provided in the following table. Supplie r Division 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2.75 2.5 3.15 2.8 2.75 2.75 2 0.8 0.2 5.4 1.2 3.4 1 3 4.7 2.6 5.3 2.8 6 5.6 4 2.6 1.8 4.4 2.4 5 2.8 5 3.4 0.4 5 1.2 2.6 3.6 • Hatcher believes in spreading its business among suppliers so that the company will be less affected by supplier problems (e.g. labor strikes or resource availability). Company policy requires that each division have a separate supplier. – a. For each supplier-division combination, compute the total cost of supplying the divisions demand. – b. Determine the optimal assignment of suppliers to divisions.
  • 4. Solution • Total Demand = sum of demand from all the divisions = 215 gallons. • Supply by each supplier, 1 to 6 is equal therefore = 215/6 = 35.833 gallons. • Formulate the solution in Excel using the below formulas in each cell – Demand "=SUM(B3: G3)" 40 45 50 35 45 "=SUM(B3:B7)" Supply 35.83333 35.83333 35.83333 35.83333 35.83333 35.83333 "=SUM(B1 "=B13*B3+B14*B4+B15*B5+B16*B6+B17*B7" 0:G10)" Suppliers Divisions 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2.75 2.5 3.15 2.8 2.75 2.75 2 0.8 0.2 5.4 1.2 3.4 1 3 4.7 2.6 5.3 2.8 6 5.6 4 2.6 1.8 4.4 2.4 5 2.8 5 3.4 0.4 5 1.2 2.6 3.6
  • 5. Solution • Using the solver options as – • Changing Cells – Shaded portion in previous slide • Constraints – – Sum of supply = Total supply – Sum of demand = Total demand • The solution is shown below, indicating the least transportation cost as $476.67. The break-up of division to supplier quantities are listed below – – Division 1 supplies 35.8 units to Supplier3 & 4.17 units to Suplier4 – Division 2 supplies 35.8 units to Supplier1 & 9.17 units to Supplier6 – Division 3 supplies 14.1 units to Supplier2 & 35.8 units to Supplier4 – Division 4 supplies 8.3 units to Supplier2 & 26.7 units to Supplier6 – Division 5 supplies 13.3 units to Supplier2 & 31.7 units to Supplier5 • Total Cost = Quantity * price (of the chosen division to supplier combination) + Transportation cost • Cost = 2673.333 + 476.6667 = $3150
  • 6. Sensitivity Analysis • Adjustable Cells – – The Suppliers who are not being served by Division1 can be serviced to the tune of 1.4 to 2.8 gallons of Rbase as the minimum and maximum. The cost per unit will increase by 1.4 to 2.8 if these suppliers that have been omitted by the solution are serviced. – For those suppliers who are being serviced as per the solution, there is no more demand remaining that can be served by divisions 1 to 6. Therefore there will be no alteration in the cost.
  • 7. Sensitivity Analysis- Contd. • Constraints interpretation- – Suppliers • There is no more Rbase remaining to be supplied to Suppliers 1 to 6. • An increased supply of 8.3 gallons can be made to Supplier1. This will increase the per unit cost by $0.6 . • An increased supply of 35.83 gallons can be made to Supplier2. This will decrease the per unit cost by $0.2 . • An increased supply of 4.17 gallons can be made to Supplier3. This will increase the per unit cost by $2.4. • Supplier 4 cannot take any more supply. His capacity is maximized. • An increased supply of 13.3 gallons can be made to Supplier5. This will increase the per unit cost by $2. • An increased supply of 8.3 gallons can be made to Supplier6. This will increase the per unit cost by $0.8 . – Division • The divisions increase their capacity to supply anymore Rbase. • A reduction in capacity of 4.17 gallons can be made by Division1. This will increase the profit by $0.75. • A reduction in capacity of 8.3 gallons can be made by Division2. This will increase the profit by $0.2. • A reduction in capacity of 35.8 gallons can be made by Division3. This will increase the profit by $2.8. • A reduction in capacity of 8.3 gallons can be made by Division4. This will increase the profit by $2. • A reduction in capacity of 13.3 gallons can be made by Division5. This will increase the profit by $0.6 .