Hemostasis Physiology and Clinical correlations by Dr Faiza.pdf
Vojtech Huser IDR Snapshot
1. IDR Snapshot:
Quantitative Assessment Methodology
Evaluating Size and Comprehensiveness of
an Integrated Data Repository
Vojtech Huser, MD PhD
James J Cimino, MD
Laboratory for Informatics Development
NIH Clinical Center
NLM
2. Research question
• How can you evaluate an IDR?
• What makes a good IDR ? (for research)?
• IDR A(in 2007) vs. IDR A (in 2012)
• IDR A vs. IDR B
Vojtech Huser http://code.google.com/p/idrsnapshot/ 2
4. Motivation/Assumptions
• Improving IDR
– while acknowledging the a-priori limitations
• Ideal IDR for a researcher
– versus existing data
• General measure on whole-IDR level
– Not research project specific
• Build on CTSA IDR surveys from 2007, 2008
and 2010
Vojtech Huser http://code.google.com/p/idrsnapshot/ 4
5. Examples
• Academic medical center
• with limited number of outpatient clinics
– University of Utah
• Integrated delivery network
• Outpatient and inpatient records
– Partners Healthcare
• HMO
• Health Plan component
– Kaiser Permanente South California
Vojtech Huser http://code.google.com/p/idrsnapshot/ 5
6. Target level (researcher-facing schema)
• Level 1: Epic Clarity (6000+ tables)
• Level 2: Clinical Data Repository (add data from
GE Centricity (outpatient) (plus other sources)
• Level 3: subset of CDR for health plan members
only
• Level 4: i2b2, or VDW, or OMOP, or XYZ
(Deduce, Further, BTRIS)
Vojtech Huser http://code.google.com/p/idrsnapshot/ 6
7. Beyond core data sources
– Diagnoses, Procedures, Labs
– ADT data (admission, ICU)
– Visit data
• Less-common data sources
– Insurance history data
– Over the counter drug data
– Death certificate data
– Link to other sources
– Pharmacy dispensing data
– Out of network claims data
• Health Plan data
» Heath Assessment questionnaire data
» Out of network pharmacy refills data
Vojtech Huser http://code.google.com/p/idrsnapshot/ 7
8. Measures
• Glasgow comma scale of 10 vs. 5
• Apgar score of 7 vs. 5
•
• Good measure:
– Intuitive to interpret (count of patients)
– facilitates monitoring and improvement
– does not place any arbitrary value on individual
measure components
– (e.g., value of 10 years of medication history vs. 10 years of
weight/height history).
Vojtech Huser http://code.google.com/p/idrsnapshot/ 8