SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 7
Descargar para leer sin conexión
A White Paper by Stratus Technologies
                                         June 2009




    Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing:
              Four Hidden Impacts on
              Uptime and Availability
Abstract
As x86 virtualization has become established and cloud computing emerges, a robust IT
infrastructure actually matters more than ever. Software aspects get most of the attention partly
because they are new. Despite the hype, not every technical challenge is better solved by software
alone because of the tradeoffs involved. For high-performance, high-density or mission-critical
services and applications, using fault-tolerant server hardware hardens against new vulnerabilities
and complements the resilience you can achieve with virtualization and cloud computing.

Virtualization and the Cloud: Where Are We Now?
Early adopters of x86 virtualization focused on server consolidation, and they have benefited
from cost savings and increased flexibility. Now they look forward to using virtualization to help
them enable cloud computing, the next big trend on the horizon.

The cloud concept takes virtualization a step further by enabling users of IT resources to avoid
investing in dedicated infrastructure. IT costs become a variable operational expense for business
users because capacity is shared. Adopting this mode allows capacity to scale up and down
dynamically and immediately in a manner that advances how virtualization is used today. The
cloud model is designed to let companies use IT resources as a service, taking advantage of
shared applications, processing and storage managed within the cloud  either inside a private
cloud at an internal data center, or in an external cloud at a service provider.




    Cloud Computing Defined
    As in any rapidly developing area, there are multiple definitions of cloud computing and what
    it constitutes. The type of cloud computing discussed in this paper includes both internal and
    external clouds. VMware, whose vSphere™ 4 is positioned as the industry’s first operating
    system for building the internal cloud, uses this definition:

    “Cloud computing is the use of networked infrastructure software and capacity to provide
    resources to users in an on-demand environment. Sometimes known as utility computing,
    clouds provide a set of typically virtualized computers which can provide users with the
    ability to start and stop servers or use compute cycles only when needed, often paying only
    upon usage.” 1




At a fundamental level, the value proposition promised by cloud computing remains much the
same as for virtualization: a means to reduce expenses and improved agility to meet changing
business needs. Using virtualization to enable disaster recovery (DR) and business continuity has
become another significant selling point as adoption of virtualization technology has grown.




1
 “VMware Cloud Computing FAQs,” retrieved May 8, 2009 from
http://www.vmware.com/solutions/cloud-computing/faqs.html

Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing:                                                  Page 1
Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
While virtualization solutions are a known quantity and deployed in real-world IT environments,
cloud computing is still taking shape. In reports published in early 2009, Forrester Research
estimated that 54% of enterprises had implemented x86 server virtualization or planned to do so
within the next 12 months. Some 53% of small and medium businesses had already implemented
x86 server virtualization or planned to do so within the next 12 months. In the cloud computing
area, Forrester found 5% of enterprises had already implemented pay-per-use-hosting of virtual
servers, with 3% more implementing within the next 12 months. Among SMBs, 2% had already
implemented pay-per-use-hosting of virtual servers. 2


                  Figure 1: From Server Virtualization to Cloud Computing

                        Today                                             Tomorrow


    •   Server virtualization is the major trend       •   Cloud computing is the major trend
    •   Virtualization initially driven by hardware    •   Driven by desire to benefit from IT
        consolidation and the resulting savings in         resources provisioned as a service
        capex, power, space                            •   Pay-as-you-go, “utility computing” models
    •   Business agility, disaster recovery and            allow business users to avoid fixed costs
        business continuity became additional          •   Highly elastic, instant access to
        drivers                                            computing resources and IT services
    •   Virtualization solutions are established;      •   Virtualization and cloud solutions become
        cloud computing solutions are emerging             mature
    •   Overall, the requirement for IT expertise is   •   Simpler deployment, use will make
        still significant for virtualization and           benefits broadly achievable
        internal clouds
                                                       •   Management and monitoring come of age
    •   Management and monitoring capabilities             to reduce requirements for specialized IT
        are still developing                               expertise
        - Ongoing IT administration is required            - Self-management
        - Policy making is not automated                   - Automated policy-making
    •   Vendors have not implemented                   •   Virtualization and cloud standards will
        virtualization and cloud computing                 increase ease of deployment, reduce risk
        standards
                                                       •   Appropriate best practices for security,
    •   Security, privacy and compliance issues            privacy and compliance will develop
        still to be addressed for sensitive
        applications/services                          •   Enterprise users of utility computing will
                                                           expect resilient cloud infrastructure and
    •   Most external cloud service level uptime           specify uptime as high as 99.999% for
        agreements (SLAs) are below mission-               mission-critical applications and services
        critical levels 3 ; for example, Amazon EC2
        is at 99.95% 4



2
 Forrester Research, Inc. press release, “Forrester: Server Virtualization Reaches A Majority Of Firms,
Spurring Initial Adoption Of Cloud Computing,” March 4, 2009
3
    ZDNet.com, “The race to 99.999 percent uptime: 3Tera ups the cloud SLA ante,” March 19, 2009
4
    “Amazon EC2 Service Level Agreement,” retrieved May 11, 2009 from http://aws.amazon.com/ec2-sla/

Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing:                                                        Page 2
Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
The abstraction of services and applications away from the physical IT infrastructure that delivers
them is an important characteristic shared by virtualization and cloud computing. One obvious
example: Provisioning a virtual machine is almost effortless compared with setting up a new
physical server. The relative ease of adding and moving virtual machines leads to a dynamic
environment  one that unintentionally obscures how service levels are affected by
interdependencies between the application software, server hardware, storage configuration and
network resources.

Hidden Impacts on IT Infrastructure Availability
Under the physical-to-virtual abstraction introduced by x86 virtualization and cloud computing, a
number of not so obvious impacts affect the uptime and availability the IT infrastructure can
deliver. Because cloud computing is enabled by virtualization technology, many of the potential
issues are common to both. These impacts, in turn, influence how well the virtualized and cloud
environments are able to meet the SLAs required by your enterprise users. The implications can
be profound in high-performance, high-density or mission-critical environments.

1. Single Points of Failure
Virtualization and cloud computing can be used quite successfully to improve the resilience of an
IT environment because they provide the means to recover quickly from component or system
malfunctions using failover, and to back up essential applications and data. Virtual machines can
be migrated from one physical server to another in a live migration; virtual machine images can
be restarted in a different location to provide for disaster recovery.

Downtime exposure grows with the number of virtual machines on any single physical server. It’s
worth noting that individually, none of the virtual machines that run on a physical server may be
deemed mission-critical or even particularly essential. Yet collectively, the virtual machines on
that server take on a critical status if an outage or slowdown would have a serious negative
impact on your business processes. In addition, in a cloud computing scenario, the number of
virtual machines (and types of applications) running on any given physical server may be out of
your company’s direct control.

Easy provisioning of virtual machines also keeps virtualized and cloud environments in perpetual
motion. That very flexibility can introduce single points of failure when too many of the virtual
machines that support a particular service or application are concentrated on the same physical
server. Close attention must be paid to how many virtual machines reside on a physical server,
and which virtual machines are placed on which physical server(s).

2. I/O and Scalability Limitations
Virtualized and cloud environments use software emulation to abstract IT resources away from
the physical hardware, which comes at a cost. Overhead is incurred because virtual resources
have to be mapped to physical resources, including the physical server’s buses, I/O adapters and
disks. Applications that are I/O-intensive often experience latency issues in a virtualized
environment for that reason.

I/O and scalability concerns increase when a virtualization or cloud solution uses software
lockstepping to provide high availability or software-based fault tolerance. Although software
lockstep increases reliability, the technique imposes additional overhead on the CPU, network
and I/O.



Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing:                                                 Page 3
Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
Furthermore, using software lockstepping to achieve high availability or fault tolerance adds
complexity and runs counter to the goal of server consolidation. That is because software lockstep
depends on having primary and secondary physical systems in place: at least one duplicate server,
a duplicate copy of any software and the planning to ensure that failover will work properly. In
this respect, software lockstep resembles the server clusters that have offered a high availability
alternative for years.

Software lockstep in addition may compromise SLA performance when application response time
degrades because of the replication and heartbeat processing necessary to keep the primary and
secondary virtual machines in sync.

Another limitation of software lockstep is that it restricts a virtual machine to a single processor
core. This precludes a virtual machine from using the symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) or
multicore capacity of a CPU, which prevents the application from using all available processor
cores to scale up in performance.

3. Failover and Fault Isolation
As mentioned earlier, virtualization software enables failover: the ability to transfer processing
from one virtual machine to another virtual machine on a different server in the event of a
hardware or application failure (and during scheduled maintenance). Storage capacity may be
virtualized as well. Depending on the capabilities of the virtualization or cloud solution you
choose, failover may be neither automatic nor instantaneous.

Virtualization and cloud software solutions on the market today cannot isolate and then determine
the root cause of a hardware or software failure. Even though failover is provided for, the cause
of the failure may be propagated to the secondary virtual machine. That allows the same failure to
repeat along with the same threats of downtime and data corruption.

In addition, finding and resolving the cause of a failure within a virtualization software stack
poses a challenge due to the increased software complexity and a lack of self-diagnostics.

Even virtualization and cloud solutions that enable high availability or fault tolerance in software
are not designed to deal with transient (temporary) hardware errors that can lead to downtime and
data corruption when these errors are left unaddressed.

4. Data Integrity
The need for data integrity is a trait of application environments that depend on high performance,
have a high density of virtual machines or are mission-critical in nature. As just observed, error-
handling and problem resolution have a meaningful impact on data integrity. And virtualization
or cloud software alone do not provide the complete protection required.

Avoiding a “split-brain” condition is crucial to preventing data corruption as well. Split brain
occurs when a server or servers go down; they reboot or restart; and each virtual machine believes
itself to be the primary VM. Selecting a virtualization solution that prevents split brain is good
practice anytime you plan to provide redundancy by using multiple physical servers and network
paths in a virtualized or cloud setup.




Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing:                                                    Page 4
Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
Hardware Assistance from Fault-Tolerant Servers
When used together with software-based x86 virtualization or cloud computing, fault-tolerant
server hardware makes a good thing better by alleviating the new concerns that arise around
single points of failure, I/O constraints, scalability limitations, failover, fault isolation, problem
resolution and data integrity.

While earlier generations of fault-tolerant servers were proprietary and expensive, today’s
versions are vastly more cost-effective Intel® architecture servers that run Windows® or Linux®
operating systems These servers offer an effective means of hardening virtualized and cloud
environments without adding complexity. With an optimal fault-tolerant architecture, software
including virtual machines need not be modified in any way to benefit from the server’s
reliability and availability features.

Eliminating single points of failure is a signature attribute of these systems, which are said to
have continuous availability. If one of the server’s components fails, its duplicate keeps the server
processing without interruption or degradation in performance. Failover is eliminated rather than
minimized. For these reasons, such fault-tolerant servers have been proven to sustain 99.999% 
“five nines”  or better availability.

Because their fault tolerance is based in hardware, such servers eliminate the overhead of
software emulation along with the I/O limitations and scalability constraints that result. True
symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) allows applications to scale across multiple CPU cores while
in a virtual machine.

Component and functional redundancy within the footprint of a single server also simplifies
deployment and support. Automatic fault isolation and diagnostic tools can be built into the
server architecture, as well. The server’s internal redundancy also protects the integrity of
committed (completed) transactions and preserves in-flight data despite a component failure or
transient error, such as a driver malfunction. To the extent all this can be done on a single
physical server rather than requiring multiple servers, hardware cost of ownership and software
license fees are far less complicated and less expensive.

Deploying fault-tolerant servers as part of a virtual resource pool therefore hardens the
environment at otherwise vulnerable points. You are also positioned to support tiered levels of
service, with the agility to upgrade virtual machines to a higher level of availability protection
when needed. This same principle will hold true as cloud computing evolves.

Conclusion
Server virtualization and cloud computing are no exceptions to the rule that every new paradigm
in computing brings new benefits (for example, client/server versus peer-to-peer), though not
without raising concerns and issues. It’s the familiar situation of solving one set of problems only
to reveal several new ones.

While software-enabled virtualization and cloud computing allow IT services and applications to
appear independent of the underlying resources, in several respects these computing models
introduce stress points that demand greater robustness of the IT infrastructure. Using fault-
tolerant server hardware for selected key roles within virtualized and cloud environments builds
in reliability and reduces management complexity, helping to sustain the high service levels that
enterprises can count on.

Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing:                                                      Page 5
Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
About Stratus Technologies
Stratus Technologies focuses exclusively on helping customers keep critical business operations
online without interruption. Business continuity requires resiliency and superior availability
throughout the IT infrastructure, including virtual environments. Stratus delivers a range of
solutions that includes software-based high availability, fault-tolerant servers, availability
consulting and assessment, and remote systems management services. Based on 29 years of
expertise in product and services technology for total availability, Stratus is a trusted solutions
provider to customers in manufacturing, health care, financial services, public safety,
transportation & logistics, and other industries. For more information, visit www.stratus.com.




Stratus and the Stratus Technologies logo are trademarks of Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. VMware is a registered
trademark and vSphere is a trademark of VMware, Inc., in the United States and/or other countries. Intel is a registered
trademark of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries/regions. Windows is a
registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries/regions. The registered
trademark Linux is used pursuant to a sublicense from the Linux Mark Institute, the exclusive licensee of Linus
Torvalds, owner of the mark on a worldwide basis. All other trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of
their respective holders.

Copyright © 2009 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. All rights reserved.
X992


Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing:                                                                    Page 6
Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Welcome to the Cloud!
Welcome to the Cloud!Welcome to the Cloud!
Welcome to the Cloud!imogokate
 
Cloud Computing And Citrix C3 - July 2009
Cloud Computing And Citrix C3 - July 2009Cloud Computing And Citrix C3 - July 2009
Cloud Computing And Citrix C3 - July 2009Michael Harries
 
Cloud Computing
Cloud ComputingCloud Computing
Cloud Computingnjeanphi
 
Cloud computing – An Overview
Cloud computing – An OverviewCloud computing – An Overview
Cloud computing – An OverviewKannan Subbiah
 
An introduction to the cloud 11 v1
An introduction to the cloud 11 v1An introduction to the cloud 11 v1
An introduction to the cloud 11 v1charan7575
 
The Importance of Cloud Management for Networks
The Importance of Cloud Management for NetworksThe Importance of Cloud Management for Networks
The Importance of Cloud Management for NetworksWestbase.io
 
Vendor classification & rating
Vendor classification & ratingVendor classification & rating
Vendor classification & ratingAmit Puri
 
Citrix Synergy 2014 - Syn231 Why cloud projects fail
Citrix Synergy 2014 - Syn231 Why cloud projects failCitrix Synergy 2014 - Syn231 Why cloud projects fail
Citrix Synergy 2014 - Syn231 Why cloud projects failCitrix
 
Cloud Computing - Challenges and Opportunities - Jens Nimis
Cloud Computing - Challenges and Opportunities  -  Jens NimisCloud Computing - Challenges and Opportunities  -  Jens Nimis
Cloud Computing - Challenges and Opportunities - Jens NimisJensNimis
 
Microsoft Private Cloud Strategy
Microsoft Private Cloud StrategyMicrosoft Private Cloud Strategy
Microsoft Private Cloud StrategyAmit Gatenyo
 
Unit 1.2 move to cloud computing
Unit 1.2   move to cloud computingUnit 1.2   move to cloud computing
Unit 1.2 move to cloud computingeShikshak
 
Greg Dixon - 2011 ScanSource POS & Barcoding Partner Conference
Greg Dixon - 2011 ScanSource POS & Barcoding Partner ConferenceGreg Dixon - 2011 ScanSource POS & Barcoding Partner Conference
Greg Dixon - 2011 ScanSource POS & Barcoding Partner ConferenceScanSource, Inc.
 
www.iosrjournals.org 57 | Page Latest development of cloud computing technolo...
www.iosrjournals.org 57 | Page Latest development of cloud computing technolo...www.iosrjournals.org 57 | Page Latest development of cloud computing technolo...
www.iosrjournals.org 57 | Page Latest development of cloud computing technolo...Sushil kumar Choudhary
 
Cloud Computing
 Cloud Computing Cloud Computing
Cloud ComputingAbdul Aslam
 
Analyst paper: Private Clouds Float with IBM Systems and Software
Analyst paper: Private Clouds Float with IBM Systems and SoftwareAnalyst paper: Private Clouds Float with IBM Systems and Software
Analyst paper: Private Clouds Float with IBM Systems and SoftwareIBM India Smarter Computing
 
Clearing the fog from cloud computing
Clearing the fog from cloud computingClearing the fog from cloud computing
Clearing the fog from cloud computingmciobo
 
Opportunites and Challenges in Cloud COmputing
Opportunites and Challenges in Cloud COmputingOpportunites and Challenges in Cloud COmputing
Opportunites and Challenges in Cloud COmputingACMBangalore
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Welcome to the Cloud!
Welcome to the Cloud!Welcome to the Cloud!
Welcome to the Cloud!
 
Cloud Computing And Citrix C3 - July 2009
Cloud Computing And Citrix C3 - July 2009Cloud Computing And Citrix C3 - July 2009
Cloud Computing And Citrix C3 - July 2009
 
Cloud Computing
Cloud ComputingCloud Computing
Cloud Computing
 
Cloud computing – An Overview
Cloud computing – An OverviewCloud computing – An Overview
Cloud computing – An Overview
 
An introduction to the cloud 11 v1
An introduction to the cloud 11 v1An introduction to the cloud 11 v1
An introduction to the cloud 11 v1
 
Cloud computing
Cloud computingCloud computing
Cloud computing
 
The Importance of Cloud Management for Networks
The Importance of Cloud Management for NetworksThe Importance of Cloud Management for Networks
The Importance of Cloud Management for Networks
 
Vendor classification & rating
Vendor classification & ratingVendor classification & rating
Vendor classification & rating
 
Citrix Synergy 2014 - Syn231 Why cloud projects fail
Citrix Synergy 2014 - Syn231 Why cloud projects failCitrix Synergy 2014 - Syn231 Why cloud projects fail
Citrix Synergy 2014 - Syn231 Why cloud projects fail
 
Cloud Computing - Challenges and Opportunities - Jens Nimis
Cloud Computing - Challenges and Opportunities  -  Jens NimisCloud Computing - Challenges and Opportunities  -  Jens Nimis
Cloud Computing - Challenges and Opportunities - Jens Nimis
 
Microsoft Private Cloud Strategy
Microsoft Private Cloud StrategyMicrosoft Private Cloud Strategy
Microsoft Private Cloud Strategy
 
Unit 1.2 move to cloud computing
Unit 1.2   move to cloud computingUnit 1.2   move to cloud computing
Unit 1.2 move to cloud computing
 
Greg Dixon - 2011 ScanSource POS & Barcoding Partner Conference
Greg Dixon - 2011 ScanSource POS & Barcoding Partner ConferenceGreg Dixon - 2011 ScanSource POS & Barcoding Partner Conference
Greg Dixon - 2011 ScanSource POS & Barcoding Partner Conference
 
www.iosrjournals.org 57 | Page Latest development of cloud computing technolo...
www.iosrjournals.org 57 | Page Latest development of cloud computing technolo...www.iosrjournals.org 57 | Page Latest development of cloud computing technolo...
www.iosrjournals.org 57 | Page Latest development of cloud computing technolo...
 
Cloud Computing
 Cloud Computing Cloud Computing
Cloud Computing
 
Virtualization - cloud computing
Virtualization - cloud computingVirtualization - cloud computing
Virtualization - cloud computing
 
Analyst paper: Private Clouds Float with IBM Systems and Software
Analyst paper: Private Clouds Float with IBM Systems and SoftwareAnalyst paper: Private Clouds Float with IBM Systems and Software
Analyst paper: Private Clouds Float with IBM Systems and Software
 
A Review on Data Protection of Cloud Computing Security, Benefits, Risks and ...
A Review on Data Protection of Cloud Computing Security, Benefits, Risks and ...A Review on Data Protection of Cloud Computing Security, Benefits, Risks and ...
A Review on Data Protection of Cloud Computing Security, Benefits, Risks and ...
 
Clearing the fog from cloud computing
Clearing the fog from cloud computingClearing the fog from cloud computing
Clearing the fog from cloud computing
 
Opportunites and Challenges in Cloud COmputing
Opportunites and Challenges in Cloud COmputingOpportunites and Challenges in Cloud COmputing
Opportunites and Challenges in Cloud COmputing
 

Similar a Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Four Hidden Impacts on ...

Clearing the fog from cloud computing
Clearing the fog from cloud computingClearing the fog from cloud computing
Clearing the fog from cloud computingmciobo
 
Cloud computing-intel-cloud-2015-vision
Cloud computing-intel-cloud-2015-visionCloud computing-intel-cloud-2015-vision
Cloud computing-intel-cloud-2015-visionHossam Zein
 
Trend and Future of Cloud Computing
Trend and Future of Cloud ComputingTrend and Future of Cloud Computing
Trend and Future of Cloud Computinghybrid cloud
 
Cloud computing computer
Cloud computing computerCloud computing computer
Cloud computing computerSanath Surawar
 
Cloud computing
Cloud computing Cloud computing
Cloud computing ananyaakk
 
Application Darwinism: Why Most Enterprise Apps Will Move to the Cloud (SVC20...
Application Darwinism: Why Most Enterprise Apps Will Move to the Cloud (SVC20...Application Darwinism: Why Most Enterprise Apps Will Move to the Cloud (SVC20...
Application Darwinism: Why Most Enterprise Apps Will Move to the Cloud (SVC20...Amazon Web Services
 
presentation_introduction_to_cloud_computing_1565085358_46246.pptx
presentation_introduction_to_cloud_computing_1565085358_46246.pptxpresentation_introduction_to_cloud_computing_1565085358_46246.pptx
presentation_introduction_to_cloud_computing_1565085358_46246.pptxSimmyNayak
 
Accenture 6 questions_executives_should_ask_about_cloud_computing
Accenture 6 questions_executives_should_ask_about_cloud_computingAccenture 6 questions_executives_should_ask_about_cloud_computing
Accenture 6 questions_executives_should_ask_about_cloud_computingNgy Ea
 
PRIVATE CLOUDS FLOAT WITH IBM SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
PRIVATE CLOUDS FLOAT WITH IBM SYSTEMS AND SOFTWAREPRIVATE CLOUDS FLOAT WITH IBM SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
PRIVATE CLOUDS FLOAT WITH IBM SYSTEMS AND SOFTWAREIBM India Smarter Computing
 
Short Economic EssayPlease answer MINIMUM 400 word I need this.docx
Short Economic EssayPlease answer MINIMUM 400 word I need this.docxShort Economic EssayPlease answer MINIMUM 400 word I need this.docx
Short Economic EssayPlease answer MINIMUM 400 word I need this.docxbudabrooks46239
 
Cloud Computing – The Best Form of IT Delivery
Cloud Computing – The Best Form of IT DeliveryCloud Computing – The Best Form of IT Delivery
Cloud Computing – The Best Form of IT DeliverySoftweb Solutions
 
Managing the move to virtualization and cloud
Managing the move to virtualization and cloudManaging the move to virtualization and cloud
Managing the move to virtualization and cloudBhaskar Jayaraman
 
Public cloud: A Review
Public cloud: A ReviewPublic cloud: A Review
Public cloud: A ReviewAjay844
 
Introduction to Cloud Computing
Introduction to Cloud ComputingIntroduction to Cloud Computing
Introduction to Cloud ComputingUnmesh Ballal
 
Ibm Perspective On Cloud Computing
Ibm Perspective On Cloud ComputingIbm Perspective On Cloud Computing
Ibm Perspective On Cloud Computinglambertt
 

Similar a Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Four Hidden Impacts on ... (20)

Clearing the fog from cloud computing
Clearing the fog from cloud computingClearing the fog from cloud computing
Clearing the fog from cloud computing
 
Introduction Of Cloud Computing
Introduction Of Cloud Computing Introduction Of Cloud Computing
Introduction Of Cloud Computing
 
Cloud computing-intel-cloud-2015-vision
Cloud computing-intel-cloud-2015-visionCloud computing-intel-cloud-2015-vision
Cloud computing-intel-cloud-2015-vision
 
Trend and Future of Cloud Computing
Trend and Future of Cloud ComputingTrend and Future of Cloud Computing
Trend and Future of Cloud Computing
 
Cloud computing computer
Cloud computing computerCloud computing computer
Cloud computing computer
 
Cloud computing
Cloud computing Cloud computing
Cloud computing
 
Application Darwinism: Why Most Enterprise Apps Will Move to the Cloud (SVC20...
Application Darwinism: Why Most Enterprise Apps Will Move to the Cloud (SVC20...Application Darwinism: Why Most Enterprise Apps Will Move to the Cloud (SVC20...
Application Darwinism: Why Most Enterprise Apps Will Move to the Cloud (SVC20...
 
Cloud computing
Cloud computingCloud computing
Cloud computing
 
Cloud computing
Cloud computingCloud computing
Cloud computing
 
presentation_introduction_to_cloud_computing_1565085358_46246.pptx
presentation_introduction_to_cloud_computing_1565085358_46246.pptxpresentation_introduction_to_cloud_computing_1565085358_46246.pptx
presentation_introduction_to_cloud_computing_1565085358_46246.pptx
 
Accenture 6 questions_executives_should_ask_about_cloud_computing
Accenture 6 questions_executives_should_ask_about_cloud_computingAccenture 6 questions_executives_should_ask_about_cloud_computing
Accenture 6 questions_executives_should_ask_about_cloud_computing
 
PRIVATE CLOUDS FLOAT WITH IBM SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
PRIVATE CLOUDS FLOAT WITH IBM SYSTEMS AND SOFTWAREPRIVATE CLOUDS FLOAT WITH IBM SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
PRIVATE CLOUDS FLOAT WITH IBM SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
 
Short Economic EssayPlease answer MINIMUM 400 word I need this.docx
Short Economic EssayPlease answer MINIMUM 400 word I need this.docxShort Economic EssayPlease answer MINIMUM 400 word I need this.docx
Short Economic EssayPlease answer MINIMUM 400 word I need this.docx
 
Cloud Computing – The Best Form of IT Delivery
Cloud Computing – The Best Form of IT DeliveryCloud Computing – The Best Form of IT Delivery
Cloud Computing – The Best Form of IT Delivery
 
Managing the move to virtualization and cloud
Managing the move to virtualization and cloudManaging the move to virtualization and cloud
Managing the move to virtualization and cloud
 
Public cloud: A Review
Public cloud: A ReviewPublic cloud: A Review
Public cloud: A Review
 
Myths About Cloud Computing
Myths About Cloud ComputingMyths About Cloud Computing
Myths About Cloud Computing
 
Cloud computing
Cloud computingCloud computing
Cloud computing
 
Introduction to Cloud Computing
Introduction to Cloud ComputingIntroduction to Cloud Computing
Introduction to Cloud Computing
 
Ibm Perspective On Cloud Computing
Ibm Perspective On Cloud ComputingIbm Perspective On Cloud Computing
Ibm Perspective On Cloud Computing
 

Más de webhostingguy

Running and Developing Tests with the Apache::Test Framework
Running and Developing Tests with the Apache::Test FrameworkRunning and Developing Tests with the Apache::Test Framework
Running and Developing Tests with the Apache::Test Frameworkwebhostingguy
 
MySQL and memcached Guide
MySQL and memcached GuideMySQL and memcached Guide
MySQL and memcached Guidewebhostingguy
 
Novell® iChain® 2.3
Novell® iChain® 2.3Novell® iChain® 2.3
Novell® iChain® 2.3webhostingguy
 
Load-balancing web servers Load-balancing web servers
Load-balancing web servers Load-balancing web serversLoad-balancing web servers Load-balancing web servers
Load-balancing web servers Load-balancing web serverswebhostingguy
 
SQL Server 2008 Consolidation
SQL Server 2008 ConsolidationSQL Server 2008 Consolidation
SQL Server 2008 Consolidationwebhostingguy
 
Master Service Agreement
Master Service AgreementMaster Service Agreement
Master Service Agreementwebhostingguy
 
PHP and MySQL PHP Written as a set of CGI binaries in C in ...
PHP and MySQL PHP Written as a set of CGI binaries in C in ...PHP and MySQL PHP Written as a set of CGI binaries in C in ...
PHP and MySQL PHP Written as a set of CGI binaries in C in ...webhostingguy
 
Dell Reference Architecture Guide Deploying Microsoft® SQL ...
Dell Reference Architecture Guide Deploying Microsoft® SQL ...Dell Reference Architecture Guide Deploying Microsoft® SQL ...
Dell Reference Architecture Guide Deploying Microsoft® SQL ...webhostingguy
 
Managing Diverse IT Infrastructure
Managing Diverse IT InfrastructureManaging Diverse IT Infrastructure
Managing Diverse IT Infrastructurewebhostingguy
 
Web design for business.ppt
Web design for business.pptWeb design for business.ppt
Web design for business.pptwebhostingguy
 
IT Power Management Strategy
IT Power Management Strategy IT Power Management Strategy
IT Power Management Strategy webhostingguy
 
Excel and SQL Quick Tricks for Merchandisers
Excel and SQL Quick Tricks for MerchandisersExcel and SQL Quick Tricks for Merchandisers
Excel and SQL Quick Tricks for Merchandiserswebhostingguy
 
Parallels Hosting Products
Parallels Hosting ProductsParallels Hosting Products
Parallels Hosting Productswebhostingguy
 
Microsoft PowerPoint presentation 2.175 Mb
Microsoft PowerPoint presentation 2.175 MbMicrosoft PowerPoint presentation 2.175 Mb
Microsoft PowerPoint presentation 2.175 Mbwebhostingguy
 

Más de webhostingguy (20)

File Upload
File UploadFile Upload
File Upload
 
Running and Developing Tests with the Apache::Test Framework
Running and Developing Tests with the Apache::Test FrameworkRunning and Developing Tests with the Apache::Test Framework
Running and Developing Tests with the Apache::Test Framework
 
MySQL and memcached Guide
MySQL and memcached GuideMySQL and memcached Guide
MySQL and memcached Guide
 
Novell® iChain® 2.3
Novell® iChain® 2.3Novell® iChain® 2.3
Novell® iChain® 2.3
 
Load-balancing web servers Load-balancing web servers
Load-balancing web servers Load-balancing web serversLoad-balancing web servers Load-balancing web servers
Load-balancing web servers Load-balancing web servers
 
SQL Server 2008 Consolidation
SQL Server 2008 ConsolidationSQL Server 2008 Consolidation
SQL Server 2008 Consolidation
 
What is mod_perl?
What is mod_perl?What is mod_perl?
What is mod_perl?
 
What is mod_perl?
What is mod_perl?What is mod_perl?
What is mod_perl?
 
Master Service Agreement
Master Service AgreementMaster Service Agreement
Master Service Agreement
 
Notes8
Notes8Notes8
Notes8
 
PHP and MySQL PHP Written as a set of CGI binaries in C in ...
PHP and MySQL PHP Written as a set of CGI binaries in C in ...PHP and MySQL PHP Written as a set of CGI binaries in C in ...
PHP and MySQL PHP Written as a set of CGI binaries in C in ...
 
Dell Reference Architecture Guide Deploying Microsoft® SQL ...
Dell Reference Architecture Guide Deploying Microsoft® SQL ...Dell Reference Architecture Guide Deploying Microsoft® SQL ...
Dell Reference Architecture Guide Deploying Microsoft® SQL ...
 
Managing Diverse IT Infrastructure
Managing Diverse IT InfrastructureManaging Diverse IT Infrastructure
Managing Diverse IT Infrastructure
 
Web design for business.ppt
Web design for business.pptWeb design for business.ppt
Web design for business.ppt
 
IT Power Management Strategy
IT Power Management Strategy IT Power Management Strategy
IT Power Management Strategy
 
Excel and SQL Quick Tricks for Merchandisers
Excel and SQL Quick Tricks for MerchandisersExcel and SQL Quick Tricks for Merchandisers
Excel and SQL Quick Tricks for Merchandisers
 
OLUG_xen.ppt
OLUG_xen.pptOLUG_xen.ppt
OLUG_xen.ppt
 
Parallels Hosting Products
Parallels Hosting ProductsParallels Hosting Products
Parallels Hosting Products
 
Microsoft PowerPoint presentation 2.175 Mb
Microsoft PowerPoint presentation 2.175 MbMicrosoft PowerPoint presentation 2.175 Mb
Microsoft PowerPoint presentation 2.175 Mb
 
Reseller's Guide
Reseller's GuideReseller's Guide
Reseller's Guide
 

Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Four Hidden Impacts on ...

  • 1. A White Paper by Stratus Technologies  June 2009 Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
  • 2. Abstract As x86 virtualization has become established and cloud computing emerges, a robust IT infrastructure actually matters more than ever. Software aspects get most of the attention partly because they are new. Despite the hype, not every technical challenge is better solved by software alone because of the tradeoffs involved. For high-performance, high-density or mission-critical services and applications, using fault-tolerant server hardware hardens against new vulnerabilities and complements the resilience you can achieve with virtualization and cloud computing. Virtualization and the Cloud: Where Are We Now? Early adopters of x86 virtualization focused on server consolidation, and they have benefited from cost savings and increased flexibility. Now they look forward to using virtualization to help them enable cloud computing, the next big trend on the horizon. The cloud concept takes virtualization a step further by enabling users of IT resources to avoid investing in dedicated infrastructure. IT costs become a variable operational expense for business users because capacity is shared. Adopting this mode allows capacity to scale up and down dynamically and immediately in a manner that advances how virtualization is used today. The cloud model is designed to let companies use IT resources as a service, taking advantage of shared applications, processing and storage managed within the cloud  either inside a private cloud at an internal data center, or in an external cloud at a service provider. Cloud Computing Defined As in any rapidly developing area, there are multiple definitions of cloud computing and what it constitutes. The type of cloud computing discussed in this paper includes both internal and external clouds. VMware, whose vSphere™ 4 is positioned as the industry’s first operating system for building the internal cloud, uses this definition: “Cloud computing is the use of networked infrastructure software and capacity to provide resources to users in an on-demand environment. Sometimes known as utility computing, clouds provide a set of typically virtualized computers which can provide users with the ability to start and stop servers or use compute cycles only when needed, often paying only upon usage.” 1 At a fundamental level, the value proposition promised by cloud computing remains much the same as for virtualization: a means to reduce expenses and improved agility to meet changing business needs. Using virtualization to enable disaster recovery (DR) and business continuity has become another significant selling point as adoption of virtualization technology has grown. 1 “VMware Cloud Computing FAQs,” retrieved May 8, 2009 from http://www.vmware.com/solutions/cloud-computing/faqs.html Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Page 1 Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
  • 3. While virtualization solutions are a known quantity and deployed in real-world IT environments, cloud computing is still taking shape. In reports published in early 2009, Forrester Research estimated that 54% of enterprises had implemented x86 server virtualization or planned to do so within the next 12 months. Some 53% of small and medium businesses had already implemented x86 server virtualization or planned to do so within the next 12 months. In the cloud computing area, Forrester found 5% of enterprises had already implemented pay-per-use-hosting of virtual servers, with 3% more implementing within the next 12 months. Among SMBs, 2% had already implemented pay-per-use-hosting of virtual servers. 2 Figure 1: From Server Virtualization to Cloud Computing Today Tomorrow • Server virtualization is the major trend • Cloud computing is the major trend • Virtualization initially driven by hardware • Driven by desire to benefit from IT consolidation and the resulting savings in resources provisioned as a service capex, power, space • Pay-as-you-go, “utility computing” models • Business agility, disaster recovery and allow business users to avoid fixed costs business continuity became additional • Highly elastic, instant access to drivers computing resources and IT services • Virtualization solutions are established; • Virtualization and cloud solutions become cloud computing solutions are emerging mature • Overall, the requirement for IT expertise is • Simpler deployment, use will make still significant for virtualization and benefits broadly achievable internal clouds • Management and monitoring come of age • Management and monitoring capabilities to reduce requirements for specialized IT are still developing expertise - Ongoing IT administration is required - Self-management - Policy making is not automated - Automated policy-making • Vendors have not implemented • Virtualization and cloud standards will virtualization and cloud computing increase ease of deployment, reduce risk standards • Appropriate best practices for security, • Security, privacy and compliance issues privacy and compliance will develop still to be addressed for sensitive applications/services • Enterprise users of utility computing will expect resilient cloud infrastructure and • Most external cloud service level uptime specify uptime as high as 99.999% for agreements (SLAs) are below mission- mission-critical applications and services critical levels 3 ; for example, Amazon EC2 is at 99.95% 4 2 Forrester Research, Inc. press release, “Forrester: Server Virtualization Reaches A Majority Of Firms, Spurring Initial Adoption Of Cloud Computing,” March 4, 2009 3 ZDNet.com, “The race to 99.999 percent uptime: 3Tera ups the cloud SLA ante,” March 19, 2009 4 “Amazon EC2 Service Level Agreement,” retrieved May 11, 2009 from http://aws.amazon.com/ec2-sla/ Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Page 2 Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
  • 4. The abstraction of services and applications away from the physical IT infrastructure that delivers them is an important characteristic shared by virtualization and cloud computing. One obvious example: Provisioning a virtual machine is almost effortless compared with setting up a new physical server. The relative ease of adding and moving virtual machines leads to a dynamic environment  one that unintentionally obscures how service levels are affected by interdependencies between the application software, server hardware, storage configuration and network resources. Hidden Impacts on IT Infrastructure Availability Under the physical-to-virtual abstraction introduced by x86 virtualization and cloud computing, a number of not so obvious impacts affect the uptime and availability the IT infrastructure can deliver. Because cloud computing is enabled by virtualization technology, many of the potential issues are common to both. These impacts, in turn, influence how well the virtualized and cloud environments are able to meet the SLAs required by your enterprise users. The implications can be profound in high-performance, high-density or mission-critical environments. 1. Single Points of Failure Virtualization and cloud computing can be used quite successfully to improve the resilience of an IT environment because they provide the means to recover quickly from component or system malfunctions using failover, and to back up essential applications and data. Virtual machines can be migrated from one physical server to another in a live migration; virtual machine images can be restarted in a different location to provide for disaster recovery. Downtime exposure grows with the number of virtual machines on any single physical server. It’s worth noting that individually, none of the virtual machines that run on a physical server may be deemed mission-critical or even particularly essential. Yet collectively, the virtual machines on that server take on a critical status if an outage or slowdown would have a serious negative impact on your business processes. In addition, in a cloud computing scenario, the number of virtual machines (and types of applications) running on any given physical server may be out of your company’s direct control. Easy provisioning of virtual machines also keeps virtualized and cloud environments in perpetual motion. That very flexibility can introduce single points of failure when too many of the virtual machines that support a particular service or application are concentrated on the same physical server. Close attention must be paid to how many virtual machines reside on a physical server, and which virtual machines are placed on which physical server(s). 2. I/O and Scalability Limitations Virtualized and cloud environments use software emulation to abstract IT resources away from the physical hardware, which comes at a cost. Overhead is incurred because virtual resources have to be mapped to physical resources, including the physical server’s buses, I/O adapters and disks. Applications that are I/O-intensive often experience latency issues in a virtualized environment for that reason. I/O and scalability concerns increase when a virtualization or cloud solution uses software lockstepping to provide high availability or software-based fault tolerance. Although software lockstep increases reliability, the technique imposes additional overhead on the CPU, network and I/O. Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Page 3 Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
  • 5. Furthermore, using software lockstepping to achieve high availability or fault tolerance adds complexity and runs counter to the goal of server consolidation. That is because software lockstep depends on having primary and secondary physical systems in place: at least one duplicate server, a duplicate copy of any software and the planning to ensure that failover will work properly. In this respect, software lockstep resembles the server clusters that have offered a high availability alternative for years. Software lockstep in addition may compromise SLA performance when application response time degrades because of the replication and heartbeat processing necessary to keep the primary and secondary virtual machines in sync. Another limitation of software lockstep is that it restricts a virtual machine to a single processor core. This precludes a virtual machine from using the symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) or multicore capacity of a CPU, which prevents the application from using all available processor cores to scale up in performance. 3. Failover and Fault Isolation As mentioned earlier, virtualization software enables failover: the ability to transfer processing from one virtual machine to another virtual machine on a different server in the event of a hardware or application failure (and during scheduled maintenance). Storage capacity may be virtualized as well. Depending on the capabilities of the virtualization or cloud solution you choose, failover may be neither automatic nor instantaneous. Virtualization and cloud software solutions on the market today cannot isolate and then determine the root cause of a hardware or software failure. Even though failover is provided for, the cause of the failure may be propagated to the secondary virtual machine. That allows the same failure to repeat along with the same threats of downtime and data corruption. In addition, finding and resolving the cause of a failure within a virtualization software stack poses a challenge due to the increased software complexity and a lack of self-diagnostics. Even virtualization and cloud solutions that enable high availability or fault tolerance in software are not designed to deal with transient (temporary) hardware errors that can lead to downtime and data corruption when these errors are left unaddressed. 4. Data Integrity The need for data integrity is a trait of application environments that depend on high performance, have a high density of virtual machines or are mission-critical in nature. As just observed, error- handling and problem resolution have a meaningful impact on data integrity. And virtualization or cloud software alone do not provide the complete protection required. Avoiding a “split-brain” condition is crucial to preventing data corruption as well. Split brain occurs when a server or servers go down; they reboot or restart; and each virtual machine believes itself to be the primary VM. Selecting a virtualization solution that prevents split brain is good practice anytime you plan to provide redundancy by using multiple physical servers and network paths in a virtualized or cloud setup. Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Page 4 Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
  • 6. Hardware Assistance from Fault-Tolerant Servers When used together with software-based x86 virtualization or cloud computing, fault-tolerant server hardware makes a good thing better by alleviating the new concerns that arise around single points of failure, I/O constraints, scalability limitations, failover, fault isolation, problem resolution and data integrity. While earlier generations of fault-tolerant servers were proprietary and expensive, today’s versions are vastly more cost-effective Intel® architecture servers that run Windows® or Linux® operating systems These servers offer an effective means of hardening virtualized and cloud environments without adding complexity. With an optimal fault-tolerant architecture, software including virtual machines need not be modified in any way to benefit from the server’s reliability and availability features. Eliminating single points of failure is a signature attribute of these systems, which are said to have continuous availability. If one of the server’s components fails, its duplicate keeps the server processing without interruption or degradation in performance. Failover is eliminated rather than minimized. For these reasons, such fault-tolerant servers have been proven to sustain 99.999%  “five nines”  or better availability. Because their fault tolerance is based in hardware, such servers eliminate the overhead of software emulation along with the I/O limitations and scalability constraints that result. True symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) allows applications to scale across multiple CPU cores while in a virtual machine. Component and functional redundancy within the footprint of a single server also simplifies deployment and support. Automatic fault isolation and diagnostic tools can be built into the server architecture, as well. The server’s internal redundancy also protects the integrity of committed (completed) transactions and preserves in-flight data despite a component failure or transient error, such as a driver malfunction. To the extent all this can be done on a single physical server rather than requiring multiple servers, hardware cost of ownership and software license fees are far less complicated and less expensive. Deploying fault-tolerant servers as part of a virtual resource pool therefore hardens the environment at otherwise vulnerable points. You are also positioned to support tiered levels of service, with the agility to upgrade virtual machines to a higher level of availability protection when needed. This same principle will hold true as cloud computing evolves. Conclusion Server virtualization and cloud computing are no exceptions to the rule that every new paradigm in computing brings new benefits (for example, client/server versus peer-to-peer), though not without raising concerns and issues. It’s the familiar situation of solving one set of problems only to reveal several new ones. While software-enabled virtualization and cloud computing allow IT services and applications to appear independent of the underlying resources, in several respects these computing models introduce stress points that demand greater robustness of the IT infrastructure. Using fault- tolerant server hardware for selected key roles within virtualized and cloud environments builds in reliability and reduces management complexity, helping to sustain the high service levels that enterprises can count on. Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Page 5 Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability
  • 7. About Stratus Technologies Stratus Technologies focuses exclusively on helping customers keep critical business operations online without interruption. Business continuity requires resiliency and superior availability throughout the IT infrastructure, including virtual environments. Stratus delivers a range of solutions that includes software-based high availability, fault-tolerant servers, availability consulting and assessment, and remote systems management services. Based on 29 years of expertise in product and services technology for total availability, Stratus is a trusted solutions provider to customers in manufacturing, health care, financial services, public safety, transportation & logistics, and other industries. For more information, visit www.stratus.com. Stratus and the Stratus Technologies logo are trademarks of Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. VMware is a registered trademark and vSphere is a trademark of VMware, Inc., in the United States and/or other countries. Intel is a registered trademark of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries/regions. Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries/regions. The registered trademark Linux is used pursuant to a sublicense from the Linux Mark Institute, the exclusive licensee of Linus Torvalds, owner of the mark on a worldwide basis. All other trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective holders. Copyright © 2009 Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. All rights reserved. X992 Server Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Page 6 Four Hidden Impacts on Uptime and Availability