2. Consider . . .
• “The research design is the ‘blueprint’ that
enables the investigator to come up with
solutions to these problems and guides him or
her in the various stages of the research”
(Frankfort-Nachmias & Nachmias, 2008, p. 89)
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2008). Research Methods in the Social Sciences (7th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
4. Definition
• Creswell (2003) describes qualitative research
as a procedure of research that relies on text
and image data collection, which draws a
diverse inquiry to the research plan
– More so, this research method requires closer
attention to the interpretive nature of the study
and situating the research with political, social,
and cultural context of the readers, participants,
and even the researcher of the study (Creswell,
2007).
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Definition
• Qualitative research typically grows out of in-
depth interviews, specific observations, or
written documents (Patton, 2002).
• Consider that “a questionnaire or interview
that asks both fixed choice [or closed]
questions and open-ended questions is an
example of how quantitative measurement
and qualitative inquiry are often combined”
(Patton, 2002)
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. • Quantitative methods “use theory deductively
and places it toward the beginning of the plan
for a study . . . [it] becomes a framework for
the entire study . . .” (Creswell, 2003, p. 125).
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Defining Surveys
• Survey Design
– To provide a quantitative description of
trends, attitudes, or opinions of a population
• Components of a Survey Method Plan
– The Survey Design
– The Population and Sample
– Instrumentation
– Variables in the Study
– Data Analysis and Interpretation
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. A Survey Method Plan
• The Survey Design
– Provide a rationale for using a survey
– Indicate the type of survey design:
• Cross-sectional (data collected at one point in time)
• Longitudinal (data collected over time)
• The Population and Sample
– Specify the characteristics of the population (size, sampling
frame)
– Specify the sampling procedures
• Single stage or multi-stage
• Random or convenience
– Use a sample size formula to determine the needed sample size
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. A Survey Method Plan
• Instrumentation
– Provide detailed information about the survey instrument
• How developed, Pilot testing
• Sample items, Types of scores
– Describe the validity and reliability scores of past and/or current
uses of the instrument
• Validity: whether one can draw meaning and useful inferences
from scores on the instruments
• Reliability: whether scores resulting from past use are internally
consistent, have high test-retest correlations, and result from
consistent scoring
– Describe steps for administering survey and ensuring a high
response rate
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Defining Experiments
• Experimental Design
– To test the impact of a treatment on an outcome, controlling for
other factors that might influence that outcome
• Components of an Experimental Method Plan
– Participants
– Variables
– Instrumentation and Materials
– Experimental Procedures
– Threats to Validity
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. An Experimental Method Plan
• Participants
– Describe the selection of participants
• Random or convenience
– Describe the assignment of participants to groups
• Random or not; Consider matching participants
– Describe the procedures for determining the number of participants per
group
• Variables
– Clarify the groups
– Identify the independent variable(s), including the treatment variable
– Identify the dependent variable(s), the outcomes
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. An Experimental Method Plan
• Instrumentation and Materials
– Discuss instruments
• development, items, and scales
• reliability and validity reports of past uses
– Thoroughly discuss materials used for the treatment
• Experimental Procedures
– Identify the type of experiment
• Pre-experimental, true experiment, quasi-experiment, and single-subject
designs
– Identify the type of comparisons: within-group or between-subject
– Provide a visual model
• X = treatment
• O = observation
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. An Experimental Method Plan
• Consider Threats to Validity
– Threats to internal validity: procedures, treatments, or
experiences of the participants that threaten the researcher's
ability to draw conclusions about cause and effect
– Threats to external validity: characteristics of the sample,
setting, or timing that threaten the researcher's ability to
generalize the conclusions to a population
– Threats to statistical conclusion validity: inadequate
statistical power or violation of statistical assumptions that
threaten the researcher's ability to draw statistical inferences
– Threats to construct validity: inadequate definitions and
measures of variables that threaten the researcher's ability to
measure relevant constructs
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Threats to Validity (Tables 8.5 & 8.6)
• Threats to Internal Validity • Threats to External Validity
– History – Interaction of selection and
– Maturation treatment
– Regression – Interaction of setting and
– Selection treatment
– Interaction of history and
– Mortality
treatment
– Diffusion of treatment
– Compensatory/resentful
demoralization
– Compensatory rivalry
– Testing
– Instrumentation
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. An Experimental Method Plan
• The Procedure
– Describe in detail the procedure for conducting the experiment
– Procedures for pre-test post-test control group design
• Measure dependent variable as a pre-test
• Assign participants to matched pairs based on scores
• Randomly assign one member of each pair to the control and
experimental group
• Expose experimental group to the treatment
• Measure dependent variable as a post-test from both groups
• Compare groups statistically
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. The Nature of Mixed Methods
Research
• Describe this approach in your proposal
– Trace its history
– Provide a definition
• Mixed methods research is an approach to inquiry that combines
or associates both qualitative and quantitative forms. It involves
philosophical assumptions, the use of qualitative and quantitative
approaches, and the mixing of both approaches in a study. Thus, it
is more than simply collecting and analyzing both kinds of data; it
also involves the use of both approaches in tandem so that the
overall strength of a study is greater than either qualitative or
quantitative research (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2007).
– Discuss the challenges with this approach
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Planning Mixed Methods
Procedures
Timing Weighting Mixing Theorizing
No Equal Integrating Explicit
Sequence
Concurrent
Sequential - Qualitative Connecting Implicit
Qualitative
first
Sequential - Quantitative Embedding
Quantitative
first
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Data Collection Procedures
• Identify the types of quantitative and
qualitative data
• Develop a rigorous sampling procedure
that may include aspects of both random
and purposeful sampling
• Provide details in a visual diagram of your
study
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Data Analysis and Validation
Procedures
• Match data analysis to the mixed methods strategy of inquiry
• Popular procedures include:
– Data transformation
– Explore outliers
– Instrument development
– Examine multiple levels
– Create a matrix
• Validation procedures:
– Quantitative procedures (e.g., validity and reliability of scores)
– Qualitative procedures (e.g., check accuracy of findings)
– Mixed methods procedures (e.g., legitimation of the mixed methods
study)
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Report Presentation Structure
• Report structure follows from the mixed methods
strategy of inquiry
– Sequential study:
• Organize the report into sections ordered to match the phases of
the study
– Concurrent study:
• Organize the data collection into separate sections
• The analysis and interpretation may be combined
– Transformative study:
• Use either a sequential or concurrent report structure
• Advance the advocacy issue at the beginning and an agenda for
change at the end
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.