SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 4
United States  V. Nixon The Watergate Scandal
Summary  This became a landmark United states supreme court decision against President Nixon. On June 17, 1972 5 burglars broke into the Watergate building also known as the Democratic headquarters. The burglars were linked to the White house under Nixon. Later tapes were found that held information that could link the president to the burglars. Nixon pleaded guilty claiming that this shouldn’t be subject to judicial resolution since the matter was a dispute within the executive branch. Also he argued that the tapes should be protected under the president’s executive privilege.
Arguments United States  Nixon The President's power to claim executive privilege is not an absolute one. Executive privilege may not be invoked to deny the courts access to evidence needed in a criminal proceeding. This is a dispute that can be heard in the federal courts. The constitutional system of separation of powers grants to the President the privilege of withholding information from the other branches of government. This power is absolute, and it is very important where high-level communications are involved. In addition, this dispute should be resolved within the executive branch, not by the courts.
Supreme Courts Decision  The Court ruled unanimously that President Nixon had to give up the tapes. The Court made it clear that the President could not withhold evidence from an ongoing criminal prosecution of another person simply because he was the President. The ruling established a constitutional basis for executive privilege. It also stated that the president is not immune from judicial process, and must turn over evidence warrant by the courts. The doctrine of executive privilege entitles the president to a high degree of confidentiality from the courts if the evidence involves matters of national security, but the president cannot hold back evidence involving non-sensitive information when needed for a criminal investigation.

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Memo Of Support For Contempt And Sanctions
Memo Of Support For Contempt And SanctionsMemo Of Support For Contempt And Sanctions
Memo Of Support For Contempt And SanctionsJRachelle
 
Alistair Jones Discovery Documents
Alistair Jones Discovery DocumentsAlistair Jones Discovery Documents
Alistair Jones Discovery DocumentsAlistair Jones
 
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...Aaron A. Martinez
 
Affidavit in support of motion for summary judgment
Affidavit in support of motion for summary judgmentAffidavit in support of motion for summary judgment
Affidavit in support of motion for summary judgmentCocoselul Inaripat
 
Annexation of Hawaii
Annexation of HawaiiAnnexation of Hawaii
Annexation of HawaiiJack Burt
 
Watergate scandal
Watergate scandalWatergate scandal
Watergate scandalrladhania
 
Writing Sample - Memorandum
Writing Sample - MemorandumWriting Sample - Memorandum
Writing Sample - MemorandumJennifer Myers
 
Watergate powerpoint
Watergate powerpointWatergate powerpoint
Watergate powerpointzaarinb
 
The Early Republic
The Early RepublicThe Early Republic
The Early Republicgpowers
 
The Articles Of Confederation
The Articles Of ConfederationThe Articles Of Confederation
The Articles Of ConfederationBryan Toth
 
Marbury v madison
Marbury v madisonMarbury v madison
Marbury v madisoncraft34
 
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and AuthoritiesPLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and AuthoritiesJoshua Desautels
 
Sample request for judicial notice in United States District Court
Sample request for judicial notice in United States District CourtSample request for judicial notice in United States District Court
Sample request for judicial notice in United States District CourtLegalDocsPro
 
Andrew jackson and indian removal
Andrew jackson and indian removalAndrew jackson and indian removal
Andrew jackson and indian removalLAUSD
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Memo Of Support For Contempt And Sanctions
Memo Of Support For Contempt And SanctionsMemo Of Support For Contempt And Sanctions
Memo Of Support For Contempt And Sanctions
 
Alistair Jones Discovery Documents
Alistair Jones Discovery DocumentsAlistair Jones Discovery Documents
Alistair Jones Discovery Documents
 
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
Writing sample (motion for summary judgment- abbreviated) for Martinez, Aaron...
 
Affidavit in support of motion for summary judgment
Affidavit in support of motion for summary judgmentAffidavit in support of motion for summary judgment
Affidavit in support of motion for summary judgment
 
What Was Watergate
What Was WatergateWhat Was Watergate
What Was Watergate
 
motion to dismiss
motion to dismissmotion to dismiss
motion to dismiss
 
Watergate Scandal
Watergate ScandalWatergate Scandal
Watergate Scandal
 
Marbury v madison
Marbury v madisonMarbury v madison
Marbury v madison
 
Annexation of Hawaii
Annexation of HawaiiAnnexation of Hawaii
Annexation of Hawaii
 
Watergate scandal
Watergate scandalWatergate scandal
Watergate scandal
 
Writing Sample - Memorandum
Writing Sample - MemorandumWriting Sample - Memorandum
Writing Sample - Memorandum
 
Watergate powerpoint
Watergate powerpointWatergate powerpoint
Watergate powerpoint
 
The Early Republic
The Early RepublicThe Early Republic
The Early Republic
 
The Articles Of Confederation
The Articles Of ConfederationThe Articles Of Confederation
The Articles Of Confederation
 
45 Reconstruction Ends
45 Reconstruction Ends45 Reconstruction Ends
45 Reconstruction Ends
 
Marbury v madison
Marbury v madisonMarbury v madison
Marbury v madison
 
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and AuthoritiesPLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
PLS 54 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
 
VazquezLA240-Unit5
VazquezLA240-Unit5VazquezLA240-Unit5
VazquezLA240-Unit5
 
Sample request for judicial notice in United States District Court
Sample request for judicial notice in United States District CourtSample request for judicial notice in United States District Court
Sample request for judicial notice in United States District Court
 
Andrew jackson and indian removal
Andrew jackson and indian removalAndrew jackson and indian removal
Andrew jackson and indian removal
 

Destacado

Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesCory Plough
 
UNITED STATES V. NIXON
UNITED STATES V. NIXONUNITED STATES V. NIXON
UNITED STATES V. NIXONMegan James
 
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. ArizonaPresentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. ArizonaImaan Virani
 
Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812shuggins1
 
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re GaultMona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re Gaultmarcus hurt
 
(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)
(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)
(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)reghistory
 
Powell vs. alabama power point
Powell vs. alabama power pointPowell vs. alabama power point
Powell vs. alabama power pointhlpowell
 
Landmark Cases
Landmark CasesLandmark Cases
Landmark CasesKatieUmana
 
Brown Vs Board Of Education
Brown Vs Board Of EducationBrown Vs Board Of Education
Brown Vs Board Of EducationLucy Norvall
 
Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesPiers Midwinter
 
Miranda Vs. Arizona
Miranda Vs. ArizonaMiranda Vs. Arizona
Miranda Vs. ArizonaTodd Beach
 
Miranda vs arizona presentation
Miranda vs arizona presentationMiranda vs arizona presentation
Miranda vs arizona presentationsk_just2121
 
History of brown v. board of education
History of brown v. board of education History of brown v. board of education
History of brown v. board of education homel866
 
Brown vs. Board of Education
Brown vs. Board of EducationBrown vs. Board of Education
Brown vs. Board of EducationTamara Isaac
 
Plessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. FergusonPlessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. Fergusonmradrian777
 
District of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. HellerDistrict of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. HellerZachariah Bernard
 
McDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagoMcDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagomariecalie
 
Principles of Teaching:Different Methods and Approaches
Principles of Teaching:Different Methods and ApproachesPrinciples of Teaching:Different Methods and Approaches
Principles of Teaching:Different Methods and Approachesjustindoliente
 

Destacado (20)

Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court cases
 
Three landmark court cases answers
Three landmark court cases answersThree landmark court cases answers
Three landmark court cases answers
 
Chapter 7 Assignments
Chapter 7 AssignmentsChapter 7 Assignments
Chapter 7 Assignments
 
UNITED STATES V. NIXON
UNITED STATES V. NIXONUNITED STATES V. NIXON
UNITED STATES V. NIXON
 
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. ArizonaPresentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
 
Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812
 
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re GaultMona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
 
(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)
(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)
(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)
 
Powell vs. alabama power point
Powell vs. alabama power pointPowell vs. alabama power point
Powell vs. alabama power point
 
Landmark Cases
Landmark CasesLandmark Cases
Landmark Cases
 
Brown Vs Board Of Education
Brown Vs Board Of EducationBrown Vs Board Of Education
Brown Vs Board Of Education
 
Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court cases
 
Miranda Vs. Arizona
Miranda Vs. ArizonaMiranda Vs. Arizona
Miranda Vs. Arizona
 
Miranda vs arizona presentation
Miranda vs arizona presentationMiranda vs arizona presentation
Miranda vs arizona presentation
 
History of brown v. board of education
History of brown v. board of education History of brown v. board of education
History of brown v. board of education
 
Brown vs. Board of Education
Brown vs. Board of EducationBrown vs. Board of Education
Brown vs. Board of Education
 
Plessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. FergusonPlessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. Ferguson
 
District of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. HellerDistrict of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. Heller
 
McDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagoMcDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicago
 
Principles of Teaching:Different Methods and Approaches
Principles of Teaching:Different Methods and ApproachesPrinciples of Teaching:Different Methods and Approaches
Principles of Teaching:Different Methods and Approaches
 

Similar a United states v. nixon

C H A P T E R 3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docx
C H A P T E R  3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docxC H A P T E R  3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docx
C H A P T E R 3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docxhumphrieskalyn
 
India Legal 29 May 2017
India Legal 29 May 2017 India Legal 29 May 2017
India Legal 29 May 2017 ENC
 
The FBI raided President Trumps home in search of documents that th.pdf
The FBI raided President Trumps home in search of documents that th.pdfThe FBI raided President Trumps home in search of documents that th.pdf
The FBI raided President Trumps home in search of documents that th.pdfadwitanokiastore
 
Us v leon_us_v_richard_nixon
Us v leon_us_v_richard_nixonUs v leon_us_v_richard_nixon
Us v leon_us_v_richard_nixonsteventringali
 
06/04/12 - Rand Paul Letter To Newsome - CONFIRMATION Of Receipt Of PINK Slip...
06/04/12 - Rand Paul Letter To Newsome - CONFIRMATION Of Receipt Of PINK Slip...06/04/12 - Rand Paul Letter To Newsome - CONFIRMATION Of Receipt Of PINK Slip...
06/04/12 - Rand Paul Letter To Newsome - CONFIRMATION Of Receipt Of PINK Slip...VogelDenise
 
Maryland v. king 569 us
Maryland v. king 569 us  Maryland v. king 569 us
Maryland v. king 569 us ztir111
 
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that .docx
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that .docx2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that .docx
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that .docxavaforman16457
 
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that hi.docx
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that hi.docx2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that hi.docx
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that hi.docxavaforman16457
 
Laws Governing Access to Search & Arrest Warrants and Wiretap Transcripts
Laws Governing Access to Search & Arrest Warrants and Wiretap TranscriptsLaws Governing Access to Search & Arrest Warrants and Wiretap Transcripts
Laws Governing Access to Search & Arrest Warrants and Wiretap TranscriptsUmesh Heendeniya
 
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES384 U.S. 436Miranda v. Arizo.docx
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES384 U.S. 436Miranda v. Arizo.docxSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES384 U.S. 436Miranda v. Arizo.docx
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES384 U.S. 436Miranda v. Arizo.docxmattinsonjanel
 
On Overview of the NSA's Surveillance Program
On Overview of the NSA's Surveillance ProgramOn Overview of the NSA's Surveillance Program
On Overview of the NSA's Surveillance ProgramJoseph V. Moreno
 
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docxChapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docxbartholomeocoombs
 

Similar a United states v. nixon (20)

C H A P T E R 3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docx
C H A P T E R  3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docxC H A P T E R  3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docx
C H A P T E R 3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docx
 
India Legal 29 May 2017
India Legal 29 May 2017 India Legal 29 May 2017
India Legal 29 May 2017
 
Freedoms Forsaken
Freedoms ForsakenFreedoms Forsaken
Freedoms Forsaken
 
Freedoms forsaken
Freedoms forsakenFreedoms forsaken
Freedoms forsaken
 
The Right to Privacy
The Right to PrivacyThe Right to Privacy
The Right to Privacy
 
Nixon
NixonNixon
Nixon
 
The FBI raided President Trumps home in search of documents that th.pdf
The FBI raided President Trumps home in search of documents that th.pdfThe FBI raided President Trumps home in search of documents that th.pdf
The FBI raided President Trumps home in search of documents that th.pdf
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Us v leon_us_v_richard_nixon
Us v leon_us_v_richard_nixonUs v leon_us_v_richard_nixon
Us v leon_us_v_richard_nixon
 
06/04/12 - Rand Paul Letter To Newsome - CONFIRMATION Of Receipt Of PINK Slip...
06/04/12 - Rand Paul Letter To Newsome - CONFIRMATION Of Receipt Of PINK Slip...06/04/12 - Rand Paul Letter To Newsome - CONFIRMATION Of Receipt Of PINK Slip...
06/04/12 - Rand Paul Letter To Newsome - CONFIRMATION Of Receipt Of PINK Slip...
 
Maryland v. king 569 us
Maryland v. king 569 us  Maryland v. king 569 us
Maryland v. king 569 us
 
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that .docx
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that .docx2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that .docx
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that .docx
 
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that hi.docx
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that hi.docx2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that hi.docx
2-3 Pages APA Style FormatThere’s an old adage that says that hi.docx
 
How Far Can The President Go To Overhaul The U.S. Immigration System Without ...
How Far Can The President Go To Overhaul The U.S. Immigration System Without ...How Far Can The President Go To Overhaul The U.S. Immigration System Without ...
How Far Can The President Go To Overhaul The U.S. Immigration System Without ...
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
Laws Governing Access to Search & Arrest Warrants and Wiretap Transcripts
Laws Governing Access to Search & Arrest Warrants and Wiretap TranscriptsLaws Governing Access to Search & Arrest Warrants and Wiretap Transcripts
Laws Governing Access to Search & Arrest Warrants and Wiretap Transcripts
 
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES384 U.S. 436Miranda v. Arizo.docx
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES384 U.S. 436Miranda v. Arizo.docxSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES384 U.S. 436Miranda v. Arizo.docx
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES384 U.S. 436Miranda v. Arizo.docx
 
On Overview of the NSA's Surveillance Program
On Overview of the NSA's Surveillance ProgramOn Overview of the NSA's Surveillance Program
On Overview of the NSA's Surveillance Program
 
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docxChapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
 
Law Research Paper
Law Research PaperLaw Research Paper
Law Research Paper
 

United states v. nixon

  • 1. United States V. Nixon The Watergate Scandal
  • 2. Summary This became a landmark United states supreme court decision against President Nixon. On June 17, 1972 5 burglars broke into the Watergate building also known as the Democratic headquarters. The burglars were linked to the White house under Nixon. Later tapes were found that held information that could link the president to the burglars. Nixon pleaded guilty claiming that this shouldn’t be subject to judicial resolution since the matter was a dispute within the executive branch. Also he argued that the tapes should be protected under the president’s executive privilege.
  • 3. Arguments United States Nixon The President's power to claim executive privilege is not an absolute one. Executive privilege may not be invoked to deny the courts access to evidence needed in a criminal proceeding. This is a dispute that can be heard in the federal courts. The constitutional system of separation of powers grants to the President the privilege of withholding information from the other branches of government. This power is absolute, and it is very important where high-level communications are involved. In addition, this dispute should be resolved within the executive branch, not by the courts.
  • 4. Supreme Courts Decision The Court ruled unanimously that President Nixon had to give up the tapes. The Court made it clear that the President could not withhold evidence from an ongoing criminal prosecution of another person simply because he was the President. The ruling established a constitutional basis for executive privilege. It also stated that the president is not immune from judicial process, and must turn over evidence warrant by the courts. The doctrine of executive privilege entitles the president to a high degree of confidentiality from the courts if the evidence involves matters of national security, but the president cannot hold back evidence involving non-sensitive information when needed for a criminal investigation.