1. Schmitz- werke v. Rockland 吴文曼 陈婉文 潘萧萧 彭春萍 梁佩玲 曾凡明

3. Schmitz PMD i ii Ordered 15 ， 000 meters Testing sample generally satisfied but still some problems Found more problems But was encouraged to continue printing Ordered 60 ， 000 meters Apparent continuing problems

4. Plaintiff Schmitz Defendant Rockland sue Breach of warranty Inspect 15% of the fabric lower grade or seconds

7. Seller argues : Buyer must show both the existence and the nature of the defect. Buyer argues : It need show is that the goods were unfit for the particular purpose warranted The court holds that: Under either CISG or Maryland Law, the buyer may prevail Seller counters that: This is improperly shifts the burden of proof …… (2) Whether the plaintiff need to prove the nature of the defect? The court holds that : Seller’s concerns are misplaced ^o^

11. Thank you !!!