A presentation that discusses a revision of a Master of Science (IT in Education) programme based on leaning outcomes initiative at The University of Hong Kong.
1. Improving HKU Programmes through an OBASL Approach: A Case from the Faculty of Education May, 12, 2010. Daniel Churchill, Faculty of Education Diane Salter, CETL
2. Program Development The Process Critical Success Factors Roles The Internal Process Faculty of Education Example CETL - How We Can Help
3. Model of OBASL What you want your students to learn: Aims and Learning Outcomes How you want your students to learn: Teaching and Learning Activities aligned with LO How you will judge how well your students have learned: Assessment methods and Standards aligned with LO
8. Creating Exceptional Student Experiences…. The Vision Program Learning Outcomes Strengths and Shortcomings of Current Programme/Courses Strategic direction of dept. and HKU aims External Accreditation Issues
9. Project Management Define project scope Develop project plan Identify required resources Assign accountability and authority
10. Teamwork Programme Teams Communicate a shared vision Define roles and responsibilities Assign work Create and maintain a level of excitement
11. Templates & Examples Promote efficiency, consistency and the ability to repeat Learn from others
12. Document Management Share material Ensure safe storage Minimize administrative challenges Online databases Ready for QA processess
14. University Aims University Level Learning Outcomes Program Level Learning Outcomes (PLO’s) Examples Course Level (CLO’s) Course Level (CLO’s) Course Level (CLO’s)
15. Document Management Teamwork The Vision Project Management Templates & Examples Success Implement and Evaluate and Revise – Process begins again..
16. Outcomes-based Approach At the Course Level Intendedoutcomes What do we expect ourstudents tobe able to door demonstrateas a result ofthe learning? Content What specificknowledge,skills and attitude dothey need tolearn to achieve theoutcomes? Teaching & Learning What are themost appropriateteaching andlearning methods for helping students to achieve theoutcomes? Assessment What methods of assessment are most suitable for measuring students’ attainment of the outcomes?
17. Programme Revised IT in Education Programme for School Leaders, Instructional Designers, Multimedia Designers, Project Managers, Educators, Corporate Trainers, Publishers…
18. WG to develop PLO Present to Programme Committee for Endorsement Student Consultative Committee Consultation External Examiner Consultation Revise the Curriculum Write Individual Modules MSC[ITE] REVISION PROCESS Develop LO Map Develop Assessment Promotion and Marketing Individual module documentation
26. Writing Learning Outcomes * From Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
27. Consultations regarding changes Present proposal to the programme committee meeting Student consultative committee consultation Past and current external examiner consultations Consolation with CETL
28. Revise the Curriculum Revise syllabus document Secure Faculty Board endorsement Ready for implementation in September 2010
29. Write Individual Modules Teachers tasked to write/revise module descriptions (to be included in the syllabus document) Write Module Learning Outcomes
31. Develop LO Map See the distributed document 1 Why develop this document? Align curriculum around PLOs Examine redundancies Develop a system that would lead to further development
32. Develop Assessment Design assessment items that evaluate achievement of LO Understand how assessment builds across modules leading to achievement of PLOs Examine possible redundancies in assessment
34. Develop Module Documentation Module Outline Document Clear communication of goals and expectations Links between LOs, assessment and content See example of a Module Outline that is distributed (document 2)