SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 4
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Asian Parliamentary DEBATE 
I. 
Motions 
UNDERSTAND MOTIONS 
• 
A MOTION CAN BE PHRASED AND INTERPRETTED DIFFERENTLY 
• 
1 MOTION PER ROUND 
• 
OPEN MOTIONS 
e.g. “THBT the glass is half full” 
• 
SEMI-CLOSED MOTIONS 
e.g. “THW alter its genetic code” 
• 
CLOSED MOTIONS 
e.g. “THW bomb Iraq” 
• 
SPIRIT OF THE MOTION 
This is what the debate calls for. 
II. 
ABBREVIATIONS 
• 
THW = THIS HOUSE WOULD 
• 
THS = THIS HOUSE SUPPORTS 
• 
THC = THIS HOUSE CELEBRATES 
• 
THR = THIS HOUSE REGRETS 
• 
THBT = THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT 
III. 
POLICY VS VALUE JUDGMENT 
a. 
POLICY DEBATE 
• 
Implies the need to institute a policy, program, law, or any other type of action 
• 
To understand how a program would work requires that you lay down the mechanisms of that program 
b. 
VALUE JUDGMENT 
-Comparison of values and standards 
c. 
ALLOWANCE FOR INTERPRETATION 
-A value judgment debate may need a policy in order to be assessed whether it would truly work (the adjudicator is still an average reasonable person) 
IV. 
FORMAT 
Government Opposition 
proposes and defends the motion refutes and negates the motion 
Prime Minister 
Leader of the Opposition 
Deputy PM 
Deputy LO 
Government Whip 
Opposition Whip 
Opp. Reply Speech 
Gov. Reply Speech 
Page 1 of 4
Page 2 of 4 
1. 
Prime Minister 
Provides the set-up of the Debate 
• 
Definition and Context 
(preferably non-literal) 
• 
Parameters 
• 
Problem 
(or at least the value to be appraised) 
• 
Standards and goals 
(preferably expressly stated) 
• 
Policy and Mechanisms 
(For a policy debate) 
• 
Team Split (very brief please) 
• 
Provides 1-2 well formulated arguments 
1. 
LABEL/BANNER (catch phrase) 
Clarify your premise if you need to 
2. HOW? 
3. WHY? 
4. SO WHAT? (Tie-up with your goals and standards) 
5. EXAMPLE 
2. 
Leader of the Opposition 
• 
Rebuts the previous speech – errors of fact, faulty premise, inconsistencies, irrelevance 
• 
Provides a clash, negation, or maintain status quo 
• 
Provides their team split 
• 
Provides constructive matter and argumentation based on their clash 
*AREAS OF REBUTTAL 
1. 
FACTUAL ERRORS 
2. 
LOGICAL ERRORS (No links) 
3. 
LOGIC is sound but the argument does not resolve the issue 
4. 
Faulty Premises 
- Provide Comparative analysis that allows your team to surpass the other’s argument 
5. 
Breaking deadlocks 
*CLASH 
• 
COUNTER POLICY 
- Oppose the proposition and provide an alternative resolution to the problem 
• 
STATUS QUO IS WORKABLE OR SELF-CORRECTING 
- The clamor by government is exaggerated, unnecessary, and even if there was a problem it is already self-correcting 
• 
COUNTER – VALUE 
- There are other values worth protecting 
- Make a comparative analysis of social values of course 
*CONSTRUCTIVE VS NEGATIVE MATTER 
• 
CONTRUCTIVE MATTER argues on the merits of a value or proposal 
• 
NEGATIVE MATTER merely negates a value or proposal 
• 
A DEBATE has an equal burden of constructive matter imposed on both sides 
• 
A mere rebuttal case therefore cannot merit a win for a team
Page 3 of 4 
3. 
Deputy Prime Minister/Deputy Leader of the Opposition 
• 
Provide Rebuttals 
• 
Rebuilds the case of government/opposition 
• 
Uses the premise of the first speaker while at the same time providing a distinct argument 
• 
Avoiding a rehash or repackaged case or argument 
• 
And if possible a deeper insight into the debate (progression) 
4. 
Government Whip/Opposition Whip 
• 
Gives some rebuttals and provides a summary of the issues which transpired in the debate and provide a thematic discussion of each issue while advancing the case of the team. 
• 
Provides a fresh perspective/insight into the debate 
• 
Provides a thematic approach on their analysis primarily emphasizing the merits of the closing team. 
• 
No new matter from whip speakers. 
ISSUE 1: 
THEY SAID: 
WE SAID: 
WHY WE’RE BETTER 
• 
An issue refers to a group of clumped arguments referring to an overall topic 
- for example, the need to recognize the civic conscience, church dogma, and liberal modern ideals could all be bannered under the issue of MORALITY 
• 
An ISSUE could also be about contrasting ideologies 
- for example MORALS vs LIBERAL ECONOMIC IDEALS 
5. 
Reply Speech 
More often than not, reply speakers would just simply talk about how he/she felt the debate went through and why should the adjudicator give the win to their side (biased adjudication). Reply speech has no bearing to the adjudication’s decision but will affect the TOTAL TEAM SCORE. To put it simply, a reply speaker would say, “adjudicators, make my team win please.” 
V. 
OTHER PARTS OF THE SPEECH 
• 
A speech lasts for about 7 minutes 
• 
A healthy speech lasts from 6:45 to 7:15 
• 
Points of Information may be given and taken in the course of a speech 
- Points of information are those instances when a speaker from an opposing team may be given a short period in order to pose rebuttals or clarify issues. 
VI. 
POINTS OF INFORMATION 
• 
1:00 – 1 CLAP (POIs may now be taken) 
• 
6:00 - 1 CLAP (No more POIs) 
• 
7:00 – 2 CLAPS – Please end your speeches 
• 
7:20 – Possible penalties 
• 
A POI last for up to 15 seconds. The speaker in front must accept it in order for the 15 second period to run.
Page 4 of 4 
VII. 
DEFINITIONAL CHALLENGE 
METHOD MUST BE FOLLOWED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE 
1. 
EXPRESSLY STATE THAT YOU ARE CHALLENGING THE DEFINITION 
2. 
STATE THE GROUNDS OF YOUR CHALLENGE 
3. 
STATE YOUR NEW DEFINITION 
4. 
OPPOSE YOUR OWN DEFINITION 
A. 
GROUNDS FOR DEFINITIONAL CHALLENGE 
• 
TIME-PLACE SET 
- 
Specialized knowledge is highly discouraged. Setting up the debate in Paraguay, or where else that is not that known is not advisable. Also, setting it up in the past and somewhere else that a certain event happened is again not allowed. 
• 
TRUISM 
- 
Simply, debating about a fact that cannot be debated upon. Example of this is: THBT the sun rises on the east. 
• 
SQUIRREL 
- In a Squirreled motion, if ever there is room for debate then try to engage the government out of the spirit of dynamism 
*Only the Leader of the Opposition may impose a definitional challenge 
VIII. 
DEBATER DECORUM 
• 
Do not approach the podium until you have been recognized by the adjudicator 
• 
Respect the adjudicator when he/she calls for order 
• 
Do not badger your opponent or use intimidation tactics 
• 
You may cross the house after the debate 
• 
Leave the room after the debate but remain within nearby premises

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente (20)

Intro To University Debating
Intro To  University  DebatingIntro To  University  Debating
Intro To University Debating
 
English Debate
English DebateEnglish Debate
English Debate
 
Case Construction Tactics
Case Construction TacticsCase Construction Tactics
Case Construction Tactics
 
Parliamentary style debate
Parliamentary style debateParliamentary style debate
Parliamentary style debate
 
Introduction to parliamentary debate
Introduction to parliamentary debateIntroduction to parliamentary debate
Introduction to parliamentary debate
 
Debating Introduction
Debating IntroductionDebating Introduction
Debating Introduction
 
Debate Basics
Debate BasicsDebate Basics
Debate Basics
 
Debate middle school
Debate middle schoolDebate middle school
Debate middle school
 
Introduction to University Debating - Chris Bisset
Introduction to University Debating - Chris BissetIntroduction to University Debating - Chris Bisset
Introduction to University Debating - Chris Bisset
 
Asian parliamentary debate
Asian parliamentary debateAsian parliamentary debate
Asian parliamentary debate
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
Debate 101 oktafia
Debate 101   oktafiaDebate 101   oktafia
Debate 101 oktafia
 
The Oregon-Oxford Debate
The Oregon-Oxford DebateThe Oregon-Oxford Debate
The Oregon-Oxford Debate
 
Assignment on pedagogy debates
Assignment on pedagogy debatesAssignment on pedagogy debates
Assignment on pedagogy debates
 
Conducting a debate
Conducting a debateConducting a debate
Conducting a debate
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
Debate seminar
Debate seminarDebate seminar
Debate seminar
 
Presentation on Debate
Presentation on DebatePresentation on Debate
Presentation on Debate
 
The persuasive speech
The persuasive speechThe persuasive speech
The persuasive speech
 
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate CompetitionRules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
 

Similar a te natanauan

Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptxOregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptxJonnaMayMota
 
20140403_debate_briefing_en.pptx
20140403_debate_briefing_en.pptx20140403_debate_briefing_en.pptx
20140403_debate_briefing_en.pptxSamuelSianipar6
 
Asian Parliamentary Debate natanauan
Asian Parliamentary Debate natanauanAsian Parliamentary Debate natanauan
Asian Parliamentary Debate natanauanMc Neil Natanauan
 
Материалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла Поппера
Материалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла ПоппераМатериалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла Поппера
Материалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла ПоппераGalina Trushkina
 
Debating dos and donts
Debating dos and dontsDebating dos and donts
Debating dos and dontsmajoydrew
 
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at GrenfellHow to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at GrenfellPatrick Arsenault, RCIC 🍁
 
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptxDEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptxssuser6b7a42
 
Worlds style debate
Worlds style debate Worlds style debate
Worlds style debate Irina K
 
British parliamentary debate track stem
British parliamentary debate track stemBritish parliamentary debate track stem
British parliamentary debate track stemJoy Rukanzakanza
 
Debate for students and feedback final
Debate for students and feedback finalDebate for students and feedback final
Debate for students and feedback finallolaceituno
 
Types of presentations
Types of presentationsTypes of presentations
Types of presentationsJim Aspinall
 
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.pptBasic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.pptzohrearabzadeh
 

Similar a te natanauan (20)

Summary of debate
Summary of debateSummary of debate
Summary of debate
 
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptxOregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
Oregon Oxford Debate Format.pptx
 
20140403_debate_briefing_en.pptx
20140403_debate_briefing_en.pptx20140403_debate_briefing_en.pptx
20140403_debate_briefing_en.pptx
 
Asian Parliamentary Debate natanauan
Asian Parliamentary Debate natanauanAsian Parliamentary Debate natanauan
Asian Parliamentary Debate natanauan
 
how to be a good debator
how to be a good debatorhow to be a good debator
how to be a good debator
 
Logic& Ethics 5
Logic& Ethics 5Logic& Ethics 5
Logic& Ethics 5
 
Debating dos and donts
Debating dos and dontsDebating dos and donts
Debating dos and donts
 
Материалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла Поппера
Материалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла ПоппераМатериалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла Поппера
Материалы для подготовки к проведению дебатов в формате Карла Поппера
 
Debating dos and donts
Debating dos and dontsDebating dos and donts
Debating dos and donts
 
Debating dos and donts
Debating dos and dontsDebating dos and donts
Debating dos and donts
 
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at GrenfellHow to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
How to Debate Effectively - International Students at Grenfell
 
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptxDEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
DEBATE - group 1 - 31 agus.pptx
 
Debating for beginners
Debating for beginnersDebating for beginners
Debating for beginners
 
Materi debat 1
Materi debat 1Materi debat 1
Materi debat 1
 
Worlds style debate
Worlds style debate Worlds style debate
Worlds style debate
 
British parliamentary debate track stem
British parliamentary debate track stemBritish parliamentary debate track stem
British parliamentary debate track stem
 
Debate
DebateDebate
Debate
 
Debate for students and feedback final
Debate for students and feedback finalDebate for students and feedback final
Debate for students and feedback final
 
Types of presentations
Types of presentationsTypes of presentations
Types of presentations
 
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.pptBasic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
Basic Debating Skills (2)2.ppt
 

te natanauan

  • 1. Asian Parliamentary DEBATE I. Motions UNDERSTAND MOTIONS • A MOTION CAN BE PHRASED AND INTERPRETTED DIFFERENTLY • 1 MOTION PER ROUND • OPEN MOTIONS e.g. “THBT the glass is half full” • SEMI-CLOSED MOTIONS e.g. “THW alter its genetic code” • CLOSED MOTIONS e.g. “THW bomb Iraq” • SPIRIT OF THE MOTION This is what the debate calls for. II. ABBREVIATIONS • THW = THIS HOUSE WOULD • THS = THIS HOUSE SUPPORTS • THC = THIS HOUSE CELEBRATES • THR = THIS HOUSE REGRETS • THBT = THIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT III. POLICY VS VALUE JUDGMENT a. POLICY DEBATE • Implies the need to institute a policy, program, law, or any other type of action • To understand how a program would work requires that you lay down the mechanisms of that program b. VALUE JUDGMENT -Comparison of values and standards c. ALLOWANCE FOR INTERPRETATION -A value judgment debate may need a policy in order to be assessed whether it would truly work (the adjudicator is still an average reasonable person) IV. FORMAT Government Opposition proposes and defends the motion refutes and negates the motion Prime Minister Leader of the Opposition Deputy PM Deputy LO Government Whip Opposition Whip Opp. Reply Speech Gov. Reply Speech Page 1 of 4
  • 2. Page 2 of 4 1. Prime Minister Provides the set-up of the Debate • Definition and Context (preferably non-literal) • Parameters • Problem (or at least the value to be appraised) • Standards and goals (preferably expressly stated) • Policy and Mechanisms (For a policy debate) • Team Split (very brief please) • Provides 1-2 well formulated arguments 1. LABEL/BANNER (catch phrase) Clarify your premise if you need to 2. HOW? 3. WHY? 4. SO WHAT? (Tie-up with your goals and standards) 5. EXAMPLE 2. Leader of the Opposition • Rebuts the previous speech – errors of fact, faulty premise, inconsistencies, irrelevance • Provides a clash, negation, or maintain status quo • Provides their team split • Provides constructive matter and argumentation based on their clash *AREAS OF REBUTTAL 1. FACTUAL ERRORS 2. LOGICAL ERRORS (No links) 3. LOGIC is sound but the argument does not resolve the issue 4. Faulty Premises - Provide Comparative analysis that allows your team to surpass the other’s argument 5. Breaking deadlocks *CLASH • COUNTER POLICY - Oppose the proposition and provide an alternative resolution to the problem • STATUS QUO IS WORKABLE OR SELF-CORRECTING - The clamor by government is exaggerated, unnecessary, and even if there was a problem it is already self-correcting • COUNTER – VALUE - There are other values worth protecting - Make a comparative analysis of social values of course *CONSTRUCTIVE VS NEGATIVE MATTER • CONTRUCTIVE MATTER argues on the merits of a value or proposal • NEGATIVE MATTER merely negates a value or proposal • A DEBATE has an equal burden of constructive matter imposed on both sides • A mere rebuttal case therefore cannot merit a win for a team
  • 3. Page 3 of 4 3. Deputy Prime Minister/Deputy Leader of the Opposition • Provide Rebuttals • Rebuilds the case of government/opposition • Uses the premise of the first speaker while at the same time providing a distinct argument • Avoiding a rehash or repackaged case or argument • And if possible a deeper insight into the debate (progression) 4. Government Whip/Opposition Whip • Gives some rebuttals and provides a summary of the issues which transpired in the debate and provide a thematic discussion of each issue while advancing the case of the team. • Provides a fresh perspective/insight into the debate • Provides a thematic approach on their analysis primarily emphasizing the merits of the closing team. • No new matter from whip speakers. ISSUE 1: THEY SAID: WE SAID: WHY WE’RE BETTER • An issue refers to a group of clumped arguments referring to an overall topic - for example, the need to recognize the civic conscience, church dogma, and liberal modern ideals could all be bannered under the issue of MORALITY • An ISSUE could also be about contrasting ideologies - for example MORALS vs LIBERAL ECONOMIC IDEALS 5. Reply Speech More often than not, reply speakers would just simply talk about how he/she felt the debate went through and why should the adjudicator give the win to their side (biased adjudication). Reply speech has no bearing to the adjudication’s decision but will affect the TOTAL TEAM SCORE. To put it simply, a reply speaker would say, “adjudicators, make my team win please.” V. OTHER PARTS OF THE SPEECH • A speech lasts for about 7 minutes • A healthy speech lasts from 6:45 to 7:15 • Points of Information may be given and taken in the course of a speech - Points of information are those instances when a speaker from an opposing team may be given a short period in order to pose rebuttals or clarify issues. VI. POINTS OF INFORMATION • 1:00 – 1 CLAP (POIs may now be taken) • 6:00 - 1 CLAP (No more POIs) • 7:00 – 2 CLAPS – Please end your speeches • 7:20 – Possible penalties • A POI last for up to 15 seconds. The speaker in front must accept it in order for the 15 second period to run.
  • 4. Page 4 of 4 VII. DEFINITIONAL CHALLENGE METHOD MUST BE FOLLOWED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE 1. EXPRESSLY STATE THAT YOU ARE CHALLENGING THE DEFINITION 2. STATE THE GROUNDS OF YOUR CHALLENGE 3. STATE YOUR NEW DEFINITION 4. OPPOSE YOUR OWN DEFINITION A. GROUNDS FOR DEFINITIONAL CHALLENGE • TIME-PLACE SET - Specialized knowledge is highly discouraged. Setting up the debate in Paraguay, or where else that is not that known is not advisable. Also, setting it up in the past and somewhere else that a certain event happened is again not allowed. • TRUISM - Simply, debating about a fact that cannot be debated upon. Example of this is: THBT the sun rises on the east. • SQUIRREL - In a Squirreled motion, if ever there is room for debate then try to engage the government out of the spirit of dynamism *Only the Leader of the Opposition may impose a definitional challenge VIII. DEBATER DECORUM • Do not approach the podium until you have been recognized by the adjudicator • Respect the adjudicator when he/she calls for order • Do not badger your opponent or use intimidation tactics • You may cross the house after the debate • Leave the room after the debate but remain within nearby premises