Publicidad
Publicidad

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Salman, K. K_2023 AGRODEP Annual Conference(20)

Publicidad

Salman, K. K_2023 AGRODEP Annual Conference

  1. Agricultural Economics Department, University of Ibadan, Ibadan Nigeria Impact of Financial Inclusion on Productivity among the Maize Farmers in Nigeria Sylvester, J., Salman, K. K., Dada, G. E., Sowunmi, F. A.
  2. Introduction  Agriculture is a major contributor to economic growth in Nigeria, it employs more than 70% of the labour force with GDP of 30% in 2021  Maize is highly utilised domestically and export  However, the level of maize productivity has declined over time  Maize productivity in 2020 was 1.59 tons/ha. This is below the ideal yield of maize which is 5 tons/ha. Source: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/maize- yields
  3. Problem Statement  Low productivity is associated with a number of reasons…  Low productivity leads to low farm income, impacting poverty among maize farmers.  Having access to finance will enable the farmers to improve their productivity performance  Available financial support programs for farmers require farmers to have a bank account  Available literature informs that 38% of Adults globally are without a bank account (Global Findex, 2014) while 45% of the population is financially included in Nigeria
  4. Research Questions & Objectives  Research Questions i. What is the level of financial inclusion among maize farmers in Nigeria? ii. What is the level of productivity among maize farmers in Nigeria? iii. What are the determinants of financial inclusion among maize farmers in Nigeria? iv. What is the impact of financial inclusion on productivity among maize farmers in Nigeria?  Objectives i. Determine the level of financial inclusion among the maize farmers in Nigeria, ii. Determine the level of productivity among maize farmers in Nigeria, iii. Find out the factors that influence FI among maize farmers in Nigeria, and to iv. Determine the impact of financial inclusion on productivity among the maize farmer in Nigeria.
  5. Public Good Theory  The public good theory of financial inclusion argues that i. The delivery of formal financial services to the entire population is a public good ii. Access to financial services to one individual does not reduce its availability to others which means that all members of the population can be brought into the formal financial sector and everyone will be better off. iii. Under this theory, all members of the population are supposed to be financially included where nobody is left out.
  6. Methodology  The study area was Nigeria  Nigerian General Household Survey (GHS) data were utilized. Information on the socioeconomic characteristics of maize farmers, input, and output financial inclusion indicators was extracted and used for the study.  Financial inclusion was measured by ownership of bank accounts by the households, following Fowowe, (2020) while Productivity among the Maize farmers was measured using the Total factor productivity.  Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, logit analysis and Propensity score matching
  7. Results-Table 1: Socio-Economic Characteristics of the Maize Farmers in Nigeria Socio-Economic Characteristics Frequencies Percentages Sex Male 955 82.6 Female 201 17.4 Mean Age(years) was 49.12 Mean Household Size was 5.9 Educational Level No formal 60 5.2 Primary 477 41.3 Secondary 406 35.1 Tertiary 213 18.4 Marital Status Married 880 76.1 Mean Farm Size(ha) was 1.43Ha Credit Access Yes 218 18.9 No 938 81.4 Total 1,156 100
  8. Results - Table 2: Level of Financial Inclusion among the Maize Farmers Financial inclusion Frequencies Percentages Financially Included 316 27.3 Financially Excluded 840 72.7 Total 1,156 100
  9. Result-Table 3: Level of Productivity among the Maize Farmers Productivity Category Freq. Percent Low (0-0.33) 795 68.8 Moderate (0.34-0.66) 141 12.2 High (0.67-1) 219 18.9 Total 1.156 100 Mean Productivity (TFP) 0.293 Std. dev. 0.352
  10. Result: Table 4: Determinant of Financial Inclusion among the Maize Farmers Financial Inclusion Coef. Std. Err. Z P>z Sex (Male) 0.4052* 0.2249 1.8 0.072 Age 0.0492 0.0364 1.35 0.177 Agesq -0.0005 0.0003 -1.31 0.189 Educational Level (Primary) 0.4553 0.7582 0.6 0.548 Educational Level (Secondary) 1.1988 0.7557 1.59 0.113 Educational Level (Tertiary) 2.4240*** 0.7483 3.24 0.001 Household size -0.1395*** 0.0312 -4.47 0.000 Income 0.1551 0.1717 0.9 0.366 Rural -1.1569*** 0.1942 -5.96 0.000 North East -0.5528 0.3508 -1.58 0.115 North West -1.4112*** 0.3900 -3.62 0.000 South East -0.9735** 0.4116 -2.37 0.018 South West -0.1776 0.3123 -0.57 0.57 South south -0.3695 0.3800 -0.97 0.331 _cons -3.5048 2.1368 -1.64 0.101 Number of Obs=1,156 LR chi2(14)= 199.93 Prob>chi2=0.0000 Pseudo R2= 0.1663 Log likelihood= -501.042
  11. Result: Table 5. Propensity score matching of the Impact of Financial Inclusion on Productivity among Maize farmers Variable Sample Treated Controls Difference S.E. Tstat Common radius Unmatched 0.0525 -0.0207 0.0732 0.0653 1.12 ATT 0.0533 0.0454 0.0079 0.0852 0.09 ATU -0.0183 0.1155 0.1339 . . ATE 0.0994 . . Kernel matching Unmatched 0.0525 -0.0207 0.0732 0.0653 1.12 ATT 0.0529 0.0149 0.0380 0.0832 0.46 ATU -0.0191 0.1578 0.1770 . . ATE 0.1374 . . Nearest Neighbour Unmatched 3.3691 2.4533 0.9158 0.8174 1.12 ATT 3.3691 3.3179 0.0512 1.1962 0.04 ATU 2.4533 2.7409 0.2876 . . ATE 0.2207 . .
  12. Figure 1. A Common Support Graph For Propensity Score Matching Of The Impact Of Financial Inclusion On Productivity Among Maize Farmers. 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 Propensity Score Untreated Treated
  13. Conclusion & Recommendations  Conclusions  The level of financial inclusion among maize farmers was low  The productivity level among maize farmers was low  Tertiary education and being a male significantly influenced financial inclusion  Financial inclusion has a positive impact on productivity among maize farmers in Nigeria  Recommendations  Provision of training and education will help stimulate the knowledge of the maize farmers. This would facilitate the farmer to have a bank account  Creation of special rural banks would also encourage more financial inclusion
  14. THANK YOU
Publicidad