Michael B. Bomar Incompatible growth near military facilities can threaten our national defense. Learn what types of development can conflict with military training. Explore the challenges of conducting multi-jurisdictional studies to promote appropriate land uses, around military facilities. Panelists will discuss lessons learned during the course of a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) of four counties and three cities for the Avon Park Air Force Range, and close coordination with conservation groups. Strategies to develop support from the community and public officials for measures such as transfer of development rights to buffer the public from the impacts of necessary military activities will be discussed.

1. FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE Michael Bomar, PE Tetra Tech September 9, 2011

2. APPROACH IDENTIFY ISSUES FOR EACH JURISDICTION DEVELOP POTENTIAL STRATEGIES PROVIDE JLUS RECOMMENDATIONS

5. Effective Disclosure Measures

6. Lighting Standards

7. Educational Handouts on Radio Frequency

8. Public Awareness Measures

9. Implement Sound Attenuation Construction Requirements

10. Identify Military Operations Areas on Public Documents

11. Military Influence Planning Area (MIPA) Ordinance

12. Small Area Studies

13. Comprehensive Plan & Land Development Code Updates

14. Military and Inter-Governmental Coordination

15. Limit Object Heights

16. Airspace Studies

17. Designate Specific Use Restrictions to Maintain Compatibility

18. Voluntary Land or Development Rights Acquisition Program

19. Additional Noise Study

20. Site Specific R/AICUZ for APAFR

21. Types of Development Near APAFR Boundary

22. Military Operations Areas (MOAs)

23. Aircraft Noise

24. Blast Noise Intensity & Frequency

25. Low Level Flight Area

26. Outdoor Lighting-Night Vision Goggle Training

27. Bird / Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH)

28. Conservation Resources

29. Transportation Corridors & Study Areas

30. Unrestricted Public Access

36. APAFR F-35 Joint Land Use Study Environmental Impact Statement =

39. NOISE

40. LAND USE

42. FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE Michael Bomar, PE Tetra Tech September 9, 2011

43. RECOMMENDATIONS

46. MIPA-II: Identified to address compatibility issues related to blast noise, low level flight training and areas where night vision training is conducted. MIPA-II’s are focused on limiting density, object height, and nighttime light encroachment. MIPA-II designations are not recommended for all jurisdictions participating in this study.

47. MIPA-III: Related to Areas of low risk of blast noise complaints, the presence of civilian aircraft operations and this area’s general proximity to MIPA’s I and II. The distance beyond the Range boundary for MIPA-III’s vary but the MIPA-III areas generally exist in the low level of blast noise risk areas outside MIPA’s I and II.