Publicidad

Fraser Health Keynote

Professor of Entrepreneurial Engineering
8 de Jun de 2017
Publicidad

Más contenido relacionado

Publicidad

Más de Lassonde School of Engineering(20)

Publicidad

Fraser Health Keynote

  1. NAVIGATING YOUR INNOVATION JOURNEY Dr. Andrew Maxwell, Chief Innovation Officer, Canadian Innovation Centre Professor, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University Fraser Health Management Team Business Meeting, June 8th
  2. INNOVATION IS HARD Recent Bain & Company study showed that: • Two-thirds of CEOs made innovation a top three priority. • Less than 25% believed their companies were effective at innovating. • Less than 20% claimed they were strong at “breakthrough” innovation. Innovation is hard, because it requires changing what people do and how they behave. And because usually leaders have been successful previously in organizations that were in steady-state. 2
  3. MAXWELL’S THREE LAWS OF INNOVATION INERTIA 1.There is a natural tendency for organizations to keep doing what they’re doing and resist changes. In the absence of a force, they will continue to do what they’ve always done. 2.Larger organizations require more force to change what they are doing than smaller organizations. 3.For every force there is a reaction force that is equal in size, but opposite in direction. When someone exerts a force on an organization, he or she gets pushed back in the opposite direction equally hard. 3 The innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions. Machiavelli
  4. INNOVATION INERTIA IN HEALTHCARE Innovation in healthcare is particularly challenging because of the multiplier effect: 1. Individuals are normally risk averse, which means that the benefits of taking a risk have to be more than double the perceived costs. 2. Public healthcare organizations operate under public scrutiny, which means that failures raise difficult questions. 3. The medical profession is by nature conservative; doctors are encouraged not to take unnecessary risks. The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. George Bernard Shaw
  5. OVERCOMING INNOVATION INERTIA FOUR FORCES OF PROGRESS 5 © Re-Wired Group
  6. PUSH OF THE SITUATION THE HEALTHCARE INNOVATION IMPERATIVE • Based on trends in healthcare needs, costs & GDP - in 15 years, BC healthcare costs will consume over 45 percent of government spending • The Fraser Institute1 concludes that such increases may be unsustainable and risk crowding out other programs or requiring fiscal adjustments • Five Cost Drivers2 • Aging population (with higher costs) • Increasing number of patients with chronic conditions • New treatments and technologies • Rising costs of trained staff • Personalized care 1Fraser Institute: The Sustainability of Health Care Spending in Canada 2017 2 Future Agenda: http://2015.futureagenda.org/category/topics/health/
  7. MAGNETISM OF NEW SOLUTION TECHNOLOGY LIKELY TO IMPACT HEALTHCARE • Web based services: Patient self-service/appointments/patient records • Wireless devices: Remote monitoring/sensors/wearables • Autonomous machines: Robots/drones/homecare • Online resources: Telemedicine/Web based diagnostics • Big Data and Artificial intelligence: for data analysis and prediction • 3D printing: Body parts/organs • Personalized pharmaceuticals • Miniaturization and local intelligence: Medical devices • Augmented reality: Surgery/treatment/diagnosis • Blockchain: Secure transactions/interoperability/data interchange Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke
  8. HABBITS OF THE PRESENT CHALLENGING TO CHANGE BEHAVIOURS • Difficult to change individual behaviours • Need to manage current performance leaves little time for looking at, and investing in, change • Challenging in organizations designed for steady state processes • Can impact individuals’ roles and responsibilities (and their jobs) • Current rules instituted to ensure compliance (discourage deviance) If you always do what you always did, you will always get what you always got. Albert Einstein 8
  9. ANXIETY OF THE NEW SOLUTION • New solutions involve risk: • Technical risk - the solution won’t work • Financial risk - money will be wasted, or more money will be needed than anticipated • Emotional risk – they will be blamed if things go wrong • Organizations and their policies often designed to punish failures • Innovation implementation can have unintended consequences: • More work for the innovator • Need for additional resources • Possible changes in job and role
  10. CHANGE IS DIFFICULT UNDER SHORT TERM PERFORMANCE PRESSURES Here is Edward Bear, coming downstairs now, bump, bump, bump, on the back of his head, behind Christopher Robin. It is, as far as he knows, the only way of coming downstairs, but sometimes he feels that there really is another way, if only he could stop bumping for a moment and think of it. And then he feels that perhaps there isn't. A.A. Milne, 1926, Winnie The Pooh 10
  11. THE INNOVATION QUOTIENT TOOL TO ASSESS INNOVATION BARRIERS The Innovation Quotient is a diagnostic tool to help you identify opportunities for improving innovation in five critical dimensions: • Strategy: Leadership, expectations, organizational design • Resources: People, assets, funds • Culture: Values, experimentation, risk-taking • Processes: Innovation processes, decision-making, engagement • Relationships: Hierarchical, cross-boundary, external Without change there is no innovation, creativity, or incentive for improvement. Those who initiate change will have a better opportunity to manage the change that is inevitable. William Pollard 11
  12. FRASER HEALTH LEADERSHIP VIEW OF INNOVATION QUOTIENT 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Strategy Culture ResourcesProcesses Relationships Your view on critical barriers: 49% - System or current processes 33% - Lack of time or resources
  13. YOUR SURVEY RESULTS BARRIERS TO INNOVATION?Strategy • “Not clear what is meant by innovation, so a clear definition that can be operationalized and a clear process.” • “Knowing that innovation is an important part of our work and that we are supported to try new things.” Resources • “Allowing the time and providing better incentive to be innovative rather then having the expectation of doing innovation by the side of your already filled desk.” Relationships • “Leadership staff stepping out of their comfort zone in corporate and operational areas to develop new ideas and ways of getting the work done rather than sticking to historical tried and true practices.” Processes • “Empower managers and frontline staff to make decisions without having to run the gauntlet of Directors, ED and VP for approval.“ Culture • “A culture that encourages us to take risks…and even some degree of failure.” • “Organization's leadership (needs) to be more open, flexible, and supportiverather than only results focused.” It’s easy to come up with new ideas; the hard part is letting go of what worked for you two years ago, but will soon be out of date. Roger von Oech
  14. STARTING YOUR INNOVATION JOURNEY • Six key innovation recommendations: • Clarify innovation strategy .... to guide decisions • Modify organizational design …. to allow innovation focus 14
  15. THE DICHOTOMY OF ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION Performance engine success • Efficiency • Repeatability • Predictability Innovation engine success • Speed • Impact • Failure Great energy only comes from a correspondingly great tension of opposites. Carl Jung 15
  16. ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY PERFORMANCE ENGINE Characterized as exploitation • Follow the rules and drive out variance and slack • Focus on serving existing customers and their needs • Manage and refine existing competencies • Optimize the organization for existing rules • Invest for short term savings If you look at history, innovation doesn't come just from giving people incentives; it comes from creating environments where their ideas can connect. Steven Johnson INNOVATION ENGINE Characterized as exploration • Break the rules and promote variance and slack • Serve new customers with new needs • Develop and lead new competences • Develop new organization system with new rules • Invest to save money in future 16
  17. STARTING YOUR INNOVATION JOURNEY • Six key innovation recommendations: • Clarify innovation strategy .... to guide decisions • Modify organizational design …. to allow innovation focus • Introduce formal processes …. to structure decisions 17
  18. INTRODUCING AN INNOVATION PROCESS 1. Establish critical innovation objectives 2. Establish a mechanism for collecting ideas – linked to an evaluation process 3. Develop rapid first cut response 4. Establish multi-functional initial review team with mandate and budget 5. Set short-term deliverables for each project (and constrained budgets) 6. Be clear on implementation goals and how performance will be measured 7. Develop a communications strategy to share success and failure 8. Embed a scale up strategy Common barrier to innovation is lack of follow up, i.e. encouraging people to suggest ideas, then not implementing/resourcing them, exacerbated by not providing rapid feedback on decisions ALM 18
  19. THE INNOVATION PROCESS IS A MULTI-STAGE ELIMINATION PROCESS Identify Priorities Collect Ideas Screen Ideas Initial Pilots Experiments Scale Up Roll Out Priorities Ideas Criteria Resources Fieldtrials Resources Engagement Non-priority Weakideas Poorideas Parkedpilots Failedpilots Parkedprojects Not-scaleable 19 19 An innovation process enables the development of an innovation portfolio – using a real options approach, which encourages failing fast, and scaling up on successful experiments. ALM
  20. STARTING YOUR INNOVATION JOURNEY • Six key innovation recommendations: • Clarify innovation strategy .... to guide decisions • Modify organizational design …. to allow innovation focus • Introduce formal processes …. to structure decisions • Allocate resources …. to undertake experiments • Foster an innovation culture …. to create personal safety net 20
  21. What does an innovation culture look like? • Encourages team and cross-boundary collaboration • Sharing ideas with internal and external partners • Two way, open, knowledge exchange • Deferred judgment and idea exploration • Speedy decision making • Experimentation and willingness to learn from failure • Incentives that reward new activities • Achieving balance between loose practices & tight processes FOSTERING AN INNOVATION CULTURE The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. George Bernard Shaw 21
  22. STARTING YOUR INNOVATION JOURNEY • Six key innovation recommendations: • Clarify innovation strategy .... to guide decisions • Modify organizational design …. to allow innovation focus • Introduce formal processes …. to structure decisions • Allocate resources …. to undertake experiments • Foster an innovation culture …. to create personal safety net • Greater reliance on trust …. to foster collabortion 22
  23. TRUST AS A BEHAVIOURAL CONSTRUCT • Viewing trust as an auditable and coachable behaviour • The Behavioural Trust Framework (BTF) enables individuals to understand how they build, damage or violate trust • It allows individuals to audit others’ behaviours and decide whom to trust • Higher levels of trust reduce relationship risk, and the need for trust proxies (controls) • Trust fosters innovation by facilitating collaboration, knowledge sharing and alignment Trust is the universal lubricant that enables innovation, it fosters collaboration and enables the innovation engine to engage with the performance engine. ALM 23
  24. INNOVATION Innovation Capacity is a ƒ(level of trust) The level of trust = ∫(Trust building - trust damaging) behaviours – ƒ(controls) MEASURING INNOVATION CAPACITY Learning to collaborate is part of equipping yourself for effectiveness, problem solving, innovation and life-long learning in an ever-changing networked economy. Don Tapscott 24
  25. Trusting: • Disclosing: Shows vulnerability by sharing confidential information • Reliance: Willingness to be vulnerable through reliance on others • Receptive: Demonstrates ‘coachability’ and willingness to change Capability: • Competent: Displays relevant technical and/or business ability • Experienced: Demonstrates relevant work/training experience • Judgment: Shows ability to make accurate / objective decisions Trustworthiness: • Consistent: Displays of behavior that confirm previous promises • Benevolent: Exhibits concern about well-being of others • Alignment: Actions confirm shared values and/or objectives Communication: • Accurate: Provides truthful and timely information • Explanation: Explains details & consequence of information provided • Openness: Open to new ideas or new ways of doing things BEHAVIOURAL TRUST FRAMEWORK25
  26. For a copy of this deck, email: Andrew.Maxwell@lassonde.yorku.ca or download from: https://www.slideshare.net/AndrewMaxwellPhD/ FraserHealthKeynote NAVIGATING YOUR INNOVATION JOURNEY The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it. Michelangelo

Notas del editor

  1. Difficult in organizations not designed for innovation
  2. Push of the situation
  3. Magnetism of the solution
  4. We tend to put innovation actions off till the next day The future is connected to the present
  5. Lets start with a definition encourages experimentation allows for failure and learns from it Particularly in addition to their day job Daily pressures to deliver short-term services and results
  6. Specific challenges are around strategy and processes, with some concern about resources
  7. We tend to put innovation actions off till the next day The future is connected to the present
  8. Move the needle – incremental vs disruptive
  9. Move the needle – incremental vs disruptive
  10. Move the needle – incremental vs disruptive
  11. Move the needle – incremental vs disruptive
  12. Collaboration is an essential ingredient for innovation Trust is a necessary pre-condition for effective collaboration In the absence of Trust, we develop proxies for Trust: Any mechanism which seeks to control behaviour is a proxy for trust (examples: employment contracts, performance reviews, annual budgeting processes, rigid organizational structures and reporting relationships, over-applied lean methodology, outcome-based objective setting) The higher the Trust Level, the lower the need for controls The higher the Trust Level, the greater the level of collaboration, which results in a higher level of innovation
  13. Speak to behaviours in each dimension – can build, damage or violate trust
Publicidad