DESIGN OF A HOUSING AT A SATELLITE CITY IN CHATTOGRAM
(HATHAZARI)
STUDENT ID.
1506009
1506024
1306004

HOUSING SITE
SITE LOCATION
N
CHITTAGONG DISTRICT HATHATAZARI UPAZILLA

ROAD TRANSPORT :
FROM OXYGEN
RAILWAY :
FROM CHITTAGONG RAILWAY STATION,
SHOLOSOHOR RAILWAY STATION
CONNECTIVITY WITH THE CITY
DISTANCE FROM CITY-20km
ROADWAY
RAILWAY
CHITTAGONG-RANGAMATI HIGHWAY(N106)

SITE DISTANCE FROM NEAREST NODES
N
Towards Rangamati
Tribeni mor
Bus stand
Jagriti mor

SITE

305’
267’
112’
96’
121’
204’
55’
307’
352’
49’
412’
97’
120’
76’
427’
98’
487’
217’
388’
213’
SITE ANALYSIS
SITE AREA:18.5 ACRE
OWNER:BTCL
N

EXISTING CONDITION
16’ WIDE MOHAMMADPUR ROAD
24’ WIDE NATIONAL HIGHWAY
TO RANGAMATI(N106)
SITE
N
FOTIKA PRIMARY SCHOOL

BUILDING HEIGHT DATA
ONE STORIED
TWO STORIED
THREE STORIED
FOUR STORIED
N

LAND USE
N
Residential
School
Mosque
Commercial
Paddy Fields
SITE

SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

Expatriate
45%
Serviceholder
21%
Businessman
15%
Farmers
11%
Others
8%
OCCUPATION
Pucca
50%
Semi-pucca
35%
Kacha
15%
HOUSE STRUCTURE TYPE
HOUSEHOLD COMPRISING-
4-5 persons 60%
6-7 persons 30%
8+ persons 10%
EXISTING DATA

TYPICAL UNIT TYPES
Low Income Group (30%)
Target Group
Rickshaw Puller, Household Worker,
Small Business
Income -10000-15000
Middle Income Group ( 60%)
Target Group
Service Holder, Business ,Employee
Income – 20000-30000
High Income Group (10%)
Target Group
Officers, Businessman, Factory Owners
Income- 50000-60000
• 4 to 5 Storied
• Each Floor Consist of 4 units
• Pucca
• Semi Pucca
• Kacha
Utilities: Primary School, Madrashah, Livestock
Development, Mosque
Social Gathering : Hathazari College Field
Clinic : No
Bazar : No
Building Types

CONCEPT
•Concentric Zone Model Theory was created by
sociologist EW Burgess in 1925
•Based on a study of land use pattern and social group in
Chicago
•City grows outward beginning with the CBD
•Similar & functionally related activities will locate at the
same distance from CBD
•Formation of zones is based on accessibility in distance
to the city center
•City is divided in to 5 concentric zones:
Zone I Central Business District:
Hotels, Offices, Businesses, Other Commercial
activities)
Zone II Zone of Transition:
Gray zone, Tendency to conversion of land uses
Zone III Lower Income working People:
Homes/slums
Zone IV High Income Residences:
White Collar/middle class families
Zone V Commuter Zone:
People who work in the center choose to live in the
suburbs

COMMUNITY
FACILITIES
MIDDLE INCOME GROUP
LOW INCOME
GROUP
HIGH
INCOME
GROUP
N
CONCEPT
• Low Income group adjacent to Community facilities and minimum walking distance.
• Middle income between high and low income
• High income group at the peripheral area and adjacent to nature.

MASTER PLAN
N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1. Mosque
2. Community
Hall
3. Supershop
4. School
5. Health Centre
6. Bazar
7. Low Income
8. Middle Income
9. High Income

VEHICULAR ROAD NETWORK
CHITTAGONG-RANGAMATI HIGHWAY

BUILDING TYPOLOGY
N
MIDDLE INCOME GROUP (60%)
LOW INCOME GROUP (30%)
HIGH INCOME GROUP (10%)
COMMUNITY FACILITIES

PRIMARY & SECONDARY OPEN SPACES
N

HIERARCHY OF OPEN SPACES
TERTIARY
OPEN SPACE
SECONDARY
OPEN SPACE

OUND FLOOR PLAN
N
CHITTAGONG-RANGAMATI HIGHWAY

UNIT TYPE TARGET
GROUP
SIZE NO. OF
UNIT
POPULATION
A LOW INCOME 530 sqft 384 1920
B MIDDLE INCOME 1150 sqft 810 4050
C HIGH INCOME 1400 sqft 144 720
TOTAL 1338 6690
TOTAL SITE AREA:18.5 ACRE
DENSITY: 361 PERSONS PER ACRE
PROVIDED COMMUNITY FACILITIES
SCHOOL-0.4 ACRE
MOSQUE-0.21 ACRE
HEALTH CENTRE-0.15 ACRE
COMMUNITY HALL-0.16 ACRE
BAZAR-0.24 ACRE
SUPERSHOP-0.21 ACRE
PARK-0.88 ACRE
PLAYGROUND- 0.83 ACRE
REQUIRED COMMUNITY FACILITIES
SCHOOL-0.5 ACRE
MOSQUE-0.217 ACRE
COMMUNITY HALL-0.14 ACRE
BAZAR-0.26 ACRE
SUPERSHOP-0.21 ACRE
PARK-0.825ACRE
PLAYGROUND- 0.55 ACRE
CALCULATIONS

TYPE A(FOR LOW INCOME GROUP)
LIVING ROOM
DINING ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
TOILET
VERANDA
N FLOOR PLAN
SECTION
UNIT LAYOUT

TYPE B( FOR MIDDLE INCOME GROUP)
LIVING ROOM
DINING ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
TOILET
VERANDA
N FLOOR PLAN
SECTION
UNIT LAYOUT

TYPE C(FOR HIGH INCOME GROUP)
LIVING ROOM
DINING ROOM
KITCHEN
BEDROOM
TOILET
VERANDA
N FLOOR PLAN
SECTION
UNIT LAYOUT
BASEMENT PARKING

SOUTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION

SITE SECTIONS
A
A’

SITE SECTION
B B’

LOW INCOME GROUP HOUSING

MIDDLE INCOME GROUP HOUSING
HIGH INCOME GROUP HOUSING

PUBLIC PLAZA

CIDCO Housing:Humane Habitate at Low Cost
Location:Kalamboli,New Bombay
Area:1137 housing units were designed as a group of housing in 35 acres
Architect:Raj Rewal
Year:1993
Traditional Morphology:
Urban fabric
Clusters
Courtyards
Streets
Gateways
Roof terraces
CASE STUDY 1 SITE ZONING
TYPOLOGY

STREET NETWORKING MAP
OWNERSHIP MAP

BUILDING TYPOLOGY
TOTAL HOUSING UNITS-1048
The system of connecting the blocks is an important feature of the pattern.
The form of every block is different and it is patterned in different formations
based on the typology of the site, to create squares and pathways.
A sense of enclosure and continuity of movement is maintained throughout
the scheme.
The division of site is accentuated by different types of building blocks
designed on the basis of dwelling unit areas.
A-20 sq. m
B-25 sq. m
C-34 sq. m
D-40 sq. m
E-50 sq. m
F-70 sq. m
STREET NETWORKING MAP

Vehicular circulation
The internal spaces are free from vehicular traffic
Width of vehicular road =6m
Courtyards
The interlocking courtyards accommodate different
functions and create a micro climate within the site.
Children's play areas
Children's play area was not provided.

CLUSTER PLAN

TARA Apartment is a group housing
project commissioned by Tara Cooperative Society, the
first housing project inDelhi.
The concept was introduced to rehabilitate the 1947
partition affected people who had nowhere to settle
down after their retirement from their professional
lives.
• The famous architect Charles Correa was roped in to
designaunique architecturalconcept.
• Tara housing group has more than 125 units and 375
personsperhectare.
• The Tara pays deeply attention to the inner activities
which are almost happen in the central garden and leave
the interaction of traffic behindawall.
Location: New Delhi, India.
Theproject is located along
Guru Ravidas Marg Street
which leads to two big
residential areasin theNorth
and the South.
TARA HOUSING
BY CHARLES CORREA
CASE STUDY 2

BUILDING:
• Theduplexunitsareaccessed either at groundfloor or second
floor levelsbyoutdoor staircases.
• Twokindsof flat: two-bedroom flats- 84sq.m(3mwide, 6
mhigh with two floorsand15mlong, three-bedroomflats
-130sq.m.
• Eachunit isprovidedanopen terracewhichisprotected
byapergolaandbigoverhangs.
• Twosidesof the projectare connectedbystaircases.
TWOBEDROOMFLAT
THREE BEDROOM FLAT

TWO BEDROOMTYPE:
•Thecomplex isformed due to the combination between pairsof
accommodation units.
•Thesecondfloor which islargerthanthe groundone with abig overhangthat rises
further approximately 6m gives the mixture between shadowandlight.
• Theduplexaboveisalsopushback
• hencefront of the below one isprotected too.
•In that way,the whole central gardenisfull filled with shadow. SECONDFLOOR PLAN
SECTION
DAYZONE NIGHTZONE
KITCHEN BATHROOM
CIRCULATION
GROUNDFLOORPLAN

THREE BEDROOMTYPE:
FLATA’SGROUNDFLOORPLAN
FLATB’SGROUNDFLOORPLAN
FLATA’SSECONDFLOORPLAN
FLATB’SSECONDFLOORPLAN
• In theshape
of “L”,this
type seemsto
bedifficult to
attach in the
middle of a
clusterandall
of them are
locatedinthe
outer-most.

JOYPURHAT LIMESTONE HOUSING
CASE STUDY 3

Thank You !