To hear Adrian's presentation, follow this link: http://snack.to/b7c9ekkz
While the benefits of caring for inpatients within a private room have now been time tested, there are thousands who still receive care outside of this clinically preferred environment on a daily basis. As is often the case, the benefits may be clear, but the perceived cost of providing more private patient rooms has prevented the wholesale adoption of this basic principle throughout the United States.
Building new bed towers has been an option for systems that could afford to build new facilities. However, many systems do not have that luxury or are landlocked, at capacity and cannot expand or afford to give up beds from their license. This session will provide a roadmap for the successful renovation of patient units to accommodate all private rooms, or enhanced 2-Bed rooms that incorporate best clinical practices in a cost effective manner.
By breaking down the success factors into ten key considerations, this session will allow designers, managers, and contractors to plan and execute such projects more effectively. Case studies will be presented to demonstrate how this straightforward approach can increase the success of renovations that convert (primarily) double bedded units into single patient room units.
2. PresentersPresenters
Adrian Hagerty, AIA, LEED AP
Principal, Regional Vice President, National Capital Region
PresentersPresenters
p , g , p g
Array Architects
Patricia Malick AAHID EDAC Lean Green BeltPatricia Malick, AAHID, EDAC, Lean Green Belt
Principal, Practice Area Leader-Interior Design
Array Architects
3. Session E09Session E09
Your Aging Patient Bed TowerYour Aging Patient Bed Tower-- Top Ten Considerations When RenovatingTop Ten Considerations When Renovating
While the benefits of caring for inpatients within a private room have now been time tested, there are thousands who still
receive care outside of this clinically preferred environment on a daily basis. As is often the case, the benefits may be
clear, but the perceived cost of providing more private patient rooms has prevented the wholesale adoption of this basic
principle throughout the United States. Building new bed towers has been an option for systems that could afford to buildprinciple throughout the United States. Building new bed towers has been an option for systems that could afford to build
new facilities. However, many systems do not have that luxury or are landlocked, at capacity and cannot expand or afford
to give up beds from their license. This session will provide a roadmap for the successful renovation of patient units to
accommodate all private rooms, or enhanced 2-Bed rooms that incorporate best clinical practices in a cost effective
manner. By breaking down the success factors into ten key considerations, this session will allow designers, managers,
and contractors to plan and execute such projects more effectively Case studies will be presented to demonstrate howand contractors to plan and execute such projects more effectively. Case studies will be presented to demonstrate how
this straightforward approach can increase the success of renovations that convert (primarily) double bedded units into
single patient room units.
Learning Objectives:
1.Explore elements that create a renovated environment that is consistent with patient centered & family centered care.
2.Learn how inpatient renovation projects can improve operational efficiency.
3 Discuss how inpatient unit renovation projects present opportunities to implement sustainable design strategies3.Discuss how inpatient unit renovation projects present opportunities to implement sustainable design strategies.
4.Demonstrate the value of integrating infrastructure improvements with inpatient unit renovation projects.
4. Session E09Session E09
Your Aging Patient Bed TowerYour Aging Patient Bed Tower-- Top Ten Considerations WhenTop Ten Considerations When RenovatingRenovating
GeorgeGeorge CostanzaCostanza might disagree:might disagree:gg g gg g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfvKc_9YbCs
5. operational
efficiency01 IT
infrastructure07
logistical02 accessibility08
life safety03 sustainability09y03
infection
control04
y09
patient/family
i l d10control04
patient
05
involved care10
Array’s Leansafety05
i i06
Array’s Lean
Process Approach
lean
process
engineering06 • University Hospitals
• New York Presbyterian
case
studies
7. fi di thfinding the
BALANCEBALANCE
between
LEAN & MEANLEAN & MEAN
8. 01 operational efficiency considerations
• Using Lean Design principles, test the work flow within a
unit to ensure maximum efficiency
01
unit to ensure maximum efficiency
• Define Current State & Map Future State
• Observe, , Envision, Model, Build Consensus
Spaghetti Mapping DiagramsValue Stream Mapping
9. 01 operational efficiency considerations
• Engagement with Caregivers and Patients
01
• Rapid Testing of Future State Solutions
D t d i D i i• Data-driven Decisions
Empathy MappingRapid Testing
10.
11.
12. 02 logistical considerations: feasibility study
• Determine appropriate level of renovation required
02
• Develop a plan to effectively execute renovation that
minimizes day-to-day disruptions to hospital
operations
• Proper Phasing is essential to success
(vertical vs. horizontal stacked phasing, cost of
escalation)
• BIM can be used to assist Stacked Phasing decisions
Vertical Stacked Phasing Horizontal Stacked Phasing
13. 03 life safety considerations
• Providing a safe environment is utmost
priority
03
priority
• Using ILSM (interim life safety measures) will
result in ZERO disruption to operationsp p
• 3 main steps in planning and implementation
of ILSMs:
(1) Pre-Construction Assessment
(2) Development and Daily Monitoring of an(2) Development and Daily Monitoring of an
ILSM Compliance Checklist
(1) Close-out of the ILSM to transition back(1) Close out of the ILSM to transition back
to standard operating procedures.
14.
15. It’s more than justIt s more than just
WASHINGWASHING
h dyour hands.
16. 04 infection control considerations
• 1 in 20 patients acquire an infection during hospital stay
04
• Aspergillus- most common microbes associated with construction
ICRA (i f ti t l i k t) ltidi i li d t d t• ICRA (infection control risk assessment)- multidisciplinary, documented assessment
process to proactively identify and mitigate risks from infection that could occur
during construction activities
• Process should begin in early stages with stakeholders; CM with strong track record
18. 05 patient safety considerations
• Patient Unit Design should promote healing and
foster patient and family collaboration
05
foster patient and family collaboration
• Provide adequate support zones to reduce hazards
• Consider proximity of bed to bathroom; lifts
• Install multi-function lighting options & controls
• Provide patient control of shading, education and
entertainment
• Incorporate noise reducing design elements
• Integrate equipment and alarm configuration
• Provide materials which are easily cleaned AND
maintained
19. 06 engineering considerations
• HVAC system can account for more than 50% of the
cost
06
cost
• Comprehensive facility condition assessment is
necessary- surprises can be expensivey p p
• Ideal opportunity to correct facility deficiencies=
improved operational costs over the life of the facility
21. 07 IT infrastructure considerations
• CINS (Clinical Integration Networks) allow caregivers to
access the data of patients
07
access the data of patients
• EMR access becomes hub for all activity on floor
• Provide Access to Point of Care (POC) Mobile Technology,
Nurse Call Innovations
• Patient Entertainment, Education, Communication & Surveys
23. 08 accessibility considerations
• “Barrier-Free Health Care Initiative”- goal of ensuring
that persons with disabilities have access to medical
08
that persons with disabilities have access to medical
information as well as physical access
• “ADA Path of Travel” requirement- visualize entire pathq p
of travel from the drop off point to patient’s destination
• Verify that constructed solution meets design criteria
and ADAG requirementsand ADAG requirements.
24. Can you make your father’sy y
OLDSMOBILE
run like a
PRIUS?PRIUS?
25. 09 sustainability considerations
• Environmentally-friendly design & system choices
09
• Investigate opportunities to recycle construction waste
• Identify design and engineering options that reduce electricity and• Identify design and engineering options that reduce electricity and
water use
• Focus on selecting sustainable project materials that support highg p j pp g
indoor environment quality (IEQ), and green cleaning
26. ““WeWe’’re all in thisre all in this““WeWe’’re all in thisre all in this
TOGETHER.TOGETHER.””TOGETHER.TOGETHER.””TOGETHER.TOGETHER.TOGETHER.TOGETHER.
27. 10 patient/family-involved care
id ti
• Opportunity to reinvent the patient
10 considerations
pp y p
experience
- Wow Factor – Inspire Confidence
- Create Generative Spaces
- Promise, Deliver, Delight!, , g
• Use Amenity & Touchpoint mapping toy p pp g
elevate the patient/family experience
28. OINTS OF IMPACTOINTS OF IMPACT Mapping the Patient and Visitor ExperienceMapping the Patient and Visitor Experience
Wayfinding Clarity…
I know where I am going
Patient Centered…
Family Focused
I know where I am going
WELCOME DISCOVER RESPITE RECOVER
First Impressions…
I made the right choice
Gathering Zones…
I need a breather
34. Project Drivers:Project Drivers:
• Aging Infrastructure
• Parity with other University Health System Hospitals
• Create a patient-centered healing environment for high-Create a patient centered, healing environment for high
risk maternity patients
35. patient and family centered
1. information sharing
2. foster collaboration / participation / education/ p p /
3. honor patient and family perspectives
4 accommodate diversity (cultural; socio economic)4. accommodate diversity – (cultural; socio-economic)
5. right support/right place/right time
6. proximity to Level III NICU
36. operational ideals
1 li / f i i i i1. quality / safety initiatives
2. support UH model-of-care
3. technology and equipment integration
4 de-centralized caregiver zones4. de centralized caregiver zones
5. improve acoustics / ergonomics
i l ‘ i6. exceptional ‘guest’ service
45. overview
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation
current state
Typical Floor
Project Challenges:Project Challenges:
• Project Scope: 5 Floors, 20 Bed
Units, 680 Beds
• Construction Start:
4Q 2012
• Construction Complete:t u t p t
1Q 2018
• Project Cost: 160MillionProject Cost: 160Million
48. current state best practice influencers vision
current
state
• infrastructure deficiencies
• out of sync with World‐Class reputation
• patient and family perspective
state
best
• safe, equitable
• patient and family centered
• operational ideals
practice
i fl
• patient experience improvement strategies
• HCAPHS, patient satisfaction scores
id b d d iinfluencers • evidence based design
• “patients first” mission
• building towards an experience
vision
• building towards an experience
• stakeholder survey, amenity mapping, image dialogue
49. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
Modern with clean lines classic & natural elementsModern with clean lines, classic & natural elements
Perceived as a place of science while having the warmth of a home.
image survey results: design vocabulary
50. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
3%39%58%
A B C19 13 1
# of respondents # of respondents # of respondents
image survey results: art
51. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
45%42%12% 45%42%12%
1 2 34 14 15
# of respondents # of respondents # of respondents
image survey results: cars
52. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
61%39% %%
1 213 20
# of respondents # of respondents
image survey results: home
53. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
73%27%27%
1 29 24
# of respondents # of respondents
image survey results: hotel
54. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
39%52%9%
1 2 3
39%
3
52%9%
17 13
# of respondents # of respondents # of respondents
image survey results: front door
55. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
How should the Milstein Tower be perceived by patients and families?
58%
1st choice
9%
1st choice
33%
1st choice
58% 9%33%
# of respondents # of respondents # of respondents
3rd choice 58%
place of science temporary home spa / resort18 11 3
# of respondents p # of respondents
56. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
What adjectives describe the aesthetic goals the enhanced bed unit?
a) sleek and modern 4
b) warm and cozy
c) quiet and peaceful
4
2
9c) quiet and peaceful
d) educational and engaging
9
1
e) ______________________ 17
57. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
Image Survey Total
Responses Preferred #1 Preferred #2 Preferred #3 Preferred #4 Preferred #5
A ‐ Wood
Stone/Textures/Tones 31 14 10 3 1 3
B Simplicity/Clean Lines 31 7 6 3 5 10
77%
23% 32%B ‐ Simplicity/Clean Lines 31 7 6 3 5 10
C ‐ Luxe/Amenity Rich 31 3 4 6 7 11
23% 32%
58%
D ‐ Color Saturated 31 4 6 13 8 0
E ‐ Patterns/Shape/Texture 31 2 5 4 12 8
68%
E Patterns/Shape/Texture 31 2 5 4 12 8
65%
image results survey
58. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
Preferred Not Preferred .
77%
23% 32%
58%
68%
65%
image results survey
59. Overview current state influencers vision
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation example
What adjectives describe the aesthetic goals the enhanced bed unit?
a) sleek and modern
4
b) warm and cozy
c) quiet and peaceful
4
2
9c) quiet and peaceful
d) educational and engaging
9
1
e)
f)
Write in: “All of the above” 6
6 Write in: “A+C”
4Write in: “welcoming” or “technology”
60. CIRCULATION
VERTICAL CIRCULATION
Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit
Renovation
MER / IT / SHAFTS
PATIENT BEDS (QUAD)
PATIENT BEDS (ISO)
PATIENT BEDS (DOUBLE)
PATIENT BEDS (SINGLE)
CLINICAL SUPPORT
OFFICE / ADMIN SUPPORT
IMAGING
69. Milstein Enhancement Bed Unit Renovation
$154.2M
TOTAL BED UNIT PROJECT
$154.2M
TOTAL BED UNIT PROJECT
$141.1M
TOTAL BED UNIT PROJECT
$141.1M
TOTAL BED UNIT PROJECT TOTAL BED UNIT PROJECT
FUNDING INCLUDING
INFRASTRUCTURE AND IT
TOTAL BED UNIT PROJECT
FUNDING INCLUDING
INFRASTRUCTURE AND IT
TOTAL BED UNIT PROJECT
FUNDING EXCLUDING
INFRASTRUCTURE AND IT
TOTAL BED UNIT PROJECT
FUNDING EXCLUDING
INFRASTRUCTURE AND IT
Bed Unit Enhancements
FACE Program
Contingency Alignment
Infrastructure
IT
70. HUDSON NORTH HUDSON SOUTH GARDEN NORTH GARDEN SOUTH
phasing scenario studies - example
MCKEEN
BEHAVIORAL
HEALTH
INFECTIOUS
DISEASE
9
HUDSON NORTH HUDSON SOUTH GARDEN NORTH GARDEN SOUTH
MCKEEN
NEUROSURGERY
NEUROLOGY /
EPILEPSY
REHABILITATION NEURO ICU8
SURGERY TRANSPLANT
SURGERY /
ORTHOPEDICS
HOSPITALIST
MEDICAL SURGICAL GENERAL GENERAL
7
6
MEDICAL
ONCOLOGY
SURGICAL
ONCOLOGY
GENERAL
MEDICINE
GENERAL
MEDICINE
CARDIAC SURGERY
STEP DOWN
CARDIAC ICU CARDIOLOGY CARDIAC
6
5
EXISTING STACKING
PHASE 0: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: PROJECT COSTS:
NA NA
STEP-DOWN
EXISTING STACKING
DIAGRAM NA NA
71. HUDSON NORTH HUDSON SOUTH GARDEN NORTH GARDEN SOUTH
phasing scenario studies - example
BEHAVIORAL
HEALTH
9
HUDSON NORTH HUDSON SOUTH GARDEN NORTH GARDEN SOUTH
ORTHOPEDICS /
TRANSPLANT
TRANSPLANT MCKEEN
NEUROLOGY /
EPILEPSY
REHABILITATION NEURO ICU8 NEUROSURGERY
MEDICAL
ONCOLOGY
SURGICAL
ONCOLOGY
GENERAL GENERAL
7
6
INFECTIOUS
SURGERY SWING SPACE
RENOVATE FOR
CARDIAC
HOSPITALIST
GENERAL
MEDICINE
GENERAL
MEDICINE
6
5
INFECTIOUS
DISEASE
CARDIAC SURGERY
STEP DOWN
CARDIAC ICU CARDIOLOGY CARDIAC
CARDIAC
PHASE 16: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION: PROJECT COSTS:
1Q2019 $154 2M
STEP-DOWN
RENOVATE CARDIAC 1Q2019 $154.2M