The presentation of the frame of the Southwest Baltic Case
* The information presented is the working exercise of the cross-border maritime spatial planning discussions and can not be treated as the official opinion of the European Commission and the Member States involved in the consortium of the Baltic SCOPE project.
2. South-West Baltic Case
Planning system
• DK, The State is responsible for planning
both TTW and EEZ, (DNA)
• DE, BSH are responsible for planning EEZ,
TTW is planned by federal stats
• PL, The State is responsible for planning
both TTW and EEZ, (Maritime Offices)
• SE, State is responsible for EEZ,
Municipality responsible for TTW together
with SWAM, (SWAM)
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 2
3. South-West Baltic Case
Planning status
MSP law in place:
• Germany, law in force
• Poland, law in force
• Sweden, law in force (waiting for
ordnance)
• Denmark, developing the law
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 3
4. South-West Baltic Case
Planning status
• DE, have an existing EEZ plan and TTW-
plans for Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Will
revise EEZ plan with start ?
• PL, Start MSP planning 2015
• SE, Start MSP planning 2015 (SE have some
municipality plans covering TTW)
• DK, Start MSP planning 2016?
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 4
5. South-West Baltic Case
Different kinds off plans
• SE, Guiding strategic plan, evidence in
environmental court
• DE, BSH issuing permits based on the
plan
• PL, Strategic plan, more detailed
planning in some areas?, base for
permits?
• DK, ??
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 5
13. Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 13
Sets Targets (legally
binding) and
Objectives for
Spatial
Development: e.g.:
• Priority areas for
wind energy
(red)
• Shipping
corridors to be
safeguarded
• no turbines in
Natura 2000
areas
• gates (EEZ –
12nm Zone) for
electricity cables
15. South-West Baltic Case, Stakeholder
Some thoughts and some experience's
• Difficult to discuss the future
• Different traditions and governance system
• Language is an issue
• Difficult to have a comprehensive
approach/understanding
• We are dealing with State issues, different kind
of legacy, mandate and ambitions
• Need to have a independent discussion
• Stick to those stakeholders with mandate
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 15
17. South-West Baltic Case
What and how do we do?
What:
• Agree on what topics we should focus on
• Agree on a common ambition for the project/case
• Agree on how to work
How:
• Multilateral thematic group meetings?
• Bilateral meetings?
• Planers meeting, when?
Who:
• What stakeholders to involve , when and how?
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 17
18. South-West Baltic Case
Expected result from a SWAM perspective
• SE, DK have jointly agreed on how to
use/protect/develop and present Oresund
(and Kattegat) in respectively plans
• SE, PL have agreed how to
use/protect/develop and present Middle
bank
• SE, DK, DE have agreed how to
use/protect/develop present Krieger's Flak
and respectively plan
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 18
19. South-West Baltic Case
Expected result from a SWAM perspective
• All have agreed on how to present liner
objectives in respective plan/plans
• All have agreed on how to sett security
masseurs connected to Wind power and
Shipping
• A common baseline map for the topics we
have worked with
• ???
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 19
20. South-West Baltic Case
Expectation
• Good working relation
• Shared responsibility and work between the
partners
• Common responsibility for the result
• Constructive discussion
• Willingness to achieve solutions
• And a lot fun together
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 20
21. Group work
• What thematic groups?
• Who is group leader, for what group?
• Responsibilities
• How to work
• What's your expectations
• Home work for next meeting
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 21
22. SWB-Case
• 20 April deadline for submitting list of issues
shown on maps too SWAM, what kind of data
information was used, in eng.
• Prepare a short paper/ppp on your Topic,
discussing, what could be the TB issues for
planning?, Potential Stakeholders to involve, etz.
Too be presented on next meeting
• 1 planners meeting 6-7 Maj, Copenhagen (Jacob)
• 2 Planners meeting, 10 lunch-11 June Stockholm,
Nordregio
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 22
23. Draft agenda for 6-7 Maj, Copenhagen
• Presentations on existing inventory work
• Presentation on MSP process in each country
• Discussing the list of issues, what do we have? what
are missing? what do we need? What is relevant?
• A first assessment on what will the thematic planning
areas/issues be? What issue to focus on? And how to
work?
• A first outline on the land sea planning report from
Nordregio
• What kind of report do we present from phase one in
the case? To be presented in September
Baltic SCOPE Partner kick-off meeting 23
Editor's Notes
How does this effect our work, who should we involve and at what stage?