2. Situation
VW admitted to intentionally cheating on federal
emissions tests by using illegal software.
Last month, Jones Day was created to investigate the
illegal software used and determine who is at fault for
the scandal.
As a result of the investigation, many employees have
been suspended.
3. Facts
The scandal has severely harmed VW’s reputation as an environmentally
friendly company.
The poorly tested vehicles have made them rather hard to sell for those
customers wishing to resell their diesel VW.
VW is not willing to buyback as they are mainly focused on EPA regulations,
currently.
Utilitarianists Perspective: Using software to benefit VW, is worse for
consumers and the entire public, and laying off several employees is not
benefiting the majority either.
Kant’s Perspective: VW’s goal was to sell more vehicles, but there intent with
using the software was to manipulate their customers.
Aristotle’s Perspective: The virtue ethics of VW, as a business, are very
flawed.
4. Questions
Is VW ethically correct in suspending the majority of its employees,
even though most were not a part of the scandal? Are they
morally correct?
Do you think that the level an employee is within the business
should be a factor in their determining if they are innocent in the
scandal? Why or why not?
How do you think the EPA allowed for faulty emissions tests in
over 11 million vehicles?
Do you think VW would have continued selling vehicles with the
defeat device in place had they not been caught? Why or why
not?
If you were an employee that got suspended, would you return to
work for VW after your suspension is lifted? Why or why not?