See how one technical assistance program is improving the quality of the state's childcare centers and preschools using the Inclusive Classroom Profile.
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
How Mississippi is Using the ICP to Improve the Quality of Inclusive Practices
1. I C P
The Inclusive
Classroom Profile:
How Mississippi is
Using the ICP to
Improve the Quality
of Inclusive Practices
Dr. Alicia Westbrook
Dr. Leslie LaVergne
2. I C P
About the Presenters
Alicia Westbrook, Ph.D
Director, Mississippi Early Childhood
Inclusion Center, The University of
Southern Mississippi
Leslie LaVergne, Ph.D
Coordinator, Mississippi Early
Childhood Inclusion Center Institute for
Disability Studies, The University of
Southern Mississippi
3. I C P
Agenda
• What is the Inclusive Classroom
Profile?
• Background of MECIC
• How does MECIC Use the ICP?
• Next Steps for MECIC
• Q&A
4. I C P
What Type of Tool is the ICP?
• Structured Classroom
Observation Tool
• 1-7 point Rating Scale
• 12 Inclusive Practices
(items)
5. I C P
ICP Items
• Adaptations of space and
materials/equipment
• Adult involvement in peer
interactions
• Adults’ guidance of children’s
free choice activities and play
• Conflict resolution
• Membership
• Relationships between adults
and children
• Support for communication
• Adaptation of group activities
• Transitions between activities
• Feedback
• Family-professional
partnerships
• Monitoring children’s
learning
7. I C P
The overarching goal of the Mississippi Early Childhood Inclusion
Center (MECIC) is to meet the needs of early childhood educators,
families, and young children with disabilities by providing high
quality early childhood inclusion.
1. Special Needs Credentials
2. Quality Trainings
3. Technical Assistance
4. Screening and Diagnostic
Evaluations
5. Family Navigation
AgendaGoal
8. I C P
• What Is It?
• The credential is a 40 hour certificate program for childcare
directors and early childhood educators that includes didactic
trainings, self-directed learning activities and on-site
mentoring.
• Universal Design for Learning is the foundation for the Special
Needs Credential.
• Provides equal access for all children in classroom
learning opportunities and activities.
• Aligned with the Division for Early Childhood Recommended
Practices.
Special Needs Preschool Credential
9. I C P
Inclusive Classroom Profile
Individualized Plan of
Action
Individualized Technical
Assistance
Didactic Trainings
Self Directed Learning
Activities
On-site mentoring
Components
10. I C P
• Didactic trainings, self-directed learning activities and on-site
mentoring
• 6 Training Modules (18 clock hours)
• Topics include: developmental monitoring, parent
engagement; early childhood inclusion; program planning;
advancing pre-academic development; advancing
developmental milestones; and supporting positive
behavior.
• Individualized Plan of Action
• Roundtable Discussion
• Learning Assignments
• On-site Mentoring
Components
11. I C P
Strengths
1. Centers and materials are labeled with pictures
and words.
2. Teacher provided verbal and hand-over-hand
support to children who were having difficulty with
painting.
3. There were many materials displayed in the
classroom that reflected individual differences in a
positive way.
4. Both teachers offered verbal and non-verbal
feedback to children.
Plan of Action - Example
12. I C P
Suggestions
1. Encourage more social interactions between
Maddox and his peers.
2. Provide opportunities for children to assume social
roles.
3. Allow more opportunities for both teachers to
engage in more positive and meaningful
interactions.
4. Offer more validation when a child is upset and
allow each child to talk about emotions and
feelings, when appropriate, during more
challenging behaviors.
Plan of Action - Example
13. I C P
The Data Tells A Story
• N = 59
• Preschool Classrooms
• Head Start: 2
• Half-Day Preschool Programs:
1
• University Affiliated: 4
• Child Care: 20
• Highest Degree
• High School: 13
• Some College: 10
• Associates: 8
• Bachelor's: 21
• Master’s: 7
• 11 out of 59 classrooms scored
5 or above
• No classrooms scored a 7
14. I C P
The Data Tells A Story
Table 1: Means and Standard Deviations of Significant Items:
Inclusive Classroom Profile for MECIC Credential
Pre-Test (N=59) Post-Test (N=59)
Item Mean Std. Error Mean Std. Error
1. Adaptations of space and
materials
5.15 1.64 5.93 1.30
2. Adult involvement in peer
interactions
3.00 1.41 3.92 1.40
5. Membership 3.39 1.72 5.08 1.23
7. Support for communication 2.76 1.07 3.37 1.36
8. Adaptations of group activities 3.73 1.80 4.65 1.70
9. Transitions between activities 2.37 1.54 3.59 1.80
10. Feedback 2.93 1.33 4.00 1.54
11. Family-professional
partnership
1.63 1.41 2.12 1.48
12. Monitoring children’s learning 2.46 1.19 2.86 1.15
Total Score 3.15 1.01 3.93 .88
15. I C P
Not significant
Item 3: F(1,58)=6.71, p>.05
Adult guidance choice and play
Item 6: F(1,58)=2.97, p>.05
Relationships between adults and
children
Marginally Significant
Item 11: F(1,58)=8.54, p<.05
Family and Professional Partnerships
Item 12: F(1,58)=7.42, p<.05
Monitoring children’s learning
Null
Item 4: Conflict Resolution
The Data Tells A Story
16. I C P
Updating the Credential
• Re-organized the Credential
• Enhanced the Plan of Action
• Highlighted Relationships
• Item 3: Intentionally Teach Scaffolding Techniques
• Item 6: Intentionally Teach Social
Interactions
• Updated Homework Assignments
Using Data to Inform Professional
Development
17. I C P
“MECIC wants every child in Mississippi to have equal access, support, and
participation in early education programs. Changes to current policy and
practice would create a culture that promotes inclusive practices and engages
families.”
Utilizing the ICP to assess inclusive practices provides us the opportunity to
ensure policy and practices are changed to enhance:
• Access to high-quality early childhood programs for ALL children
• Early access to specialized instruction
• Program standards for inclusion
• Positive attitudes and beliefs of adults and peers
Using Data to Effectively Impact Policy
and Practice
18. I C P
Available ICP Products
• Manual
• Guides users on understanding,
implementing, and scoring the ICP
• Forms
• Package of 5 32-page forms
• Set
• Includes the ICP Manual and one package of
forms
To order, visit brookespublishing.com/icp
Available Products
19. I C P
Thanks for joining us today.
Save 20% on Brookes products!
Use code ICPWEB20
Expires October 31, 2017
*Not to be combined with any other discounts or offers. Consumer orders only,
please. Excludes BOL training, pre-discounted bundles, and online products such as
ASQ Online and AEPSinteractive™.
Special Offer
20. I C P
Q&A
Please submit your questions.
Thanks for joining us!
Q&A
Editor's Notes
For the Q&A, please submit your questions during the webinar.
The ICP is a structured observation assessment that assesses the quality of daily inclusive practices that support the developmental needs of children with disabilities in the early childhood setting. It is designed for inclusive settings that serve children ages 2-5. The ICP uses a rating scale (1-7) to indicate the extent to which classroom practices intentionally adapt the environment, activities, and instructional supports so that young children can have access and active participation in the environment. There are 12 practices or “items” that are assessed:
To meet the needs of children with disabilities in early childhood programs, the MS Department of Human Services contracts with the Institute for Disability Studies to provide the Mississippi Early Childhood Inclusion Center. MECIC was developed to meet the needs of early childhood educators, families, and young children with disabilities by providing high quality early childhood inclusion. To do this, we provide training and technical assistance to early childhood educators and provide family support through our family navigation and screening program.
One of the specialty programs that MECIC offers is the Preschool Credential program. This 40 hour certificate program utilizes the ICP to measure quality inclusive practices of participants in the credential program and to assess the effectiveness of our professional development program.
The ICP is administered at the beginning of each credential. Participants in the credential then begin a comprehensive professional development program that consist of didactic trainings, self-directed learning activities, and on-site mentoring. The credential is aligned with the DEC initial standards and includes topics around best practices for early childhood inclusion. In addition to trainings and learning activities, participants receive an Individualized Plan of Action that is developed based on areas of concerns identified during the initial ICP. On-site mentoring and individualized technical assistance is provided to address these concerns.
One of the specialty programs that MECIC offers is the Preschool Credential program. This 40 hour certificate program utilizes the ICP to measure quality inclusive practices of participants in the credential program and to assess the effectiveness of our professional development program.
The ICP is administered at the beginning of each credential. Participants in the credential then begin a comprehensive professional development program that consist of didactic trainings, self-directed learning activities, and on-site mentoring. The credential is aligned with the DEC initial standards and includes topics around best practices for early childhood inclusion. In addition to trainings and learning activities, participants receive an Individualized Plan of Action that is developed based on areas of concerns identified during the initial ICP. On-site mentoring and individualized technical assistance is provided to address these concerns.
One of the specialty programs that MECIC offers is the Preschool Credential program. This 40 hour certificate program utilizes the ICP to measure quality inclusive practices of participants in the credential program and to assess the effectiveness of our professional development program.
The ICP is administered at the beginning of each credential. Participants in the credential then begin a comprehensive professional development program that consist of didactic trainings, self-directed learning activities, and on-site mentoring. The credential is aligned with the DEC initial standards and includes topics around best practices for early childhood inclusion. In addition to trainings and learning activities, participants receive an Individualized Plan of Action that is developed based on areas of concerns identified during the initial ICP. On-site mentoring and individualized technical assistance is provided to address these concerns.
Here is an example of a current Plan of Action. You can see that it is individualized to the teachers and children in the classroom.
Let’s take a look at the data. Listed here are all the items that showed a significant change from the pretest conducted at the beginning of the credential and the post test conducted at the end of the credential. This table lets us know that we are seeing significant changes in the quality of inclusive practices in the classrooms that have participated in the credential.
We can look at this data and see where the strengths and challenges still are and also note some areas of strength such as membership and feedback.
The other side of the story, is that the data also shows areas where there was not a significant change between pre and post evaluations. Specifically, items 3 and 6. Item 3 assesses Adult’s Guidance of Children’s Free-Choice Activities while Item 6 assesses Relationships Between Adults and Children.
So, we looked closely at the criteria for 3 & 6 to see where participants were missing the mark. We found that participants had difficulty getting past the minimum standards for these questions.
Item12 was significant, however, it did not show as strong of a change as the other items. And lastly, item 4, which is conflict resolution was null as we only had 4 classrooms where this was observed.
What does this data tell us? It pointed to us what changes we needed to make in our credential program. This past year, we updated several things to improve the professional development program based on what we learned from our data.
1- We re-organized our credential. Where we use to start with an introduction to quality inclusion and UDL, we now start at the basics of typical development and identifying red flags.
2- Next, we enhanced the Plan of Action. Not only did we change the format of the Plan of Action to be more teacher friendly, we also now review the Plan of Action during each mentoring session and if needed, truly break it down over the course of the credential. We try not to overwhelm the participants by identifying all of the areas of concern at once.
3- In general, now the importance of relationships and building relationships is highlighted in every single module and we provide more active learning opportunities during the didactic trainings.
4- To address Item 3, we discuss embedding learning opportunities throughout the credential; specifically, how to use scaffolding techniques during learning activities. TA takes this one step further to help participants learn how to do this is their own classrooms.
5- To address Item 6, we intentionally teach the importance of individual conversations with teachers, discussing how to have sustained, reciprocal conversations with all children. Again, TA follows-up, modeling this in the classroom and coaching teachers through this practice.
6 - Additionally to address Item 6 and Item 11; we updated the homework…
Item 6: the homework assignment and TA for module 6, “Engage Me: Framework for Behavior Management” looks specifically at practicing strategies to enhance social/emotional development with 3 children in the classroom, including at least one identified child with a disabilities. So here, teachers have to be intentional and practice strategies that encourage social interactions in their classroom.
For item 11, which was only marginally significant; we updated the homework to include a specific assignment for directors on including an “inclusive statement” and in their handbook
What does this data tell us? It pointed to us what changes we needed to make in our credential program. This past year, we updated several things to improve the professional development program based on what we learned from our data.
1- We re-organized our credential. Where we use to start with an introduction to quality inclusion and UDL, we now start at the basics of typical development and identifying red flags.
2- Next, we enhanced the Plan of Action. Not only did we change the format of the Plan of Action to be more teacher friendly, we also now review the Plan of Action during each mentoring session and if needed, truly break it down over the course of the credential. We try not to overwhelm the participants by identifying all of the areas of concern at once.
3- In general, now the importance of relationships and building relationships is highlighted in every single module and we provide more active learning opportunities during the didactic trainings.
4- To address Item 3, we discuss embedding learning opportunities throughout the credential; specifically, how to use scaffolding techniques during learning activities. TA takes this one step further to help participants learn how to do this is their own classrooms.
5- To address Item 6, we intentionally teach the importance of individual conversations with teachers, discussing how to have sustained, reciprocal conversations with all children. Again, TA follows-up, modeling this in the classroom and coaching teachers through this practice.
6 - Additionally to address Item 6 and Item 11; we updated the homework…
Item 6: the homework assignment and TA for module 6, “Engage Me: Framework for Behavior Management” looks specifically at practicing strategies to enhance social/emotional development with 3 children in the classroom, including at least one identified child with a disabilities. So here, teachers have to be intentional and practice strategies that encourage social interactions in their classroom.
For item 11, which was only marginally significant; we updated the homework to include a specific assignment for directors on including an “inclusive statement” and in their handbook