How to use the Cataloguing Code Ethics at your day job : a hands-on workshop / Jane Daniels (Cardiff Metropolitan University [retired]) and Diane Rasmussen McAdie (Edinburgh Napier University).

CILIP MDG
CILIP MDGCILIP MDG
How to use the Cataloguing Code of
Ethics in your day job: a hands-on
workshop
Jane Daniels & Diane Rasmussen McAdie
Cataloguing Ethics Steering Committee members UK
CILIP MDG Conference Birmingham Wednesday 6th September 2023
Agenda
• 13.30 Welcome & introductions
• 13.40 The Code – a brief intro
• Group work
• 14.00 - 14.25 Theme 1 Audiences,
tasks & hurdles
• 14.30 – 15.00 Break & Poster Session
• 15.00 – 15.25 Theme 2 Collaboration
• 15.30 – 15.55 Theme 3 Education, jobs
and advocacy
• Next steps – sharing ideas and feedback
The Code 2018 - 2023
• Inspired by Critical Cataloguing movement, DEI and Decolonisation discourses
• Recognises special responsibilities of cataloguers and metadata managers
• Complements professional codes of ethics.
• International community initiative
• Inclusive and open
• Endorsed by ALA 2021, CILIP 2022, Canadian consultation ends Dec 2023
Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee website https://sites.google.com/view/cataloging-
ethics/home?pli=1
Common ethical concerns
• Access to resources and metadata
• Acknowledging bias
• Advocacy
• Collaboration
• Critically applying standards
• Diversity, equity, and inclusion
• Education and training
• Respect for agent privacy and
preferences
• Responsibility and transparency
• Understanding and meeting user
needs
The Code – Purpose
An ethical lens to examine cataloguing and metadata management policy and practice.
Advocates for the essential work of cataloguers in facilitating Search; Discovery;
Collection creation, development & management
Ten high level statements – Not a checklist – Standards neutral – You are already
applying the Principles!
Provides agency & empowerment for the workforce and by extension our user
communities
Intended for ALL stakeholders in the cataloguing ecosystem
Cataloging Ecosystem
Audiences, tasks, barriers
1. We catalogue resources in our collections with the end-user in mind to facilitate
access and promote discovery. Who are your users?
3. We acknowledge that we bring our biases to the workplace; therefore, we strive to
overcome personal, institutional, and societal prejudices in our work. Examining
institutional policies, procedures? Self-education?
2. We commit to describing resources without discrimination whilst respecting the
privacy and preferences of their associated agents. Enhanced discoverability: FAIR &
OPEN v CARE?
Group work
Audiences, Tasks & Barriers (15 mins)
Please discuss:
• Q1 How are you already applying these principles?
• Q2 Any perceived barriers?
Please record comments, suggestions, ideas on post its and add them to the flipchart.
Collaborations
7. We collaborate widely to support the creation, distribution, maintenance, and enrichment of
metadata in various environments and jurisdictions. What can we do better together – locally,
regionally, nationally, internationally?
4. We recognise that interoperability and consistent application of standards help our users find and
access materials. However, all standards are biased; we will approach them critically and advocate
to make cataloguing more inclusive. How can you instigate and support change?
5. We support efforts to make standards and tools financially, intellectually, and technologically
accessible to all cataloguers, and developed with evidence-based research and stakeholder input. Can
we bridge the accessibility gap by exploring open metadata standards?
10. We work with our user communities to understand their needs in order to provide relevant and
timely services. How do we make and sustain partnerships with user groups?
Group work
Collaborations (15 minutes)
Please discuss:
• Q1 How are you already applying these principles?
• Q2 Any perceived barriers?
Please record comments, suggestions, ideas on post its and add them to the flipchart.
Education, jobs, advocacy
8. We insist on diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace. We promote
education, training, equitable pay, and a fair work environment for everyone who
catalogues so that they can continue to support search and discovery. Does your employer
have a public statement on DEI? What are your training CPD needs as service
provider or service receiver?
6. We take responsibility for our cataloguing decisions and advocate for transparency
in our institutional practices and policies. Are your cataloguing policies front-facing?
9. We advocate for the value of cataloguing work within our organisations and with
external partners. Who are your internal cataloguing champions and commercial
partners?
Group work
Education, jobs and advocacy (15 minutes)
Please discuss:
• Q1 How are you already applying these principles?
• Q2 Any perceived barriers?
Please record comments, suggestions, ideas on post its and add them to the flipchart.
Next Steps
Share:
Comments
Common themes
Suggestions
Ideas
1 de 13

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a How to use the Cataloguing Code Ethics at your day job : a hands-on workshop / Jane Daniels (Cardiff Metropolitan University [retired]) and Diane Rasmussen McAdie (Edinburgh Napier University).

COMMUNITIES of PRACTICECOMMUNITIES of PRACTICE
COMMUNITIES of PRACTICELouise Chen
2.8K vistas21 diapositivas
Ola ei nov. 22 2103Ola ei nov. 22 2103
Ola ei nov. 22 2103Stephen Abram
1.8K vistas26 diapositivas

Similar a How to use the Cataloguing Code Ethics at your day job : a hands-on workshop / Jane Daniels (Cardiff Metropolitan University [retired]) and Diane Rasmussen McAdie (Edinburgh Napier University).(20)

COMMUNITIES of PRACTICECOMMUNITIES of PRACTICE
COMMUNITIES of PRACTICE
Louise Chen2.8K vistas
Magic willmers presentation_30.06.16Magic willmers presentation_30.06.16
Magic willmers presentation_30.06.16
Michelle Willmers494 vistas
Ola ei nov. 22 2103Ola ei nov. 22 2103
Ola ei nov. 22 2103
Stephen Abram1.8K vistas
Improving the Transparency and Credibility of Open Access Publishing by Lars ...Improving the Transparency and Credibility of Open Access Publishing by Lars ...
Improving the Transparency and Credibility of Open Access Publishing by Lars ...
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)2.6K vistas
Cultivating knowledge through co ps   may 2010Cultivating knowledge through co ps   may 2010
Cultivating knowledge through co ps may 2010
Departament de Justicia1K vistas
Critical friend meeting megs kt 07th febCritical friend meeting megs kt 07th feb
Critical friend meeting megs kt 07th feb
Andrea Wheeler334 vistas
Global Corporate Sustainability Standard - Focus on Extractive IndustriesGlobal Corporate Sustainability Standard - Focus on Extractive Industries
Global Corporate Sustainability Standard - Focus on Extractive Industries
Publish What You Pay (PWYP) Indonesia419 vistas
scce-2016-cei-brochurescce-2016-cei-brochure
scce-2016-cei-brochure
Krista Muszak, CCEP, CCEP-I376 vistas

Más de CILIP MDG(20)

Último(20)

MemVerge: Memory Viewer SoftwareMemVerge: Memory Viewer Software
MemVerge: Memory Viewer Software
CXL Forum115 vistas
Liqid: Composable CXL PreviewLiqid: Composable CXL Preview
Liqid: Composable CXL Preview
CXL Forum118 vistas
ChatGPT and AI for Web DevelopersChatGPT and AI for Web Developers
ChatGPT and AI for Web Developers
Maximiliano Firtman152 vistas
The Research Portal of Catalonia: Growing more (information) & more (services)The Research Portal of Catalonia: Growing more (information) & more (services)
The Research Portal of Catalonia: Growing more (information) & more (services)
CSUC - Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya51 vistas
AMD: 4th Generation EPYC CXL DemoAMD: 4th Generation EPYC CXL Demo
AMD: 4th Generation EPYC CXL Demo
CXL Forum117 vistas
ThroughputThroughput
Throughput
Moisés Armani Ramírez28 vistas

How to use the Cataloguing Code Ethics at your day job : a hands-on workshop / Jane Daniels (Cardiff Metropolitan University [retired]) and Diane Rasmussen McAdie (Edinburgh Napier University).

  • 1. How to use the Cataloguing Code of Ethics in your day job: a hands-on workshop Jane Daniels & Diane Rasmussen McAdie Cataloguing Ethics Steering Committee members UK CILIP MDG Conference Birmingham Wednesday 6th September 2023
  • 2. Agenda • 13.30 Welcome & introductions • 13.40 The Code – a brief intro • Group work • 14.00 - 14.25 Theme 1 Audiences, tasks & hurdles • 14.30 – 15.00 Break & Poster Session • 15.00 – 15.25 Theme 2 Collaboration • 15.30 – 15.55 Theme 3 Education, jobs and advocacy • Next steps – sharing ideas and feedback
  • 3. The Code 2018 - 2023 • Inspired by Critical Cataloguing movement, DEI and Decolonisation discourses • Recognises special responsibilities of cataloguers and metadata managers • Complements professional codes of ethics. • International community initiative • Inclusive and open • Endorsed by ALA 2021, CILIP 2022, Canadian consultation ends Dec 2023 Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee website https://sites.google.com/view/cataloging- ethics/home?pli=1
  • 4. Common ethical concerns • Access to resources and metadata • Acknowledging bias • Advocacy • Collaboration • Critically applying standards • Diversity, equity, and inclusion • Education and training • Respect for agent privacy and preferences • Responsibility and transparency • Understanding and meeting user needs
  • 5. The Code – Purpose An ethical lens to examine cataloguing and metadata management policy and practice. Advocates for the essential work of cataloguers in facilitating Search; Discovery; Collection creation, development & management Ten high level statements – Not a checklist – Standards neutral – You are already applying the Principles! Provides agency & empowerment for the workforce and by extension our user communities Intended for ALL stakeholders in the cataloguing ecosystem
  • 7. Audiences, tasks, barriers 1. We catalogue resources in our collections with the end-user in mind to facilitate access and promote discovery. Who are your users? 3. We acknowledge that we bring our biases to the workplace; therefore, we strive to overcome personal, institutional, and societal prejudices in our work. Examining institutional policies, procedures? Self-education? 2. We commit to describing resources without discrimination whilst respecting the privacy and preferences of their associated agents. Enhanced discoverability: FAIR & OPEN v CARE?
  • 8. Group work Audiences, Tasks & Barriers (15 mins) Please discuss: • Q1 How are you already applying these principles? • Q2 Any perceived barriers? Please record comments, suggestions, ideas on post its and add them to the flipchart.
  • 9. Collaborations 7. We collaborate widely to support the creation, distribution, maintenance, and enrichment of metadata in various environments and jurisdictions. What can we do better together – locally, regionally, nationally, internationally? 4. We recognise that interoperability and consistent application of standards help our users find and access materials. However, all standards are biased; we will approach them critically and advocate to make cataloguing more inclusive. How can you instigate and support change? 5. We support efforts to make standards and tools financially, intellectually, and technologically accessible to all cataloguers, and developed with evidence-based research and stakeholder input. Can we bridge the accessibility gap by exploring open metadata standards? 10. We work with our user communities to understand their needs in order to provide relevant and timely services. How do we make and sustain partnerships with user groups?
  • 10. Group work Collaborations (15 minutes) Please discuss: • Q1 How are you already applying these principles? • Q2 Any perceived barriers? Please record comments, suggestions, ideas on post its and add them to the flipchart.
  • 11. Education, jobs, advocacy 8. We insist on diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace. We promote education, training, equitable pay, and a fair work environment for everyone who catalogues so that they can continue to support search and discovery. Does your employer have a public statement on DEI? What are your training CPD needs as service provider or service receiver? 6. We take responsibility for our cataloguing decisions and advocate for transparency in our institutional practices and policies. Are your cataloguing policies front-facing? 9. We advocate for the value of cataloguing work within our organisations and with external partners. Who are your internal cataloguing champions and commercial partners?
  • 12. Group work Education, jobs and advocacy (15 minutes) Please discuss: • Q1 How are you already applying these principles? • Q2 Any perceived barriers? Please record comments, suggestions, ideas on post its and add them to the flipchart.

Notas del editor

  1. Critical cataloguing understanding how knowledge organisation codifies systems of oppression. E.g. by the language used in subject cataloguing and the hierarchies imposed by classification systems. How we catalogue, classify and describe peoples, places, cultures and resources can elevate or demote them leading to over or under representation.
  2. The 10 ethical statements are a robust response to these widely expressed concerns.
  3. Let’s take a look at the wider cataloguing ecosystem. What we do and how we do it is largely dictated by our place in this ecosystem but the diagram also shows our spheres of influence and the capacity for collaboration.
  4. I have grouped the 10 ethical statements under 3 themes. The first being Audiences, tasks and barriers. Practical examples Prin. 1 Artists’ books – creation of WHELF cataloguing template. Conference link – Bengali cataloguing challenges: making the undiscovered discoverable. Prin 3. Perhaps reviewing the Code provides an excellent way to initiate discussions regarding identifying, acknowledging and reducing bias in the organisation as a whole? I’m lobbying for the newly formed Museums Association Ethics Committee to factor in the Code as they review the existing professional Code Ethics. Conference link – Prin 2 – With increased drive to digitisation in Museums I do have concerns about what we are cataloguing and why. It’s why I am glad to see groups like the Queer Metadata Collective and the Cultural Heritage Terminology Network working to fill the enormous gaps in my knowledge. Conference link – UK NACO Funnel: progress, obstacles and solutions. FAIR = Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability. CARE = Collective benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, Ethics https://www.gida-global.org/care
  5. There is power in unity – we can share costs, staffing expertise and cataloguing outputs. We can also influence the development of systems, standards and services. The key here is to ensure that we advocate for change and ensure that standards are reflective of our global society. In Practice Prin 7 – WHELF involvement with the Jisc NBK project. NBK for discovery, copy cataloguing and collections management. Conference link –MarcEdit task lists and vendor-supplied metadata : revisiting the subscriber-publisher relationship at the University of Leeds Prin 4 – GLAM terminology – a new area for me but so lucky to be able to learn from Carissa Chew and the wonderful Glossary of Inclusive Terminology. Conference link – Updating the Wessex Classification Scheme for UK Health Libraries: a case study in improving inclusion and diversity. Prin 5 – My experience of trying to select the least expensive but most effective means of sharing the museums collections. Conference link – Community Forward: developing descriptive cataloging of rare materials (RDA edition) as an open access standard. Prin 10. My work in 2013 identifying gaps in metadata provision for Welsh language resources. Conference link – ISNI: an identifier for researchers, research sector organizations and beyond!
  6. We need a diverse, valued, supported workforce and a sustainable model for recruiting, retaining and developing staff to carry out the essential work of creating, sharing, enriching and preserving the metadata to service search, discovery and collection development and management. In Practice Prin 8 – Cataloguing is not just data entry, it’s an intellectual activity. In libraries I was successful in making the case for extra cataloguing hours which were paid commensurate with skills and knowledge of the cataloguer. Conference link – Pick any paper, lightning talk and you get the gist of how much intellectual application is required to catalogue or manipulate metadata! Prin 6 – With the increased emphasis now on collection management and development, and in particular the impact of DEI and decolonisation initiatives, I am seeing more policies appearing on webpages that provide declarations of intent regarding acquisitions and cataloguing policies. It’s good to acknowledge the challenges and share the work. Conference link – Prin 9 – Cataloguers don’t just work in libraries. They work in GLAM and for the companies that sell or licence us systems, resources or metadata. I spent a lot of time advocating for the value of quality metadata and the need for all parties involved in it’s creation, dissemination, enrichment and preservation to work more productively together e.g. I was on the EX Libris CZ Management Group. Conference Link -