Presentation by Skip Brown of Asphalt Consulting Services on "Intersection Mix" aka "Type-C or High-Stability Mix delivered at the CalAPA Fall Asphalt Pavement Conference Oct. 24, 2013 in Sacramento, Calif.
3. Caltrans HMA Type C –
What’s in a name? AKA …
High
Stability
Intersection
Desert
4. What?
Type A … on steroids
Rut resistant mix made with similar
components as Type A, BUT with
minor changes in the aggregate
structure and stiffer binder
5. What?
Type C
higher stability than conventional Type A
3 Mix choices: 1-inch, ¾-inch, ½ -inch
Mix choice CRITICAL as it determines
minimum lift thickness
6. What?
Modified Compaction with CA
Kneading Compactor
150 tamps at 230ºF
500 additional tamps at 140ºF
Stability
Initial – ≥ 37
Modified – ≥ 35
7. What? Type A vs Type C
(½-inch Mix)
Sieve Size
Type A
Type C
¾-inch
½-inch
100
95-99
100
90-98
⅜-inch
No. 4
No. 8
No. 30
No. 200
75-95
55-66
38-49
15-27
2-8
64-86
42-57
29-39
13-19
3-7
9. Mix Design Data - Example
Property
Type A
Type C
OBC (% dwa)
5.5
4.9
Air Void Content (%)
4.0
4.0
4.0
39
≥37
≥37
41
≥35
68
65 – 75
60 – 70
Initial Stability
37
Modified Stability
VFA (%)
72
Spec
Note – Caltrans recommends
selecting binder content at 5% air voids
for Central Valley and Desert.
12. How? – Mix Design
Mix Designation
1-inch
¾-inch
½-inch
Aggregate Crushed Particles
Aggregate Size
Coarse
(2 Fractured Faces)
Fine
(1 Fractured Face)
Type A
Type C
≥ 75%
≥ 95%
≥ 70%
≥ 90%
13. How? Mix Design
Binder
Recommend “harder” binder, ie, Grade “bump”
Central Valley – PG 70-10 (rather PG 64-10)
Binder Content
5% air voids or 4% air voids?
Caltrans recommendation
5% for Valley and Desert
4% for Coast and Mountain
14. Impact of Aggregate Size
on Lift Thickness
½-inch
Type C
Tolerance
TV ±
¾-inch
100
─
½-inch
90-98
6
⅜-inch
64-86
6
No. 4
42-57
7
No. 8
29-39
5
No. 30
13-19
4
No. 200
3-7
2
15. Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size (NMAS)
(one size larger than the first sieve to retain more than 10%)
⅜-inch
mix
100
100
90
72
65
48
36
22
15
¾-inch
½-inch
⅜-inch
No. 4
No. 8
No. 30
No. 200
100
99
89
72
65
48
36
22
15
½-inch
mix
16. What? Type A vs Type C
(½-inch Mix)
Sieve Size
Type A
Type C
¾-inch
½-inch
100
95-99
100
90-98
⅜-inch
No. 4
No. 8
No. 30
No. 200
75-95
55-66
38-49
15-27
2-8
64-86
42-57
29-39
13-19
3-7
17. Construction Considerations
Ratio of Lift Thickness (LT) to NMAS
Maintain LT/NMAS of 4:1
Segregation ** – doesn’t like to be
“handled”
Compaction – It’s difficult to compact!
Need high amplitude, low roller speed to
achieve density.
**
Pick-up machine
MTV
Raking
22. Local Successes
Highway 50 Ramps
I-80 at Yolo Causeway
Local Agencies
Sac County (Watt Ave)
Roseville (Sierra College Blvd)
Elk Grove (Bradshaw Rd)
West Sac (I-80 Off Ramp to West El Camino )
23. Watt Ave & Folsom Blvd
Traffic – Very Heavy w/ High Truck Volume
Teichert Mix Design - ½-inch Type C