Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.

Desalination of Sea Water using Membrane technology

8.997 visualizaciones

Publicado el

  • Sé el primero en comentar

Desalination of Sea Water using Membrane technology

  1. 1. INTRODUCTION  The scarcity of fresh water resources and the need for additional water supplies is already critical in many arid regions of the world and will be increasingly important in the future. It is very likely that the water issue will be considered, like fossil energy resources, to be one of the determining factors of world stability. Thus, it is of utmost importance to fabricate methods to use sea water as drinking water so as to fulfill the rising demand of water supply. This can be done by water desalination methods which remove the salt content and other unwanted compounds from water thus making it suitable for various applications.
  2. 2. DESALINATION  It is a process that removes or separates salts from saline water to give fresh water, at the expense of energy.  Depending upon the type or form of energy used, Desalination Processes can be broadly classified into two groups: 1. Thermal Desalination 2. Membrane Desalination
  3. 3. THERMAL DESALINATION  Thermal desalination processes involves heating of saline water to its boiling point to produce water vapor, this pure vapor is condensed to produce fresh water.  The three types of thermal desalination units used commercially are: 1. Multistage flash (MSF) 2. Multiple effect distillation (MED) 3. Low Temperature Evaporation (LTE)
  4. 4. Multi-Stage Flash (MSF) Distillation
  5. 5. Multi-Effect Distillation (MED)
  6. 6. Low Temperature Evaporation
  7. 7. MEMBRANE DESALINATION  Membrane processes use a semi permeable membrane to move water across the membrane from the salt solution to produce fresh water on the other side of the membrane.  Membrane desalination is classified depending on the driving force. Process Size of materials retained Driving force Microfiltration 0.1-10.0 microns molecules Pressure difference Ultrafiltration 5-100 nm molecules Pressure difference(1 - 4 bar) Nanofiltration 0.5 - 5 nm molecules (mostly charged species) Pressure difference(5 - 15 bar) Reverse Osmosis < 1 nm molecules Pressure difference(10 - 60 bar)
  8. 8. MICROFILTRATION  Microfiltration is a process of separating material of colloidal size and larger   1. 2. 3. 4. than true solutions. The MF membranes are made from natural or synthetic polymers such as cellulose nitrate or acetate, polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), polyamides, polysulfone, polycarbonate, polypropylene, PTFE etc. The inorganic materials such as metal oxides (alumina), glass, zirconia coated carbon etc. are also used for manufacturing the MF membranes. Applications of MF are: Food & beverages Chemical industry Microelectronics industry Fermentation
  9. 9. ULTRAFILTRATION  Ultrafiltration is most commonly used to separate a solution that has a  1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. mixture of some desirable components and some that are not desirable. Rejected species include sugars, biomolecules, polymers and colloidal particles. Applications of MF are: Oil emulsion waste treatment Treatment of whey in dairy industries Concentration of biological macromolecules Electrocoat paint recovery Concentration of textile sizing Concentration of heat sensitive proteins for food additives Concentration of gelatin
  10. 10. NANOFILTRATION  The separation mechanism of NF involves size exclusion as well as   1. 2. 3. 4. electrostatic interaction. In NF, organic molecules with molecular wt. greater than 200-400 are rejected. Membranes used for NF are of cellulosic acetate and aromatic polyamide type. Applications of NF are: Concentration of sugars, divalent salts, bacteria, proteins, particles, dyes and other constituents that have a molecular weight greater than 1000 daltons. Removal of color and total organic carbon (TOC) from surface water Removal of hardness from well water Overall reduction of total dissolved solids (TDS)
  11. 11. REVERSE OSMOSIS  RO membranes give 96%-99% NaCl rejection. Greater than 95-99% of   1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. inorganic salts and charged organics will also be rejected by the membrane due to charge repulsion established at the membrane surface. RO membranes are made of polymers, cellulosic acetate and aromatic polyamide types. Applications: Potable water from sea or brackish water Ultra pure water for food processing and electronic industries Pharmaceutical grade water Water for chemical, pulp & paper industry Waste treatment etc. Municipal and industrial waste treatment
  12. 12. DEVELOPMENT OF MEMBRANES  Ultrafiltration: Chemicals Used: 18-20% (w/w) in N-Methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) solvent Ultrafiltration membrane is basically used for pre-treatment of water so as to reduce the process cost and it is also used as a support for nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.  Nanofiltration: Chemicals Used: 1.Solution made of poly(ether)sulfone (PES) 2.Solution of polyamide (PA) The nanofiltration membranes should possess good selectivity, good rejection ability and good flux. The parameters involved in the development of the membrane should be optimized so as to obtain a good quality membrane.
  13. 13.  Reverse Osmosis: Chemicals Used: 1. 2% amine solution (MPD) 2. Organic solution of acid chloride (TMC)  Comparison between Membranes: Microfiltration, Ultrafiltration Nanofiltration, Reverse Osmosis Energy required for the operation is less. Energy required for the operation is very high. They have a good selectivity. They only separate suspended solids. They do not have a good selectivity. They separate suspended as well as dissolved solids.
  14. 14. MEMBRANE PREPARATION  Membrane preparation was done using the immersion precipitation technique.  Dry polysulfone beads were taken in air tight bottles and then a specific amount of DMF was added to dissolve the polymer. The same method was applied the PVDF powder.  A piece of fabric was kept on the glass plate and the casting solution was spread on it evenly.  The entire assembly was immediately immersed in a room temperature gelling bath made by using Ultra Filtered water.  The membranes were stored in laboratory refrigerator maintained at 5oC. Membrane Polymer Polymer w/w) conc. (% Solvent(DMF) (% w/w) Gelling used medium PSf1 Polysulfone 18% 82% Ultra water PSf2 Polysulfone 18% 82% 2% v/v DMF in ultrafiltered water PVDF1 Polyvinylidene fluoride 15% 85% Ultrafiltered water PVDF2 Polyvinylidene fluoride 15% 85% 2% v/v DMF in ultrafiltered water filtered
  15. 15. RESULTS Experiment PSf1 PSf2 PVDF1 PVdF2 (1) Pure water permeability 1333.33 LMD Pure water flux 1000 LMD 2000 LMD 1571 LMD (2) PEO rejection 975 LMD Product flux 66.2% % Rejection 850 LMD 67.2% 625LMD 87.2% 500 LMD 94.66% Experiment PSf2 PVDF2 (1) BSA Product flux % rejection 875 LMD 75.56% 875 LMD 81.21% /(2) Sodium Alginate Product flux % rejection 1000 LMD 85.36% 100 LMD 86.58%
  16. 16. Renewable Energy based Desalination  • • • • Conventional sources of energy are depleting fast and hence there is an urgent need to find renewable sources of energy. Desalination can also be carried with the help of renewable sources of energy such as solar energy. One of the methods is Solar Reverse Osmosis. This setup can also be done in those areas where access to grid electricity is not possible. Also, renewable energy based methods are pollution free and environmental friendly. Solar Reverse Osmosis Unit: POWER PACK PRE-TREATMENT REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANE POST TREATMENT
  17. 17. PIPE PRESSURE DROP CALCULATIONS  Factors affecting pressure drop calculations: 1. Friction between the fluid and the wall of the pipe 2. Friction loss as the fluid passes through any pipe fittings, bends, valves, or components 3. Pressure loss due to a change in elevation of the fluid (if the pipe is not horizontal) 4. Friction between adjacent layers of the fluid itself
  18. 18. FORMULAE USED  Tube id is given by, Tube id (D) = (tube od – (2*thickness))  The velocity (v) of fluid is estimated based on internal cross sectional area of pipe which is shown as follow. v = (mass flow rate/(ρ*cross sectional area))  Then, Reynold's number is:  Reynolds number (Re)=((ρ*v*D)/µ)  Viscosity depends upon the temperature of the liquid and is calculated from the correlation. The friction factor (f) is: f = 1/ ( 16*(Log(((e/D)/3.7)+(5.74/(Re^0.9))^2))  From the friction factor, pressure drop (pd1) due to friction is calculated. Pd1=dp = (2 * f * l * ρ * (v2)) / D  The pipe fitting is selected and its corresponding k value is selected.  Therefore, pressure head(hf) due to pipe fittings is, hf= =(k*((v)^2))/2*g pressure drop(pd2)=(ρ*g*hf)  Total pressure drop (Tpd) across the piping system is as follows: Tpd = (pd1+pd2)
  19. 19. Pressure drop calculations in MS Excel A program has been developed in MS Excel for estimation of pressure drop based on above methodology.
  20. 20. FUTURE WORK  Designing of Low Temperature Evaporator ( LTE )for Desalination of Sea Water Calculation of Heat Transfer Area of the various stages of LTE and optimising the design with the given flow rate of product water.