2. • We
acknowledge
that
people
all
around
the
world
are
demanding
more
openness
in
government;
• We
accept
responsibility
for
seizing
this
moment
to
strengthen
our
commitments
to
promote
transparency;
• We
accept
responsibility
to
harness
the
power
of
new
technologies;
• We
uphold
the
value
of
openness
in
our
engagement
with
ci9zens
4. Ac9on
Plan
on
Open
Government
Source: Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
5. Tony
Clement
“Data is
Canada’s new
Natural
Resource”
Winnipeg Free Press, July 12, 2012
6. Canadians Government
Citizen / Industry
Participation
Opportunities / Benefits
Timely Access to Elimination of effort and cost
Quality Data responding to ad-hoc requests
Economic
Innovation
Royalties from commercial
Gov’t Accountability
exploitation of liberated data
Loss of Revenue from Data
Privacy rights compromised
Cost/Capacity of Provisioning Data
Lack of skills to manipulate /
Challenges / Risks
understand (ie non-tech savvy) Lack of consistency of standards-
architecture, meta-data, delivery
Decisions compromised by
relying on erroneous data Quality Issues
Misinterpretation of Data Unable to explain contextual questions
National / Individual
Security
8. Digital
Economy
“The
total
size
of
digital
economy
is
es=mated
at
$20.4
trillion,
equivalent
to
roughly
13.8%
of
all
sales
flowing
through
the
world
economy.”
Source:
The
New
Digital
Economy
How
it
will
transform
business,
Oxford
Economics
38. State
of
Colorado
• How
Data
Management
Improved
– The
EDM
program
helped
facilitate
much
greater
communica=on
between
business
and
IT
– A
robust
Governance
process
and
commiOee
structure
was
established
–
A
set
of
Data
Principles
were
developed
and
accepted
– Specific
ini=a=ves
were
undertaken
in
the
areas
of
Master
Data,
Architecture
and
Meta-‐data
• How
the
Business
Issue
was
addressed
– Colorado
Unique
Personal
Iden=fier
(CUPID)
MDM
program
generated
benefits
in
quality,
sharing,
understanding,
security
and
stewardship
– Educa=on
Longitudinal
Data
System
Architecture
ini=a=ve
reduced
the
gaps
in
school
readiness
and
academic
achievement
between
popula=ons
of
children
– Improved
client-‐service
through
access
to
integrated
health
informa=on
– Improved
policy
making
through
a
more
informed
process
42. DBpedia
A community-based
effort structure
Wikipedia
Semantic
techniques extend this
to structured models
43. For
Against
• "Data
belong
to
the
human
race”
• Government
funding
may
not
be
used
to
duplicate
or
• Public
money
was
used
to
fund
the
challenge
the
ac=vi=es
of
the
private
sector
work
and
so
it
should
be
universally
• Governments
have
to
be
accountable
for
the
efficient
available.
use
of
taxpayer's
money:
If
public
funds
are
used
to
• It
was
created
by
or
at
a
government
aggregate
the
data
and
if
the
data
will
bring
commercial
ins=tu=on
(private)
benefits
to
only
a
small
number
of
users,
the
• Facts
cannot
legally
be
copyrighted.
users
should
reimburse
governments
for
the
cost
of
• Sponsors
of
research
do
not
get
full
providing
the
data.
value
unless
the
resul=ng
data
are
• The
government
gives
specific
legi=macy
for
certain
freely
available.
organisa=ons
to
recover
costs
(Stats
Canada)
• Data
are
required
for
the
smooth
• Privacy
concerns
may
require
that
access
to
data
is
process
of
running
communal
limited
to
specific
users
or
to
sub-‐sets
of
the
data.
human
ac=vi=es
(map
data,
public
• Collec=ng,
'cleaning',
managing
and
dissemina=ng
data
ins=tu=ons).
are
typically
labour-‐
and/or
cost-‐intensive
processes
-‐
• In
scien=fic
research,
the
rate
of
whoever
provides
these
services
should
receive
fair
discovery
is
accelerated
by
beOer
remunera=on
for
providing
those
services.
access
to
data.
• O]en,
targeted
end-‐users
cannot
use
the
data
without
addi=onal
processing
(analysis,
apps
etc.)
44. Canadians Government
Citizen / Industry
Participation
Opportunities / Benefits
Timely Access to Elimination of effort and cost
Quality Data responding to ad-hoc requests
Economic
Innovation
Royalties from commercial
Gov’t Accountability
exploitation of liberated data
Loss of Revenue from Data
Privacy rights compromised
Cost/Capacity of Provisioning Data
Lack of skills to manipulate /
Challenges / Risks
understand (ie non-tech savvy) Lack of consistency of standards-
architecture, meta-data, delivery
Decisions compromised by
relying on erroneous data Quality Issues
Misinterpretation of Data Unable to explain contextual questions
National / Individual
Security
45. Addressing
the
Challenges,
Realizing
the
Opportunity
Decisions compromised by Quality Issues
relying on erroneous data
Data Quality Management EDM
Privacy rights compromised Governance
Enterprise Data Security
National / Individual Security
Lack of consistency of standards- Master-Data Management Open Data
architecture, meta-data, delivery Delivery
Misinterpretation of Data Meta-Data Management Platform
Can’t address contextual questions
Data Architecture
Timely Access to
Lack of skills to Quality Data
manipulate / understand EDM Competency Center
Loss of Revenue Cost/Capacity of Citizen / Industry
from Data Provisioning Data Participation
Royalties from commercial Elimination of effort and cost Economic Innovation
exploitation of liberated data responding to ad-hoc requests