Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.

UKSG Transfer Update (2011 CrossRef Workshops)

1.349 visualizaciones

Publicado el

Publicado en: Empresariales, Tecnología
  • Sé el primero en comentar

  • Sé el primero en recomendar esto

UKSG Transfer Update (2011 CrossRef Workshops)

  1. 1. UKSG TRANSFER Code of Practice A collaborative project to improve journal transfers
  2. 2. Librarians’ perspective: <ul><li>Keeping track of e-journal movement is a nightmare for librarians </li></ul><ul><li>Access issues continue to be problematic </li></ul><ul><li>Timing is crucial </li></ul><ul><li>Archival/Perpetual Access is essential </li></ul>
  3. 4. How common? <ul><li>A case study: </li></ul><ul><li>In 2007 EBSCO logged 2,667 unique titles that moved from one publisher to another. </li></ul><ul><li>2,667 titles moving between publishers required EBSCO to make 20,000-25,000 changes to their title file. </li></ul>
  4. 5. TRANSFER Goals <ul><li>Ensure that journal content remains easily accessible by librarians and readers when there is a journal transfer </li></ul><ul><li>Ensure that the transfer process occurs with minimum disruption </li></ul><ul><li>Establish explicit obligations for Transferring Publishers and Receiving Publishers </li></ul><ul><li>Establish best practice to help publishers be more efficient </li></ul><ul><li>Get publishers, librarians, agents and others to work together better </li></ul>
  5. 6. Overview of code <ul><li>Access to the title </li></ul><ul><li>Digital Content Files </li></ul><ul><li>Subscription Lists </li></ul><ul><li>Journal URL </li></ul><ul><li>Communication </li></ul><ul><li>DOI name ownership </li></ul>
  6. 7. Transfer Working Group <ul><li>Elsevier, Springer, SAGE Publications, Oxford University Press, Nature Publishing Group, John Wiley & Sons </li></ul><ul><li>Kingston University, Georgia Institute of Technology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, University of Hertfordshire </li></ul><ul><li>Content Complete, Ringgold, Swets Information Services </li></ul><ul><li>Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, CrossRef </li></ul>
  7. 8. Current Status <ul><li>Code 2.0 released end of 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>36 publishers signed up – including Elsevier, Nature, OUP, Sage, Springer, T&F, Wiley-Blackwell </li></ul><ul><li>~10,000 journals covered </li></ul><ul><li>Impact with publishers behind the scenes </li></ul><ul><li>Launching new notification service </li></ul>
  8. 9. Transfer Alerting Services <ul><li>Central location for publishers to register basic data about a transfer as soon as contracts are signed </li></ul><ul><li>Minimal data, available to all </li></ul><ul><li>Available via email and blog - http://www.uksg.org/transfer/notifications </li></ul><ul><li>Hundreds of Transfers announced – big jump from September 2010 </li></ul>
  9. 11. Working Toward <ul><li>Communication is key! </li></ul><ul><li>Seamless data exchange between publishers, data providers, third-party hosts, subscription agents, knowledge bases, and libraries </li></ul>
  10. 12. What can publishers do? <ul><li>Participate! </li></ul><ul><li>Publicly endorse your involvement </li></ul><ul><li>Participating publishers can give guidance to new adopters </li></ul><ul><li>Work with libraries that want compliance in licenses </li></ul>
  11. 13. Work that still needs to be done <ul><li>More publishers need to endorse the Code </li></ul><ul><li>More involvement from societies </li></ul><ul><li>Launch Enhanced Alerting Service </li></ul><ul><li>Revise the Code based on experience </li></ul><ul><li>Checking compliance </li></ul>
  12. 14. Transfer Website <ul><li>UKSG Transfer </li></ul><ul><li>http://www.uksg.org/transfer </li></ul><ul><li>Code version 2.0 </li></ul><ul><li>Supplementary Materials </li></ul><ul><li>Communications Guidelines </li></ul><ul><li>Information about the Working Group </li></ul>
  13. 15. Going forward <ul><li>Collaborative, rather than punitive, approach is best…unless it doesn ’ t work </li></ul><ul><li>Keep focus on benefits to readers of online journals and customers </li></ul><ul><li>Learn from COUNTER – steady progress with lots of consultation; moved from informal to more formal </li></ul>

×