Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Se está descargando tu SlideShare. ×

DC4Cities: Following the Patterns of Renewable Power in a Smart City

Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio

Eche un vistazo a continuación

1 de 14 Anuncio

Más Contenido Relacionado

Presentaciones para usted (20)

A los espectadores también les gustó (20)

Anuncio

Similares a DC4Cities: Following the Patterns of Renewable Power in a Smart City (20)

Más reciente (20)

Anuncio

DC4Cities: Following the Patterns of Renewable Power in a Smart City

  1. 1. Page 1SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIMDataCloud Europe 2015 DC4Cities: Following the Patterns of Renewable Power in a Smart City S O N J A K L I N G E R T D C 4 C I T I E S g r o u p Follow us! @ D C 4 C I T I E S
  2. 2. Page 2SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIMDataCloud Europe 2015 General Approach  Data centres in the city  Lack of locally produced renewable energy due to space limitations. -> minimize energy consumption and adhere to constraints based on renewable energy supply
  3. 3. Page 3SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM High-Level Architecture DataCloud Europe 2015
  4. 4. Page 4SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM Power Planner Component Renewables (local source) Power Scaled power proportional to grid ren% Final power plan, including Renewables Power Power + DataCloud Europe 2015 - =
  5. 5. Page 5SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM Energy Adaptation within a DC  Multi-level API for IaaS, PaaS and SaaS DataCloud Europe 2015
  6. 6. Page 6SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM Results – HP and Trento  Batch jobs: Producing 4320 reports per day  Percentage of renewable energy in the Italian grid varies between 29,21% and 49,18% (avg. 37,16)  Data from HP experiment Uniform workload distribution over 24 hours Workload concentrated at grid max RenPerc 37,16% 42,20% DataCloud Europe 2015
  7. 7. Page 7SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM Results –HP and Trento (cont.)  When adding 8 local solar panels (max 250Wh) to the previous setting, the RenPercent rises to 79,41% Local Solar Energy Production DataCloud Europe 2015
  8. 8. Page 8SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM DC4Cities Business Issues  Benefit !> Cost  Benefit  Energy budget  currently no incentives  Marketing/CSR/CRM  doubtful  Cost: mostly flexibility, e.g business model DataCloud Europe 2015
  9. 9. Page 9SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM Flexibility in a DC DataCloud Europe 2015 SLA GreenSLA RenEnergy Contracts/Incentives Technical flexibility, e.g apps., infrastr. Customer flexibility: customization Political framework and boundaries
  10. 10. Page 10SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM Starting Point: Smart Cities DataCloud Europe 2015 London 7.074 Madrid 3.265 Paris 2.212 Barcelona 1.620 Cologne 1.007 Amsterdam 780 Helsinki 589 Frankfurt 680 Copenhagen 542 Brussels 156  Smart Cities’ Data Centres: 68 Smart Cities with 43 Mio people  Add: Weather/Climate Conditions
  11. 11. Page 11SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM Step 3: Scenario Set-up
  12. 12. Page 12SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM Conclusions  Increasing share of renewables by following patterns of renewable supply is technically feasible, but highly dependent on power infrastructure and flexibilities of applications  Economic incentives increase scope  DC4Cities can be used to tune the most efficient infrastructure for on-site generation  Trials: results are best when variability of renewables in the grid is high – because then there are more opportunities to adapt  Business Perspectives: South Europe  SC, BCN? DataCloud Europe 2015
  13. 13. Page 13 Q U E S T I O N S ? Thank you! K L I N G E R T @ I N F O R M A T I K . U N I - M A N N H E I M . D E W W W . D C 4 C I T I E S . E U D C 4 C I T I E S g r o u p Follow us! @ D C 4 C I T I E S Contact us!
  14. 14. Page 14SONJA KLINGERT – UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM The DC4Cities Architecture 1. DC4cities process controller retrieves the next 24 hours energy forecasts for each EP of the DC through the ERDS handler 2. The Max/Ideal power plan is computed3. The power plan is split into different plans, one for each service hosted by the DC 4. Multiple splitting policies can be configured to better tailor the system to the DC business needs 5. The controller will request EASC to create specific power budgets for the next 24 hours for each service 6. The Option plan collector will receive a set of possible alternatives by each EASC 7. All Option plans will be consolidated and globally optimized to achieve the best usage of renewable energy source 8. If a good solution is found, the EASCs are informed which option plan to enact. Else, an escalation process is triggered [8x] 9. EASC will use automation tools to control the SW/HW resources of the service in line with the received plan (Working Mode). 10. Finally the controller will share the DC power plan with the energy provider, to enable some form of demand/response cooperation DataCloud Europe 2015

×