Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.

Quantitative Methods for Lawyers - Class #4 - Research Design Part IV - Professor Daniel Martin Katz

1.227 visualizaciones

Publicado el

Quantitative Methods for Lawyers - Class #4 - Research Design Part IV - Professor Daniel Martin Katz

Publicado en: Tecnología, Salud y medicina
  • Was a little hesitant about using ⇒⇒⇒ ⇐⇐⇐ at first, but am very happy that I did. The writer was able to write my paper by the deadline and it was very well written. So guys don’t hesitate to use it.
    ¿Estás seguro?    No
    Tu mensaje aparecerá aquí
  • If you’re looking for a great essay service then you should check out ⇒ ⇐. A friend of mine asked them to write a whole dissertation for him and he said it turned out great! Afterwards I also ordered an essay from them and I was very happy with the work I got too.
    ¿Estás seguro?    No
    Tu mensaje aparecerá aquí
  • I have always found it hard to meet the requirements of being a student. Ever since my years of high school, I really have no idea what professors are looking for to give good grades. After some google searching, I found this service ⇒ ⇐ who helped me write my research paper. The final result was amazing, and I highly recommend ⇒ ⇐ to anyone in the same mindset as me.
    ¿Estás seguro?    No
    Tu mensaje aparecerá aquí
  • You can ask here for a help. They helped me a lot an i`m highly satisfied with quality of work done. I can promise you 100% un-plagiarized text and good experts there. Use with pleasure!
    ¿Estás seguro?    No
    Tu mensaje aparecerá aquí

Quantitative Methods for Lawyers - Class #4 - Research Design Part IV - Professor Daniel Martin Katz

  1. 1. Quantitative Methods for Lawyers Research Design - Part IV Class #4 @ computational professor daniel martin katz
  2. 2. In our last session, we were discussing randomized control trials
  3. 3. Randomized Control Trial Control Group Treatment Group Follow Up Evaluation Follow Up Evaluation
  4. 4. RCT’s Are Often Considered the Gold Standard in Science
  5. 5. Because if properly executed there is a fairly clean relationship between cause and effect
  6. 6. Randomized Control Trial Control Group Treatment Group Follow Up Evaluation Follow Up Evaluation
  7. 7. Lets go through RCT’s and related forms of experiments
  8. 8. Experimental Data
  9. 9. Experiments are a great way to attempt to isolate causal effects
  10. 10. Major Weakness is External Validity (due to unknown interactions between variables, etc.)
  11. 11. Key Ideas: Random Assignment Representativeness Experimental Control Experimental Manipulation Factorial Design Double Blind
  12. 12. Random Assignment P r o b a b i l i t y o f B e i n g i n Treatment or Control Group Should Be Equal Composition of the Treatment or Control Group Should Be Similar Under Ideal Conditions this Eliminates other Confounds that could undermine Validity
  13. 13. Would like to overall subject group to mirror the population of interest Example: If we are interested in studying juveniles than the composition of bot h our treatment and control groups should be juveniles Representativeness
  14. 14. Experimental Control Classic Example is Medical Trial Involving a New Drug Experimental Group Given the New Drug Control Group Given the Sugar Pill How would Double Blind work in this context? What is a Placebo Effect?
  15. 15. Experimental Manipulation Under Ideal Conditions this would be the only difference between treatment and control group Experimental Manipulation and Factorial Design Watch out for too many Manipulations at one time
  16. 16. Variables
  17. 17. Concept: A variable is an attribute which describes a part of the makeup of an individual.
 Examples are gender, age, employment status, income level, race, or education level.
  18. 18. Studies are usually designed to collect and then compute the distribution and variation between and among the variables.
  19. 19. It should be noted that a variable, by definition, must possess variation; if all of the studied population have the same attribute, for example they are all employed, that attribute is a constant rather than a variable. 

  20. 20. There are different types of variables. One important division is between independent variables and dependent variables.

  21. 21. Independent variables act as the potential cause. They influence or predict an outcome from the dependent variable. They are the X’s on the right side of the equation.

  22. 22. Dependent variables act as the effect (or potential effect). They may change because of the influence of the independent variable. This is the Y on the left hand side of the equation.
  23. 23. Other Types of Variables
  24. 24. Categorical variables can take on one of a limited, and usually fixed, number of possible values
  25. 25. Nominal variables are variables that have two or more categories but which do not have an intrinsic order. For example, a real estate agent could classify their types of property into distinct categories such as houses, condos, co-ops or bungalows.
  26. 26. Dichotomous variables are nominal variables which have only two categories or levels. For example, we could categorize somebody as either Treated or Not Treated as either "Yes" or “No”. In the real estate agent example, if type of property had been classified as either residential or commercial then "type of property" would be a dichotomous variable.
  27. 27. Ordinal variables are variables that have two or more categories just like nominal variables only the categories can also be ordered or ranked. Large, Medium, Small, etc.
  28. 28. Describe some variables could that could predict/determine the price of a house? How Are They Coded?
  29. 29. School Quality New or Used Pool Garage Distance from City Center ... etc. BedRooms BathRooms Square Feet Lot Size Age of House Crime Rate
  30. 30. Bias in Scientific Study
  31. 31. Please note that “bias” in research terms is different. In normal language, bias is a prejudicial look at someone or something. 
 In research, bias is an action or inaction which can skew the outcome. 
 It does not have to be intentionally done. Bias in Scientific Study
  32. 32. What is a Correlation?
  33. 33. What is a Correlation?
  34. 34. Causality
  35. 35. Sometimes the statistical test shows a clear and significant relationship called a correlation between two variables. 
 There is a tendency to then conclude that the correlation shows causation. It may (or may not). 
 It could have nothing to do with causation or it could only have an indirect affect on the causation.
  36. 36. Daniel Martin Katz @ computational illinois tech - chicago kent college of law@