SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 39
Report on the Status of Academic Work Life: CSU AAUP Central Connecticut State University September 19, 2011
The CSU AAUP Workload Study ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Overview of today’s presentation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Methods and Data Sources ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Methods and Data Sources ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Methods and Data Sources ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],Note: All national averages are derived from the National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF), U.S. Department of Education. Institutional type:  public master’s I universities . Paid work for institution Unpaid work for institution External work, paid External work, unpaid Total  Central 44.1 6.8 0.9 3.2 55.0 Eastern 44.5 8.1 1.4 3.2 57.2 Southern 43.6 7.8 1.8 2.6 55.8 Western 41.4 5.6 2.9 3.5 53.4 National average 44.4 4.5 2.2 2.2 53.2
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],National average   Central Undergraduate instruction 28.30 hours (53.2%) 32.58 hours (53.4%) Graduate instruction 6.28 hours (11.8%) 8.92 hours (14.6%) Research 7.93 hours (14.9%) 10.29 hours (16.9%) Other (including service) 10.69 hours (20.1%) 9.22 hours (15.1%) Total 53.2 hours (100%) 61.01 hours (100%)
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],Total FLCs Instructional FLCs % of total Non-instructional FLCs % of total Central 11.94 9.84 82.4% 2.10 17.6% Eastern 12.78 11.08 86.7% 1.70 13.3% Southern 11.81 8.63 73.1% 3.18 26.9% Western 12.16 9.89 81.3% 2.27 18.7%
Distribution of Load Credits Across Activities:  Four-Year Totals  (controls for sabbaticals, leaves) Activity LC % % FT Courses 29874.10 76.1% 82.4% FT Lab 942.86 2.4% FT Student-Teach Supervise 33.00 0.1% FT Ind Study 1163.38 3.0% FT Thesis 243.16 0.6% FT Supp Lab 112.25 0.3% FT Special Assign 355.75 0.9% 17.6% FT Admin Duties 2686.50 6.8% FT Reassign Curriculum 1725.54 4.4% FT Reassign Grants 185.36 0.5% FT Online 0.00 0.0% FT Research Activity 1666.55 4.2% FT Other Non-Instruct 275.38 0.7% 39263.83 100%
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object]
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],Policy issue : potential to increase the contractual minimums so that they are closer to current averages Percentage of total FLCs Awarded for Research Average per semester (contractual minimum) Central 4.2% 208.3 (64.8) Eastern 1.4% 33.0 (21.6) Southern 3.3% 157.7 (64.8) Western 2.2% 53.4 (25.8)
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],Policy issue : potential to increase the contractual minimums so that they are closer to current averages Article 10.6.5  – broad category that includes academic program direction and direction of centers and institutes (makes interpretation difficult) Percentage of total FLCs Awarded for Curriculum Development Average per semester (contractual minimum) Central 4.4% 215.7 (132.0) Eastern 4.5% 105.1 (64.0) Southern 10.3% 488.8 (132.0) Western 7.9% 193.2 (87.0)
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Percentage of total FLCs Awarded for Administrative Duties Percentage of total FLCs Awarded for  Special Assignments Total Central 6.8% 0.9% 7.7% Eastern 5.7% 1.0% 6.7% Southern 7.3% 4.9% 12.2% Western 7.9% 0.0% 7.9%
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Current Collective Bargaining Agreement Fall 2005 Spring 2006 Fall 2006 Spring 2007 Fall 2007 Spring 2008 Fall 2008 Spring 2009 overall average per semester 10.8 8.6 11.2 18.0 19.3 15.1 15.5 13.7 14.0
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],Teaching practice   Prevalence at Central compared to national average   Implication   Assessing multiple drafts of students’ written work  More likely  Effective practice  Student presentations in class  More likely  Effective practice  Group and team projects  More likely  Effective practice  Peer feedback on student work  More likely  Effective practice  Research papers and writing assignments  More likely  Effective practice  Lab, shop, and studio assignments More likely Effective practice Essay exams More likely Effective practice Short-answer exams  More likely  Potential concern   Multiple-choice exams Comparable  Service-learning or co-op experiences Less likely  Potential concern
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],Dimension of the work environment   Central compared to national average   Institutional support for instructional technology  Less satisfied  Workload  Less satisfied  Good teaching is rewarded by the institution  Less likely to agree  Women faculty are treated fairly at this institution Less likely to agree Faculty from racial and ethnic minority groups are treated fairly at this institution Less likely to agree Part-time faculty are treated fairly at this institution Less likely to agree Quality of facilities and equipment available for classroom instruction Comparable Institutional support for teaching improvement  Comparable  Salary  Comparable  Overall job satisfaction  Comparable  Benefits  More satisfied
Quantitative study findings ,[object Object],Dimension of the work environment   Responses at Central Faculty have a voice in what occurs within their departments  88.5% agreed  Institutional support to experiment with new teaching approaches  63.9% satisfied  Institutional support for research, creative, and other scholarly activities  59.6% dissatisfied  Faculty are sufficiently involved in campus decision making 62.1% disagreed Administrators at this institution consider faculty concerns when making policy 71.3% disagreed Availability of child care (among those for whom it is applicable)  88.0% dissatisfied
Qualitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Qualitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Qualitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Qualitative study findings ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Part-Time Faculty   ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Part-Time Faculty   ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Librarians ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Librarians ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Coaches and Trainers ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Coaches and Trainers ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Counselors ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

More Related Content

What's hot

Project-Progress-Presentation.pptx
Project-Progress-Presentation.pptxProject-Progress-Presentation.pptx
Project-Progress-Presentation.pptx
TecnicoItca
 
Traffic Volume Studies
Traffic Volume StudiesTraffic Volume Studies
Traffic Volume Studies
Md Tanvir Alam
 

What's hot (17)

Quality management
Quality managementQuality management
Quality management
 
Measuring tendering and estimating for CBE
Measuring tendering and estimating for CBEMeasuring tendering and estimating for CBE
Measuring tendering and estimating for CBE
 
Project-Progress-Presentation.pptx
Project-Progress-Presentation.pptxProject-Progress-Presentation.pptx
Project-Progress-Presentation.pptx
 
Urban Transportation System
Urban Transportation SystemUrban Transportation System
Urban Transportation System
 
Traffic volume study
Traffic volume studyTraffic volume study
Traffic volume study
 
Origin – Destination survey
Origin – Destination surveyOrigin – Destination survey
Origin – Destination survey
 
Air pollution due to road traffic
Air pollution due to road trafficAir pollution due to road traffic
Air pollution due to road traffic
 
10.30 Mark Peckham.pdf
10.30 Mark Peckham.pdf10.30 Mark Peckham.pdf
10.30 Mark Peckham.pdf
 
Traffic Volume Studies
Traffic Volume StudiesTraffic Volume Studies
Traffic Volume Studies
 
L2 Microscopic Traffic Flow Parameters
L2 Microscopic Traffic Flow ParametersL2 Microscopic Traffic Flow Parameters
L2 Microscopic Traffic Flow Parameters
 
Phases of a Project
Phases of a ProjectPhases of a Project
Phases of a Project
 
Consolidation
ConsolidationConsolidation
Consolidation
 
traffic characteristics
traffic characteristicstraffic characteristics
traffic characteristics
 
O and d study
O and d studyO and d study
O and d study
 
Chapter 1 traffic characterstics
Chapter 1 traffic charactersticsChapter 1 traffic characterstics
Chapter 1 traffic characterstics
 
Pre qualification stages and tender selection
Pre qualification stages and tender selectionPre qualification stages and tender selection
Pre qualification stages and tender selection
 
IQAC
IQACIQAC
IQAC
 

Similar to CCSU Presentation on Faculty Workload

ECSU NERCHE study Sept 21 2011
ECSU NERCHE study Sept 21 2011ECSU NERCHE study Sept 21 2011
ECSU NERCHE study Sept 21 2011
ecsuaaup
 
2010 Exploring online faculty workload
2010 Exploring online faculty workload2010 Exploring online faculty workload
2010 Exploring online faculty workload
WCET
 
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficient
Iblc10   making an existing assessment more efficientIblc10   making an existing assessment more efficient
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficient
Mark Russell
 
REAP Assessment/Feedback Principles and Examples
REAP Assessment/Feedback Principles and ExamplesREAP Assessment/Feedback Principles and Examples
REAP Assessment/Feedback Principles and Examples
Martin Hawksey
 
6.Social Sciences And The Humanities Curriculum Review In Ontario Kim Crupi
6.Social Sciences And The Humanities Curriculum Review In Ontario  Kim Crupi6.Social Sciences And The Humanities Curriculum Review In Ontario  Kim Crupi
6.Social Sciences And The Humanities Curriculum Review In Ontario Kim Crupi
LGRIS
 
Syllabus development power point
Syllabus development power pointSyllabus development power point
Syllabus development power point
cdayblack
 

Similar to CCSU Presentation on Faculty Workload (20)

ECSU NERCHE study Sept 21 2011
ECSU NERCHE study Sept 21 2011ECSU NERCHE study Sept 21 2011
ECSU NERCHE study Sept 21 2011
 
2010 Exploring online faculty workload
2010 Exploring online faculty workload2010 Exploring online faculty workload
2010 Exploring online faculty workload
 
Innovations in assessment: an investigation into the role of blended learning...
Innovations in assessment: an investigation into the role of blended learning...Innovations in assessment: an investigation into the role of blended learning...
Innovations in assessment: an investigation into the role of blended learning...
 
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficient
Iblc10   making an existing assessment more efficientIblc10   making an existing assessment more efficient
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficient
 
Transitioning to Blended and Online Learning with Carolyn Jarmon, NCAT
Transitioning to Blended and Online Learning with Carolyn Jarmon, NCATTransitioning to Blended and Online Learning with Carolyn Jarmon, NCAT
Transitioning to Blended and Online Learning with Carolyn Jarmon, NCAT
 
Assessment of online learning
Assessment of online learningAssessment of online learning
Assessment of online learning
 
Bachelor of English Education Based on Semester system of Far Western Univers...
Bachelor of English Education Based on Semester system of Far Western Univers...Bachelor of English Education Based on Semester system of Far Western Univers...
Bachelor of English Education Based on Semester system of Far Western Univers...
 
Interview presentation.pptx
Interview presentation.pptxInterview presentation.pptx
Interview presentation.pptx
 
REAP Assessment/Feedback Principles and Examples
REAP Assessment/Feedback Principles and ExamplesREAP Assessment/Feedback Principles and Examples
REAP Assessment/Feedback Principles and Examples
 
Faculty Mentoring Faculty
Faculty Mentoring FacultyFaculty Mentoring Faculty
Faculty Mentoring Faculty
 
Compare and Contrast of Student Course Evaluation (SCE) between Waseda and UW
Compare and Contrast of Student Course Evaluation (SCE) between Waseda and UWCompare and Contrast of Student Course Evaluation (SCE) between Waseda and UW
Compare and Contrast of Student Course Evaluation (SCE) between Waseda and UW
 
Why Do Students Use Lecture Capture?
Why Do Students Use Lecture Capture?Why Do Students Use Lecture Capture?
Why Do Students Use Lecture Capture?
 
6.Social Sciences And The Humanities Curriculum Review In Ontario Kim Crupi
6.Social Sciences And The Humanities Curriculum Review In Ontario  Kim Crupi6.Social Sciences And The Humanities Curriculum Review In Ontario  Kim Crupi
6.Social Sciences And The Humanities Curriculum Review In Ontario Kim Crupi
 
Evalution criterion & procedures in semester system
Evalution criterion & procedures in semester systemEvalution criterion & procedures in semester system
Evalution criterion & procedures in semester system
 
Syllabus development power point
Syllabus development power pointSyllabus development power point
Syllabus development power point
 
Innovative and Inquiry-based Teaching for Excellence
Innovative and Inquiry-based Teaching for ExcellenceInnovative and Inquiry-based Teaching for Excellence
Innovative and Inquiry-based Teaching for Excellence
 
Blended Solutions: Hitting the Sweet Spot of Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Blended Solutions: Hitting the Sweet Spot of Universal Design for Learning (UDL)Blended Solutions: Hitting the Sweet Spot of Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Blended Solutions: Hitting the Sweet Spot of Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
 
Capstone Assessment Project
Capstone Assessment ProjectCapstone Assessment Project
Capstone Assessment Project
 
Capstone Assessment Project
Capstone Assessment ProjectCapstone Assessment Project
Capstone Assessment Project
 
Successful Statistics Course Redesign
Successful Statistics Course RedesignSuccessful Statistics Course Redesign
Successful Statistics Course Redesign
 

Recently uploaded

Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
AnaAcapella
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
ZurliaSoop
 
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
KarakKing
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptxDyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POSHow to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
How to Manage Global Discount in Odoo 17 POS
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
Jual Obat Aborsi Hongkong ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan...
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student briefSpatium Project Simulation student brief
Spatium Project Simulation student brief
 
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
 

CCSU Presentation on Faculty Workload

  • 1. Report on the Status of Academic Work Life: CSU AAUP Central Connecticut State University September 19, 2011
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11. Distribution of Load Credits Across Activities: Four-Year Totals (controls for sabbaticals, leaves) Activity LC % % FT Courses 29874.10 76.1% 82.4% FT Lab 942.86 2.4% FT Student-Teach Supervise 33.00 0.1% FT Ind Study 1163.38 3.0% FT Thesis 243.16 0.6% FT Supp Lab 112.25 0.3% FT Special Assign 355.75 0.9% 17.6% FT Admin Duties 2686.50 6.8% FT Reassign Curriculum 1725.54 4.4% FT Reassign Grants 185.36 0.5% FT Online 0.00 0.0% FT Research Activity 1666.55 4.2% FT Other Non-Instruct 275.38 0.7% 39263.83 100%
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.