% of respondents that said ABM is “extremely” or “very” important to their overall marketing initiatives
Companies investing 11-30% of marketing budget on ABM, up from 19% in 2015
For those that did have staff, media number of FTEs on ABM is 2.
Percentage of organizations that indicate they will increase or significantly increase their ABM budgets over the next 12 months.
PRESENTER NOTE
Talk track for each model to include:
Who the model is designed for
When the model is used
How the model is used
What to expect when implementing the model (tips and tricks or cautionary tales)
Where we have seen especially strong implementation of the model
AT Sirius decisions, we’ve seeing a few different ways that our clients are executing ABM, and we work with clients on all of them. So, let me describe each one:
Large account model – very small number of accounts (10 or 15 accounts). Think 1:1 marketing. Very resource-intensive and very personalized. When I was leading HP’s ABM program, we had a team of five people, each with about 4 accounts. So, we touched about 20 accounts – and that was quite a lot for that model.
Named account model – dozens, hundreds or even thousands of accounts. Typically in a territory. 1:few: mass customized, scale becomes very important
Industry/segment – similar to named account model – but with the added requirement that you have domain/industry expertise to have relevant, specific messages.
Customer lifecycle marketing – here, you are focused on the post-sales experience: getting customers adopted and onboarded and engaged. You want to create stickiness with your customers that hopefully leads to advocacy, retention and growth
So, those are the four ABM types…and the focus of our conversation today will be the first three.
Cliff’s notes to the maturity model.
PRESENTER NOTE
Talk track for each model to include:
Who the model is designed for
When the model is used
How the model is used
What to expect when implementing the model (tips and tricks or cautionary tales)
Where we have seen especially strong implementation of the model
Commitment of sales and marketing leadership to eliminate the US versus THEM mentality
Join alignment on ZERO DEFECT quality standards
Demandbase TAM had more than 3,000 accounts initially and they knew they didn’t have the resource to effectively go after that many.
So they developed an ABM strategy, working closely with sales and leadership to: identify the target accounts (ended up being ~1,000), determine relevant engagement based on different account goals (new target acquisition, existing customer upsell, etc.), and create different sets of playbooks to drive relevance and customization, that they would ultimately measure to see how these ABM accounts would perform vs. non-treated accounts.
Demandbase worked with predictive analytics vendor (Lattice Engines) to take a data-science approach to determine the highest value companies to target (using company fit, firmographic and intent data, among others) to get to 1,000 accounts. What’s important to note is that the level of involvement between marketing, sales and the vendor was critical here. All too often we hear challenges with the final list if sales isn’t part of the model building process (think lead scoring 10 years ago).
For different segments, they had different engagement goals and corresponding approaches. One scenario focused on upselling Analytics module. Another scenario was focused on net-new acquisition for their form-fill append solution as well as the display advertising platform, for example. For each approach, a series of personalized messages were executed via display advertising, retargeting and email nurture for example, and custom dynamic web content was displayed based on company that was coming to the website.
They’ve had some impressive results. For those Enterprise companies that were part of the ABM program, they’ve had almost 400% lift in close rates and higher average contract value vs. other Enterprise deals where they haven't’ applied an ABM approach. For mid-market accounts, they’ve had equally successful rates with a higher close rate and ACV. Note, that the funnel velocity wasn’t necessary faster (in their case) with their ABM mid-market clients. Demandbase suggests that other mid-market customers that came inbound were further through their evaluation process vs. those mid-market companies that they reached out to outbound as part of their ABM efforts (some new concept) and therefore had longer velocity times. However, the organization is quite happy with that tradeoff.
NB
NB
With the proper technique, tools and safety mechanisms in place for a safe – it can be quite rewarding and exhilarating jump.