Supplier Scorecards have become the Holy Grail of supplier performance measurement, although most companies are less than satisfied with their systems in place to measure supplier performance.
Learn how to:
- Leverage internal and external data sources to foster collaboration with suppliers and get up-to-the minute visibility across your extended supply chain.
- Improve supplier relationships through on-time payments and rapid problem resolution.
Powering Real-Time Decisions with Continuous Data Streams
Using Analytics to Build Solid Supply and Supplier Management Relationships
1.
2. The Supply Chain Intelligence Company
Using Analytics to Build Solid Supply and
Supplier Management Relationships
Keith Peterson, President & CEO | Halo
Lora Cecere, President & CEO | Supply Chain Insights
Nate Weaver, Senior Director of PreSales Engineering | Halo
19. Effective Supply Chain Management
Focus on the things that matter
Inventory Management
Sales and Operations Planning
Executive and Financial Analytics
What do I know?
When did I know it
When should I have known it?
What should I know now?
Supply and Supplier
Management
Customer and Channel
Management
Supply and Supplier
Management
20. What we are
• Heterogeneous data from multiple sources
• Sit “on top” of enterprise, supplier, customer,
• Pre-Built Supply Chain templates
• Comparisons and “What-Ifs”
• Data Cleansing
• Easy-to-Change, Configure
• Executive/Manager/User-oriented
• Rapid Time to Value
• Alerting and Collaboration
• Mobile
What makes Halo different?
What we are not
• An ERP System
• A functional process management system
• A workflow system
• A transaction reporting system
21. Halo Business Analytics for Supply Chain Intelligence
Increasing transparency from customers to suppliers
⏵ For business users and data
experts alike
⏵ Leverage legacy tools and
data - No “rip and replace”
⏵ Non-proprietary platform at
fraction of the cost
⏵ Easy to get up and running –
4 to 6 weeks
⏵ Collaborate with external
suppliers and data experts
⏵ 252 global customers 96%
retention
23. The Supply Chain Intelligence Company
Applying Business Analytics to Supplier Development
An Example
24. ⏵ 7–10% average annual improvement
in delivery responsiveness
⏵ 10–13% average annual
improvements in quality
⏵ 22% lower product development times
The potential of supplier development
Source: Best Practices in Supplier Relationship Management and Their Early Implementation. Rand Corp (2012).
25. Supplier Management
Supplier Scorecards have become the Holy Grail of supplier performance
measurement, although most companies are less than satisfied with their
systems in place to measure supplier performance.
26. Supply and Supplier Management
• Supply delivery network is fragmented
• Data is spread across multiple systems, difficulty in
data integration
• Historical data is not trusted, data lacks credibility
• Assessing trends is time consuming
• Sharing data with suppliers is not easy
• Metrics not strategically aligned with the business
goals
• Too complex and difficult
Why is Supplier Management difficult and why does it fail?
27. • Major supply chain disruptions
• Lost Sales and Revenue
• Delivery problems (late or partial orders)
• Poor quality issues (returns from dissatisfied customers)
• Customer Satisfaction issues(and other issues that damage a company’s brand equity and credibility)
• High Expediting Costs and Penalties
• High Total Acquisition Costs
Failure to Manage Critical Supplier Performance
28. The Time Value of Supplier Intelligence
TIME
“Event Horizon”Product not shippedInventory drops below min. Order Cancelled
No time to respond
Why didn’t I know?
Supplier Information and Metrics not defined
Poor, inaccurate data
Data not available to executives from key sources
Supplier Management
Lost Revenue
Lost Margin
High Total Acquisition Costs
High expediting costs
E2E Supplier Visibility
Suppliers at risk
Alternative Suppliers
Strategic decisions
Standard costs
29. Solution
• Automated Supplier Scorecard, dashboards, and reports to manage your global supplier base
• Instant visibility into the metrics that matter (Cost, Delivery, Quality, Risk)
• Clarity across the enterprise, purchasing and procurement department, and supplier base
• Easily share reports with suppliers (how you measure them and how they can better perform)
Benefits
• Improved efficiency and response times (proactive vs. reactive)
• Reduce overall inventory and manufacturing downtime caused by shortages
• Reduce spend and rush shipment costs (working capital)
• Replace underperforming suppliers by understanding alternate suppliers
• Clear goals
Halo for Supplier Management
The solution and the awesome benefits
30. Supply and Supplier Management
• How does my supplier base look in terms of performance?
• Which of my suppliers are performing the worst? Whom should I be concerned about?
• What is the performance scorecard of a particular supplier? How are they performing?
• Which suppliers should I consider replacing? Should I split my commodity purchases further to mitigate risk?
• What information do I need for the next QBR and/or negotiation session?
Concerns and problems we address
31. The road to supply and supplier development
How to achieve the best value
#1
Know your
supplier
#2
Scorecard
every
supplier
#3
P2P
Model
#4
Develop
Supplier
Base
#5
Integrate
d
Partnerin
g
“Golden Record”
Master data mgmt.
Distributed reporting
Solve supplier
deficiencies
Supply sensing
Collaboration tools
Payment-Invoice-
Purchase
Data integration
N-tier development
Supplier networks
Image adapted from http://www.hicxsolutions.com/blog/compliance/purchasing-fraud-prevention/
32. Halo for Supplier Management
Your Control Tower for increased visibility, shared information, and better relationships with
your suppliers.
Visibility Agility Sharing
33. Supply and Supplier Management
Cost: 30% (EPPV = 70%, Pay Terms = 30%)
Quality: 30% (PPM = 100%)
Delivery: 30% (OTD = 75%, Lead Time = 25%)
Risk: 10% (SSI = 50%, SER = 50%)
Economic Purchase Price Variance: the difference between the previous price paid and its current price, multiplied by the actual number of units purchased
Payment Terms: # of days allowed to pay off the amount due
Defective Parts Per Million: calculated based on the total number defects received versus the total number of items received
On-Time Delivery: Percentage of on-time product deliveries against promise dates under normal operating conditions
Lead Time: Days between order date and delivery date
Supplier Stability Index and Supplier Evaluation Risk: Financial health of your suppliers, who is likely to cease operations and close their doors
Completely configurable based on your needs
34. Supply and supplier relationships
How to achieve the best value?
1. Manage the total business with each supplier
2. Measure and shape supplier performance
3. Involve key suppliers in product
4. Promote dialogue with suppliers
5. Recruit skilled personnel
6. Develop personnel to know suppliers in-depth
Source: Best Practices in Supplier Relationship Management and Their Early Implementation. Rand Corp
(2012).
35. Let’s keep talking
Keith Peterson
President & CEO
www.slideshare.net/HaloBI
info@halobi.com |888.300.0219
@Halo_BI
Notas del editor
This is a sample customer logo slide. More images are available on the Marketing Dropbox folder \\HALOBIFILE\Shares\Dropbox (Halo)\Global\Marketing\Slide deck\Images\Customer logos.
A survey of leading companies found a 7–10 percent per year average improvement in delivery responsiveness attributable to supplier development and management initiatives (Trent and Monczka, 1998).
Rockwell Collins reported that supplier on-time delivery increased from 83.8 percent to 96.5 percent in three years after it developed a portal through which suppliers can gain access to engineering designs and forecasts, download scorecards that monitor their performance, and send invoices to and receive payment from Rockwell Collins.6
Sun Microsystems’ Enterprise Services organization reported improvements in repair-parts-vendor turnaround times from 34–40 days to 4–5 days after it fully integrated its technology platform and systems with those of 12 of its key vendors in the Americas (Pazmany, 2000).
Cessna reported a 113 percent increase in production inventory turns over six years, with dramatically higher material availability. Cessna achieved this improvement by creating a strategic plan and cross-functional commodity teams that rationalized the company’s supplier base;
Few people look at their suppliers’ performance and risk potential in a comprehensive manner that includes delivery, quality, cost and time – whether this is for their broad supply base or for individual suppliers
Suppliers are managed in a fragmented manner through the Procurement organization of Commodity Managers and Buyer-Planners
It is difficult to obtain data from multiple enterprise, provider and supplier systems
Few people look at Supplier performance over time to assess trends and capability
Historical data is often suspect in an organization and is not trusted
Few companies share their performance data with their suppliers with a view towards improving performance
The Consequences of a failure to manage and monitor Critical Supplier Performance can be significant.
How has my supplier base changed over time?
How has my suppliers’ performance changed over time? Should I be concerned? What should I be concerned about?
What are the financial and customer consequences?
What do I tell my Commodity Managers/Buyer-Planners to focus on?
Visibility into Cost, Quality, Delivery, and Risk. Agility is the ability to make better/more informed decisions. Share this information with Suppliers.