Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.

Improving Research Engagement to Support Policy and Institutional Change

Webinar recorded on 23 Sept. 2020, co-organized by the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM), the CGIAR Research Program on Fish Agri-Food Systems, and Collaborating for Resilience (CoRe).

Too often, research aiming to inform public policies or strengthen institutions for effective policy implementation remains disconnected from the real political economy of policy and institutional reform. This webinar introduces a new rubric to assess opportunities for research partnerships that navigate this complex terrain of power and leverage sometimes unexpected spaces of engagement.
Full recording at https://bit.ly/2GFIdx1.

  • Sé el primero en comentar

  • Sé el primero en recomendar esto

Improving Research Engagement to Support Policy and Institutional Change

  1. 1. Improving research engagement to support policy and institutional change September 2020 Blake Ratner, Mark Dubois, Tiffany Morrison, Xavier Tezzo, Andrew Song, Emmanuel Mbaru, Sloans Chimatiro, Pip Cohen
  2. 2. A structured approach to a messy process Key questions: • How does policy and institutional change happen? • Where are the opportunities for research to most constructively contribute? • What role(s) do we, as researchers, seek to play? We offer: • A rubric to assess opportunities for research engagement in the policy process • Cases illustrating the rubric at national and regional levels • Principles for successful engagement in policy and institutional change
  3. 3. What influences policy change? The Kaleidoscope Model (Resnick et al. 2015) How can research engagement affect these? Problem analysis and convening Assessment of alternative optionsExchange of experience & dialogue Institutional capacity building Outcome evaluation
  4. 4. Where are the spaces for engagement? Source: Gaventa (2006) Need to consider modes of engagement that recognize this diversity Forms of power Spaces of engagement Visible: making and setting the rules Closed: behind-doors negotiations Hidden: setting the agenda Invited: formal policy dialogue or consultation Invisible: shaping meaning and value Claimed or created: social movements, public demonstrations Power Cube
  5. 5. A rubric to assess opportunities for research engagement in the policy process
  6. 6. Note: Examples in the table are illustrative of possible modes of engagement.
  7. 7. Case: Myanmar Fisheries Partnership Modes of engagement Key outcomes Multi-stakeholder coordination platform supporting dialogue on policy priorities. Policy problem identification through jointly produced issue briefs. Distilling lessons through assessment of the leasable fishery domain. Improved multiscale and multilevel stakeholder coordination. Inland fishery policy experiments assessing the performance of community- based management, contributing to management options introduced in the Ayeyarwady Delta regional fisheries law (2018).
  8. 8. Myanmar Fisheries Partnership
  9. 9. Case: Pacific “New Song” Policy Modes of engagement Key outcomes Assessment of “fit” between global, regional and national policy frameworks and barriers to implementation. Dialogue and reflection engaging potential policy champions and veto players. Interviews and discussions with key policy makers to validate diverse perspectives and interpretations. Increased political commitment to regional coordination in policy design and implementation. Improved capacity to interpret and adapt global and regional policy frameworks at national level.
  10. 10. Pacific Islands regional “New Song” Policy
  11. 11. Case: Africa Regional Fish Trade Modes of engagement Key outcomes Policy impact assessment. Regional and national policy dialogue. Evidence on trade patterns to support policy champions. Identification of barriers to policy implementation. Documenting evidence from local innovation. Media outreach. Increased recognition of the importance of cross-border fish trade for nutrition, revenue and GDP. Harmonized regional fish standards to formalize the informal fish trade and increase women’s access. Capacity built for recognition of the standards at national and subnational levels.
  12. 12. Africa Regional Fish Trade
  13. 13. Principles 3. Embed ongoing research communications to support dialogue 4. Employ evaluation in a cycle of action and learning 1. Nurture multistakeholder coalitions – across scales, at different points in policy process 2. Engage alternative forms of power and spaces of engagement
  14. 14. Questions for discussion in research teams 1. What are the main policy processes where you aim to see your research evidence applied? 2. What are the key forums in which you aim for this evidence to have influence – at global, regional, and/or national levels? 3. What does this imply for the partnerships that need to be built, strengthened or adapted to achieve your intended influence?
  15. 15. Q&A Recoding of this webinar will be available on the PIM website shortly after the live event. All registrants will receive a follow- up email with the link to the webinar materials (video, presentation, podcast). Previous PIM Webinars: http://bit.ly/PIMwebinars If you want to receive alerts about future PIM Webinars, sign up here: https://pim.cgiar.org/subscribe/ @PIM_CGIAR @PIM.CGIAR

×