WOTUS Presentation.pdf

J
Presentation Outline
• Background
• Final Jan. 2023 Rule
Framework
 Jurisdictional Waters
 Exclusions
• Litigation update
• Sackett Decision – select
overview for Oil
“NavigableWaters”: Waters of the United States,
including Territorial Seas
303
Water
Quality
Standards
&TMDLs
311
Oil Spill
Programs
401
State/Tribal
Certification
402
Pollutant
Discharge
Permits
404
Discharge of
dredged
and/or fill
material
States
Tribes
EPA
EPA
USCG
DOT
States
Tribes
EPA
States
Tribes
EPA
USACE
EPA
States
Tribes
Background: Why “Waters of the United
States” Matters
Background: “Waters of the United States”
Over Time
The definition of “waters of the United States” has been a subject of dispute
and addressed in several major Supreme Court cases.
1972:
WOTUS used
in CWA
definition for
“navigable
waters”
1986/1988:
Corps and
EPA issue
revised
regulations
1985: Riverside Bayview
Homes (addressing adjacent
wetlands)
2001: SWANCC (addressing “other
waters”); agencies issue guidance in 2001
and 2003
2006: Rapanos
(adjacent
wetlands to
non-navigable
tributaries);
guidance in
2007 and
2008
1993:
Addition of
exclusion
for prior
converted
cropland
1973-1979: EPA &
Corps issue regs and
revisions
Previous final
rules revising
the definition
in 2015, 2019,
2020, and
2023
1975:
NRDC v.
Callaway
(finding the
Corps’
1974 regs
to be too
narrow)
1980:
Addition of
waste
treatment
system
exclusion
2023: Sackett in
May; final rule
signed/announced
in August
50
Final Rule Framework
Categories of Jurisdictional Waters
(a)(1)
 (i) Traditional Navigable Waters
 (ii) Territorial Seas
 (iii) Interstate Waters
(a)(2) Impoundments of Jurisdictional Waters
(a)(3) Tributaries
(a)(4) Adjacent Wetlands
(a)(5) Intrastate lakes and ponds, streams, and
wetlands that do not fall within (a)(1) – (a)(4)
Final Rule Framework
Exclusions
(b)(1) Waste treatment systems
(b)(2) Prior converted cropland
(b)(3) Certain ditches
(b)(4) Artificially irrigated areas that would revert to dry land
if irrigation ceased
(b)(5) Certain artificial lakes and ponds
(b)(6) Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small
ornamental bodies of water
(b)(7) Certain waterfilled depressions
(b)(8) Swales and erosional features
(b)(3) – (b)(8):
Pre-2015 “generally non-
jurisdictional features,”
added to the final rule as
exclusions
(b)(1) – (b)(2):
Pre-2015 exclusions,
modified in the final rule
Final Rule Framework
Definitions
(c)(1) Wetlands
(c)(2) Adjacent
(c)(3) High tide line
(c)(4) Ordinary high water mark
(c)(5) Tidal waters
(c)(6) Significantly affect
(c)(1) – (c)(5):
Pre-2015 definitions,
with no changes
(c)(6):
New term and definition
in the final Jan. 2023
rule – deleted in revised
2023 rule
Key Concepts
• The “relatively permanent standard” means
relatively permanent, standing or continuously
flowing waters connected to paragraph (a)(1)
waters, and waters with a continuous surface
connection to such relatively permanent waters or
to paragraph (a)(1) waters. – Retained in revised
rule
• The ‘‘significant nexus standard’’ means waters that
either alone or in combination with similarly
situated waters in the region, significantly affect
the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of
paragraph (a)(1) waters. – Deleted in revised rule
due to Sackett decision
WOTUS
RULE STATUS AND LITIGATION UPDATE
On March 19, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted a motion
preliminarily enjoining the 2023 final rule in TX and ID.
The Jan. 2023 rule took effect on March 20, 2023, except in TX and ID.
On April 12, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota granted a motion
preliminarily enjoining the 2023 final rule in 24 states: WV, ND, GA, IA, AL, AK, AR, FL, IN,
KS, LA, MS, MT, MN, NE, NH, OH, OK, SC, SD, TN, UT, VA, and WY. And on May 10, 2023,
KY was added to PI list.
In light of these preliminary injunctions, the agencies are interpreting “waters of the United
States” consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime in these states until further notice.
WOTUS
RULE STATUS AND LITIGATION UPDATE, cont’d
• The U.S. Supreme Court issued their decision in the case of Sackett v. EPA on May 25,
2023. In light of this decision, EPA and the Dept. of Army are interpreting the phrase
“waters of the United States” consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision.
• EPA and Army are developing a new rule to amend the final "Revised Definition of 'Waters of the
United States'" rule, published in the Federal Register on January 18, 2023, consistent with the
U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Sackett case.
• The revised 2023 rule was announced on August 30, 2023. Publication in the FR is anticipated
soon.
Nationwide Demarcation of
Operative Definition of WOTUS
In States where the 2023 Rule is Enjoined,
the Agencies Are Implementing the Pre-2015
Regulatory Regime Until Further Notice
For Oil Spill Programs under 40 CFR 112, the pre-2015 regulatory regime utilizes the 1973
definition of “navigable waters.” EPA interprets Section 311 and the 1973 definition to have
the same breadth as the phrase “navigable waters” used elsewhere in section 311, and in
other sections of the Clean Water Act, and as defined by the agencies.
The term “navigable waters” includes:
1) All navigable waters of the United States, as defined in judicial decisions prior to
the passage of the 1972 Amendments of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(Pub. L. 92-500) also known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), and tributaries of
such waters;
2) Interstate waters;
3) Intrastate lakes, rivers, and streams which are utilized by interstate travelers for
recreational or other purposes; and
4) Intrastate lakes, rivers, and streams from which fish or shellfish are taken and
sold in interstate commerce.
Supreme Court decisions in Riverside Bayview, SWANCC, Rapanos and Sackett and
applicable guidance also play a role in jurisdictional decisions.
Additional Information
• See https://www.epa.gov/wotus for additional information.
• Public webinars have been scheduled for:
 Sept. 12, 2023 (3pm-4pm Eastern Time)
 Sept. 13, 2023 (1pm-2pm Eastern Time)
 Sept. 20, 2023 (3pm-4pm Eastern Time).
• Please contact CWAwotus@epa.gov with any questions.
1 de 12

Recomendados

Water Law and Policy in the U.S. por
Water Law and Policy in the U.S.Water Law and Policy in the U.S.
Water Law and Policy in the U.S.Chuck Bowen
1.3K vistas50 diapositivas
Waters of the United States por
Waters of the United StatesWaters of the United States
Waters of the United StatesMichael McMenus
152 vistas7 diapositivas
Overview of California Water Law and Regulation por
Overview of California Water Law and RegulationOverview of California Water Law and Regulation
Overview of California Water Law and RegulationKevin Haroff
3.2K vistas22 diapositivas
The Changing Law Down Under - Texas v. New Mexico and WOTUS por
The Changing Law Down Under - Texas v. New Mexico and WOTUSThe Changing Law Down Under - Texas v. New Mexico and WOTUS
The Changing Law Down Under - Texas v. New Mexico and WOTUSTexas Alliance of Groundwater Districts
115 vistas30 diapositivas
Trask MS Thesis 2015 por
Trask MS Thesis 2015Trask MS Thesis 2015
Trask MS Thesis 2015Sabrina Trask
404 vistas78 diapositivas
WOTUS - AFA EVP Max Braswell - May 1, 2015 por
WOTUS - AFA EVP Max Braswell - May 1, 2015WOTUS - AFA EVP Max Braswell - May 1, 2015
WOTUS - AFA EVP Max Braswell - May 1, 2015Arkansas Forestry Association
476 vistas27 diapositivas

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a WOTUS Presentation.pdf

John Lane & Braiden Chadwick: storm water runoff control por
John Lane & Braiden Chadwick: storm water runoff controlJohn Lane & Braiden Chadwick: storm water runoff control
John Lane & Braiden Chadwick: storm water runoff controlCalifornia Asphalt Pavement Association
599 vistas15 diapositivas
ARTBA Comments on “Waters of the United States” Proposed Rule por
 ARTBA Comments on “Waters of the United States” Proposed Rule ARTBA Comments on “Waters of the United States” Proposed Rule
ARTBA Comments on “Waters of the United States” Proposed Ruleartba
1K vistas6 diapositivas
Final paper for ESM 222 por
Final paper for ESM 222Final paper for ESM 222
Final paper for ESM 222Trevor Lee
261 vistas8 diapositivas
Great Lakes Compact Challenges and Opportunities por
Great Lakes Compact Challenges and OpportunitiesGreat Lakes Compact Challenges and Opportunities
Great Lakes Compact Challenges and OpportunitiesHealthy Lakes, Healthy Lives
1.3K vistas19 diapositivas
January 22 ESP 179 Hydro por
January 22  ESP 179 HydroJanuary 22  ESP 179 Hydro
January 22 ESP 179 HydroCEQAplanner
432 vistas26 diapositivas
Developments in Wetland Protection under the Clean Water Act por
Developments in Wetland Protection under the Clean Water ActDevelopments in Wetland Protection under the Clean Water Act
Developments in Wetland Protection under the Clean Water ActMark Ostendorf
974 vistas27 diapositivas

Similar a WOTUS Presentation.pdf(20)

ARTBA Comments on “Waters of the United States” Proposed Rule por artba
 ARTBA Comments on “Waters of the United States” Proposed Rule ARTBA Comments on “Waters of the United States” Proposed Rule
ARTBA Comments on “Waters of the United States” Proposed Rule
artba1K vistas
Final paper for ESM 222 por Trevor Lee
Final paper for ESM 222Final paper for ESM 222
Final paper for ESM 222
Trevor Lee261 vistas
January 22 ESP 179 Hydro por CEQAplanner
January 22  ESP 179 HydroJanuary 22  ESP 179 Hydro
January 22 ESP 179 Hydro
CEQAplanner432 vistas
Developments in Wetland Protection under the Clean Water Act por Mark Ostendorf
Developments in Wetland Protection under the Clean Water ActDevelopments in Wetland Protection under the Clean Water Act
Developments in Wetland Protection under the Clean Water Act
Mark Ostendorf974 vistas
TWCA Annual Convention: Water Rights Developments in Other States, Lyn Clancy por TWCA
TWCA Annual Convention: Water Rights Developments in Other States, Lyn ClancyTWCA Annual Convention: Water Rights Developments in Other States, Lyn Clancy
TWCA Annual Convention: Water Rights Developments in Other States, Lyn Clancy
TWCA360 vistas
EPA Proposed “Waters of the United States” Rule por artba
EPA Proposed “Waters of the United States” RuleEPA Proposed “Waters of the United States” Rule
EPA Proposed “Waters of the United States” Rule
artba759 vistas
Past Present And Future Trend por JPoore
Past Present And Future TrendPast Present And Future Trend
Past Present And Future Trend
JPoore167 vistas
Past Present and Future Trends por JPoore
Past Present and Future TrendsPast Present and Future Trends
Past Present and Future Trends
JPoore720 vistas
Presentation (3-9-04) por David Lewis
Presentation (3-9-04)Presentation (3-9-04)
Presentation (3-9-04)
David Lewis76 vistas
Environmental and Natural Resource Protection por Connie Sue Martin
Environmental and Natural Resource ProtectionEnvironmental and Natural Resource Protection
Environmental and Natural Resource Protection
Connie Sue Martin949 vistas
Warren Formo, Joe Smentek - Water Regulations Update: Waters of the United St... por John Blue
Warren Formo, Joe Smentek - Water Regulations Update: Waters of the United St...Warren Formo, Joe Smentek - Water Regulations Update: Waters of the United St...
Warren Formo, Joe Smentek - Water Regulations Update: Waters of the United St...
John Blue240 vistas
WOTUS Update, Paulina Williams - Baker Botts por TWCA
WOTUS Update, Paulina Williams - Baker BottsWOTUS Update, Paulina Williams - Baker Botts
WOTUS Update, Paulina Williams - Baker Botts
TWCA143 vistas
Legislative Update - Brian Sledge por TWCA
Legislative Update - Brian SledgeLegislative Update - Brian Sledge
Legislative Update - Brian Sledge
TWCA119 vistas
Special Protections And Areas Of Special Biological Significance Casqa Powerp... por awaltner
Special Protections And Areas Of Special Biological Significance Casqa Powerp...Special Protections And Areas Of Special Biological Significance Casqa Powerp...
Special Protections And Areas Of Special Biological Significance Casqa Powerp...
awaltner358 vistas

Último

ijospin77.pdf por
ijospin77.pdfijospin77.pdf
ijospin77.pdfHaseebBashir5
5 vistas2 diapositivas
Smart Cities por
Smart CitiesSmart Cities
Smart CitiesDr. Salem Baidas
9 vistas40 diapositivas
feel the nature por
feel the naturefeel the nature
feel the naturemrudusahithi
5 vistas1 diapositiva
Towards a just and regenerative aquaculture system por
Towards a just and regenerative aquaculture systemTowards a just and regenerative aquaculture system
Towards a just and regenerative aquaculture systemMartin Koehring
14 vistas15 diapositivas
ESG -in construction.pptx por
ESG -in construction.pptxESG -in construction.pptx
ESG -in construction.pptxtheparnikakadam
6 vistas15 diapositivas
Monetary policy in Vietnam and impacts of interest rate on the economy por
Monetary policy in Vietnam and impacts of interest rate on the economyMonetary policy in Vietnam and impacts of interest rate on the economy
Monetary policy in Vietnam and impacts of interest rate on the economylamluanvan.net Viết thuê luận văn
14 vistas12 diapositivas

Último(20)

Towards a just and regenerative aquaculture system por Martin Koehring
Towards a just and regenerative aquaculture systemTowards a just and regenerative aquaculture system
Towards a just and regenerative aquaculture system
Martin Koehring14 vistas
Citizen science of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea Expedition por Dr Adam Smith
Citizen science of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea ExpeditionCitizen science of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea Expedition
Citizen science of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea Expedition
Dr Adam Smith45 vistas
PROGRAMMES OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION.pptx por DrHafizKosar
PROGRAMMES OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION.pptxPROGRAMMES OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION.pptx
PROGRAMMES OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION.pptx
DrHafizKosar125 vistas
Arkan. İngilis dili sərbəst iş.pptx por ArkanAdisli
Arkan. İngilis dili sərbəst iş.pptxArkan. İngilis dili sərbəst iş.pptx
Arkan. İngilis dili sərbəst iş.pptx
ArkanAdisli5 vistas
Exceeding-returning-Intro-v1Dec-final.pptx por ipcc-media
Exceeding-returning-Intro-v1Dec-final.pptxExceeding-returning-Intro-v1Dec-final.pptx
Exceeding-returning-Intro-v1Dec-final.pptx
ipcc-media43 vistas
climate and the world por Basel Ahmed
climate and the worldclimate and the world
climate and the world
Basel Ahmed35 vistas
Business X Design - Digital for People, Product, and Planet - an Intersection... por Matt Gibson
Business X Design - Digital for People, Product, and Planet - an Intersection...Business X Design - Digital for People, Product, and Planet - an Intersection...
Business X Design - Digital for People, Product, and Planet - an Intersection...
Matt Gibson34 vistas

WOTUS Presentation.pdf

  • 1. Presentation Outline • Background • Final Jan. 2023 Rule Framework  Jurisdictional Waters  Exclusions • Litigation update • Sackett Decision – select overview for Oil
  • 2. “NavigableWaters”: Waters of the United States, including Territorial Seas 303 Water Quality Standards &TMDLs 311 Oil Spill Programs 401 State/Tribal Certification 402 Pollutant Discharge Permits 404 Discharge of dredged and/or fill material States Tribes EPA EPA USCG DOT States Tribes EPA States Tribes EPA USACE EPA States Tribes Background: Why “Waters of the United States” Matters
  • 3. Background: “Waters of the United States” Over Time The definition of “waters of the United States” has been a subject of dispute and addressed in several major Supreme Court cases. 1972: WOTUS used in CWA definition for “navigable waters” 1986/1988: Corps and EPA issue revised regulations 1985: Riverside Bayview Homes (addressing adjacent wetlands) 2001: SWANCC (addressing “other waters”); agencies issue guidance in 2001 and 2003 2006: Rapanos (adjacent wetlands to non-navigable tributaries); guidance in 2007 and 2008 1993: Addition of exclusion for prior converted cropland 1973-1979: EPA & Corps issue regs and revisions Previous final rules revising the definition in 2015, 2019, 2020, and 2023 1975: NRDC v. Callaway (finding the Corps’ 1974 regs to be too narrow) 1980: Addition of waste treatment system exclusion 2023: Sackett in May; final rule signed/announced in August 50
  • 4. Final Rule Framework Categories of Jurisdictional Waters (a)(1)  (i) Traditional Navigable Waters  (ii) Territorial Seas  (iii) Interstate Waters (a)(2) Impoundments of Jurisdictional Waters (a)(3) Tributaries (a)(4) Adjacent Wetlands (a)(5) Intrastate lakes and ponds, streams, and wetlands that do not fall within (a)(1) – (a)(4)
  • 5. Final Rule Framework Exclusions (b)(1) Waste treatment systems (b)(2) Prior converted cropland (b)(3) Certain ditches (b)(4) Artificially irrigated areas that would revert to dry land if irrigation ceased (b)(5) Certain artificial lakes and ponds (b)(6) Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of water (b)(7) Certain waterfilled depressions (b)(8) Swales and erosional features (b)(3) – (b)(8): Pre-2015 “generally non- jurisdictional features,” added to the final rule as exclusions (b)(1) – (b)(2): Pre-2015 exclusions, modified in the final rule
  • 6. Final Rule Framework Definitions (c)(1) Wetlands (c)(2) Adjacent (c)(3) High tide line (c)(4) Ordinary high water mark (c)(5) Tidal waters (c)(6) Significantly affect (c)(1) – (c)(5): Pre-2015 definitions, with no changes (c)(6): New term and definition in the final Jan. 2023 rule – deleted in revised 2023 rule
  • 7. Key Concepts • The “relatively permanent standard” means relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing waters connected to paragraph (a)(1) waters, and waters with a continuous surface connection to such relatively permanent waters or to paragraph (a)(1) waters. – Retained in revised rule • The ‘‘significant nexus standard’’ means waters that either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of paragraph (a)(1) waters. – Deleted in revised rule due to Sackett decision
  • 8. WOTUS RULE STATUS AND LITIGATION UPDATE On March 19, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted a motion preliminarily enjoining the 2023 final rule in TX and ID. The Jan. 2023 rule took effect on March 20, 2023, except in TX and ID. On April 12, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota granted a motion preliminarily enjoining the 2023 final rule in 24 states: WV, ND, GA, IA, AL, AK, AR, FL, IN, KS, LA, MS, MT, MN, NE, NH, OH, OK, SC, SD, TN, UT, VA, and WY. And on May 10, 2023, KY was added to PI list. In light of these preliminary injunctions, the agencies are interpreting “waters of the United States” consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime in these states until further notice.
  • 9. WOTUS RULE STATUS AND LITIGATION UPDATE, cont’d • The U.S. Supreme Court issued their decision in the case of Sackett v. EPA on May 25, 2023. In light of this decision, EPA and the Dept. of Army are interpreting the phrase “waters of the United States” consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision. • EPA and Army are developing a new rule to amend the final "Revised Definition of 'Waters of the United States'" rule, published in the Federal Register on January 18, 2023, consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Sackett case. • The revised 2023 rule was announced on August 30, 2023. Publication in the FR is anticipated soon.
  • 10. Nationwide Demarcation of Operative Definition of WOTUS
  • 11. In States where the 2023 Rule is Enjoined, the Agencies Are Implementing the Pre-2015 Regulatory Regime Until Further Notice For Oil Spill Programs under 40 CFR 112, the pre-2015 regulatory regime utilizes the 1973 definition of “navigable waters.” EPA interprets Section 311 and the 1973 definition to have the same breadth as the phrase “navigable waters” used elsewhere in section 311, and in other sections of the Clean Water Act, and as defined by the agencies. The term “navigable waters” includes: 1) All navigable waters of the United States, as defined in judicial decisions prior to the passage of the 1972 Amendments of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Pub. L. 92-500) also known as the Clean Water Act (CWA), and tributaries of such waters; 2) Interstate waters; 3) Intrastate lakes, rivers, and streams which are utilized by interstate travelers for recreational or other purposes; and 4) Intrastate lakes, rivers, and streams from which fish or shellfish are taken and sold in interstate commerce. Supreme Court decisions in Riverside Bayview, SWANCC, Rapanos and Sackett and applicable guidance also play a role in jurisdictional decisions.
  • 12. Additional Information • See https://www.epa.gov/wotus for additional information. • Public webinars have been scheduled for:  Sept. 12, 2023 (3pm-4pm Eastern Time)  Sept. 13, 2023 (1pm-2pm Eastern Time)  Sept. 20, 2023 (3pm-4pm Eastern Time). • Please contact CWAwotus@epa.gov with any questions.