SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 3
Descargar para leer sin conexión
-1Amanda Kitchen

                                   Week 6, Assignment 3




The F-scale is an extremely old and out dated test, that was once used to measure the

dominance of an authoritarian personality. Although it consists of thirty questions, there

are a few that seem to more directly address the desire to dominate. Number 1, which

reads as, “Obedience and respect are the most important virtues children should learn.”

People who believe in the authoritarian way of life, need to be in control of their

surroundings. They would only raise their children to be totally submissive to their rules

and ideas about politics, religion, money, and morals. This question when answered

(agree strongly), would be a good predictor that a person is more conservative and or,

authoritarian. The second question I would identify as a strong measure was number ten.

It reads, “Nobody ever learned anything really important except through suffering.” In

other words, only hard work and no play, make a successful life. “The true American way

of life is disappearing so fast that force may be necessary to preserve it.” This is another

extremely direct question. During this time, when war was on the forefront of everyone’s

mind and the concept of the American home and family was changing rapidly, many

people were simply scared. They wanted to hold on to traditional values and not confront

what was coming for them. (Anesi, C. 1997)



       There were also questions on the F-scale that seemed weak links in truly

identifying a authoritarian. Number nine states “No sane, normal, decent person could
ever think of hurting a close relative or friend.” I believe that even today, most people

would hold this view, not necessarily a conservative, liberal, etc. This question to me

would not directly correlate a relationship with a controlling personality. Another

question, number twenty nine says, “The wild sex life of the Romans was tame compared

to some of the going-ons of this country.” (Anesi, C. 1997)This question, based on the

time when it was asked is irrelevant. If a person held this view point today I would

definitely think they had a very authoritarian viewpoint. However, in the 1940’s and 50’s

people were sexually conservative. They were not open, it was never discussed in the

public. Even those who probably were more sexually amorous would simply be too

embarrassed to admit it.



       As I stated, the test was created fifty years ago, it is hardly relevant today. We, as

a country have experienced the sexual revolution, desegregation, an attack on our

homeland, the aids epidemic and more. Our eyes have been opened up to the reality of

change. The general consensus is no longer power by dominant control of the governing

power. They have lost too much of our trust. Not only is the relevance questionable, the

test has proved to be very inaccurate and incredibly lacking in validity. The F-scale

mistakenly identifies people who tend to admire traditional authority with people who

like to dominate others. There are many people admiring of traditional authority who

would timidly cringe at the thought of having to exercise authority themselves. (Ray, J.J

1979) Since this time other tests have been created to be a more accurate tool for

measuring this personality type as well as many others.

Ray, J.J. 1979. DOES AUTHORITARIANISM OF PERSONALITY GO WITH
CONSERVATISM? Australian Journal of Psychology. Volume 32. Number 1, pg 19-32.



Anesi, C 10097. The F-Scale. The Authoritarian Personality. Anesi.com

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Sexual orientation and Gender Identity
Sexual orientation and Gender IdentitySexual orientation and Gender Identity
Sexual orientation and Gender IdentityDakotah Gumm
 
Galileo Research: The State of the (Dis)Union
Galileo Research: The State of the (Dis)UnionGalileo Research: The State of the (Dis)Union
Galileo Research: The State of the (Dis)UnionMeg Stagaard
 
Heterosexism and Homophobia
Heterosexism and HomophobiaHeterosexism and Homophobia
Heterosexism and Homophobiacdj02
 
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal geneE2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal geneAarono1979
 
Gender identity project (1)
Gender identity project (1)Gender identity project (1)
Gender identity project (1)Gavin McAtee
 
Gender identity and sexual orientation
Gender identity and sexual orientationGender identity and sexual orientation
Gender identity and sexual orientationjjacobs4
 
Gender identity and sexual orientation pp
Gender identity and sexual orientation ppGender identity and sexual orientation pp
Gender identity and sexual orientation ppNicole Jean
 
Sexual and-gender-identity-lesson-ppt
Sexual and-gender-identity-lesson-pptSexual and-gender-identity-lesson-ppt
Sexual and-gender-identity-lesson-ppttshepiso montsheng
 
Androgyny powerpoint (psychology)
Androgyny powerpoint (psychology) Androgyny powerpoint (psychology)
Androgyny powerpoint (psychology) Sufia Irshad
 
Gender and sexuality
Gender and sexualityGender and sexuality
Gender and sexualitybchozinski
 
Psy240 wk5-cp
Psy240 wk5-cpPsy240 wk5-cp
Psy240 wk5-cpceledune
 
Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation
Gender Identity & Sexual OrientationGender Identity & Sexual Orientation
Gender Identity & Sexual Orientationkhartnett7
 
Sexism and Gender Diversity
Sexism and Gender DiversitySexism and Gender Diversity
Sexism and Gender DiversityDiane Mitschke
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Teachback
TeachbackTeachback
Teachback
 
Sexual orientation and Gender Identity
Sexual orientation and Gender IdentitySexual orientation and Gender Identity
Sexual orientation and Gender Identity
 
Lgb tpowerpoint
Lgb tpowerpointLgb tpowerpoint
Lgb tpowerpoint
 
Galileo Research: The State of the (Dis)Union
Galileo Research: The State of the (Dis)UnionGalileo Research: The State of the (Dis)Union
Galileo Research: The State of the (Dis)Union
 
Sexism
SexismSexism
Sexism
 
Heterosexism and Homophobia
Heterosexism and HomophobiaHeterosexism and Homophobia
Heterosexism and Homophobia
 
Coming out
Coming outComing out
Coming out
 
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal geneE2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
E2al theilgaard (1984) the criminal gene
 
Gender identity project (1)
Gender identity project (1)Gender identity project (1)
Gender identity project (1)
 
Gender identity and sexual orientation
Gender identity and sexual orientationGender identity and sexual orientation
Gender identity and sexual orientation
 
Gender identity and sexual orientation pp
Gender identity and sexual orientation ppGender identity and sexual orientation pp
Gender identity and sexual orientation pp
 
Sexism presentation (1)
Sexism presentation (1)Sexism presentation (1)
Sexism presentation (1)
 
Sexual and-gender-identity-lesson-ppt
Sexual and-gender-identity-lesson-pptSexual and-gender-identity-lesson-ppt
Sexual and-gender-identity-lesson-ppt
 
Androgyny powerpoint (psychology)
Androgyny powerpoint (psychology) Androgyny powerpoint (psychology)
Androgyny powerpoint (psychology)
 
Heterosexism
HeterosexismHeterosexism
Heterosexism
 
Gender and sexuality
Gender and sexualityGender and sexuality
Gender and sexuality
 
Heterosexism
HeterosexismHeterosexism
Heterosexism
 
Psy240 wk5-cp
Psy240 wk5-cpPsy240 wk5-cp
Psy240 wk5-cp
 
Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation
Gender Identity & Sexual OrientationGender Identity & Sexual Orientation
Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation
 
Sexism and Gender Diversity
Sexism and Gender DiversitySexism and Gender Diversity
Sexism and Gender Diversity
 

Similar a Authority

474 2015 pol psych prejudice (11 2015) up
474 2015 pol psych prejudice (11 2015) up474 2015 pol psych prejudice (11 2015) up
474 2015 pol psych prejudice (11 2015) upmpeffl
 
Humanistic Psychology.pptx
Humanistic Psychology.pptxHumanistic Psychology.pptx
Humanistic Psychology.pptxgladysdzoro
 
Think Every Person Would.docx
Think Every Person Would.docxThink Every Person Would.docx
Think Every Person Would.docxwrite5
 
Dustin McCutchenDSSA 200Professor Riedel14 October, 2014Fr.docx
Dustin McCutchenDSSA 200Professor Riedel14 October, 2014Fr.docxDustin McCutchenDSSA 200Professor Riedel14 October, 2014Fr.docx
Dustin McCutchenDSSA 200Professor Riedel14 October, 2014Fr.docxjacksnathalie
 
A Call For Common Sense 081111
A Call For Common Sense 081111A Call For Common Sense 081111
A Call For Common Sense 081111Brad Benner
 
Is censorship a good or bad idea?
Is censorship a good or bad idea?Is censorship a good or bad idea?
Is censorship a good or bad idea?cloestead
 

Similar a Authority (8)

474 2015 pol psych prejudice (11 2015) up
474 2015 pol psych prejudice (11 2015) up474 2015 pol psych prejudice (11 2015) up
474 2015 pol psych prejudice (11 2015) up
 
Humanistic Psychology.pptx
Humanistic Psychology.pptxHumanistic Psychology.pptx
Humanistic Psychology.pptx
 
Think Every Person Would.docx
Think Every Person Would.docxThink Every Person Would.docx
Think Every Person Would.docx
 
Dustin McCutchenDSSA 200Professor Riedel14 October, 2014Fr.docx
Dustin McCutchenDSSA 200Professor Riedel14 October, 2014Fr.docxDustin McCutchenDSSA 200Professor Riedel14 October, 2014Fr.docx
Dustin McCutchenDSSA 200Professor Riedel14 October, 2014Fr.docx
 
A Call For Common Sense 081111
A Call For Common Sense 081111A Call For Common Sense 081111
A Call For Common Sense 081111
 
Is censorship a good or bad idea?
Is censorship a good or bad idea?Is censorship a good or bad idea?
Is censorship a good or bad idea?
 
Diversity
DiversityDiversity
Diversity
 
Diversity Studies Unit III
Diversity Studies Unit IIIDiversity Studies Unit III
Diversity Studies Unit III
 

Más de Argosy University (6)

North shores
North shoresNorth shores
North shores
 
Dress for
Dress forDress for
Dress for
 
Culture and religion
Culture and religionCulture and religion
Culture and religion
 
Cultural metaphors
Cultural metaphorsCultural metaphors
Cultural metaphors
 
Alternatives
AlternativesAlternatives
Alternatives
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 

Authority

  • 1. -1Amanda Kitchen Week 6, Assignment 3 The F-scale is an extremely old and out dated test, that was once used to measure the dominance of an authoritarian personality. Although it consists of thirty questions, there are a few that seem to more directly address the desire to dominate. Number 1, which reads as, “Obedience and respect are the most important virtues children should learn.” People who believe in the authoritarian way of life, need to be in control of their surroundings. They would only raise their children to be totally submissive to their rules and ideas about politics, religion, money, and morals. This question when answered (agree strongly), would be a good predictor that a person is more conservative and or, authoritarian. The second question I would identify as a strong measure was number ten. It reads, “Nobody ever learned anything really important except through suffering.” In other words, only hard work and no play, make a successful life. “The true American way of life is disappearing so fast that force may be necessary to preserve it.” This is another extremely direct question. During this time, when war was on the forefront of everyone’s mind and the concept of the American home and family was changing rapidly, many people were simply scared. They wanted to hold on to traditional values and not confront what was coming for them. (Anesi, C. 1997) There were also questions on the F-scale that seemed weak links in truly identifying a authoritarian. Number nine states “No sane, normal, decent person could
  • 2. ever think of hurting a close relative or friend.” I believe that even today, most people would hold this view, not necessarily a conservative, liberal, etc. This question to me would not directly correlate a relationship with a controlling personality. Another question, number twenty nine says, “The wild sex life of the Romans was tame compared to some of the going-ons of this country.” (Anesi, C. 1997)This question, based on the time when it was asked is irrelevant. If a person held this view point today I would definitely think they had a very authoritarian viewpoint. However, in the 1940’s and 50’s people were sexually conservative. They were not open, it was never discussed in the public. Even those who probably were more sexually amorous would simply be too embarrassed to admit it. As I stated, the test was created fifty years ago, it is hardly relevant today. We, as a country have experienced the sexual revolution, desegregation, an attack on our homeland, the aids epidemic and more. Our eyes have been opened up to the reality of change. The general consensus is no longer power by dominant control of the governing power. They have lost too much of our trust. Not only is the relevance questionable, the test has proved to be very inaccurate and incredibly lacking in validity. The F-scale mistakenly identifies people who tend to admire traditional authority with people who like to dominate others. There are many people admiring of traditional authority who would timidly cringe at the thought of having to exercise authority themselves. (Ray, J.J 1979) Since this time other tests have been created to be a more accurate tool for measuring this personality type as well as many others. Ray, J.J. 1979. DOES AUTHORITARIANISM OF PERSONALITY GO WITH
  • 3. CONSERVATISM? Australian Journal of Psychology. Volume 32. Number 1, pg 19-32. Anesi, C 10097. The F-Scale. The Authoritarian Personality. Anesi.com