SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
Download to read offline
Dolivet, Laurent
Concentrix Annual Year Performance Evaluation 2016
1/1/16 to 8/31/16
Document Status Document shared with worker
Evaluated By Eeles - Willettes, Victoria
Employment Details
Position Job Team Manager
Location GB-BEL-LANYO-00 Department 0101-OPERATIONS-DIR
Manager Eeles - Willettes, Victoria
Overall Summary
Worker Manager
Overall Rating 4 - Exceeds Performance
Comments Final year review
Laurent took on board most
points listed below and actively
began to implement such points
and learnings from first half of the
year.
Mid-Year Review
Laurent comments:
- Has enjoyed gaining better
understanding on how the
company works e.g. challenges /
how we work with the client -
found this exp. valuable
- Has liked the improvements in
Specialists engagement and liked
working on the plan.
- Proud of bringing survey monkey
in to the wider team and mostly
been able to follow priorities he
set out in may for himself.
Focuses on mind mapping
- Has found the shift from Agent
>TM most rewarding thing he has
done in past year - getting the
relationship right with his agents
has be good whereby there is a
sense of real mutual respect.
- Liked his development so far and
working with other TMs plus the
client interaction he has
- Likes initiating projects to benefit
the contract
- Talked about individuals and
stages of performance
management – feels comfortable
putting people on PIPs because
he has a good understanding of
where they are
- Main barrier is time constraints in
the fast paced environment on the
contract
- Laurent recognises he has
improvements to be made in
terms of his own time
management. Struggles with 1:1's
formal meetings and performance
catch-ups, yes there are times
where these will be difficult to
meet but something to work on for
himself as well. Keen to continue
using resources available to him
e.g. ER to help close things off
quicker.
- Will also continue to look at his
own working processes and their
efficiency.
Victoria Comments:
• Agree with all points
above as in
discussion in meeting
– it's been really
exciting to watch
Laurent's journey
over the past few
months as a new
Manager on the
contract.
• I believe that Laurent
meets most of the
cultural attributes but
most especially "We
have high integrity
with exemplary
character" in contrast
to what he thinks. I
do believe although
he may get things
wrong sometimes, his
intention is always
very good and he has
a lovely character
that is both extremely
professional and
approachable.
• I'd like Laurent to
branch a little further
away from the French
Team and get to
know how the other
teams on the floor he
is responsible for
work a little better
especially with Ramp
upon us.
• I think it is a fair point
he makes in terms of
his on time
management – this
always takes time
when still adapting to
the TM position so
good that it is an area
he recognises as one
for continuous
improvement.
• Also – have set
Laurent the challenge
to take control of
some tech situations
when Supervisor not
present to test him a
little further and give
him more experience
in directing his own
wider team of
colleagues.
• On the whole, very
happy with Laurent
and the progress he
has made over the
last few months and
where he has taken
his team and from
with his initiatives and
projects. Continue
doing what he is
doing because it's
working. Also, to not
be afraid to reach out
and ask for support if
needed or if he feels
pressured by myself
or other sources.
• Finally, I would agree
that Laurent is a
"Solid Contributor"
and standing at a
performance ranking
of 3. I believe the
next 6 months where
he gains further
experience in the role
and works on his
development areas
will see him surpass
this level.
Goals
Worker Manager
Comments
1:1 Completion - 100%
Description 1:1 Completion - 100%
Success Criteria Laurent became efficient in last quarter of year
completing 1:1s in a timely fashion to an excellent
standard.
Start Date 5/1/16 Priority Medium
Status Completed Completion Percentage 100
Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16
Level Category Other
Related Link
Comments
Weight 25 %
Worker Manager
Comments Improved work in getting
these closed of early
following month in latter half
of year. Stimulated great
discussions with his agents
and completed to high
standard.
Absence - 4% or less
Description Absence - 4% or less
Success Criteria
Laurent achieved this metric and on the whole had
excellent absence rates which were below 3% for the
entire year.
Start Date 5/1/16 Priority Medium
Status Completed Completion Percentage 100
Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16
Level Category Revenue
Related Link
Comments
Weight 25 %
Worker Manager
Comments Absence rate <3% for most
of year - great work here.
FCR - 88%
Description FCR - 88%
Success Criteria FCR improved in laster quarter of the year due to focus
from Laurent on reducing small errors by his team and
driving future needs.
Start Date 5/1/16 Priority Medium
Status Completed Completion Percentage 100
Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16
Level Category Other
Related Link
Comments
Weight 25 %
Worker Manager
Comments Strong FCR that began to
climb back up to target at
end of year despite news of
ramp-down.
Personal Goal
Description Laurent to go back to basics with his new team and drive overall team
responsibility.
Success Criteria Laurent did well in these area, driving new self-
responsibility ideas back to his Specialists. Ramp-down
of FR Market in December prevented continuation of
this.
Start Date 5/16/16 Priority Medium
Status Completed Completion Percentage 100
Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16
Level Target Category Skill
Related Link
Comments
MAY >Team adapt well to being managed more
strongly by predecessor. Laurent works hard with
individuals to show them what he expects from
them but also what they can expect from him. He
did encounter push back but has worked with
these individuals by creating an Action Plan for
all.
JUNE >Continues with the same theme of
managing strongly - creates visual tools for the
Specialists so they can track their results and
therefore have much more visibility of their
overall performance. Still has a little bit of
pushback from some team members but seeing
this reduce a lot more. Also introduces the idea
of managing Specialists behaviours and this will
be embraced by the full team of managers in the
near future.
Weight 0 %
Worker Manager
Comments Laurent continued to
develop as a stronger TM
throughout the year and took
personal commitments in his
own one to ones to improve
focus areas for himself e.g.
quicker performance
management and managing
his own time management.
SSAT - 61%
Description FR SSAT - 61%
Success Criteria SSAT remained static throughout the year and was one
metric that made only marginal improvements. Partly
due to market impacts but also poor efforts from team in
regards to embracing quality expectations.
Laurent managed this metric better towards the end of
the quarter especially when the FR team split into Sales
and Service so he could purely focus on Service. He
began to introduce some creative elements which
could have driven improvements if there had more time
to complete and no ramp-down.
Start Date 5/1/16 Priority Medium
Status Completed Completion Percentage 100
Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16
Level Target Category Customer satisfaction
Related Link
Comments
Weight 25 %
Worker Manager
Comments Area that remained static
throughout the year. Some
improvements towards the
end when ramp-down was
announced.
Signatures
Worker Date
Manager Date

More Related Content

Similar to Performance evaluation 2016

PDR_2014_15_LPS_-_Mark_Everest
PDR_2014_15_LPS_-_Mark_EverestPDR_2014_15_LPS_-_Mark_Everest
PDR_2014_15_LPS_-_Mark_EverestMark Everest
 
Storebrand Baltic darbuotojų pasitenkinimo tyrimas
Storebrand Baltic darbuotojų pasitenkinimo tyrimasStorebrand Baltic darbuotojų pasitenkinimo tyrimas
Storebrand Baltic darbuotojų pasitenkinimo tyrimasekorekomendacijos
 
Career Path Development Presentation
Career Path Development PresentationCareer Path Development Presentation
Career Path Development PresentationRoy Mark
 
PDR 14-15 ME (half year)
PDR 14-15 ME (half year)PDR 14-15 ME (half year)
PDR 14-15 ME (half year)Mark Everest
 
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014Jonathan Fuller
 
End of the First Quarter - Strategic Team Planning
End of the First Quarter - Strategic Team Planning End of the First Quarter - Strategic Team Planning
End of the First Quarter - Strategic Team Planning Jonathan Hartley
 
Sasima Aimwongsri - Update May 2016
Sasima Aimwongsri - Update May 2016Sasima Aimwongsri - Update May 2016
Sasima Aimwongsri - Update May 2016Sasima Aimwongsri
 
Assessment of performance for small business
Assessment  of performance for small businessAssessment  of performance for small business
Assessment of performance for small businessRamiro Mazzeo
 
Tom's Performance Review - August 2011
Tom's Performance Review - August 2011Tom's Performance Review - August 2011
Tom's Performance Review - August 2011Tom Crouch
 
Peter Balentine 2014 Appraisal
Peter Balentine 2014 AppraisalPeter Balentine 2014 Appraisal
Peter Balentine 2014 AppraisalPeter Balentine
 
FMP Event - How a facilities team can effectively evolve and support the goal...
FMP Event - How a facilities team can effectively evolve and support the goal...FMP Event - How a facilities team can effectively evolve and support the goal...
FMP Event - How a facilities team can effectively evolve and support the goal...Global Business Intel
 
PIP Guide 2008_7April08.ppt
PIP Guide 2008_7April08.pptPIP Guide 2008_7April08.ppt
PIP Guide 2008_7April08.pptPeopleSolv
 
iGIP Tier 1 Talent Capacity for Re-raising and up scaling
iGIP Tier 1 Talent Capacity for Re-raising and up scaling iGIP Tier 1 Talent Capacity for Re-raising and up scaling
iGIP Tier 1 Talent Capacity for Re-raising and up scaling AIESEC
 

Similar to Performance evaluation 2016 (20)

2014 YE PA
2014 YE PA2014 YE PA
2014 YE PA
 
PDR_2014_15_LPS_-_Mark_Everest
PDR_2014_15_LPS_-_Mark_EverestPDR_2014_15_LPS_-_Mark_Everest
PDR_2014_15_LPS_-_Mark_Everest
 
Storebrand Baltic darbuotojų pasitenkinimo tyrimas
Storebrand Baltic darbuotojų pasitenkinimo tyrimasStorebrand Baltic darbuotojų pasitenkinimo tyrimas
Storebrand Baltic darbuotojų pasitenkinimo tyrimas
 
Career Path Development Presentation
Career Path Development PresentationCareer Path Development Presentation
Career Path Development Presentation
 
OD_Strategy Review Meeting.pptx
OD_Strategy Review Meeting.pptxOD_Strategy Review Meeting.pptx
OD_Strategy Review Meeting.pptx
 
PDR 14-15 ME (half year)
PDR 14-15 ME (half year)PDR 14-15 ME (half year)
PDR 14-15 ME (half year)
 
2015 Annual Review
2015 Annual Review2015 Annual Review
2015 Annual Review
 
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
Annual Review - Jonathan Fuller - 2014
 
End of the First Quarter - Strategic Team Planning
End of the First Quarter - Strategic Team Planning End of the First Quarter - Strategic Team Planning
End of the First Quarter - Strategic Team Planning
 
Sasima Aimwongsri - Update May 2016
Sasima Aimwongsri - Update May 2016Sasima Aimwongsri - Update May 2016
Sasima Aimwongsri - Update May 2016
 
2.2 MFI Performance Management Process Part2
2.2 MFI Performance Management Process Part22.2 MFI Performance Management Process Part2
2.2 MFI Performance Management Process Part2
 
Assessment of performance for small business
Assessment  of performance for small businessAssessment  of performance for small business
Assessment of performance for small business
 
Make Time to Lead!
Make Time to Lead! Make Time to Lead!
Make Time to Lead!
 
Tom's Performance Review - August 2011
Tom's Performance Review - August 2011Tom's Performance Review - August 2011
Tom's Performance Review - August 2011
 
Resume - Florida
Resume - FloridaResume - Florida
Resume - Florida
 
Peter Balentine 2014 Appraisal
Peter Balentine 2014 AppraisalPeter Balentine 2014 Appraisal
Peter Balentine 2014 Appraisal
 
FMP Event - How a facilities team can effectively evolve and support the goal...
FMP Event - How a facilities team can effectively evolve and support the goal...FMP Event - How a facilities team can effectively evolve and support the goal...
FMP Event - How a facilities team can effectively evolve and support the goal...
 
Updated Profile
Updated ProfileUpdated Profile
Updated Profile
 
PIP Guide 2008_7April08.ppt
PIP Guide 2008_7April08.pptPIP Guide 2008_7April08.ppt
PIP Guide 2008_7April08.ppt
 
iGIP Tier 1 Talent Capacity for Re-raising and up scaling
iGIP Tier 1 Talent Capacity for Re-raising and up scaling iGIP Tier 1 Talent Capacity for Re-raising and up scaling
iGIP Tier 1 Talent Capacity for Re-raising and up scaling
 

Performance evaluation 2016

  • 1. Dolivet, Laurent Concentrix Annual Year Performance Evaluation 2016 1/1/16 to 8/31/16 Document Status Document shared with worker Evaluated By Eeles - Willettes, Victoria Employment Details Position Job Team Manager Location GB-BEL-LANYO-00 Department 0101-OPERATIONS-DIR Manager Eeles - Willettes, Victoria Overall Summary Worker Manager Overall Rating 4 - Exceeds Performance Comments Final year review Laurent took on board most points listed below and actively began to implement such points and learnings from first half of the year. Mid-Year Review Laurent comments: - Has enjoyed gaining better understanding on how the company works e.g. challenges / how we work with the client - found this exp. valuable - Has liked the improvements in Specialists engagement and liked working on the plan. - Proud of bringing survey monkey in to the wider team and mostly been able to follow priorities he set out in may for himself.
  • 2. Focuses on mind mapping - Has found the shift from Agent >TM most rewarding thing he has done in past year - getting the relationship right with his agents has be good whereby there is a sense of real mutual respect. - Liked his development so far and working with other TMs plus the client interaction he has - Likes initiating projects to benefit the contract - Talked about individuals and stages of performance management – feels comfortable putting people on PIPs because he has a good understanding of where they are - Main barrier is time constraints in the fast paced environment on the contract - Laurent recognises he has improvements to be made in terms of his own time management. Struggles with 1:1's formal meetings and performance catch-ups, yes there are times where these will be difficult to meet but something to work on for himself as well. Keen to continue using resources available to him e.g. ER to help close things off quicker. - Will also continue to look at his own working processes and their efficiency. Victoria Comments: • Agree with all points above as in discussion in meeting – it's been really exciting to watch
  • 3. Laurent's journey over the past few months as a new Manager on the contract. • I believe that Laurent meets most of the cultural attributes but most especially "We have high integrity with exemplary character" in contrast to what he thinks. I do believe although he may get things wrong sometimes, his intention is always very good and he has a lovely character that is both extremely professional and approachable. • I'd like Laurent to branch a little further away from the French Team and get to know how the other teams on the floor he is responsible for work a little better especially with Ramp upon us. • I think it is a fair point he makes in terms of his on time management – this always takes time when still adapting to the TM position so good that it is an area he recognises as one for continuous improvement. • Also – have set Laurent the challenge to take control of some tech situations when Supervisor not present to test him a little further and give him more experience in directing his own wider team of colleagues.
  • 4. • On the whole, very happy with Laurent and the progress he has made over the last few months and where he has taken his team and from with his initiatives and projects. Continue doing what he is doing because it's working. Also, to not be afraid to reach out and ask for support if needed or if he feels pressured by myself or other sources. • Finally, I would agree that Laurent is a "Solid Contributor" and standing at a performance ranking of 3. I believe the next 6 months where he gains further experience in the role and works on his development areas will see him surpass this level. Goals Worker Manager Comments 1:1 Completion - 100% Description 1:1 Completion - 100% Success Criteria Laurent became efficient in last quarter of year completing 1:1s in a timely fashion to an excellent standard.
  • 5. Start Date 5/1/16 Priority Medium Status Completed Completion Percentage 100 Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16 Level Category Other Related Link Comments Weight 25 % Worker Manager Comments Improved work in getting these closed of early following month in latter half of year. Stimulated great discussions with his agents and completed to high standard. Absence - 4% or less Description Absence - 4% or less Success Criteria Laurent achieved this metric and on the whole had excellent absence rates which were below 3% for the entire year. Start Date 5/1/16 Priority Medium Status Completed Completion Percentage 100 Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16 Level Category Revenue Related Link Comments Weight 25 %
  • 6. Worker Manager Comments Absence rate <3% for most of year - great work here. FCR - 88% Description FCR - 88% Success Criteria FCR improved in laster quarter of the year due to focus from Laurent on reducing small errors by his team and driving future needs. Start Date 5/1/16 Priority Medium Status Completed Completion Percentage 100 Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16 Level Category Other Related Link Comments Weight 25 % Worker Manager Comments Strong FCR that began to climb back up to target at end of year despite news of ramp-down. Personal Goal Description Laurent to go back to basics with his new team and drive overall team responsibility.
  • 7. Success Criteria Laurent did well in these area, driving new self- responsibility ideas back to his Specialists. Ramp-down of FR Market in December prevented continuation of this. Start Date 5/16/16 Priority Medium Status Completed Completion Percentage 100 Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16 Level Target Category Skill Related Link Comments MAY >Team adapt well to being managed more strongly by predecessor. Laurent works hard with individuals to show them what he expects from them but also what they can expect from him. He did encounter push back but has worked with these individuals by creating an Action Plan for all. JUNE >Continues with the same theme of managing strongly - creates visual tools for the Specialists so they can track their results and therefore have much more visibility of their overall performance. Still has a little bit of pushback from some team members but seeing this reduce a lot more. Also introduces the idea of managing Specialists behaviours and this will be embraced by the full team of managers in the near future. Weight 0 % Worker Manager Comments Laurent continued to develop as a stronger TM
  • 8. throughout the year and took personal commitments in his own one to ones to improve focus areas for himself e.g. quicker performance management and managing his own time management. SSAT - 61% Description FR SSAT - 61% Success Criteria SSAT remained static throughout the year and was one metric that made only marginal improvements. Partly due to market impacts but also poor efforts from team in regards to embracing quality expectations. Laurent managed this metric better towards the end of the quarter especially when the FR team split into Sales and Service so he could purely focus on Service. He began to introduce some creative elements which could have driven improvements if there had more time to complete and no ramp-down. Start Date 5/1/16 Priority Medium Status Completed Completion Percentage 100 Target Completion Date 7/31/16 Actual Completion Date 12/31/16 Level Target Category Customer satisfaction Related Link Comments Weight 25 % Worker Manager Comments Area that remained static throughout the year. Some improvements towards the end when ramp-down was announced.