LVHN has improved patient access and experience using bundled solutions. They analyzed patient survey results to identify solution bundles to implement countermeasures. This included standardizing provider templates, promoting the patient portal, utilizing clinical intelligence and optimizing the EMR. As a result, patient experience scores increased from 87.2% to 91% nationally, completed appointments increased 13%, and 111,001 patients were activated on the patient portal, the fastest rate of any Epic client. LVHN continues using a plan-do-study-act cycle to implement changes, measure metrics, and report progress.
2. ▪ Lehigh Valley Physician Group
▪ 1,450 employed providers
▪ 200 practices
▪ 2.5 million annual visits
▪ 3,500 colleagues
▪ Lehigh Valley Health Network
▪ Top 30 U.S. NWR, Top 50
Healthgrades, MSK Partner
▪ 8 Campuses, 18,000 employees
2
3. 3
• In 2015, a network wide goal was
established to improve access
and the patient experience overall
• A critical priority for the success
of our ACO, our PCMH model,
overall growth, clinical outcomes,
population health, coordination
and continuity of care, payer and
employer partnerships, colleague
satisfaction and the patient
experience/value-the Triple Aim-
Better Health, Better Care, Better
Cost
4. 4
• LVHN is improving
their patient access
and experience
challenges using a
bundled solution set
• By affinitizing patient
survey results with
selective solution
bundles
9. Project Name: Access Always - MPC
Process Owner: Joane Young Prepared by: Naser Chowdhury Contact: naser_m.Chowdhury@lvhn.org
Team Members:
Creation Date: 5/1/15 Revision Date: 5 Sept 2016Jean Daversa, Joan Young, Naser Chowdhury, Molly
Thompson, Dr. Michael Ehrig, Denise Hylton
Process
Step/Input
Potential
Failure
Mode
Potential
Effect(s) of
Failure
S
E
V
Potential Cause(s) /
Mechanism(s) of
Failure Input
Variables (X's)
O
C
C
Current
Process
Controls to
Prevent
Failure
Mode
Current
Process
Controls to
Detect
Failure
Mode
D
E
T
R
P
N
Recommended Actions
Person
Responsible
for Actions
Target
Complet
ion Date
Actions Taken
S
E
V
O
C
C
D
E
T
R
P
N
Scheduling Phones
a,. Patient
Satisfaction
b. Process
Efficiency
c. Volume &
Revenue
10
Ratio of personnel on
phone to volume of
calls
10 None None 8 800
1.Clinical air traffic controller
2.Auto attendant br. logic
3. E-Scheduling
4. Time study - Balance call
volume/cycle time/takt
time/FTE
Jean Daversa
& Joan Young
05/29/15
1. Phone tree standard
established
2. Observation data being
collected
10 6 3 180
Scheduling Phones
a,. Patient
Satisfaction
b. Process
Efficiency
c. Volume &
Revenue
10
Patients call about
medication refill
errors
8 None None 8 640
1. Advanced clinical
intelligence
2. EMR optimization
Jean
Daversa/
Joan Young
06/15/15
1.Current and future states:
mapping and standard work
created
2. RX refill policy to be attached
3. Approval needed by Dr Ehrig
10 5 3 150
Rooming
Arrived
Status
a,. Patient
Satisfaction
b. Process
Efficiency
c. Volume &
Revenue
10
Provider recognizes
patient has arrived to
practice but still
registering at front.
8 None None 6 480
1.Deconstruct provider
template
2.Advanced clinical
intelligence
3. EMR Optimization
4.Patient arrival time &
scripting work
Jean
Daversa/
Joan Young
06/15/15
1. Pilot underway with Dr. ;
initial results positive;
2.Standard work drafted and
will be communicated to
providers May 27
10 6 3 180
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
9
10. Countermeasures Implemented
1. Standard Phone Tree - Standard scripting implemented
2. Reduce Wrong Calls - Express Care line removed
3. Analysis of Calls – Volume, types, cycle time, takt time, TOD variations (time of day)
4. Staff Optimization – Peak staffing; addition of 2 front office staff + clinical air traffic controller
5. My LVHN Portal – Marketing and tracking
6. Training - Front line staff trained to optimize cycle time
7. Control Plan – Assigned process owner to maintain call metrics via visibility wall & daily huddle
10
39%
49%
46%
37%
22%
14%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Feb Mar April May June July
%Abandoned
Abandoned Calls
Target=9%
12. JOB AID: Deconstructing Provider Templates
Why? Resons for key points Who?
Primary Care:
Follow Standard Visit Types Established by
LVPG Leadership (Link to documentation)
LINK TO EPIC REPORT
Specialty Care:
1) Look at which visit types are being used
most often.
2) Remove visit types that are not frequently
used.
Discuss with practice leadership
what visit types are necessary for
scheduling accuracy. Create
standards on when each visit type
should be used.
Practice
Manager/Pract
ice Lead/
Office
Coordinator
1) Standardize length of each visit type
2) Standardize how/when visit types are
scheduled throughout the practice
3) Follow Standard Work for scheduling
patients with those established visit types.
INSERT EXAMPLE DOCUMENT LINK
Practice
Manager/Pract
ice Lead
1) Review the actual cycle time compared
to visit duration in EPIC DAR.
2) Visit duration includes the actual clinical
time a patient interacts with a provider.
INSERT LINK TO MPC EXAMPLE
Practice
Manager/Pract
ice Lead
1) Reduce blocks in schedule for
administration, meetings, and chart prep.
2)Track the number of open appointment
blocks being saved for acute appointmemts
INSERT SAME DAY ILL TRENDING
REPORT LINK (EA PUBLIC NCG DATA)
Utilize the Daily Management
System to review open slots on a
daily basis. Communicate open slots
with providers.
Practice
Manager/Phys
ican Lead
1) Open schedule templates to allow for any
visit type at any time, based on patient
preference
Practice
Manager/Pract
ice Lead
1) Compare contractual clinical time to what
is built in EPIC template
LINK TO DASHBAORD REPORT WHEN
AVAILABLE
Practice
Manager/Pract
ice Lead
Job Aid
Bundle: 1.0 Deconstructing Provider Templates
Countermeasure: 1.1 Streamline Visit Types
What? The logical steps to advance the work.
1.1.1 Optimize Number of Visit Types
1.1.2 Standardize Visit Types
Why
2.1.3 Balance Clinical FTE and NON Clinical
FTE time
Role
2.1.1 Analyze scheduling slots and blocks.
2.1.2 Reduce Provider Preferences
Variations in scheduling practice
create more burden for enterprise
scheduling.
Providers may request longer
durations for visits. Durations
should be close to actual time.
Multiple visit types create a more complicated template and barriers to finding an appointment.
ReasonsKey Points/Best Practice
Multiple visit types create a more
complicated template and barriers
to finding an appointment. Creates
a stremlined process for enterprise
scheduling.
Components
Provider preferences often create
scheduling blocks for certain types
of appointments. This blocks
patient access.
Block in schedules are direct
obstacles for patient access.
1.1.3 Analyze actual duration vs. slot duration
Alternative Solution(s)
How? Tips that will make or break, avoid injury, make it easier
12
13. Schedule Capacity - SAMPLE
Expected Clinical
Hours
Potential Capacity Epic Scheduled Hours
(OP Practice)
Cancel, Bumps, No-
Show Hours
Epic Completed
Hours (OP Practice)
Legend
Blue: Key columns
Green and Orange: Potential capacity
in schedule
13
1 2 3
A
B
Clinical FTE
cFTE
14. 14
Data Source: Epic April/May 2015
Check In - Check Out (Epic data)
Provider Encounter (est.)
16. 16
F&S History, Chief Complaint,
Clinical Interview
Allergies
Meds
ROS
Duplicate Clinical Intake
Written
Static
Questions
Verbal
Intake
Process
Clinical
Staff
Prov
Inter-
view
Dup
Data
Entry
MA’s LPN’s Physicians
Frequent Flyer
Chronic
Risk for CC
F&S Hist/Factors
Healthy
Patient Clinical Staff Provider
Waiting
Rooming
Provider
Care Planning
Discharge
Chief
Complaint
Drill Down
Critical
Thinking and
Follow Up
Prospective
Review of CI
Current State
Future
State eCare
Document
Critical
Thinking
Prospective
Review of CI
Future
State
Increased
Throughput
17. JOB AID: Advanced Clinical Intelligence
Why? Reasons for key points Who?
Every colleague has the ability to promote and
encourage patients to sign up for MyLVHN, our
patient portal. From patient scheduling, front-
desk registration, rooming, provider encounter
and check-out colleagues should discuss the
benefits such as prescription refill requests,
scheduling well check-ups, paying copays, etc.
A good opening to start the conversation with
patients is simply asking "Do you have a
smartphone or computer at home?" to identify if a
patient would have access to this tool.
All reference materials including FAQs, talking
points, best practice recommendations and
tipsheets are available via the Epic
Transformation Share Point Site
Understanding not every patient may be
comfortable with using technology, a
good opening question to start the
conversation can be "Do you have a
smartphone or computer at home?" This
sets up if MyLVHN is an option.
However, patients can also have a
"proxy" assigned in a caregiver/guardian
would like to help manage care for their
loved one via MyLVHN. If a patient still
refuses, respect their decision.
SharePoint site
● Utilize standard workflow for PEQs (PDF & Tip
sheets – Epic Transformation SharePoint)
For some practices, especially high
volume, there were some concerns for
the impact of PEQs on workflow. As
one pilot practice suggested, they
started with just piloting the tablet
usage in one of their many pods at
check-in initially to monitor the impact,
get patient/staff satisfaction and then
slowly rolled out to all areas of check-in.
Clinical
Support
Staff/Provid
ers/Patient
Service
Reps.
Allows patients to complete registration items in
advance of appointment.
What can they do:
– Verify and update demographics
– Verify and update meds and allergies
– Answer patient questionnaires
– Pay copayments
● Utilize standard workflow for PEQs (PDF & Tip
sheets – Epic Transformation SharePoint)
Again, not all patients may not welcome
signing up for MyLVHN. In the case
where a patient does not have MyLVHN,
in the future, a patient may use the
tablets currently used for PEQs to
complete aspect of registration/check-
in. Currently, if a patient does not have
MyLVHN, please follow your normal
instructions for patients to check-in.
Patient
Services
Representa
tives and
clinical
support
staff
Pilot Practices Only
• E-visits can replace in-person visits for
routine issues like pink eye or sinus
infections, freeing up your providers for
more complex appointments.
Role
Why
• Complete most of check-in process
from the convenience of home via
MyLVHN
• Save patients time when they arrive at
practice
• Extension to our expanded online
scheduling and questionnaire
capabilities
• Registration process benefits for
patient services representatives
• Better patient experience at the office
front desk
-Minimizes arrival “paperwork”
-Minimizes concerns about privacy
1.1.4 Utilize E-Visits (Pilot Practices only)
• Patient entered questionnaires allow
patients to answer questions prior to
their visit. This saves valuable charting
time for the clinical staff and provider,
who now only needs to verify the
answers, rather than enter the answers
at time of visit.
• Pilot practices have benefits from
decreasing average encounter times
from 3-12 minutes.
How? Tips that will make or break, avoid injury, make it easier
ReasonsKey Points/Best PracticeComponents
● Increase patient satisfaction:
allows providers to more frequently
interact with patients who are able to
communicate directly to their providers.
● Improve practice efficiencies:
since patients can view results online,
schedule appointments, message
providers, etc. it decreases the amounts
of calls to the practice and relieves time
for staff and providers to focus on direct
patient care appointment.
● Patient engagement: patients are
involved in their care outside the walls of
LVHN, messaging their care teams,
viewing their health histories and
results, and taking a proactive stance to
manage their health.
Alternative Solution(s)
1.1.3 Utilize eCheck-In
Job Aide
Bundle: 9.0 Advanced Clinical Intelligence
Countermeasure: 1.1
What? The logical steps to advance the work.
1.1.2 Utilize Patient Entered Questionnaires
(PEQs)
1.1.1 Promote use of MyLVHN
All
Colleagues
17
22. 22
• The overall
improvement in
patient experience at
LVHN’s Physician
Practice Group
increased from 87.2%
to 91.0% over a 12-
month period
• Equates to moving up
from 37% to 64%
national ranking
23. 23
• Improving patient
Experience goes
hand-in-hand with
patient Access
• LVHN increased
completed
appointments by 13%
over a 9-month
period
24. 24
Results Achieved - Operations Dashboard
▪ New Patient Lag-best practice is one decile improvement within one year
- Primary Care: 23% to 44% (two deciles)
- Specialty Care:
• 9 specialties moved at least two deciles
• 5 specialties moved at least one decile
▪ New Patient Visits-normalized for provider growth, increased 49% year over year
▪ Enterprise Visits scheduled-79,178
▪ Provider Schedule utilization-APC’s 68% to 76%, Phys. 87% to 92%
25. 25
▪ 111,001 patients activated on our patient portal in just
over one year (fastest rate of any Epic client)-presented
at Epic UGM Summer 2016
▪ In network referral capture rate reached 84%
▪ Outpatient practice visits (exclusive of new providers)
increased by 10.5% or 120,276 visits
▪ Same day block utilization-APC’s 33% to 63%,
Physicians from 64% to 74%
Results Achieved - Operations Dashboard
26. 26
Beg
QMAP Template/
Solution Bundles
Develop Action Plan/
Countermeasures
Define and Report
Improvement Metrics
Implement Changes
Report Progress/Did
the Metric Change?
1
4
3
2
1
5
Yes
No
1. Survey Results
2. VOC/QFD Analysis
3. ID Solution Bundles
4. ID Countermeasures Aligned
with Solution Bundles
5. Define Process Metrics for Each
Countermeasures
6. Develop Job-Aids for implementing
Countermeasures
Begin Next Cycle
Ops & Physician Practices Development Team
27. Action Plan LVPG Neurosurgery – CC/MH (Care Team - Schedule & Structure)
Item # Date Issue Action Who When Update
1 11.22.16
Inability to respond to patient concerns in a
timely manner
Increase training of MA team to better handle questions
which are typically forwarded to RN or provider.
Clinical Manager, RN 12/5/16
MAs are handling more calls and working to respond more quickly to clinical concerns.
Additionally, MAs are better utilizing APCs and RN to retrieve information rather than
waiting for answers.
Increase clinical support staff by adding an RN to assist in
call triage and clinical responses
Practice Leadership FY18 Approved for FY18. Recruiting will begin when budget is final. Target of start of FY18
2 11.22.16
Inconsistent rooming process causing less
efficient rooming and unnecessary delays.
Work with HR to fill all vacant MA positions. Increase speed
of interview and screening process to improve selection
process.
HR, Practice Leadership
Prior to formal
action plan All MA Positions currently filled. 2 newest MA’s in training process.
Return to more standardized clinical teams to ensure
improved efficiency
Clinical Manager, Practice Director
Upon full
compliment
of MA
support
With all MA positions filled we now focus on aligning MA, APC and surgeon to return to a
more care team focused approach. No longer a need to pull from one team to cover
another as all teams are currently fully staffed.
Effective Countermeasures:
Successfully recruited for all budgeted MA positions.
Approved for increase in clinical support to provide more timely
response times
Improved stability of MA assignments in alignment with provider
schedules
Barriers:
Limited pool of strong MA candidates
Difficulty creating consistent workflow without full compliment of
clinical support staff.
Increasing volume and demand with increase of surgeons