Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Se está descargando tu SlideShare. ×

Hcad 650 healthcare ethics

Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Anuncio
Próximo SlideShare
HCAD 650 Healthcare Ethics
HCAD 650 Healthcare Ethics
Cargando en…3
×

Eche un vistazo a continuación

1 de 25 Anuncio

Más Contenido Relacionado

Presentaciones para usted (20)

Similares a Hcad 650 healthcare ethics (20)

Anuncio

Más de Modupe Sarratt (20)

Más reciente (20)

Anuncio

Hcad 650 healthcare ethics

  1. 1. Modupe Sarratt Healthcare Legal Consultant Legal Aspects of Health Care Administration HCAD 650 Section 9043
  2. 2. Healthcare Ethics An Issue: a Case of Ethical Violation A Solution: a Training in Healthcare Ethics
  3. 3. CASE SCENARIO On July 15, 2013. Patient X started experiencing dizzy spells and sought the care of his New physician Dr. Y. On July 15, 2013. Dr. Y diagnosed patient X with Swan Syndrome and informed him that the standard course of treatment would consist of taking Pentamite for three weeks. Dr. Y made sure to discuss with the patient all the risks and benefits of the medication. After Dr. Y was done discussing the medication, the patient consented to taking the medication according to Dr. Y orders. The medication dosage instructions from the manufacturer stated to take one tablet a day for three weeks. .
  4. 4. ETHICAL VIOLATION Dr. Y misread the instructions and ordered Patient to take ten tablets of Pentamite once a day for three weeks. These instructions were giving orally and in writing. Patient followed the instructions given by the doctor and at the end of his second week he died due to a heart attack. The people who are affected by this would be: The patient’s family and Dr. Y’s family was both affected. Dr. Y prescribed the wrong medication dosage which lead to the death of patient X. Dr. Y is affected because she was the cause of a death due to medication negligent.
  5. 5. LEGALASSESSMENT This is a case of unintentional torts medical malpractice. Since the doctor failed in her duty to prescribe the correct medication dosage which was printed on the drug manufacturer’s warning label. So, responsibility for the death lies with the physician – not the drug manufacturer or Littleville Family Health Plan. The patient’s wife would have to prove that Dr. Y was negligent in prescribing the medication. The elements that need to be proven for his wife to win the lawsuit would be as follow: • What the medical standard of care was under the circumstances • How his doctor deviated from that standard • How his death was due to being prescribed the wrong dosage.
  6. 6. ETHICALASSESSMENT Health care ethics is a set of moral principles, beliefs and values that guide us in making choices about medical care. So, in other words, healthcare ethics is about our moral compass, our sense of right and wrong and our beliefs about the rights we possess along with the duties we might owe other people (Aronson, J. K., 2009). The ethical principle that is involved with this case would be autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence.
  7. 7. There are many dilemmas that can arise during healthcare crises which can be difficult to analyze for ethics. Petrini (2017) states that there are four references that can be utilize: 1) medical indication, 2) patient preference, 3) quality of life, and 4) contextual features. Ethics has to do with…. A set of concepts and principles that guide us in determining what behavior is right and wrong in a situation. • It should not be confused social conventions, religious beliefs or our own personal “feelings” unless we can show how they are related to a clearly set of defendable actions beyond a reasonable, that the action is appropriate to the situation. Leaders must have a very clear set of ethical principles for them to be able to do the right thing at the right time for the right reasons
  8. 8. Why is healthcare ethics important?  To meet patient expectations  To address the community's health needs  To enhance the quality of care  To foster professionalism  To enhance the organization's culture  To improve staff morale and performance  To enhance marketing and public relations  To enhance organization's compliance to regulatory standards  To decrease the impact of ethics conflicts on patients, families, staff, and organization (Nelson, n.d.).
  9. 9. Purpose of Healthcare Ethics • To address the emergence of a growing array of ethical dilemmas associated with medical procedure, treatment, and the increasing use of health information technology for patient health data breaching. • To protect patients confidentiality, privacy, and security while maintaining the transparency for coordination of services. • To stop data breaching that rises from expedient exposure of patient m protective medical and health record • To enhance resolving ethical problems or issues by individual cases as well as the ethical healthcare policies at the institutional level.
  10. 10. TRAINING IN HEALTHCARE ETHICS What Is Healthcare Ethics? Health care ethics (a/k/a "medical" ethics or "bioethics"), at its simplest, is a set of moral principles, beliefs and values that guide us in making choices about medical care. At the core of health care ethics is our sense of right and wrong and our beliefs about rights we possess and duties we owe others. Thinking carefully about the ethical aspects of health care decisions helps us make choices that are right, good, fair and just (Nelson, n.d.)
  11. 11. Two ethics that guide healthcare The two most important ethical systems to healthcare managers are: 1. Professional ethics: is the standards of ethical behavior governing individual behavior, particularly when that conduct directly relates to the role and identity of the healthcare executives 2. Clinical ethics: is the basic principles guiding the practice of medicine. They are the rules that all healthcare providers must follow to practice “ethically appropriate” care. .
  12. 12. The Four Principles of Healthcare Ethics in Medicine 1) Autonomy 2) Beneficence 3) Non-maleficence 4) Justice
  13. 13. AUTONOMY Autonomy refers to the capacity to think, decide and act on one's own free initiative. • Patients should be given enough information to come to their own decision regarding their care. • We also need to respect a competent adult making the “wrong” decision. • Honor the patients wishes for directive care to make their own decisions
  14. 14. Example of Autonomy is Patient Informed Consent No medical intervention done for any purpose - whether diagnostic, investigational, cosmetic, palliative, or therapeutic - should take place unless the patient has consented to it. Consent may be expressed or implied; the former (e.g., via a signed consent form) typically occurs in hospitals and relates to specific procedures. For routine procedures such as a blood pressure check, consent may be implied if the patient comes voluntarily to the doctor’s office for a check-up. For consent to be ‘informed’ the patient must receive a full description of the procedure, its risks and benefits, the prognosis with and without treatment, and alternative treatments.
  15. 15. Beneficence Beneficence refers to what is best for the patient. Beneficence implies consideration of the patient's pain; their physical and mental suffering; the risk of disability and death; and their quality of life. At times, beneficence can imply not intervening, if the benefit of therapy would be minimal. To be generous or doing good
  16. 16. Non-maleficence • Means Do no harm to a patient, either intentionally or indirectly • Is the moral principle in bioethics that all students are taught in school about using humans in clinical research and it is a fundamental principle of medicine throughout the world • the moral promise to abstain from doing harm. • Non-maleficence is the physician moral to gauge whether given an existing problem, it may be better not to do something, or even to do nothing, than to risk causing more harm than good.
  17. 17. Non-maleficence Core Value Non-maleficence is the moral conscience that one considers in violating professional obligation, organization policy, and the medical ethical standard for practicing medicine. Non-maleficence is a reminder in health care and medical care that the healthcare professionals and providers must consider the possible harm that any intervention might do. It can be use to invoked when debating the use of intervention that carries an obvious risk of harm or a less chance of benefit.
  18. 18. Justice Justice in principle: Equal access for equal treatment. To dictates that patients in similar situations should have access to the same care, and in allocating resources to one group should be the same measure that impact the choice on others. Justice in fairness: Patient should be treated with respects and dignity. Healthcare providers will make fair decision to emphasizes that patients are treated equally and that healthcare services is accessible to all patients.
  19. 19. The fundamental objectives of the healthcare management profession are to maintain or enhance the overall quality of life, dignity and well-being of every individual needing healthcare service and to create a more equitable, accessible, effective and efficient healthcare system. Dilemmas/Conflicts are often resolve because of the guidelines provided in the codes of ethics of medical associations or healthcare institutions, ethics training and implementation of ethical decision- making model.
  20. 20. According to Beauchamp and Childress (2001) and Gillon (1994), the role of ethics in healthcare industry is based on five basic values that all healthcare providers must adhere: Autonomy: Decision making may be different, and healthcare providers must respect their patients’ decisions. Beneficence: The best interest of the patient should always be the first priority of the healthcare provider. Non-maleficence: Meaning the healthcare provider will not take any actions to harm the patients. Justice/fairness: Healthcare providers will make fair decision to emphasizes that patients are treated equally and that healthcare services is accessible to all patients. Dignity/respect: Respect patient directiveness and directedness for how they want to be treated should be honor and respects .
  21. 21. Justice is related principle concerns confidentiality Confidentiality forms a cornerstone of the doctor-patient relationship, but it is increasingly hard to maintain with the growth of electronic data. In order to protect the trust between the healthcare provider and patient, personal medical information should not be released without the patient's consent. Like other ethical duties, however, confidentiality is not absolute. It can be necessary to override privacy in the interests of public health, as in contact tracing for partners of a patient with a sexually transmitted disease. Note that healthcare providers are legally obligated to report a possibly HIV infected patient to the public health authorities. However, this should always be done in a way that minimizes harm to the patient.
  22. 22. Questions for the Case Do you believe that the physician's actions can be justified in any way? Is there anything else that they could have done? Is it ever right to take away someone's autonomy? Would a court order make the physicians' decisions ethical? What would you do if you were one of the health care workers? How do we do the right thing as healthcare leaders?
  23. 23. Video for Reviewing Ethic Training
  24. 24. References Aronson, J. K. (2009). Medication errors: what they are, how they happen, and how to avoid them. Qjm, 102(8), 513-521. Beauchamp, T. & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (5th ed), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press Gillon, R. (1994). Principles of medical ethics. British Medical Journal, 309;184 Nelson, W. (n.d.). Vermont Ethics Network. http://www.vtethicsnetwork.org/ethics.html Petrini, C. (2017). Bioethics of Clinical Applications of Stem cells. International Journal Of Molecular Sciences, 18(4), doi:10.3390/ijms18040814

Notas del editor

  • The ETHICAL DILAMMA IN THE CASE
    Is the two unrelated possibilities, neither of which is acceptable or preferable
    Since not all situations for medical procedures or treatments require an informed consent it will be hard to prove that a signed consent could have saved John’s life.
    Unfortunately, medication is one does not require an informed consent unless the medication is part of a drug study.
    In a drug study such as a clinical trial require a consent for medical research under bioethics.
  • Ethical Principle as follows:
    Autonomy because John Parker was given information regarding his condition and what would be recommended as a treatment plan. During this time, he could make his own decision.
    Beneficence was picked because Dr. Green was striving to improve her patient’s health by doing the most good possible.
    Non-maleficence addresses doing no harm to the patient. At the time when Dr. Green prescribed the medication, the benefit out weighted the risk.

×