Anaysing The Ib Oral Assessment Criteria

•Download as PPT, PDF•

3 likes•4,328 views

The document outlines the criteria used to assess oral presentations on literary works in the IB program. Criteria B and C, which evaluate interpretation/response and presentation skills, are considered the most important as they are each worth 10 points. Criteria A focuses on demonstrating knowledge and contextualization of the work. Criteria D examines use of language and register. Successful presentations will offer a valid interpretation through analysis of literary techniques, demonstrate critical thinking, integrate precise references, have an effective structure and manner of presentation, and use appropriate vocabulary, tone and style.

Business News & Politics

Criteria A is worth 5 points ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Criteria B is worth 10 points ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Criteria C is worth 10 points ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Criteria D is worth 5 marks ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Analysis of the criteria ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Criteria A ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Criteria B ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Criteria C ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Criteria D ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Conclusion ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What's hot

3R's campaign. Project Assessment

CEDEC

Project "Your first CV". Assessment rubric.

CEDEC

Wr check

Amit Prakash Singh

Question 3

sandilands83

Pet & fce tips and tricks of the trade1

Gladys Ledwith

Eng 102H Rhetorical Problem Statement Assignment

Victoria Arthur

Graduation project oral presentation rubric

Chris Hitchens

Lesson 12: Introductions And Conclusions

bsimoneaux

Assessment rubric project "A TV program"

CEDEC

Scoring Rubric: Writing in Chinese

Lee Kerk

English Language Year 11 Top Tips

Laura Lithgow

4 ar0 02_msc_20140821

AnneRostom

Rubric for Chinese Dialogue

Lee Kerk

Assessing reading

mrssuarez

IGCSE Describe all (lwr set)

E3kings

English Literature Top Tips for Year 11

Laura Lithgow

Rubrica presentacion 1m

Ana María

Workplace Writing Chapter 1

jschultz

Constructive Response Chinese Writing Rubric

Lee Kerk

What's hot (19)

3R's campaign. Project Assessment

Project "Your first CV". Assessment rubric.

Wr check

Question 3

Pet & fce tips and tricks of the trade1

Eng 102H Rhetorical Problem Statement Assignment

Graduation project oral presentation rubric

Lesson 12: Introductions And Conclusions

Assessment rubric project "A TV program"

Scoring Rubric: Writing in Chinese

English Language Year 11 Top Tips

4 ar0 02_msc_20140821

Rubric for Chinese Dialogue

Assessing reading

IGCSE Describe all (lwr set)

English Literature Top Tips for Year 11

Rubrica presentacion 1m

Workplace Writing Chapter 1

Constructive Response Chinese Writing Rubric

Viewers also liked

Kkbi pronunciation

sk bukit garam

Ae101 oral presentation wt content copy

shyamsiva83

As undergraduate engineers it is inevitable that you will, during your undergraduate course, be required to deliver a presentation as part of an assessed module, for example, a group coursework assignment or final year project. You may be required to deliver a presentation as part of a recruitment exercise and it is likely that this skill will be required by future employers. This comprehensive handout provides information starting with the initial preparation that is required through to the day of your presentation. A checklist of important points is also included.

Oral Presentations

The Engineering Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning

Tips to get better marks in the oral exam

cristinaca

IOP

IB Screwed

Link to part 1 of Spoken interaction https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1RbChWPd58 Subscribe to my channel for more upcoming education videos. bit.ly/gohbangrui These slides are used to explain the idea of part 2 of Spoken Interaction of oral examination for O Level English Language Examination in Singapore. Students are introduced to the concept of Spoken Interaction which consists of 20 marks or 67% of the Oral Examination. Students are expected to carry out a conversation based on the given picture after given 10 minutes to practise reading as well as using the picture as stimulus. They are then expected to answer given prompts and provide well-developed responses related to the theme given in the picture. The video is divided into three sections. 1. Introduction 2. Why conversations break down (02:55) 3. 10 tips from examiners (09:48) 4. Practices (13:30) If you have any feedback, please comment and like it if you find it useful. Subscribe to my Youtube channel if you like what you are watching. Thank you

English Language - Spoken Interaction Part 2

Goh Bang Rui

Oral presentations

Gull Zareen Khan

Oral presentation

nagalaxmis

Oral Presentation Skills

mussawer KHAN

Oral presentation

HelenBickers

Viewers also liked (10)

Kkbi pronunciation

Ae101 oral presentation wt content copy

Oral Presentations

Tips to get better marks in the oral exam

IOP

English Language - Spoken Interaction Part 2

Oral presentations

Oral presentation

Oral Presentation Skills

Oral presentation

Similar to Anaysing The Ib Oral Assessment Criteria

The IOP criteria

IB Screwed

1 Graduate Program Rubric—MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Expectations: Student work at the graduate level is expected to focus on mastery of advanced discipline-specific frameworks, professional practices, and tools. Criteria Exemplary (A)) Accomplished (B) Proficient (C) Partially Proficient (D) Unacceptable (F) BUSINESS PROGRAM CONTENT PROFESSIONAL MASTERY AND KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION/MANAGEMENT Functional areas include, where applicable: Leadership, management, innovation, and teambuilding Operations and Marketing Finance Economics Qualitative and quantitative tools Technology and Internet Ethical and legal issues International issues Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. All requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates sound or accomplished mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Most requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates adequate or proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Many requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Some requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Few or no requirements of the assignment are included in the response. EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION Approach and Purpose, Organization, Style, Grammar, Mechanics, Format, Presentation and Delivery (where applicable) Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Demonstrates sound or accomplished application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound or accomplished expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present, but do not distract. Organization is apparent Demonstrates adequate or proficient application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates adequate ...

1 Graduate Program Rubric—MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATI.docx

aryan532920

English 2015 onwards presentation

Roding Valley High School

One of the risks you anticipated for the project was the late delivery of the prototype from the vendor. You adjusted your project schedule to minimize the impact of the risk, built in a penalty for late delivery, and created action plans in case the vendor delivered late. You also identified a risk with the vendor that they have very little technical depth; if the key engineer is not available to your project, the risk of a delay is even greater. You determined how you would monitor the vendor's performance and ensure a timely delivery. You took a very risk-averse, protective approach to the relationship, but now, as the project is progressing, you are wondering if there is something you could do with the vendor to actually benefit the project instead of just protecting it. Assignment Guidelines: Create a 1-page addendum to your risk management plan that describes how you will modify the plans or create new plans relative to that vendor to create an opportunity that will result in lower costs, earlier delivery, higher quality, or other positive impacts. Also, answer the following questions: What can you change in your plans to create an opportunity? What would that opportunity be? What is the probability that this opportunity could occur? What is the impact? What are the risks (adverse effect) that are introduced by this change in plans? How will you communicate this change to the vendor? Your submitted assignment ( 175 points ) must include the following: A compiled risk management plan with your 1-page addendum in it A 2 to 3 page document answering the questions above Submit both files as 1 zipped document to the drop box Undergraduate Program Rubric—BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and ASSOCIATE OF ARTS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Expectations: Student work at the undergraduate level is expected to focus on a broad overview of the academic discipline, along with—where appropriate—basic theoretical frameworks of professional practices and familiarity with discipline-specific tools and their application. Criteria Exemplary (A)) Accomplished (B) Proficient (C) Partially Proficient (D) Unacceptable (F) BUSINESS PROGRAM CONTENT Functional areas include, where applicable: Leadership, management, innovation, and teambuilding Operations and Marketing Finance Economics Qualitative and quantitative tools Technology and Internet Ethical and legal issues International issues Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. All requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates sound or accomplished mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Most requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates adequate or proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and th.

One of the risks you anticipated for the project was the late delive.docx

MadonnaJacobsenfp

Bachelors Program Rubric— Bachelors of Healthcare Management Expectations: Student work at the Bachelor’s level is expected to focus on mastery of advanced discipline-specific frameworks, professional practices, and tools. Criteria Exemplary (A) Accomplished (B) Proficient (C) Partially Proficient (D) Unacceptable (F) HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT CONTENT PROFESSIONAL MASTERY AND KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Functional areas include, where applicable: Legal, financial, and labor considerations, applications of information technology such as EMRs (EHRs), healthcare system management, international healthcare delivery system descriptions and comparisons, and healthcare (HCO) management and administration. Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. All requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates sound or accomplished mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Most requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates adequate or proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Many requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Some requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Few or no requirements of the assignment are included in the response. EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION Approach and Purpose, Organization, Style, Grammar, Mechanics, Format, Presentation and Delivery (where applicable) Written communication should be logical and subject specific. Style of the work should be professional in tone using an academic format (e.g. journal style, APA). Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment (APA format). Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). Demonstrates sound or accomplished application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound or accomplished expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors ...

Bachelors Program Rubric— Bachelors of Healthcare Management.docx

rock73

W7 siitp portfolio guidelines

Gareth Hill

GCSE Drama C1 Devising - portfolio guidelines

Gareth Hill

Page 1 of 2 C M C 1 0 1 E s s a y r u b r i c 3 0 % o f f i n a l g r a d e Criteria HD 85-100% D 75-84% C 65-74% P 50-64% F 0-49% Weighting 25-30 21-24 18-20 15-17 <15 grade Research Evidence of broad, systematic and creative research. Selection of data goes beyond the mainstream literature/tutorial/textbook. Evidence of controlled and systematic research. Demonstrates selection of credible, relevant data from quality literature/tutorial notes/textbooks. Evidence of good research skills. Information is gathered from a good range of electronic and non- electronic sources. Research conducted demonstrates an attempt to collect credible and/or relevant data. Information is gathered from a limited range of electronic and non- electronic sources. Limited research skills demonstrated. Poorly selected data. /20 Weighting 10 8-9 6-7 5 <5 grade Referencing Consistent and accurate referencing used throughout, showing ability to reference a range of source types. Ideas and words of others acknowledged. Mostly accurate referencing demonstrates an ability to reference a variety of source types. Ideas and words of others are acknowledged Referencing is at times inconsistent or demonstrates ability to reference only some source types accurately Words, but not always the ideas of others are acknowledged. Overuse of another’s words or ideas which may also inconsistently or inaccurately referenced. Failure to acknowledge the words and ideas of others. Plagiarised: reads like a “data dump” from other sources. /10 Weighting 18-20 16-17 13-15 10-12 <10 grade Format, structure, expression Clear and fluent expression indicates the report has been successfully edited and proofread before submission. Correct form for text type: (headings, indentations etc.); spelling, punctuation error- free. Mastery of sentence patterns demonstrated; may have occasional grammatical errors on the sentence level suggesting that some closer proofreading was needed Form, punctuation, and spelling mostly error free. Sentence patterns most often successfully used; several grammatical errors at the sentence level. Occasional errors in, form, punctuation, and spelling; sometimes distracting. Some additional editing and proofreading is warranted. Clear and fluent expression indicates the report has been successfully edited and proofread before submission. Correct form for text type: (headings, indentations etc.); spelling, punctuation error- free. Run on sentences, attempts at simple sentences often not successful; many errors in sentence structures detract from communication purpose. Form, punctuation and spelling, errors throughout. /20 Weighting 25-30 21-24 18-20 15-17 <15 grade Page 2 of 2 Content Clear, controlled and focussed dire.

Page 1 of 2 C M C 1 0 1 E s s a y r u b r i c 3 0 .docx

alfred4lewis58146

Building on your initial user interface (UI) design mock-up of the organization’s program UI, the interface now needs to present more information to the user. Complete the following for this assignment: The interface should present information visually with icons or graphics and text regarding critical issues related to the system, such as the following: New orders Change in employee status Updated pictures New products or services offered Describe techniques for developing prototypes of user interfaces. You must add at least 5 critical issue UI design items to your interface. Remember to ensure that these are easily understood by users. Submit a screenshot in Word or another functional application. Describe the items that you added to your interface design. Be specific with your descriptions, and identify the particular design features along with an explanation of why they are added in the way that they were. Please submit your assignment. This assignment will also be assessed using the additional criteria provided here. For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials. Grading Rubric Project Criteria Exceeds: 90%–100% Very Good: 80%–89% Meets: 70%–79% Needs Improvement: Below 70% Content (75%) Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment. Effective Communication (10%) Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates very good written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present, but do not distract from the message. Organization is apparent and mostly clear. Format is appropriate to assignment, but not entirely consistent. The writing was of collegiate level with two or less errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates acceptable written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates reasonable expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Sometimes, audience is addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the ...

Building on your initial user interface (UI) design mock-up of the o

jenkinsmandie

1 Undergraduate Program Rubric—BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and ASSOCIATE OF ARTS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Expectations: Student work at the undergraduate level is expected to focus on a broad overview of the academic discipline, along with—where appropriate—basic theoretical frameworks of professional practices and familiarity with discipline-specific tools and their application. Criteria Exemplary (A)) Accomplished (B) Proficient (C) Partially Proficient (D) Unacceptable (F) Functional areas include, where applicable: BUSINESS PROGRAM CONTENT Leadership, management, innovation, and teambuilding Operations and Marketing Finance Economics Qualitative and quantitative tools Technology and Internet Ethical and legal issues International issues Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. All requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates sound or accomplished mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Most requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates adequate or proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Many requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Some requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Few or no requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Approach and Purpose, Organization, Style, Grammar, Mechanics, Format, Presentation and Delivery (where applicable) EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Demonstrates sound or accomplished application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound or accomplished expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present, ...

1 Undergraduate Program Rubric—BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMIN.docx

joyjonna282

ADVT7512 Ad Review Report Semester 1, 2020 - Marking Rubric Criterion Unsatisfactory <3 Fail 0-49% Satisfactory 4 Pass 50-64% Good 5 Credit 65-74% Very Good 6 Distinction 75-84% Excellent 7 High Distinction 85-100% Background (5%) Provided a specific and well-focused background of the Ad. Little or no background with insufficient discussion of the ad and a lack of clarity about the direction for the review. A basic and broadly written background of the ad or the direction for the review, but which needs more specific insight and lacks engagement.. A broadly written background of the ad and direction for the review lacking in impact. A succinctly written background and direction for the review with impact. A succinct yet comprehensively written background for the ad and direction for the review, engaging the reader from the outset. Ad Analysis (20%) Analysed the main issues in detail. Ascertained whether the Ad works, what works and why and what does not work and why not. Your analysis of the key issues is largely superficial and shows a lack of commitment to deeper critical analysis. You must pursue your ideas with more determination and care. Your work evidences a developing capacity for critical thinking and an understanding of the importance of pursuing your ideas. You have provided a convincing analysis of the key issues. Your work evidences a developed capacity for critical thinking and a commitment to pursuing your ideas fully. You have provided a convincing analysis of the key issues. Your work evidences a well- developed capacity for critical thinking and an impressive commitment to intellectual inquiry. You have pursued your ideas and provided a detailed analysis of the key issues. Your work evidences a highly developed capacity for critical thinking and an outstanding commitment to intellectual inquiry. You have pursued your ideas with determination and provided a detailed and precise analysis of the key issues. Target Audience (15%) Identified, evaluated and discussed the audience. Ascertained whether the Ad was appropriate for the audience. Your identification of and evaluation of the audience is superficial/erroneous, and fails to identify convincing arguments regarding appropriateness of the ad for the audience. Your identification of and evaluation of the audience and your arguments regarding appropriateness of the ad for the audience are convincing. Your identification of and evaluation of the audience and your arguments regarding appropriateness of the ad for the audience are thoughtful. Your identification of and evaluation of the audience and your arguments regarding appropriateness of the ad for the audience are imaginative and authentic and reflects very good understanding of the nuances. Your identification of and evaluation of the audience a ...

ADVT7512 Ad Review Report Semester 1, 2020 - Marking Rubric

saundersabelard

In a paper, discuss the implications related to risk with patients, staff, and organizations with a focus on mitigating such risk through management practices. Include the following: Interpret an existing operation, or identify typical issues you might find in a health care organization, with indications of the potential risk. Describe methods for monitoring and analyzing identified potential areas of risk. Document 5 key strategies for addressing identified potential areas of risk and how they will be implemented. Document how you will assess the value of the programs implemented in reducing risk. The paper should be 4–6 pages, excluding cover page, abstract page, and reference page. Students need to support their work with at least 4 academic or professional peer-reviewed sources published within the past 5 years. For a resource guide on using the online library to search for references, click here . Please submit your assignment. Your assignment will be graded in accordance with the following criteria. Click here to view the grading rubric. Individual Project Rubric: Grading Criteria Percentage Deliverable requirements addressed; understanding of material and writer's message and intent are clear 35% Scholarly research which supports writer's position properly acknowledged and cited direct quotations may not exceed 10% of the word count of the body of the assignment deliverable (excluded title page, abstract or table of contents if used, tables, exhibits, appendices, and reference page(s). Inclusion of plagiarized content will not be tolerated and may result in adverse academic consequences. 20% Critical thinking: position is well justified; logical flow; examples 20% Structure: includes introduction and conclusion; proper paragraph format and reads as a polished, academic paper or professional presentation, as appropriate for the required assignment deliverable 10% Mechanical - no spelling, grammatical or punctuation errors 10% APA - deliverable is cited properly according to the APA Publication Manual (6th Ed.) 5% Bachelors Program Rubric — Bachelors of Healthcare Management Expectations: Student work at the Bachelor’s level is expected to focus on mastery of advanced discipline-specific frameworks, professional practices, and tools. Criteria Exemplary (A) Accomplished (B) Proficient (C) Partially Proficient (D) Unacceptable (F) HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT CONTENT PROFESSIONAL MASTERY AND KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Functional areas include, where applicable: Legal, financial, and labor considerations, applications of information technology such as EMRs (EHRs), healthcare system management, international healthcare delivery system descriptions and comparisons, and healthcare (HCO) management and administration. Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. All requirements of the assignment are included in the resp.

In a paper, discuss the implications related to risk with patients, .docx

gordienaysmythe

Requirements for Sociology 4 chapters of the sociology book will be summarized in individual power point presentations and will answer the following questions. Making a total of 4 presentations to submit this term. The Power points for each chapter will answer the following question as well as provide a brief summary of the chapter. 1. What stood out most and why? 2. What confused you most and why? 3. What made you angry or bored or not in agreement with and why? The format for the chapter power point presentations is the 10/20/30 rule 10 slides – 15 maximum 20 minutes maximum for reader/viewer to go through presentation 30 font The submission will include a 1-2 page max reflection paper on the learning submitted from the chapters and how the learning applies to the world of business. No APA style required for the paper. 1 Undergraduate Program Rubric—BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and ASSOCIATE OF ARTS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Expectations: Student work at the undergraduate level is expected to focus on a broad overview of the academic discipline, along with—where appropriate—basic theoretical frameworks of professional practices and familiarity with discipline-specific tools and their application. Criteria Exemplary (A)) Accomplished (B) Proficient (C) Partially Proficient (D) Unacceptable (F) Functional areas include, where applicable: BUSINESS PROGRAM CONTENT Leadership, management, innovation, and teambuilding Operations and Marketing Finance Economics Qualitative and quantitative tools Technology and Internet Ethical and legal issues International issues Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. All requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates sound or accomplished mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Most requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates adequate or proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Many requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Some requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content, appropriate to the assignment and the relevant terminal course objectives and program learning outcomes. Few or no requirements of the assignment are included in the response. Approach and Purpose, Organization, Style, Grammar, Mechanics, Format, Presentation and Delivery (where applicable) EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATIO ...

Requirements for Sociology4 chapters of the sociology book wil.docx

debishakespeare

California State University, Chico • College of Business Writing Rubric- Guidelines for Assessment* Writing Trait Unacceptable in Market Communications Acceptable-Good Excellent Organization of Ideas and Content (OIC) Writing is not concise and has a tendency to ramble. No clear direction in the writing. Lack of focus and organization interfere with communication and understanding. If appropriate: Lacks a clear introduction and conclusion. Needs work F D- D D+ Writing could be a bit more concise. Focus and direction of writing is acceptable, but could use a little work. Organization doesn’t interfere with communication and understanding, but could use a bit more attention. If appropriate: Introduction and conclusion are acceptable, but could use a little work. C- C C+ B- B Writing is concise. Information is presented in a manner which makes it extremely easy for the reader to understand the points being made. Ideas are clearly stated. Focus and direction of the writing are extremely clear. If appropriate: Compelling introduction, informative body with details, and effective conclusion. B+ A- A Sentence Structure (SS) Poorly developed sentences. Sentences don’t express ideas well. Sentence structure is sometimes so poor that it makes reading and understanding difficult. Sentences are awkward, rambling and would sound strange if read out loud. Needs work. F D- D D+ Sentences usually flow well while at other times are awkward due to lack of conciseness, wordiness, or lack of appropriate structure. Overall, most sentences clearly express ideas. C- C C+ B- B Extremely well developed sentences. Sentences flow well. Sentences clearly express ideas. Sentences are concise. B+ A- A Paragraph Structure (PS) Sentences within a paragraph are unrelated. No clear direction within the paragraph. Connections between paragraphs are confusing. Needs work. F D- D D+ Similar to Superior, but a few paragraphs need improvements. Most sentences within a paragraph build upon or relate to a single issue. A few paragraphs lack good lead-in or transitional sentences. C- C C+ B- B Organization of paragraphs enhances readability. Sentences within paragraph all build upon or relate to a single issue. Logical flow. Good lead-in sentence for each paragraph. Good transition between paragraphs. B+ A- A Word Choice and Tone (WCT) Writer struggles to use appropriate vocabulary. Language is vague. Words are used incorrectly. Tone and word choice are inappropriate for intended audience. Inappropriate use of “casual language” and Writer uses familiar words well and occasionally makes more sophisticated word choices. Tone and word choice are.

California State University, Chico • College of Business W.docx

hacksoni

ENG 115 ASSIGNMENT 2: INFORMATIVE ESSAY Draft due Week 5 and worth 50 points Revision due Week 7 and worth 150 points Have you ever needed just the facts? At times a formal, objectively written approach is more appropriate or even critical for establishing credibility so that your audience will listen and get informed! The key to informative writing is making the shift from personal opinion to objective facts. This assignment will provide you with the important opportunity to practice making this shift to a style that is required in so many workplaces and throughout your academic program. For this assignment, you will write an informative essay on the topic you have previously chosen. You will need to identify a problem, need, or process related to your topic. Then you will inform your audience and provide supporting evidence from a minimum of two credible sources that have been provided in the webtext. Keep in mind, you will continue to use the standard essay format: Introduction paragraph with a thesis statement, body paragraphs that specifically support the points in your thesis statement, and a conclusion paragraph. INSTRUCTIONS: Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following: 1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper. a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their) b. Do you sound impartial, informative/explanatory, and professional? How do you want your reader to feel? (trust, smarter/informed) c. Is the tone formal and factual? 2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences. a. Does my introduction get the reader’s attention by using an intriguing statistic, quote, question, or scenario? b. Does my introduction explain the context and state the importance of the problem/issue? c. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that can be debated from a different perspective? d. Is your thesis statement clear and concise? 3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggested that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences. a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics? b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have? c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation? 4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper. a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance? b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your thesis statement? 5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences. a. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way? b. Did you.

ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 2 INFORMATIVE ESSAYDraft due Week 5 and.docx

christinemaritza

Definition of MLA Format The MLA format is a series of rules and guidelines for writers that have been used since 1985. The writing style prevents plagiarism and allows readers to easily access the sources cited by authors. Because the MLA writing style does not accommodate scientific and technical publications, it is primarily used in the humanities with subjects including the arts, media, literature, and social science. MLA Format Guidelines · Double-space the text of your paper. · 1 inch margins · Font size should be 12 pt. · Choose a legible font such as Arial, Lucida, or Times New Roman. · Leave only one space after periods or other punctuation marks. · First line of paragraphs should be indented one half-inch from the left margin. · Page number in upper right-hand corner. MLA Format example of a first page. Theatre 383 - A WELL WRITTEN PLAY CRITIQUE A play critique is an evaluation of a performance. Using the vocabulary developed in your course of study, construct strong statements of observation and support them with specific details. All work is to be original to you and a result of your viewing the live performance you are writing about. Reference the MLA and College Level Expectations handouts available in our TITANium course page. Please use the Writing Center on campus if you need assistance to achieve college level success. Third person is used when a degree of objectivity is intended and is used in academic documents such as theatrical reviews. The third person perspective directs the reader’s attention to the subject being presented and discussed. Third person personal pronouns include he, she, it, they, him, her, them, his, her, hers, its, their and theirs. There is no place for “I” in this type of academic document. Each of the theatrical elements you will analyze needs to be approached in three different steps. DESCRIBE what you saw in detail. Make the reader see what you saw. Be specific and thorough. Use adjectives and adverbs that paint a picture for the reader. ANALYZE and reach conclusions as to what the director or designer was trying to achieve. Why did they design the movements, sets, lights, sound effects, make-up or costumes that way? What emotions were they trying to make the audience feel? JUDGE how effective their efforts were. Do not be vague. (ie. Don’t say things like: “It was awesome.” They were appropriate to the time.” “It was good.” Arghh….) Give a diplomatic, honest opinion. Give credit for positives to the individual. If you have something negative to say, do so constructively. IF YOU CANNOT SUPPORT YOUR OPINION WITH SPECIFIC DETAILS FROM THE SHOW TO ILLUSTRATE YOUR POINTS, THEN YOUR JUDGEMENTS – POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE – ARE NOT REALLY WORTH MENTIONING. WRITE A STANDARD FIVE PARAGRAPH CRITIQUE. INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH (include answers to these questions) What is the title of the show? Who wrote it? Where was the show performed? Who directed it? When does the.

Definition of MLA FormatThe MLA format is a series of rules an.docx

simonithomas47935

Assignment 3D. Critical reflection journal Learning outcomes This assessment is designed to make the students write an in depth reflective research journal about two to three selected diversity themes from the course. The reflective research learning journal should exhibit student’s reflections, critical analysis and explanations around their own reactions and opinions as well as learning outcomes from the themes selected. Objective Students will write a reflective research journal around two to three themes from the course. Task Description Students will select two to three themes related to managing diversity that has engaged the student at a personal level. Themes can be: · a specific diversity dimension with which the student has had experience with in work or personal life; · an overarching concept related to managing diversity (for instance equity, stereotypes, acculturation or other managing diversity concepts/theories) that the student can relate some personal or professional experience with; · a particular event/experience from personal or professional life which can be explained using concepts or theories from the Managing Diversity course. The reflective research journal should be written following the DIEP strategy as described in assessment 3C and in RMIT note posted on Blackboard): D – Describe objectively what was experienced. I - Interpret the experience/events/themes. E – Evaluate the effectiveness and usefulness of the experience. P – Plan how this reflective activity will be useful to you. We would expect that you use more At least five academic references from the reading list must be used. The written expression can be personal, but needs to exhibit use of academic concepts and references. The student can decide a structure for the journal ensuring that the DIEP elements are covered. Word Limit : 1500 words +- 10% (Exclusive of references) Weighting : 25% Due Date and Submission : Tuesday 9th June at Midnight Through Turnitin Assessment Criteria : See attached rubric. 1. Demonstrated ability to reflect and critically analyse and explain the themes/experiences selected, applying theories, concepts and vocabulary from the course.Demonstrated ability to select and clearly describe themes/events relevant for managing diversity, the context they appear in and the students reaction to these themes/events 2. Demonstrated ability to reflect and critically analyse themes/events applying theories, concepts and vocabulary from the course to explain equity and diversity issues. 3. Clearly identify learning outcomes and usefulness of knowledge gained 4. Written expression, structure and use of academic sources 5. Ability to use and reference academic sources 6. Clarity of expression and structure of written work. Marking Rubric for Reflective Research Journal Criteria Fail (<2.5) poor Pass/Credit (2.5-4)good Distinction/High Dist. (>4) very good Marks Demonstrated ability to select and clearly describe the ...

Assignment 3D. Critical reflection journal Learning outcom.docx

rock73

1 Undergraduate Program Rubric—BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMIN.docx

ShiraPrater50

Mobility can have either a positive or negative impact on our patient's lives. You are the nurse of an older adult who is being discharged and need to provide education for the promotion of safe ambulation. How can mobility promote a healthy lifestyle? Remember that your posts must exhibit appropriate writing mechanics including using proper language, cordiality, and proper grammar and punctuation. If you refer to any outside sources or reference materials, be sure to provide proper attribution and/or citation. Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University Business Skills 1 (BUS 161) Personal Development Plan Due Date Week 6 (12/1/2023) Type Individual assignment Weight This assignment is worth 5% of your total grade Length NA Format Word doc, Times New Roman, font size 12 and a line spacing of 1.5, Saved and submitted in PDF format. Each student is required to write her Personal Development Plan centered on short-term or long- term development. Fill in the following schedule. Write 1 competency to be developed in the short-term or in the long-term. Make sure everything is specific, clear, and complete. Time Scale Proposed Development Action(s) Rationale Competency to be developed Specific number of months Action: Name: Date: Location: Organizer: Total hours: - Definition with citation (using indirect or external voice) - Personal experience - Academic goal Competency name (selected from slide 9) Select if it is: Short-Term Development Or Long-Term Development Important Notes: 1. You can select either a course in Arabic or English for the proposed action. However, you are ONLY allowed to use English sources (including websites) for the competency definition in the rationale section. 2. You must paraphrase the competency definition in the rational part. You are NOT allowed to quote directly from the original source. 3. You are allowed to use either the indirect voice or external voice, when providing the definition of the competency. 4. You need to include both the in-text citation and the REFERENCE of the competency definition. 5. You will be working on developing this competency in your reflection. Guidelines: - Font Type: Time New Roman. - Font Size: 12 - Consider the following: coherence and relevance of ideas and style, grammatical accuracy, appropriate words, and spelling. - Include a cover page that contains your name – student ID – section # - instructor name - assignment name - submission date. - Combine the PDP with the Reflection and save them in one PDF file. - Name the file with your full name. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Business Skills 1 (BUS 161) Reflective Journal Writing Due Date Week 6 (12/1/2023) Type Individual assignment Weight This assignment is worth 5% of your total grade Length Between 550 - 600 words in length Format Word doc, Times New Roman, font size 12 and a line .

Mobility can have either a positive or negative impact on our pati.docx

pauline234567

Individual Oral Rubric (2021).pdf

SusanaMatthews

Similar to Anaysing The Ib Oral Assessment Criteria (20)