1. Design and Optimization of Net Zero
Energy Building
NAME: ALI MUHAMMAD
REG#: 3119999051
MAJOR: POWER ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING THERMOPHYSICS
SUPERVISOR: HAIHU LIU
2. Self Introduction:
MY SELF IS MUHAMMAD ALI AND I AM FROM LAHORE PAKISTAN
FAMOUS FOR ITS HISTORICAL PLACES AND DELICIOUS COSINES.
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
MASTER STUDENT : XIAN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (CONT)
BACHELORS: UNIVERSITY OF LAHORE
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
• 2 YEAR AS MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR IN MANAMA PACKAGING
INDUSTRY KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN
• 1 YEAR AS HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY AT LAHORE POLY TECHNIQUE INSTITUTE LAHORE
HOBBIES:
• TRAVELLING AND TOURISM
• PARTICIPATING IN SPORT ACTIVITIES
3. Introduction to topic:
ZERO ENERGY BUILDING (ZEB):
AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT BUILDING WHERE, ON
A SOURCE ENERGY BASIS, THE ACTUAL
ANNUAL DELIVERED ENERGY IS LESS THAN OR
EQUAL TO THE ON-SITE RENEWABLE
EXPORTED ENERGY.
ACCORDING TO WORLD GREEN BUILDING
COUNCIL:
THE DEFINITION OF A NET ZERO CARBON
BUILDING IS A BUILDING THAT IS HIGHLY
ENERGY EFFICIENT AND FULLY POWERED
FROM ON-SITE AND/OR OFF-SITE RENEWABLE
ENERGY SOURCES.
5. Motivation:
Energy consumption of residential and commercial buildings has increased between
20% and 40% in developed countries (Pérez-Lombard et al. 2008).
Energy use in residential buildings of different countries ranges between 16% and 50%,
and the worldwide average energy consumption of the residential sector accounts for
about 30% of the total energy usage (Meyers et al. 2003; Morelli 2001; Boardman 2004;
Ueno et al. 2006; Araujo et al. 2001; Kamal 1997; Lenzena et al. 2006).
In China, it is estimated that buildings stocks will account for about 35% of total energy
consumption in 2020, 65% of this being consumed by the heating, ventilation, and air-
conditioning (HVAC) system (Lam et al. 2008).
6. Motivation:
The cooling consumption of residential buildings is influenced by many factors,
including building envelope, building equipment, climate, and so on. Amongst these
factors, the type of air-conditioning (AC) system plays an important role in the building
consumption and system efficiency (Peng et al. 2012).
Buildings together contribute to over a third of world’s energy consumption and carbon
emissions (Pan and Garmston, 2012).
Buildings in Hong Kong account for almost 92% of electricity use and 60% of
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the city (EMSD, 2014).
7. Problem Statement:
The project is proposed to design and
optimize Net Zero Energy Building in Lahore
(Pakistan) at severe hot humid environment
to reduce its energy demand for heating and
cooling by using passive cooling
techniques.to optimize building energy
performance by reducing is running cost.
8. Literature Review:
Within an urbanizing environment where 66% of the world’s population is projected to be
urban by 2050 [1].
the need to reduce global CO2 emissions is becoming apparent. Currently in the EU nearly
40% of final energy consumption and 36% of greenhouse gas emissions are attributed to
buildings [2].
In China, it is estimated that buildings stocks will account for about 35% of total energy
consumption in 2020, 65% of this being consumed by the heating, ventilation, and air-
conditioning (HVAC) system.
In order to achieve the EU’s 2020 targets in the EPBD Directive, but also to meet the longer
term objectives of the climate strategy of the low carbon economy roadmap 2050.[3]
optimized strategies in designing nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) and high-rise
nZEBs need to be developed. A zero energy building refers to a building that produces as
much energy as it consumes in a defined period. [3].
9. Literature Review:
Aimed to minimize heating and cooling loads of an office space in Seoul using optimization
driven by NSGA-II. The following parameters were investigated: floor area, building
orientation, ceiling height, aspect ratio, plenum height, window-to-wall ratio, wall insulation,
window insulation, and solar heat gain coefficient and air leakage.. [4]
Aim in the study of was to find the optimal solution for a residential building in Chongqing,
China, with regards to energy consumption and indoor thermal comfort. The optimization
was driven with NSGA-II and EnergyPlus was used for energy simulations. [5]
10. Explored the trade-off between cost and carbon emissions, for the design of a modular
hotel unit. An optimization was applied for various climate types. Investigated
variables were envelope design parameters, different HVAC systems and energy
generation from PV and solar thermal panels installed on the roof. [6]
The need of optimization for improving building and HVAC system performance was
underlined by In his optimization for a school building in Trondheim, Norway he
explored both passive and active design aspects. The later entailed night setback
temperatures. [7]
Review on optimization studies:
11. Review on ZEB strategies:
In 1996 Lysen [8] presented a stepped environmental design approach for energy called the
Trias Energica. The 1st step aimed to prevent the use of energy. The 2nd step refers to using
renewable energy sources as widely as possible. The last step relates to the remaining energy
demand and entails using fossil fuels as efficiently and cleanly as possible [9].
Another stepped strategy is The New Stepped Strategy that eliminates the use of fossil fuels
in exchange of the exploitation of waste flows [10]. The 1st step includes passive strategies
such as shading or improved insulation of the building envelope. The 2nd step includes
reusing and recycling waste flows, like exchanging heat between different buildings or
functions.
The 3rd step refers to producing energy from active systems like PV panels or solar collectors.
With regard to the Climate Responsive Design approach, according to Looman [12], the
design should exploit natural energy sources like the sun, earth, wind, sky, water,
complemented with energy recovery from waste flows. A combination of techniques will
result into a low-energy, comfortable building.
12. Review on ZEB strategies:
The passive house strategy is based on the principles of reducing losses and
optimizing passive solar gains, without the use of active systems [13]. The strategy
refers to optimizing variables like the U value of external walls, roofs, shading surfaces,
window area, etc individually, in a stepped approach [14].
This strategy suggests optimizing variables like window size, shading and thermal mass
and others for maximizing thermal comfort. Optimizing the energy aspect includes
optimizing wall U value, building orientation, infiltration, using natural ventilation and
increasing daylight availability [14].
13. Objectives:
To determine the overall energy efficiency of
building
To determine initial cooling and heating load of
the building
Analysis of each component contributed in
energy consumption
Applying passive cooling methods
Recalculation of energy performance of the
building
Recommend an appropriate renewable energy
source for the building
14. Methodology:
The project is based upon simulation which consists of
the following steps:
Study and analysis of initial energy performance of
building by using simulation tools.
Study and analysis of present HVACR system in the
building
Evaluate energy demand of the existing building.
Optimization of building performance by using
passive cooling methods
Simulation of optimize building and compare results
with previous simulation results.
Recommend an appropriate renewable energy
source according to the annual energy demand of
building.
16. Simulation Tools
Design Builder
Autodesk Revit 2019
Autodesk AutoCAD 2018
Energy Plus
Carrier HAP
17. References:
[1]. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2014). World Urbanization
Prospects the 2014 Revision Highlights.New York: United Nations, pp.7-10.
[2]. Berardi, U. (2017). A cross-country comparison of the building energy consumptions and
their trends. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 123, pp.230-241.
[3].Lam JC, Wan KKW, Tsang CL, Yang L (2008). Building energy efficiency in different climates.
Energy Conversion and Management, 49: 2354–2366.
[4]. Lysen, E.H. (1996). The Trias Energica: Solar Energy Strategies for Developing Countries. In:
Proceedings of the Eurosun Conference. Freiburg. September 16-19. pp. 1-6.
[5]. Xu, J., Kim, J., Hong, H. and Koo, J. (2015). A systematic approach for energy efficient
building design factors optimization. Energy and Buildings, 89, pp.87-96.
[6]. Yu, W., Li, B., Jia, H., Zhang, M. and Wang, D. (2015). Application of multiobjective genetic
algorithm to optimize energy efficiency and thermal comfort in building design. Energy and
Buildings, 88, pp.135-143.
18. References:
[7]. Evins, R., Pointer, P. and Burgess, S. (2012). Multi-objective optimisation of a modular building for
different climate types. In: First Building Simulation and Optimization Conference. UK, pp.173-180.
[8]. Holst, J. (2003). Using whole building simulation models and optimizing procedures to optimize
building envelope design with respect to energy consumption and indoor environment. In: Eighth
International IBPSA Conference. Netherlands, pp.507-514.
[9]. Lysen, E.H. (1996). The Trias Energica: Solar Energy Strategies for Developing Countries. In:
Proceedings of the Eurosun Conference. Freiburg. September 16-19. pp. 1-6.
[10]. Konstantinou, T. (2014).Facade Refurbishment Toolbox, Supporting the design of residential
energy upgrades. Ph. D Thesis. Delft University of Technology.
[11]. Looman, R. (2017). Climate-responsive design, a framework for an energy concept design-
decision support tool for architects using principles of climateresponsive design. Ph. D. Thesis. Delft
University of Technology.
[12]. Pfluger, R., Feist, W., Ludwig, S. and Otte, J. (2007). Nutzerhandbuch für den Geschoßwohungsbau
in PassivhausStandard. [ebook] German Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning, p.11
[13]. Pfluger, R. (2007). Simulation des thermischen Gebäudeverhaltens eines Passivhauses in
GeschoßwohnungsbauTypologie und städtischer Bebauung. Darmstadt: PHI Passivhaus-Institut, pp.3-
31.
[14]. Active House Alliance (2015). ACTIVE HOUSE - the guidelines. Bruxelles: Active House, pp.8-62.