Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. (MEEC) delivers best-in-class, patented solutions for the coal-fired electric utility industry to achieve and maintain compliance with highly restrictive new EPA requirements on mercury smokestack emissions.

1. Corporate Presentation
January 2015
OTCQB: MEEC

2. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” as defined in Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and reflect our current
expectations regarding our future growth, results of operations, cash flows, performance and
business prospects, and opportunities, as well as assumptions made by, and information
currently available to, our management. We have tried to identify forward-looking statements
by using words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “expect,” “intend,” “will,” and similar
expressions, but these words are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking
statements. These statements are based on information currently available to us and are
subject to various risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, those
discussed herein under the caption “Risk Factors” that could cause our actual growth, results of
operations, financial condition, cash flows, performance and business prospects and
opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements.
Except as expressly required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to
update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any of the forward-looking
statements contained herein to reflect future events, developments, or changed circumstances
or for any other reason. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statement involve
risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in ME2C’s filings and with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
2

3. COMPANY OVERVIEW
• Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. (ME2C)
delivers best-in-class, patented solutions for
the coal-fired electric utility industry to
achieve and maintain compliance with highly
restrictive new EPA requirements on mercury
smokestack emissions.
• Multi-year, recurring revenue contract model.
• Strong patent portfolio across multiple
solutions, spanning the U.S., Europe, Canada
and China.
• Large multi-billion dollar annual market
commencing in 2015 in the U.S.
3

4. KEY INVESTOR CONSIDERATIONS
• Current contracts in hand for 2016 for over $30m with major US utilities
• Expecting to generate significant free cash flow in 2016
• Utility mercury compliance mandates – customers must spend
• Up to $2.5B annual market opportunity beginning in 2015
• Best-in-class patented technology (25 patents issued or pending), significantly
cheaper and more effective than alternative solutions
• Over 20yrs & $60M invested into exhaustive R&D on mercury air emissions
• High margin, multi-year recurring (razor/razor blade) revenue model
• Technology preserves ability to recycle fly ash for utility customers
• Experienced and proven management team
• Funded to cash flow - $10M capital raise in August from strong financial partner
4

5. KEY DRIVER
EPA MANDATE ON MERCURY REMOVAL
• In April 2015, the final component of the Clean
Air Act of 1990 – MATS (Mercury and Air Toxic
Standard) - becomes effective, U.S. federal court
of appeals upheld in April 2014.
• The MATS rule requires all U.S.-based coal- and
oil-fired electric power plants generating 25MW
and higher to reduce mercury emissions by
approximately 90%.
• 3 of the 4 major air pollutants (NOX, SOX, and
particulates) have already become regulated as
part of the Clean Air Act of 1990.
• Zero compliance-avoidance policy, with
substantial fines and penalties for compliance
failure.
5

6. MERCURY: A GLOBAL MARKET OPPORTUNITY
• EPA estimates the MATS rule will apply to
about 1,400 electric-generating units in the
U.S.
– 850-900 coal-fired EGU’s in the US
• Canada currently has regulations, while
Europe, and China are expected to be large
opportunities for mercury removal in the
coming years.
• 140 Nations signed a global treaty to
eradicate mercury emissions from air and
water in October 2013 under the Minimata
Convention.
6

7. PATENTED BEST OF BREED TECHNOLOGY
THE ME2C TOTAL MERCURY CONTROL PROGRAM
7
A tunable, two-stage, multi-product approach on mercury capture, born of science and engineering
• Sorbent Enhancement Additives (SEA™) – Front-End
- Proprietary Products
- Designed to Promote and Protect activated sites
- Distributes chemical efficiently throughout furnace system
• Proprietary Sorbents – Back-End
- Proprietary Products
- Enhances active capture sites for mercury adsorption
- Limits use of activated carbon
 Since 2000, the SEA™ solution was developed with over $60M spent by ME2C, EERC, DOE, & Utilities
 Tested all coal types, various boiler designs & operational configurations
 Tested with successful commercial demonstrations at more than 30 generating units
 Achieves greater than 90% removal of mercury

8. ME2C’s PROCESS:
A RECURRING REVENUE MODEL
• Low incremental cap-ex versus competing solutions
• Rapid payback on equipment from lower O&M
Injection System Sorbent Silos
Ongoing supply of proprietary SEATM Material and Sorbent Material
8

9. TECHNOLOGY PATENT PORTFOLIO
25 Patents or Pending in U.S.,
Canada, China, Europe.
• Developed from ~$60
million in government and
private funding.
• Continuous innovation
and research.
Patents developed by the Energy
and Environmental Research
Center (EERC)
• Internationally recognized
center for mercury control
• 300 engineers and
scientists
• More than 20 years
of field testing and
development
ME2C has EXCLUSIVE, ongoing
rights to EERC mercury control
patents.
• Patent protection runs
through 2025+
• Highly defensible portfolio
• ME2C maintains rights to
acquire the portfolio in
perpetuity
9

10. MERCURY CONTROL MARKET
THE EVOLUTION OF MERCURY CONTROL
Scrubber & SCR Combo
Powdered (PAC) or Brominated
Activated Carbon (BAC)
ME2C’s
SEA™ Technology
• Utilized to achieve high SOX &
NOx reduction for earlier
Clean Air Act regulations
• Large, complex and capital
intensive systems with
extended plant disruptions
• Hundreds of millions of
dollars for a medium EGU
• Modest mercury capture
impact
• Most common technology
currently being utilized for
mercury reduction
• Effective at reduction levels of
70% or less with minimal
material required
• Above 80% reduction levels,
injection rates often have
severe operational issues
including rendering fly ash
unsuitable for sale
• Costs can range from $5M to
$20M per year at 80% to 90%
removal
• Maximum efficiency in use of
materials
• Allows for >90% mercury
removal, meeting or
surpassing new emissions
regulations
• Least balance of plant
disruptions
• Will maintain fly-ash salability
($450mm U.S. market).
• Most economical, typically
40% less than BAC or PAC
10

11. COST COMPARISON: ME2C vs. BAC
11
ME2C’s process of mercury capture is
one that focuses on the maximum efficiency
in use of materials. As the level of mercury
capture escalates, so to does the intensity
off the process, as mercury emissions are
measured in parts-per-trillion.
Across several demonstrations of the SEA
program, ME2C’s cost advantage at 80%
and 90% capture rates exceeded 30%, and
in many cases, was well over 50% lower.
Primary cost-effectiveness is just one facet
of the ME2C value proposition.

12. ME2C FLY-ASH ADVANTAGE
• The sale of fly-ash represents a
~$450mm/year industry, with fly-ash
being sold to cement manufacturers
all over the world. Utilities view this as
highly important sources of income.
• ME2C’s patented SEA™ Technology
assures the continuation of these
revenue streams.
– Most competing carbon-based
sorbents often render fly-ash
unusable at volumes needed for MATS
compliance.
– MEEC’s technology preserves fly-ash
integrity.
12

13. ME2C VALUE PROPOSITION
ME2C Patented Process for Mercury Control is “Best-In-Class”
 ME2C delivers MATS Compliance – guaranteed results, consistently, and confidently.
 Proprietary solution significantly more cost-effective (50% in some cases).
 Delivers compliance across a broad spectrum of fuel/system types.
 Maintains high-profit fly-ash salability.
 Minimal cost/impact on plant operations, system corrosion, or ash-ponds.
The Competition
 Require higher chemical volumes and costs.
 Corrosive properties in plant equipment – before and after boiler.
 Likely introducing new chemicals to ash ponds.
 Degradation of fly-ash will curtail sales to cement industry.
13

14. MANAGEMENT: INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP
• Alan Kelley – President and CEO
– Electric Energy, Inc.
– Ameren
– Grand Bahamas Power Company
• John Pavlish – Chief Technology Officer
– Energy & Environmental Research Center
• Director of Center for Air Toxic Metals
– Black & Veatch
• Marc Sylvester – Vice President of Sales
– Nalco
– Fuel Tech
– Johnson Controls
• Dr. Nicholas Lentz
– Energy and Environmental Research Center
• Research Scientist/CATM Program Area Manager
– PHD; Analytical Chemistry
14

15. CAPITAL MARKET PROFILE
• Incorporated in Dec 2008 – Public Since June 2011
• Traded on the OTCQB – ticker MEEC
• Headquartered in Worthington, Ohio
• 40,200,000 total shares outstanding
• >50% insider ownership
• $20mm Equity Market Cap
• $15.7 Million in debt (convertible)
• $17 Million in capital raised
• Recent $10mm raise in August 2014 with Alterna Capital Partners, >$1b in
AUM, and owners of two coal-fired EGU’s
15

16. INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS
• Multi billion dollar annual market of compliance, beginning April,
2015.
• Patented best-of-breed technology: proven, contracted, installed.
• Most cost-effective solution on the market.
• Ensures marketability and recycling of fly-ash for utilities.
• Recurring revenue, multi year contracts.
• High operating-leverage business model.
• High barriers to entry.
• Industry veteran management team.
16

17. CONTACTS
Keith R. McGee
Senior Vice President
Business Development & IR
(732)-403-7684
kmcgee@midwestemissions.com
Alan Kelley
CEO, Director
17