This document discusses the 360-degree feedback evaluation model and its benefits. It provides an overview of 360-degree feedback, describing it as an assessment tool that gathers feedback from an individual's subordinates, peers, and managers to evaluate their competencies and improve performance. The document outlines how 360-degree feedback can benefit organizations, programs, and individuals by developing leadership skills and strengthening performance. It also provides best practices for implementing a 360-degree feedback program, including establishing purpose, selecting raters, interpreting results, and developing action plans.
2. PERFORMANCE
EVALUATIONS…WHO CARES?
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) – The 2000
Performance Management Survey
HR professionals reported that many executives and
managers did not use their performance management
system
Towers-Watson- 2012 Global Workforce Study
Only 44% of organizations do an effective job of using
technology to deliver the performance management
process
3. PERFORMANCE
EVALUATIONS…WHO CARES?
Research firm I4CP- 2013 Keys to Performance Management
55% of respondents stated existing performance
development processes had a positive impact on
their organizations
28% believed their organizations were effective at
performance management
SHRM- 2014 HR Professionals’ Perceptions About Performance Management
Effectiveness
53% of HR prof. gave their organizations C+-B
21% gave a C
2% gave an A
4. WHY WE DON’T CARE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pciLAbaxO
Rk
6. WHAT IS A 360-DEGREE EVALUATION DESIGN?
An assessment and evaluation instrument
Known as a multisource or multi-rater evaluation system
Utilized to evaluate and enhance job performance skills
Measures behaviors and competencies
Assess program effectiveness and intent
7. HISTORY OF THE 360-
DEGREE FEEDBACK
First used by the German Military during World War II
Utilized by T-Groups during the same time as WWII
Gained momentum after being used by Esso Research and
Engineering Company in the 1950’s
It’s suggested that the first 360-degree instrument was created in 1973
by Clark Wilson, PHD (Survey of Management Practices)
Most organizations understood/accepted the multi-rater concept by
the 1990’s
9. WHO UTILIZES THE 360-
DEGREE FEEDBACK
MODEL?
Professionals seeking growth and longevity…
10. EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTIONS
School principals rarely receive
feedback that would improve their
leadership. Often, feedback is task
centered.
With the 360-degree feedback model,
principals have the opportunity to
gain trust and respect from co-
workers and staff.
12. HEALTH CARE
INSTITUTIONS
Studies suggest that the 360-degree
feedback method improves emotional
intelligence (EI) in physicians.
Professionalism, interpersonal and
communication skills are 2 of the 6
core clinical competencies that if
strengthened will improve the EI of
physicians.
13. HEALTH CARE
INSTITUTIONS…
Physicians/Leaders feedback:
• Nurses
• Therapists
• Pharmacists
• Other physicians
• Social workers
• Patients
Relatively new in the health care organizations
Significant reduction in disruptive behaviors & behavioral complaints
Improves patient satisfaction & adherence to treatment regimens
14. SPORTING ARENA
The role of a coach is essential to the
performance of any team or athlete.
Understandably, many believe that sports
play an important role in our economic,
political, cultural and social world.
In the sport arena the coach-athlete
relationship is imperative to improving
sporting success. The 360-degree feedback
model helps coaches understand their roles
in the organizational success.
15. SPORTING ARENA…
Coaches/Leaders feedback:
• Athletes
• Other coaches
• Parents
• Sponsors
• Fans
• Line managers
• Administrators
• Support staff
Successful performance management, effective problem solving and work
habits
16. BENEFITS OF USING THE
360-DEGREE EVALUATION
MODEL
More Than a Salary Increase…
17. PERSONAL BENEFITS
Multiple perspectives
Relationship & trust
Understanding strengths & weaknesses
Increased job satisfaction
Individual ownership for self-development
Leadership development
Improved communication
Performance improvement
Generates accountability
18. ORGANIZATION
BENEFITS
Amplified productivity & quality
Extremely developed workforce
Increased promotions from within
Creates a interactive learning culture
Improves managerial skills and behaviors
Produces competent leaders
Aligns organization vision with strategy
Spawns training needs assessment
Builds organizational longevity
19. PROGRAM BENEFITS
Program intent
Impact assessment
Continuous research
Permanence
Recurring Funding
Cost cutting
Exploration/new initiatives
Evidence & Justification
Integrated implementation
20. HOW 360-DEGREE
FEEDBACK COULD FAIL
Lack of participation from upper management
Not aligned with organization mission/vision
Lack of communication/trust
Poor planning
Inappropriate delivery of feedback
No development plan
No follow up
Lack of confidentiality
Vague questions
23. ESTABLISHING PURPOSE
Strategic Needs/ Specific Purpose
______________________________________________
Management
Development
Succession
Planning
Performance
Management
Coaching
Career
Development
24. CLARIFY ANONYMITY
What data is confidential
and anonymous?
Enforce
confidentiality
agreements
Written comments
transcribed or
summarized?
What feedback is
shared with a person’s
manager?
How will results be
used? Integrated?
What is the minimum
number of respondents?
27. REVIEW AND INTERPRET
Competencies that make a
difference to the organization
Discovering strengths
as the primary focus
Tailor results to
individual positions
Constructive & easy to read
results. Graphical & chart
data?
29. DEVELOP ACTION PLAN
Provide Resources
_______________________________________________
Training
Mentoring
Self-
study
Job
Rotation
Coaching
Funds
Materials/
Staff
30. FOLLOW-UP
1. A follow-up should be conducted six
months to a year.
2. Change/behavior is hard and often
requires reminders.
3. Revisit a post 360-plan periodically.
32. Tailor content for specific
requirements
Good for larger organizations
Companies w/well established and
publicized leadership models
Organizations w/ample HR
resources
Saves time
Benefit from expertise of others
Benchmark data-compare
organizations
Good for small organizations
Better for new organizations with
limited HR resources
BUILD OR BUY?
Build Buy
33. DESIGN SELECTION
Several 360-degree instruments can be found online:
Center for Creative Leadership www.ccl.org
INSEAD Global Leadership Centre
http://centres.insead.edu/global-leadership
3D Group www.3dgroup.net
SelfStir Business www.selfstir.com (free)
34. CREATE YOUR OWN
Your organization/program is unique
Tailor survey to your organization/program
Design survey around observable behaviors & performance-Not opinion
Be mindful that your instrument is a research tool
Create space for unstructured comments
Invest in professional consultation
Be time conscience
35. THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN
CREATING YOUR OWN MODEL
Identify competencies & expectations of your organization
1) Competencies- tied to values, mission, and strategy
2) Work with leaders- share knowledge/increase buy-in
Differences by level
1) Creates an atmosphere of fair-mindedness
2) Specific behaviors and requirements differ depending on level of
employment
36. THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN
CREATING YOUR OWN MODEL
Identify position-specific competencies
1) Does not require creating different 360-degree models
2) Add specific competencies for key positions and functions
Quantitative vs. Qualitative
1) Quantitative allows for identifying strengths and weaknesses
2) Qualitative offers insight into specific issues
38. SELECTING RATERS
Rater selection is important to ensure buy-in and feedback results
Self, management, and direct reports are always included
External customers add unique perspectives on behaviors &
service
Raters should have worked & known participant 4-6 months
Raters should have frequent interactions w/participants
Raters should understand participants role & job duties
39. TYPICAL RATER
SELECTION
1) Selected by participant based on
guidelines
2) Selected by direct managers
3) Selected by HR w/specific
guidelines (i.e. all peers must be
included)
4) Selected using collaborative
process by participant and manager
40. BUY-IN
It’s benefits
How it works
Who will see the feedback results
How and when results will be
communicated
What the results are used for
Who will participate (mandatory?)
How raters are selected and their
roles
42. ACCESS AND RESULTS
The employee and a neutral feedback facilitator should have access to
the feedback reports
As a rule, managers should not be allowed to interpret results or
handle feedback themselves
Never allow employees to receive feedback in a printed form or online
report
Feedback should be interpreted and delivered by professionals
experienced in delivering 360-degree feedback (H.R. or external
consultant)
43. INTERPRETATION
Feedback coach- Specialized skill
Familiar with typical reactions/assists with handling feedback appropriately
Assist with interpretation via open dialog over time
Inspires employees to look within themselves and examine behavior
Teaches employees to reflect on their interactions with others
Encourages employees to examine their own performance while being honest
about needed development
Emphasizes common themes of the raters to reinforce intended messages
Assesses data
44. HUMAN NATURE AND
FEELINGS
Receiving feedback can invoke as much fear as public speaking
Accepting feedback from others takes us out of our comfort zone
Negative feedback is often viewed as rejection (vulnerability &
defensiveness)
Undesirable feedback may threaten self-concept
Our most intense emotions come from relationships; negative
feedback interrupts our relationships
For many, our place within an organization defines who we are