1. Chapter 3
The Chief
Everything Officer
Should businesses and the CIO
embrace the Chief Everything Officer?
Or are the job requirements better
suited to a number of individuals within
the C-Suite? Which option is better
for delivering business innovation,
competitive advantage and value?
Arguably, this is something that can
only be decided on a case by case
basis. What has worked for one
organisation may not work for another.
Even so there are a number of factors
that must be kept in mind no matter
the organisation in order to prevent
pitfalls.
Preventing “Two Speed IT”
Traditionally the CIO is in charge
of building and maintaining the IT
infrastructure. There is a perception
that the CIO “keeps the lights on”
as it were. However, with the advent
of disruptive technology the IT
department once again has that
chance to become a real differentiator
for the business, driving competitive
advantage through technology
adoption.
The question is whether or not
responsibility for this new tech should
fall under the CIO’s remit, another
member of the C-Suite or a new
Executive employee entirely. There
are arguments that due to lower
technology expertise requirements
of SMAC technologies, as they are
often hosted or managed by third
party suppliers, that the department
that uses that new technology
should manage it. For example,
data collection, analysis and insight
is heavily used by the marketing
department in many businesses, so
some argue that the decisions relating
to this technology should be up to the
marketing department rather than IT.
This can create a challenge for IT as
the interplay between third party IT
and on premise systems could create
a security issue, thereby creating an
opposing argument that it should
remain within the remit of the IT
department.
This still poses the question on
whether or not a new Executive
employee should be hired to handle
new technology areas. The issue is
splitting traditional IT and disruptive
IT between job functions can create
conflict between the two technology
officers. If the CIO’s role changes little,
and the rate of IT commoditisation
continues at the same pace, gradually
more and more IT will be available
through outsourcing or hosting in the
cloud. This will essentially erode the
CIO’s position. Similarly, the individual
responsible for new technology is in
a better position to offer technology
driven differentiators to the business,
thereby positioning themselves more
advantageously and directly related to
business outcomes.
This split can create tension. It may be
more agreeable for new technologies
to become the CIOs responsibility,
helping them to delivering new
initiatives directly from the IT
department.
Innovation
Technology