The NRC, as a part of an effort to establish a water trail on the Nisqually River, conducted a survey to understand public opinions towards such a trail.
2. 2
Current Use and Activities
Visitation to the Nisqually River (146/146 respondents)
The first question in the survey asked have you been to the Nisqually River. After responding to this,
two tracks in the survey were created: users and non-users. Since the survey only captured three non-
users, this information is not included.
Activity Participation by Season (130/146 respondents)
Survey respondents listed walking/hiking, wildlife and bird watching, and boating as the top three
activities they participated in. Use was spread throughout the seasons with summer receiving the
highest participation levels.
98%
2%
Have you ever visited the Nisqually River? See the map as a reference.
Yes
No
9. 9
Vision for the Future
Desired Amenities for the Water Trail (115/146 respondents)
Participants were asked what type of features they would like to see in the future. The responses were
pretty wide spread across all the amenities and the most valued responses were new access sites to put-
in/take-out boats, a map/guide of the water trail, ability to access hiking trails along the water trail, and
signs along the water trail that identify access sites and hazards.
11. 11
Willingness to Pay for Map/Guide (115/146 respondents)
Participants were asked if they would be willing to pay for a map/guide; the majority (43%) indicated
they would be willing and 23% said they would not.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Allow river use
for several
weeks during
certain times
of the year.
Gated river
access where
boaters would
park outside
the gate and
walk down
their boats to
the river, boat
carts would be
provided to
help with
towing heavy
boats.
A permit that
allows boaters
to park at an
access site.
The permit
system would
likely be
limited to just a
few vehicles at
a time.
A fee-based
shuttle service
where vehicles
are parked at
the take-out
and personal
boats are
transported to
the put-in by
an outfitter
who has
access.
Fee-based
guided trips
To make river recreation compatible with endangered species protection, we are
exploring several options for the upper reaches of the Nisqually River. Please
share your thoughts on these options.
Very High
Value
High Value
Neutral
Low Value
Very Low
Value
12. 12
Issues and Barriers (65/146 respondents)
Participants were asked open ended questions on if there were any barriers or issues to their
use of the Nisqually River. In addition they were asked if they had anything else they would like
to share. The most common responses were lack of access, need for more information, and
safety concerns. Below is a summarized list of the responses:
• Need more access
• Need more information
• Concern about safety (log jams, sharp objects in the river, fast moving water, unskilled
users)
• Litter
• Power plant take-out - need more room
• Crime
• Lack of places to fish
• Need better drift boat access
• Need more parking at trailheads
• Address disrespect of private property and create approved haul out areas that do not
conflict with private property
• Getting around the diversion dam
• Jet boats/speed boats too close to other boaters
• Lack of enforcement
13. 13
• Poaching
• Not enough room for parking at McKenna
• Need areas for kids to explore
• Rough shuttle road
• Behavior issues with other users (rudeness, aggressiveness, alcohol use)
• Focus on land based activities in the upper reach
• Reestablish take-out at tank crossing permits from Ft Lewis
• Keep it the way it is
• Remove the dams
• Archaeological sites protection
• Reopen Luhr beach fishing pier for fishing
• Need bathrooms
Values
Participants were asked a series of questions on what their values were.
Overall Value Rating (113/146 respondents)
Survey respondents rated ecological, recreational and cultural values highest.
Value Rating of the Reaches by Boaters (70/146 respondents)
0 1 2 3 4
Economic Value (logging, non-timber forest
products, agriculture, tourism, drinking water,
etc)
Subsistence Value (hunting areas, firewood,
gathering berries/mushrooms, etc)
Education Value (outdoor classroom, etc)
Spiritual/Aesthetic Value (viewpoints,
waterfalls etc)
Cultural and Historic Values (tribal history,
heritage sites, homesteads, etc)
Recreation Value (hiking, boating, wildlife
watching, etc.)
Ecological Values (wetlands, old growth,
endangered species habitat, etc)
What do you see as the highest value(s) of the Nisqually River Watershed?