Salford’s Pre
Application
Journey
PAS event Monitoring and Reviewing your
Pre Application Service
14th March 2023

Content
• Salford - a bit of context
• Our humble beginnings
• Our refreshed service
• Monitoring
• Review
• Lessons learnt

Over the past five
years, Salford has
seen growth of over
14,500 new
homes (over 2,900
per annum) and
almost 212,000
sqm of
commercial
floorspace

SALFORD’S
Population
Expected to reach
300,000 by 2040
A further 25,000 additional
jobs by 2040
Salford’s Growth Potential
Employment
£2.55 billion investment into
the city, with £7.51 of private
investment for every £1 of public
investment
Growth in the overall £GVA value
of the economy of over £500 million to
£7.8 billion, with Salford now
the 3rd largest local economy in
Greater Manchester

Pre
application-
our humble
beginnings
We first introduced pre application charging in 2010.
First to do so in Greater Manchester and part of only a small handful of
northern LPA’s.
Charges not devised to achieve cost recovery (intentional). Testing the
water with developers and the fact that most (northern) LPA’s did not
charge.
Did not want to discourage developers.
Simple 3 tier category fixed fee offering – Large scale major development;
Small scale major development and all other development but excluding
householder.
We consulted consultees. Committed to written response and said we
would reply in 6 weeks.

Our
refreshed
pre app
service
Having undertaken some customer focus
groups in 2018 it was clear that customers
were willing to pay for pre application advice
but they wanted:
• more flexibility;
• a choice of approach and more initial control
over what they needed;
• creation of more certainty and timeliness;
• did not want one size fits all;
• wanted a collaborative dialogue; and,
• where appropriate the ability to have a bespoke
approach tailored to individual needs.

Customer
choice
We have tailored the service as much
round the customer as possible:
• They can choose the level of service
required;
• Ability to select whether consultees are
invited to comment;
• Whether they would like to meet with the
case officer and/or key consultees;
• Whether they require a quicker response
than normal (fast track); and,
• We offer core fees for each development
category with any additional services
selected attracting an additional fee.

Nine development types
• We developed 9 development
categories based on the workflow
profile we regularly receive.
• We costed each development type
using an average hourly rate and a
typical time to complete (for simplicity).
• If preferred, we offer a bespoke
Planning Performance Agreement
service that can include the pre-app
phase.

Customer interface
• We direct customers to our web site where
they choose the development category that
best reflects their requirement.
• They complete the web form including usual
applicant details; site information; details of
the pre application and finish with a
payment.
• The form is designed with a series of drop
down options which take them to different
sections/questions depending on their
choices.
• They use the complete form in their
submission.

Monitoring
Microsoft Power BI is used to monitor our
performance.

• When the service was 18 months old, a
review was undertaken to establish
whether cost recovery was successfully
being achieved.
• A sample was taken from the preceding 6
month period of closed cases, excluding
following ups and householders.
• The sample consisted of case studies
across all categories (except for category
6) with senior and principal planners
being asked to quantify how much time
they and others spent on their cases.
Is the pre-application service
achieving cost recovery?
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA

Outcome of the
review
• Cost recovery was made in the
vast majority of applications.
• The small number of applications
that made a loss related to
heritage assets, which required a
higher level of officer input.
• In addition, a category 1 & 2 case
was allocated to principal officers
where perhaps they should have
been given to senior officers.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA

What is the customer
experience?
• Survey Monkey:
• 34 users of our pre-application service
were engaged with a Survey Monkey
questionnaire.
• A 32% response rate.
• The survey comprised 4 multiple
choice questions and 2 open ended
questions.
• The multiple-choice questions were
completed by all respondents while
the open-ended questions were not.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND

So, what did our
customers say?
• Q1:- 73% of those surveyed found the webpage
provided adequate information.
• Q2:- 73% of the respondents found the application
form easy to use with 9% expressing that the
experience exceeded expectations. 18% found the
form difficult to use.
• Q3:- No respondents indicated that the form is less
than adequate in terms of the choice it offers with
regards to the service provision.
• Q4:- 82% of those surveyed considered the service
value for money and 18% did not agree.

So, what did our customers say?
• More flexibility in choosing specific consultees;
• Ability to meet with the case officer;
• Quicker turnaround time; and,
• Improvements to the payment system:
• Automation like the Planning Portal;
• Third party payment; and,
• A confirmation email.
Q5:- Improvements to the service offered.
• The ability for developers to pay directly to the
Council via the webpage;
• More detail concerning the available service options;
• Improve the format of the initial page; and,
• Improve navigation to the most relevant pages.
Q6:- When asked about ways to improve the webpage…

Lessons Learned
• Value of good customer service to encourage repeat
business
• Ensure you have a clear and up to date website,
informing customers of how they can use the service
• PPAs can be used for those proposals that don’t
readily fall into a particular charging category
• Be flexible!